Modern art as attack more than art (from the archive)

Art and Sexual Selection

Art seems to have grown out of sexual selection, if so, then women should be better at discerning art, because they have needed to be acute in judging the authenticity of men, since they pay a heavier price with the long-term care of babies if they judge wrong. But the desire of men to impress women might help explain, at least unconsciously, why their are more top men artists and male art critics than women. Homosexuals in the arts, at least in these times, might also explain some of the disparities in the sexual selection-discernment hypothesis.

This gets confusing when we consider the stereotypical common man who says he hasn't a clue as to what color goes with what, especially since men are trying to impress women in sexual selection and should therefore care about the way they look. Perhaps women give central importance to the money or position a man has, at least beyond the teen years, and they just kind of overlook his lack of color harmonizing.

In any case, this connection with sexual selection is probably the way to study art origins (see Dutton's “The Art Instinct) ), which gets us away from the absurd and phony abstractions that define postmodern art. High art (low art too) can then be seen sociobiologically as an affirmation of what the group holds sacred, since the group is the main unit of selection over the long term. 

Modern art as attack more than art

Atonal music actively attacked tonal music, otherwise tones would have now and then occurred, Schoenberg had to consciously avoid tones, as Dutton pointed out. But modern art in general does this too, actively attacking realism, meaning and order, as if to destroy it. Why? Why the anger? Why the desire to destroy? And they were triumphant! They conquered the art world!

People have not, by and large, to this day accepted contratonal music or modern/postmodern art, in spite of its strong promotion, and in spite of the taunts that people are just too lazy to appreciate it. The human mind is not infinitely malleable, not a blank slate. People prefer meaning, order, which are evolutionary traits developed in the minds of our Paleolithic ancestors, mainly because this strengthened social health and helped us survive. Individual artists also used art in the game of sexual selection. Real art throughout human history grew out of these dynamics and out of this human nature.

This says to me that atonal music and modern art were not really a legitimate development in art history but were mainly an attack on the order and meaning of Western culture, more like an abortion, as someone once called it. Who did the attacking, and why? This needs to be brought out more. Was there a pattern?  Names, groups, need to be named. I know years ago Tom Wolfe did a great job in “The Painted Word” exposing the sham of modern art, but more needs to be done, as we try to exhume the meaning of real art from the old battlefield.

The inevitability of ethnostates?

 "The genes hold culture on a leash. The leash is very long, but inevitably values will be constrained in accordance with their effects on the human gene pool. The brain is a product of evolution. Human behavior...is the circuitous technique by which human genetic material has been and will be kept intact..." Edward O. Wilson

The leash that our genes hold on our culture define basic human nature as being genetically ethnocentric, even xenophobic, as well as being kin-centered, with group-selection as the primary unit of selection, and they do so because in the old tribal days ethnic or group-selection was the best way for individuals to successfully survive, so altruism, or being for others, was naturally limited mainly to kin and ethnic group because they shared the same genes which strive for successful survival and reproduction. Those genes are still with us today even if this basic human nature is considered politically incorrect by our decadent prevailing culture.

Ultimately the work of sociobiologists will be allowed to present this real picture of human nature so that we can apply a set of healthy preferences with which political life can find real harmony. This strongly suggests that if real kin and ethnic-centered human nature is allowed to be what it is, it naturally leads to regionalism, localism, ethnostates, and finally an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. A true natural rights or civil rights movement would promote ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc. by federalism.  For example, in the U. S. this could be accomplished not by way of radical revolution but through adapting---not overturning---the U.S. constitutional separation of powers and states.

For now the marauding imperialists, Marxists, and global money grubbers block this from happening with help from the brainwashing tactics of the schools and the media, but ethnostates seem inevitability because values will be constrained in accordance with their effects on the human gene pool.

Defining cultures by creed or ideas alone is not enough

Liberals as well as conservatives have not understood or lack the courage to say that the melting pot didn't melt, which led to multiculturalism,  but that hasn't worked either, because real human nature is genetically ethnocentric, even xenophobic, as well as being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, with group-selection as the primary unit of selection.

Multiculturalism would have worked if the various cultures had linked their race to their own territory or ethnostate; defining cultures by creed or ideas alone with such unreal ideas as egalitarianism is not enough to offset the reality that multicultural multi-ethnic societies are a zero sum game where the gain of one ethnic group is offset by the loss of another ethnic group, with much cruel social discord in the process. Ethnostates are in harmony with the biological origin of social behavior and in accord with real human nature.

Although now just rising again, identity politics will continue to ascend, identifying with ethnicity, nationality, race, culture and faith is the world's future. People will see that diversity within the same state is not our greatest strength but is our greatest weakness. A true natural rights or civil rights movement would promote an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc., with a defensive federalism. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states.

We have no choice but to try to stop the modern liberals from committing suicide, which will take us all down with them

The highly irritating thing about modern liberals is their attitude of superiority which we see in their overbearing manner and their presumptuous claims and arrogant assumptions, even in the face of having suicidal ideas about human political life, which they got from our traitorous schools and the vile media.

The schools and the Media have transformed students and citizens into identifying with a rootless universal “humanity” replacing the way American's naturally identified with their own ancestors and traditions and their own genetic ethnic/racial roots. The schools and the Media have successfully imposed a radical deracination or displacement of American tradition and culture with cultural Marxism. Oligarchies who affirm the Left now rule us and control our democracies, and the Ivy League schools provide the credentials, while virtually the entire Media loudly proclaims the politically correctness of cultural Marxism.

The rise of cultural Marxism (demanding equality for the unequal), radical feminism (demanding biologically unnatural roles for women), homosexuality (demanding biologically unnatural sexual life styles) and postmodern relativism (demanding a biologically unnatural relativity of values) have led to biologically and culturally diseased societies across the West.

So how do we stop modern liberals from committing suicide, which will take us all down with them, when they are now closing down all objections to the suicide? If their suicide was not taking us all down with them we might barbarously applaud their suicide and say good riddance. What we require and what we think the world requires, is an affirmation, or reaffirmation, of real human nature acknowledging that human beings are bio-culturally oriented toward family, ethnic group, and locality, and, yes, humans are religiously driven.

When real human nature is suppressed rather than bonded and affirmed, all hell breaks loose. America and the world needs to be rid of the various versions of imperialism, whether financial, religious or racial. A United States of truly independent states, or ethnostates, and a Europe and Asia of thousands of ethnostates, defensively federated, and concerned with true human nature, and future evolution, is the future that we require, and the future that will develop, since ethnostates affirm true human nature in accord with evolution and the natural world.

We have no choice but to try to stop the modern liberals from committing suicide, which will take us all down with them.

The tragedy of conservatism: what defines a nation?

Traditional conservatives talk about the two visions of America as being between those who believe in "places" (Jeffersonians) and those who believe in "ideas (Hamiltonians)" and how modern liberals and neoconservatives talk only of abstract ideas.

But people come before places or ideas in defining a nation. Places and ideas are important but it is the people who essentially make a nation and culture what it is. Does it really have to be said that a European will create a culture different from a Chinese who will create a culture different than an African, almost irregardless of where they live or what ideas they may have? 

Can there be a nation not rooted in ethnic identity? This is considered a politically incorrect question to ask. It should have been asked by the Founders, because it has led to the tragedy of conservatism.

This tragedy stems from the liberal, and even conservative, blockade of knowledge of the biological or genetic origin of most of our social behavior, which does not fit their abstract "ideas" about the malleability of human nature and culture, or the fallen nature of man.

This misplaced hierarchy of values also explains why the saving political solution, of adapting our already existing constitutional separation of powers and states toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates continues to be left out of discussions regarding the solution to our growing civil disruptions.

Human nature is genetically kin-centered and ethnic-centered, even xenophobic, as well as being genetically gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, and religious-making, with group-selection and ethnic selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection. A true natural rights or civil rights movement would promote an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc., and defended by a defensive federalism. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states. 

America and the world needs to be rid of the various versions of imperialism, whether financial, religious or racial. A United States of independent ethnostates, and a Europe and Asia of thousands of independent states, federated for defense, and concerned with true human nature and future evolution, is the future that we require.

How did such common sense become politically incorrect?

Solving the age old problem of division and union in America

Our Founders tried to solve the age old problem of division and union in America. They relied on the ideas of people like Aristotle to help solve the differences between rich and poor, etc, but they missed the problems that came later from allowing unlimited and undiscriminating immigration, most likely assuming immigrants would be from Christian northern Europe. 

Hamilton thought open and free economics could help heal the divisions between rich and poor by giving everyone a chance at getting rich, and it was very successful when the culture was homogeneous, but ethnic and racial divisions later followed the unlimited and undiscriminating immigration. And the Founders also missed the social problems that would later come from allowing black slavery for economic purposes. Our inner cities eventually became filled with unassimilated blacks.

What was missing was knowledge of the biological origin of social behavior which came with Darwin, when real human nature could be seem as being genetically kin and ethnic centered, with group selection as the main unit of successful survival and reproduction. 

The decline of America culture and the American people really began to accelerate in the 1960's when several destructive things came together: postmodernism in the academic world, hedonism promoted by the Big Media, modern liberalism on the left, and libertarianism on the right, and of course continuing unlimited and undiscriminating immigration.

For example, white Minnesotan's have turned themselves inside out to accommodate non-whites. Populations of people of color have increased faster in Minnesota than the rest of the nation since 2010. The over  20,000 Somali's in Minneapolis have begun to broadcast the call to prayer over loudspeakers in their neighborhoods. There are more than 66,000 Hmong in Minnesota, the largest concentration of Hmong in America. The assimilation  of Somalis and Hmong has not taken place, and recent riots in Minneapolis have shown us that that the inner city blacks have after many years still not really assimilated.

The first person I read who had the knowledge and the self-sacrificing courage to challenge Spengler's cyclic view of history was Wilmot Robertson in "The Ethnostate.” Robertson suggested that we could halt and reverse the decline of America by transforming the socially destructive aspects of ethnic or racial competition into developing socially constructive ethnostates.  The new (yet old) solution to the division of the nation, which the liberals and cultural Marxists have willing and consciously created with the help of the media and the schools, is to form ethnostates or an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. 

We will probably have to wait for future leaders to pick up what President Trump leaves undone, as he picked up what Ronald Reagan left undone. But we can continue to counter Spengler's prediction of inevitable fall by solving the age old problem of division and union in America by working toward forming an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, legally adapted from our Constitutional separation of powers and states, and then protecting the ethnostates from marauding imperialists, supremacists, and global money grubbers, with a defensive federalism.  

I think the Founders might approve.

What we should have is people being woke to the sociobiological reality of the biological origin of social behavior

"The genes hold culture on a leash. The leash is very long, but inevitably values will be constrained in accordance with their effects on the human gene pool. The brain is a product of evolution. Human behavior . .is the circuitous technique by which human genetic material has been and will be kept intact..." Edward O. Wilson

The black slang term woke culture or woke politics associated with social justice and racial justice pushes cultural Marxism, political correctness, multiculturalism, with constant attacks on the nuclear family, marriage, patriotism, traditional morality, law and order, etc., but it really means being asleep to the reality of the biological origin of social behavior, or the opposite of being woke.

What we should have is people being woke to the sociobiological reality of the biological origin of social behavior which defines human nature as being genetically kin-centered and ethnic-centered, even xenophobic, as well as being genetically gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, and religious-making, with group-selection and ethnic selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

What would being woke to the sociobiological reality of the biological origin of social behavior mean politically? Given real human nature a true natural rights or civil rights movement would promote an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc., and defended by a defensive federalism. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states. That is the most humane solution to our deepening identity crisis.

Given human nature multi-cultural multi-ethnic societies are a futile dream

The reality of multicultural multi-ethnic societies is that they are a zero sum game where the gain of one ethnic group is offset by the loss of another ethnic group. Real human nature is genetically kin and ethnic-centered, which the evolutionary sciences have been telling us for years.

The “black lives matter” movement is mainly the slightly disguised will to power of blacks, the protests and riots almost always become a shakedown of whites to obtain power or money, losing sight of the original injustice, which are often fakes. 

Many whites who promote the black lives matter movement have been brainwashed by the schools and the media and do not realize that the movement is mainly the raw will to power of blacks---do cuckolded whites really want to live in a black culture? 

Given human nature multi-cultural multi-ethnic societies are a futile dream. A true natural rights or civil rights movement would promote ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states.

The cultural zoo

The cultural zoo we have today is mainly the result of the attempt to abandon the basic biological origin of social behavior.

Amoral modern technology didn't predict how it would gradually help take away the traditional gender roles of women and men making it possible for either gender to push the button on missiles or robot vacuum cleaners. But the overall attempt to denaturalize the genders does not work any better than the attempts to denaturalize politics, although a lot of damage can be done in the process. There are obvious genetic and hormonal differences between men and women, as well as between different ethnic groups, which certainly influence both gender, ethnic, and cultural behavior.

The rise of cultural Marxism (demanding equality for the unequal), radical feminism (demanding biologically unnatural roles for women), homosexuality (demanding biologically unnatural sexual life styles) and postmodern relativism (demanding a biologically unnatural relativity of values) has led to biologically and culturally diseased societies.

Real genetically-derived human nature contains not only big gender differences, human nature in general remains biologically kin-centered, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

The cultural zoo we live in today does not agree with the reality of the basic biological origin of social behavior.

On the rise to political power

Paul Gottfried said “There’s only one way, as far as I can tell, that a political force can take off. It’s the way neoconservatives moved up, by putting together a king’s fortune, which they used to acquire media power.” But so did the now faded WASPS and the not-fading Jews become a political force, by putting together a king’s fortune which they used to acquire media power. And so did the cultural Marxists in the schools attach themselves to the media powers, although cunning social skills in the battle for ideas lined up against the biological origin of social behavior and had much to do with the rise of the cultural Marxists in the schools.

What Gottfried and other paleoconservatives don't mention is beneath all these grabs for power is the biological origin of social behavior. The reality of multicultural multi-ethnic societies is that they are a zero sum game where the gain of one ethnic group is offset by the loss of another ethnic group. Why don't the paleos mention that?

Perhaps it doesn't line up with the conservative religious-based agenda which says that God is the origin of social behavior; but more likely knowledge of the biological origin of social behavior gets in the way of a Machiavellian ethnic bid for power: human nature remains genetically kin-centered and ethnic-centered, with group-selection and ethnic selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

Evolutionary conservatism features the biological origin of social behavior. A true natural rights or civil rights movement would promote an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc., and defended by a defensive federalism.
 
An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states. That is the most humane conservative solution to our deepening identity crisis.

 

The police and the soldier are primary actors on whose backs cities, nations, and cultures rise

The majority of liberals, socialists, communists, and anarchists in liberal American cities who seek to defund and weaken the police are stunningly ignorant of real human nature. The police and the soldier who protect the land, the material space, from lawlessness and disorder make it possible for there to be a city and a culture at all. Priests cannot be priests without the protection of the police and the soldier, the professors who brainwash students with cultural Marxism wouldn't be able to do that without the police and the soldiers protecting the material space of the colleges and universities. 

The police and the soldier are primary actors on whose backs cities and nations rise and through whom cultural and spiritual values are protected and carried on. And the liberals, socialists, communists, and anarchists in liberal American cities want to defund and weaken the police!?

Only the Antifa leadership of this stunningly ignorant mob of liberals, socialists, communists, and anarchists know what they are doing when they preach defunding or weakening the police and the soldier: they want to destroy the traditional cultural and spiritual values of America which the police and soldiers protect.

We are in a beginning war of Western civilization versus barbarism and the Antifa leadership of the stunningly ignorant protesting and rioting mob seeks the death of Western civilization.

Speculation on religious origins (from the archive)

Perhaps in the distant past Proto-Indo-European warriors of the mythical Hyperborea discovered techniques for helping them to endure distress before battle without mental disturbance, which gave them advantage over their competitors. Specialists in these techniques developed, teaching initiated warriors etc. Gradually this class of specialists became a priest class.

As long as the techniques for helping warriors to endure distress were used for the warrior purposes, the great metaphysical error was undeveloped. This was perhaps the high point in ancient Indo-European Civilization, that is, when the Inward Soul was reached primarily for the purpose of helping warriors to victory. When attaining the Soul Within became an end in itself decline set in. The priest class became ascendant over the warrior class. The Soul Within was declared the Kingdom of God Within, and the primary purpose of existence was now to attain this God or Soul Within. Material life, including the warrior life, was degraded and the Great Spiritual Blockade of material life and material evolution began in earnest.

All the Revealed Religions followed this Inward Path in what has since been called the Perennial Philosophy. Perhaps some branches sought to return the balance between warriors and priests. Perhaps Zarathushtra, or his ancestors, diverged from the main group for this reason. But all branches continued the great error of defining the Soul Within as God, and all branches continued the Great Spiritual Blockade against the material world.

Theological materialism seeks to address this ancient error. Tirips (formerly the Spirit which could be called the Spark of the Soul) is defined as the inward material force activating material life to evolve toward Godhood.

I do not reject the Soul Within as the secularists do, I affirm the Soul Within as the Involutionary Inward Path perhaps first discovered by ancient Proto-Indo-Europeans and later continued in the revealed religions. I define Godhood as that which we must materially evolve to, activated by Tirips Within, which is the Evolutionary Outward Path to Godhood.

We could describe that period when the Soul Within was declared God as a great ancient metaphysical error which over time led to general decline.

Who benefits most from this destruction of Western high and low culture?

Our ethnic-racial, heroic, political, and religious past is being destroyed by the protesters and rioters, which looks like revolution from below of the lower classes/races but it was the professors in all our colleges and universities who support this revolution, and the Media who affirms them, that led to the present destruction of our cultural and biological being.

