Tuesday, March 28, 2017
The outsider: fool, genius, or anti-social?
I sympathize with outsiders for obvious
reasons. Outsiders never know if their work will be buried with them
or not. Outsiders often create their own reality which they usually
believe comes closer to reality than traditional thinking. Yet
because they move alone outside of the world, the outsider has
moments when they wonder if they are a fool, a genius, or just
antisocial. They have high moments of happiness, or at least moments
of satisfaction in their work. But in the end it is the evolutionary
truth that matters more than happiness. History will be the judge.
It might be helpful if future outsiders
could ask themselves if they could live without respect in the academic world?
Can they write to illuminate rather than impress? Can they live with
the consequences of appearing less comprehensive regarding the past,
present and future, which makes philosophy so dull? Can they write
knowing that even ancient grammar obfuscates the truth?
That being said, with empathy for
outsiders, the bottom line for me regarding outsiders, fools and
geniuses was examined by the courageous psychologist Raymond Cattell,
who believed that the key was for society to have a way to
understand the difference between the social and anti-social outsider,
because outsiders can be virtually criminals in rejecting laws.
This harmonizes well with the understanding that group-selection is the
primary unit of selection and individual selection only follows
after. Cattell's field was in comprehensive psychometric testing (he
invented many of the tests) and the tests work quite well in telling
much about people, as long as there is room for outsiders to fall
through the cracks, which being outsiders they often do.
The bottom line is, let outsiders
freely create with no strings attached, philosophers, artists,
engineers, or whoever, but in the end the judgment on the work of outsiders has
to come down to choosing socially responsible work and not
antisocial work, and based also on sound sociobiologically knowledge of the biological origin of much of social behavior. Outsiders, and insiders, need to live
with that judgment.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment