Aggressive empires, marauding globalism, and megalomaniacal states caused the devastation of our World Wars, they were not caused by nationalism, patriotism, populism, ethnostates, or ethnocentrism

"Politics ought to be adjusted not to human reason but to human nature, of which reason is but a part..." Edmund Burke

The present global elite, the media, and the academics call for the subordination of nations and ethnic groups to globalism---think of that asinine globalist speech by Macron on Armistice Day---although they are usually more indirect and weaseling about promoting globalism. Nationalism, patriotism, populism, ethnostates, and ethnocentrism are exactly what the globalists don't want, even though these things are a deep and genetically-derived part of real human nature; it is real human nature that created patriotism, populism, and ethnocentrism as the best means for a people to survive and reproduce successfully.

Aggressive empires, marauding globalism, and megalomaniacal states caused the devastation of our World Wars, they were not caused by nationalism, patriotism, populism, ethnostates, or ethnocentrism. Civil disruptions are mainly caused by trying to melt distinctly different people into one motley living space, they are not caused by the ethnocentric traits of real human nature, which tend to prefer ethnostates.

All this global chaos is promoted and instituted by a very few global elite, the media, and academics for their own selfish ends...They have to be courageously curbed if we are all ever to live in relative peace.

Can we resolve the combative mix of left and right?

Charles Kesler described the "cold civil war" between the left and the right (Imprimis, Oct, 2018). Can this combative mix be resolved and prevent a hot civil war? It can if the better parts of human nature prevail---but that's a big "if."

I can agree with parts of both the right and the left. The idea on the left of a "living Constitution" rightly leans toward the evolutionary side of human nature, toward evolutionary rights---but not revolutionary rights which some on the left and the right encourage. And the left today, in contrast to the apotheosis of the individual rights by conservatives, tracks the rights of various groups or ethnic groups which is in harmony with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection in human nature, followed by individual selection. But the left then goes on to champion the rights of almost every kind of perversion which is not in harmony with real human nature---many in the left don't even think there is a human nature believing human nature springs only from ones environmental upbringing. Human nature remains genetically kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, territorial, and even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other mostly conservative things.

The right affirms a reinvigoration of federalism which is in harmony with the growing variety of ethnic groups in America with different genetic pools and different agendas who could, with federalism and the Constitutional separation of powers and states, develop an ethnopluralism of ethnostates in harmony with real human nature ---but not secession which could endanger the federal national protection needed for the states in a world that continues to have marauding imperialism.

All of these vital changes need to be done legally, constitutional, and not by revolutionary means which almost never work and cause great biological and cultural convulsions in life...The Right/Left Coalition?