Why is Fox News featuring wall to wall coverage of the passing of supreme court justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg?

An occasional polite mention of the passing of Ruth Bader Ginsburg would have been better for a supposedly conservative cable company. Ginsburg stood for the American left and all things contrary and damaging to conservative tradition.

While I'm at it, why is Chris Wallace still featured on Fox when he is almost always critical of conservative tradition? He is a bigger pain in the neck than his father was on CBS.

Fox News is one of the only media companies that has anything good to say about president Trump, but it drifts too often into the commercial/leftist globalism of neoconservatism, which is the enemy of real conservatism.

Can the destructive power of the Big Media be curbed?

Something has to be done about the power of the Big Media, which along with openly teaching cultural Marxism, hatred of America, and especially hatred of white Americans, is also continuing the lies and dirty tricks regarding everything that president Donald Trump does.

Obviously we need to reinstate media ownership rules that curb the domination of the media by a few corporations, and we need to encourage a much wider range of ownership of media. But any move such as this is smeared by the media as limiting freedom of the press, when it would really do the opposite. But it has to be done.

Back in the 1980's 50 corporations controlled a majority of American media. By 2012 that number was six, mainly due to ending a rule preventing companies from owning a newspaper and radio and TV stations in the same city.

But the media bias, lies, and dirty tricks was drummed into journalists and reporters in all our schools which openly teach cultural Marxism, hatred of America, and especially hatred of white Americans, so the schools are institutions that also need to be recovered.

With what we see now going on in the Big Media in America and in the West it is easy to see why the first thing dictators do is take control of the Media. Is that what we want? Is that the only way to curb the destructive power of the Big Media? I hope not.

Is president Trump the only person with the courage to take up the great task of curbing the power of the media which, along with the schools, is turning America into a leftist third-world dictatorship? It is at least as important a task as reinstalling economic nationalism.

What is hidden beneath the multicultural and egalitarian lies of the Media and the schools

The natural genetic will to power of individuals and groups as usual is hidden beneath the multicultural and egalitarian lies of the Media and the schools, which led to the loud ignorance of the people regarding the racial protests and riots we have been witnessing the past week.

Here is the predicament: real human nature is ethnocentric or racist, we are different from one another, never equal, because for many thousands of years right up to our present time group selection, or ethnic altruism, was the best way to be successful in survival and reproduction. So human nature became genetically kin-centered and ethnic-centered, even xenophobic, as well as being genetically gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, and religious-making, with group-selection and ethnic selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

The U.S. has spent billions of dollars and tried endless government programs trying to do away with the will to power of ethnocentric human nature without success. What happens in reality, hidden beneath the multicultural and egalitarian lies, is a zero sum game where one race rises at the expense of another.

A true natural rights or civil rights movement would promote an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc., and defended by some sort of federalism. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states.

It turns out that in advocating for ethnostates both white Wilmot Robertson and black Louis Farrakhan had a more humane solution to the race problem than the sainted Martin Luther King's call for multicultural equality.

Big Tech companies have joined forces with the traditional Big Media in breaking down our culture

We thought it couldn't get much worse than the cultural break down and moral decline successfully promoted by the traditional Big Media, but now we see that online censorship has taken away most of the freedom of expression we thought we had on line, with Google,Twitter, and Apple curating content to the Left and demonizing the Right. Google controls 88.5 percent of the global search market and 90 percent of the online video market with its YouTube. And 95 percent of political donations from tech company employees went to Hillary Clinton in the last election.

I don't know if I have room for more dislike than I feel for the traditional Big Media, but now we have the Big Tech companies joining forces with the traditional Big Media in breaking down our culture and causing moral decline promoting both hedonism and cultural Marxism.

Our heroic President Trump has had too many neoconservatives working for him pushing the strategy of full global dominance, and Trump continues to grant favors to Israel, the Saudis, and others, against American interests, which could lead to a major war. But Trump is all we have at the time and he at least talked about having a non-interventionist, America First worldview.

So what to do? What I am doing is elucidating and promoting the biological origin of social behavior and its consequences. When real kin and ethnic-centered human nature is allowed, it leads naturally to localism, regionalism, and eventually to ethnostates, and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. The U. S. could adapt---not overturn---the constitutional separation of powers and states and create ethnostates, and then protect the ethnostates or regions from marauding imperialists, supremacists, and global money grubbers, with a defensive federalism. I don't believe there is better way or healthier way for all groups and races to live in this world. Leaders and politicians elucidating and promoting this have to rise, and I think they will, eventually.

The academic world and the Media left and right are missing the obvious solution to the problem of identity politics: why?

Lack of courage? Lack of reason? Yes, but ironically it is the very knowledge they shun of the biological origin of social behavior, considered taboo and politically incorrect, that initiates their shunning of identity politics: they don't want to lose their politically correct reputations and the comfortable livelihood on which their families depend as a consequence of publicly affirming the the biological origin of social behavior.  

“Identity politics” has come foreword again as it naturally has throughout human history because cultures can operate for a time with behavior that goes against human nature, which is primarily kin and ethnic centered, with such experiments as the cultural Marxism that now rules the academic world and the Media, but cultures are eventually pulled back by the biological and genetic leash of real human nature to cultures that better reflect real human nature, and humans then work within and adapt to the environments they find themselves living, and very slowly change.  

The reality is that identity politics demonstrates cultures being pulled back by the biological and genetic leash of real human nature which remains genetically and biologically kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection. So race, gender, religion, and sexual orientation tend to eventually conform to the human nature reflected in identity politics. 

The obvious solution to the diversity of bio-cultural identities in the world, each with its own natural urge to perpetuate itself and establish its own culture, is not to try to jam everyone together in the same territory or to demand a creed of equality or multiculturalism, but to establish ethnostates for all distinctive groups and then protect them from marauding imperialists, supremacists, and money grubbers, with a light federalism. For example, an ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be established, legally, in the United States adapted from our constitutional separation of powers and states. 

But you may have to lose one of your automobiles, one of your smart TV'S, and perhaps the company of a few relatives, in the short term.

The suicidal side of paying millions to athlete-gladiators

I enjoy both amateur and professional sports, and I believe in meritocracy, selecting people on the basis of their ability, but I also see the quickening pace to emulate the fall of the Roman Empire in mostly white American's paying mostly black professional athlete-gladiators multi-millions of dollars each, which gives them a great advantage over non-gladiators in the survival and reproduction competitions in which whites are no-longer breeding faster than dying.

Apparently that was not enough. Now suicidal white politicians in California and other benighted states want to pay millions to mostly black amateur college athlete-gladiators---apparently a totally free “scholarship” ride through college was not enough in the competitions for cheerleaders, etc.

No thought is given to paying millions to, say, those in engineering, medicine, and science, who happen to be mostly white, and who actually help human's survive, including black athlete-gladiators. The athlete-gladiator circus games must go on, which keeps the population from understanding the suicidal side of paying millions to athlete-gladiators.

They are turning unsuspecting whites into cuckolds, keeping us all ignorant of the biological origin of our social behavior by way of the cultural Marxist indoctrination in the media and in all our schools.

In the end, social and cultural judgment has to come down to choosing socially, culturally, biologically, and genetically responsible behavior and not choosing anti-social, anti-cultural, anti-biological, anti-genetic behavior, based on sound sociobiologically knowledge of the biological origin of our social behavior.

On the acceptance of whites becoming a minority by whites

Almost more astounding than the prediction that whites will be a minority in the United States, Canada, and New Zealand by 2050 is the lack of concern about it. Why?

It is mostly do to the Media and the schools constantly affirming this trend to make whites a minority, and by threatening anyone who objects to it with the charge of racism and all the social consequences of that label. 

But the seeming acceptance of whites becoming a minority by whites also has to do with the altruism of Northern ethnic groups, which was strongly genetically programmed into Northern Europeans and Northern Asians; altruistic behavior by an individual that looked like it may be disadvantages to the individual benefited others of its kind. This was especially important in the North for survival during and after the last Ice Age. But altruism stops being beneficial to ethnic groups in multicultural states and becomes more suicidal.

Also, none of us were taught in our schools or in the popular Media to know that as the people change the culture changes, so we have not fully realized that we will largely lose our culture too when whites become a minority.

Are these fatal flaws for whites? We will probably end up with the choice of saving ourselves and our cultures by separating into regionalism, localism, ethnostates, and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected by some sort of federalism. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states. It is probably that, or something like it, or the fading away of whites.

People of color better go slow in waking up the white giant to identity politics

Do people of color really want to create racial or identity politics? I suppose now seems like a good time to bring up their racial causes because whites have their hands tied behind their backs and can't talk about white racial concerns—it's even against the law in some countries! But whites are a powerful force, after all, they largely created the Western world, so people of color better go slow in waking up the white giant to identity politics.

Can the dissolution and destruction of Western culture continue?

As the social justice warriors now try to stomp out our history by tearing down statues and changing historical names, beneath their push for the cultural Marxism of political correctness is their real aim, which is to stomp out whites. The biological origin of social behavior is always there beneath the surface.

The success of indoctrination in the political correctness of cultural Marxism is really astounding. I've heard more than one young white person say, “Who cares if whites die out, they have f....up the world.” If they are told that that way of thinking is suicidal as well as psychologically and biologically sick, they call it racist.

What is conveniently missing from our schools and the media is the biological origin of our social behavior and the sociobiological truth that real human nature is kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of selection.

It really is amazing to see intellectuals and politicians so afraid of the social justice warriors of cultural Marxism they they will allow whites and white culture to be torn down right in front of them. Will the dissolution and destruction of Western culture continue?!

I doubt it, the will to live is too strong and will rise again. The question is how will we rise? I hope we don't rise by way of old racial supremacism and imperialism but by developing ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates out of our Constitutional separation of powers and states, protected by federalism. That is the instinctive, reasonable, and equitable way to live together and prosper, with the variety that enhances life and ongoing evolution.

The desperate genius of political correctness and cultural Marxism

Not that long ago it was accepted that people naturally prefer their own kin, ethnic group, and culture, but then the political correctness of cultural Marxism was brainwashed into the population, so that the old fairy tale “the emperor's new clothes" or the saying “the elephant in the room” now apply to the politically incorrect guy who says at a party, “but I prefer to hang out with my own ethnic group.”

This brainwashing in political correctness and cultural Marxism was what Nietzsche called a “trans-valuation of values,” implying that only a desperate or even genius people could pull it off. And it has been brilliantly pulled off in the U. S. and the Western world. The naked emperor is called clothed and the elephant in the room is not seen.  Now merely saying you prefer to be with your own ethnic group is called “hate,” and in some countries is even against the law!

Astoundingly, the desperate genius of political correctness and cultural Marxism has denied real human nature, which remains as it has always been, kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of selection.

To love your own kin, ethnic group, and culture, does not have to mean that you hate other ethnic groups. The realistic way to to find order in our crowded world of different kin, ethnic groups, and cultures, is not with the farce of “multiculturalism,” which jams everyone together in the same living space and demands that they all get along, when this arrangement naturally causes competitive civil disruption, and eventually civil war. The realistic way to find order in our crowded world of different kin, ethnic groups, and cultures, is to develop ethnostates, and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, which is the best political configuration for humans beings to live within, given human nature.

It may require a few constitutional amendments to give more power to the states to move toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, and it will not be easy at all, but it is far preferable to the destructive farce of political correctness, cultural Marxism, and multiculturalism.

I'll bet there was a few curses and temper tantrums thrown in Tel-Aviv and Riyadh last night

I'll bet there was a few curses and temper tantrums thrown in Tel-Aviv and Riyadh last night when President Trump called off the bombing strike on Iran, in flight, which would not have benefited the U. S. in any way.

Trump normally seems to be in the pocket of Israel and Saudi Arabia so why did he save the U.S. from bombing Iran? Maybe Trump's egoism and narcissism, which is usually his weakness, didn't want to be blamed for a war that would be called “Trumps War,” especially since he was elected promising to keep us out of suicidal wars?

Trump has been good for the U.S. but if he could begin to stand up to Israel and Saudi Arabia, and sycophants like Bolton, he could be a great President.

It is not clear whether the attacks might still go forward. We will see who Trump really supports.

How we exhume and re-constitute the permanent things in art and politics

Burke, Eliot and Kirk told us about the loss of the traditional themes, which Eliot called “the permanent things” in literature, art, film, and which are now replaced by nihilism, porn, egoism, etc. Traditional literature and art generally taught us about real human nature without being too didactic, teaching through analogy and allegory---the best art did it subtly with “imaginative persuasion.” But this great fall, this transvaluation of values, this presenting of nihilism, porn, and egoism was also taught to the people using analogy and allegory, although not always subtly. Why?

Essentially the transvaluation of traditional values was the will to power of the transvaluators. They tore apart Western tradition and Western people so that they could inherit what was left. And the transvaluators mainly picked the weakest link of spiritualism, using science to make the kill.

But what science kills it can re-constitute. The science of sociobiology has taught us about real human nature from the evolutionary perspective and it turns out that human nature as gradually defined by the evolutionary sciences is not that different from the permanent things of Burke, Eliot and Kirk, but with a few vital changes.

The evolutionary sciences have shown us that human nature is basically and genetically kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of selection. The addition and prominence of ethnocentrism, xenophobia, and group-selecting as being natural to man, and not evil, is the biggest change and addition to the permanent things.

Political philosophy needs to affirm the implications of the biological origin of our social behavior---which points toward ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. This needs now to be taught with analogy, allegory, imaginative persuasion, and subtly. That is how we exhume and re-constitute the permanent things in literature, art, and film.

It is not enough to speak only of reviving the spirit of the gentleman and religion

Edmund Burke's writings against the French revolution probably had much to do with saving England from the revolution. He said the spirit of the gentleman and the spirit of religion made the civilization of Europe, which the revolution wanted to tear down. It was also a class or caste thing in England of Burke's time with most gentleman existing in the upper classes.

But how much of that spirit of the gentleman and spirit of religion was genetic in origin, since biology is at the deeper origin of our social behavior? Yes, there is a co-evolution between genes and culture but biology is the hardware, culture is the software. As John Cacioppo said, “The genes are like the keyboard on which the song of life is played, but the pianist is the social environment.”

I see the spirit of the gentleman grounded in the warrior and softened or civilized by religion, almost the way women tend to civilize men. But the balance here is important, go too far taking the warrior out of man and the society is vulnerable to other marauding warriors.

Today what is left of the spirit of the gentleman and the spirit of religion are in the process of being destroyed, again. It is not only an attack similar to the attacks of the French revolution, this time self-immolation or suicide is involved, we are not even breeding faster than we are dying. Europe and America are opening their borders (and thighs) to anyone from anywhere. It's even against the law now in many places to speak of saving the white race.

With the help of radical feminism, minorities, and the cheering leftist Media we have gone too far in taking the man out of man, not realizing or not caring that taking the gentleman warrior out of man leaves us and our societies virtually undefended against men who do not behave like European or American gentleman.

Conservatism should be concerned with conserving the genes of Europe and America which in the deepest sense were responsible for the spirit of the gentleman and the spirit of religion that made the civilization of Europe and America...It is not enough to speak only of reviving the spirit of the gentleman and religion.

No psychologically healthy person would call it “hate” when a person applauds and defends their own ethnic group and its history

No psychologically healthy person would call it “hate” when a person applauds and defends their own ethnic group and its history, but that is what many liberal whites are saying about whites who defend whites. And the liberals are doing even more, they are championing other ethnic groups and races even as they attack their own ethnic group.

Show business and Hollywood are increasingly showing nonwhites as heroes and whites as villains. White men and boys now watch professional sports dominated by nonwhites and are encouraged to admire them. Beauty contests are now being won by nonwhite women. And this is synchronized with what our schools are teaching us about evil white history...This is being thrown at the ethnic group who largely created the Western world!

I am not saying that nonwhites are wrong or evil to advance their own ethnic group or wrong to try to be successful in survival and reproduction, they are healthy to do so. What I am saying is that liberal whites are psychologically unhealthy when they call it “hate” for whites to applaud and defend their own ethnic group and its history. Human nature has been affirmed throughout human history to this day as being basically kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of selection.

Some bold men have been comparing what the liberals are doing to cuckoldry, the term used in evolutionary biology for males who are unwittingly investing parental effort in offspring that are not genetically their own.

Those who promote the hatred of whites by whites in the Media are the most responsible for the growing hatred of whites, and they are responsible for whites unwittingly investing in and applauding groups that are not genetically or culturally their own. In doing so the Media, of course, advances themselves and their own ethnic group.

Such is life in the West today...

Modern culture has buried the biological origin of social behavior: why?

Modern culture has buried the biological origin of social behavior. Think of that: buried. There is virtually no mention of it in political philosophy today.

Yes, there is a co-evolution between biology and culture, but “biology is the hardware, culture is the software.” We don't even hear that mentioned much and it certainly doesn't condone burying biology in the glut of freaked out cultural software.

So why has the biological origin of social behavior been buried? Mainly because it is thought to not enhance the biological and social power of those who bury it for that reason.

The fascists affirmed the biological origin of social behavior but then they demeaned it by including crude supremacist values for only one chosen people. World War Two ended 74 years ago but the Big Media and the schools today make it look like the fascists were defeated yesterday and could rise at any minute. That is resentment toward a defeated foe on a grand but degenerate level, and unworthy of a noble people.

Modern culture and modern trends reek of an entirely fictionalized view of human nature that buries real human nature as the will power of those who bury it. Human nature  remains as it has always been: genetically kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

The destruction of young actresses by Hollywood and cultural Marxism

Hollywood and Show Biz are characterized by excessive indulgence in pleasure and luxury, which defines decadence. Combine that with the Media and the schools promoting cultural Marxism and we see the causes of the gradual destruction of Hollywood actors and actresses, who most young people emulate. Let's take a look at a few young women in Show Biz.

First there is the trend of young actresses deciding to be gay or bisexual. A few years ago that included Lindsay Lohan---along with her excessive indulgence in drugs. Then there was Ellen Page, Kirsten Stewart, and the internet phenom Alexis Zall. Before that there was comedian Ellen DeGeneres and her actress girlfriend or wife, and Jodie Foster before that. Most of the newly minted lesbians quickly lost their healthy looks and became pale and drawn, as if the life was sucked out if them. Ellen Page now looks seriously ill, and Alexis Zall went from a lively healthy girl to a pale little thing with dark circles under her eyes. Lindsay Lohan never really recovered. Kristen Stewart at least has become a talented actress, but she usually looks and dresses like a homeless person. More recently redhead Bella Thorn has put a ring through her nose and usually looks like she has gone without sleep for a week, though I don't know if she has declared herself bisexual yet or not. I suppose we will have to see the “Stranger Things” phenom Millie Bobby Brown follow the same sort of road.

But then we have those young actresses who seem to have escaped the drugs and the decadence, like Emma Watson---although she does follow the trend of having a long string of sexual partners. Watson went to good colleges but was there brainwashed in the whole charade of radical feminism. I doubt if she had one course in the biological origin of social behavior, and if she did it was probably portrayed only as patriarchal crime. The reality of the biology of real human nature utterly destroys the claims of radical feminism, but no one reads them or teaches them.

I won't go into the number of young men destroyed by Hollywood and Show Biz, I feel more angry and protective about the destruction of young women. But nothing much is being done about it. Measures to protect young people from Hollywood and Show Biz are seen as only hateful...Well, to quote the degenerate Bob Dylan, “a hard rain is going to fall.”

Brilliant degeneracy

" The question is to what extent is judgment life-promoting, life-preserving, species preserving, perhaps species cultivating." (Nietzsche, BGE)

I call them brilliant degenerates, ten percent or so of modern artists and writers, including film makers, who are seductive, full of flash and wit, and yet are still subtle, not heavy handed. They use their brilliant degeneracy to sell values and morals that are, well, degenerate.

As I've written here before, libertarianism among businessmen shares some of the blame for the brilliant degeneracy of modern art. Concentrating almost exclusively on making a god of individualism and the freedom to make money came back to bite them when the Hollywood moguls and leftist publishers and producers of New York and Los Angeles, as well as the academic world, exploited American freedom and deformed a formerly traditional conservative culture to fit their leftist cultural agendas. The Hollywood moguls and leftist publishers found that they could personally make big money but also change culture in a culturally Marxist direction. They marched through the institutions and they won the cultural war. It was brilliant. Burke and Kirk's "moral imagination" among artists now is applied only to the political correctness of cultural Marxism.

At its essence brilliant degeneracy is the will to power of those who do not know or want to escape or block real human nature and the values that implies. And so they brilliantly attack tradition and traditional human nature derived from the biological origin of social behavior. Healthy uncorrupted artists would do the opposite and critique the brilliant degenerates with subtlety and wit. Healthy uncorrupted artists know that real tradition and conservatism believes in change and progress but only while retaining the best of the past.

I guess the counter-march through the institutions has to begin with the first steps. So where are the marchers? Perhaps some of those libertarian conservative businessmen who were hoodwinked by making a god of individualism and money will finance the recovery of the arts---there is even money to be made in it. That could help redeem them and redeem the time.

Western people seem too depressed to breed or maintain their cultures anymore, as we see reported almost daily and gleefully in the demographic statistics of the Big Corrupt Media. Western people now see and hear post-modern culture created by loud and angry people who usually do not share their same genetic or cultural traits. The hard reality is, as the people change the culture changes. Conserving Western culture means conserving Western people.

It is really the Left that is stupid and vulgar not Trump or Trump supporters

The Left has a stupid way of judging President Trump: modern democrats and the Left judge what is superior almost solely by "politically correctness,” that is, by the cultural Marxism they were taught in corrupted schools that Trump didn't attend.

People tend to think the ends, the goals that one seeks to achieve, are seen or foretold in the means to that goal. There is snobbery involved in the hatred of Trump because Trump's manner and way of talking don't conform to politically correctness; President Trump is often coarse and arrogant in his behavior, or in his means, and the Left think the ends that Trump has in mind must therefore also be vulgar, that is, economic nationalism, bringing manufacturing and jobs back to America, protecting our borders etc, must be vulgar.

The problem for the Left is that most of the people who live between the coasts think and act like Trump, and vote for Trump, which is often defined as populism or populist nationalism. In other words the people either have not been corrupted by the corrupted schools and the corrupted Media, or they just don't buy the lies of politically correctness and cultural Marxism preached in our schools and in the Media.

It is really the Left that is stupid and vulgar, not Trump or Trump supporters.

Hollywood has been wildly successful in the destruction of traditional Western culture

It is more entertaining to the masses to attack a culture than to affirm a culture and Hollywood has become an evil genius at entertainingly destroying traditional Western culture. Hollywood has been very successful in promoting and establishing their own degenerate garbage culture in America---and getting very rich in the process.

Then that destruction was combined with the destruction of traditional Western culture in virtually all of our schools. A majority of our young people have bought it all. We can see why Hollywood is the most dangerous organization in America today.

Hollywood was very cunning to at first sell only wholesome patriotic movies and television before and just after World War Two; they took their time to get to the point to where they now sell only hedonism, sex, drugs, and revolution. When Hollywood does temporarily put aside its constant attacks against Western culture its favorite default worldview is cultural Marxism, which is just another more academic attack against Western culture. 
 

This quote from Joseoph Goebbels shows that Hollywood learned from its greatest enemy (or was it the other way around?): “ We shall reach our goal, when we have the power to laugh as we destroy, as we smash whatever was sacred to us as tradition, as education, and as human affection.”

Traditional Western culture is in serious trouble. What can we do about it? We could try to do to Hollywood what they did to us, destroy their culture; but in the long term it is better to just work on legally establishing ethnostates, and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates in America. Hollywood might even then have their own ethnostate to pollute---New York? Los Angeles?

Hollywood lies to the common man and the academic world lies to the educated

Hollywood lies to the common man and the academic world lies to the educated, and we therefore have a culture of lies because Hollywood and the academic world virtually control popular culture.

One example: Movies and television now almost always portray whites as criminals and blacks and other minorities as heroes, which is a lie about real crime statistics. Of the approximately 660,000 crimes of interracial violence that involved blacks and whites in 2013, blacks were the perpetrators 85 percent of the time. This meant a black person was 27 times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa. A Hispanic was eight times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa.

These lies demoralize young whites, anger older whites, and embolden hatred of whites by blacks and minorities, which is what they are designed to do because the lies are the will to power of Hollywood and the academic world who have ridden to power on the backs of blacks and minorities.

The lies in the academic world are the lies of cultural Marxism which include the destruction of family, male against female, class against class, and concentration of power in a culturally Marxist big government. And of course the lies bring more power to Hollywood and the academic world.