Such hooey as “post-structuralist” deconstruction, Lacanian analysis, ect. was brought to our colleges and universities by French intellectuals and it was greedily picked up by American professors desperate to publish academic work to further their careers or perish. The gibberish of postmodernism was also a way to attack the hated traditional West since most of these academics were Marxist, or cultural Marxists.

In one or two simplified herculean sweeps the verdicts of the science of sociobiology could clean out the Augean stables of our postmodern humanities departments, which contain a great amount of horseshit. Edward O. Wilson, the father of the science of sociobiology wrote: "The genes hold culture on a leash. The leash is very long, but inevitably values will be constrained in accordance with their effects on the human gene pool. The brain is a product of evolution. Human behavior. . .is the circuitous technique by which human genetic material has been and will be kept intact.

Meanwhile they are pulling down all our historical statues and trashing all our cities. Who benefits most from this destruction of Western high and low culture? Modern liberalism is disguised in a zero sum game as a cultural front for the will-to-power and dominance of some individuals and some ethnic groups over other ethnic groups. I see an ethnopluralism of ethnostates adapted from our constitutional separation of powers and states as the healthy and rational way to deal with this competition, which in multicultural states ends up destroying all cultures and civilizations.

Racism is not the main reason the police are involved with blacks, black crime is

Though blacks are 24 percent of New York City’s population, they committed 68.5 percent of all murders, rapes, robberies, and assaults in the city in 2018, and the statistics in Chicago are similar. Of the approximately 660,000 crimes of interracial violence that involved blacks and whites in 2013, blacks were the perpetrators 85 percent of the time. This meant a black person was 27 times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa. A Hispanic was eight times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa. That is why the police are involved so much with these people; if they want the police out of their neighborhoods then they should stop committing the crimes. Any person or group who is actively opposed or hostile to the police is the enemy of American peace and order.  

That being said, people are racists and ethnocentric, this certainly includes blacks who are among the most racist and ethnocentric people I know of, surpassed only by the Jews---whites have become the least racist and ethnocentric people. But this reality is hidden due to the cultural Marxism that controls our schools and the Media.

Real human nature is ethnocentric and racist because for tens of thousands of years right up to our present time group selection, or ethnic altruism, was the best way for individuals and groups to be successful in survival and reproduction. So human nature became genetically kin-centered and ethnic-centered, even xenophobic, as well as being genetically gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, and religious-making, with group-selection and ethnic selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

A true natural rights or civil rights movement would not attempt to install multiculturalism but would see that in reality we have a zero sum game where the gain of one ethnic group is offset by the loss of another ethnic group. A true natural rights or civil rights movement would promote an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc. and defended by federalism. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states. We won't have some measure of peace and order between the races until we separate into ethnostates.

Trump-haters have immature and unrealistic values and priorities

Most Trump-haters I encounter object to his arrogant and self-centered personality more than anything else and they won't vote for him mainly for that reason, which tells me that Trump-haters have immature and unrealistic values and priorities. Few people on the right or the left like Trump's personalty, but he has been able to get very big things done, like bringing manufacturing back to America, as well as bringing our far flung military home, which no other president has been able to do.

Why are Trump haters so immature? It's mainly due to the Trump-hating schools and the Trump-hating media which now influence people more than religion or even family. The massive fraud of cultural Marxism, radical feminism, homosexuality, postmodern relativism, has been perpetuated in the West through our schools and the media. While patriotic Americans were busy working, raising children, going to church, and serving in the military, they barely noticed the vile and nefarious march through our schools and through the media.

What can we do about it? The biological origin of our social behavior, as empirically explained by sociobiology, actually ends the intellectual defense of cultural Marxism and postmodern relativism. As long as we are alive every cell in our body demands survival and reproductive success for ourselves, our kin, and our ethnic groups. This natural activation can be blocked, subverted, or it can be unknown to us, but it can't legitimately be intellectually or instinctively denied.

A defense of real human nature affirms in general the populist nationalism and identity politics now trying to rise in the corrupted West, which could one day lead to the political and cultural expression of regionalism, localism, and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, legally adapted from our American constitutional separation of powers and states, and protected by federalism.

It will not be easy, but really have no better choice. The death of traditional America is the likely alternative.

Why theological materialism doesn't have to venture into spiritualism

Materialism doesn't have to venture into spiritualism, materialism covers all the forms of matter all the way to Godhood. Matter is convertible into energy or light (photons or atoms of light), the same matter can change from solid to liquid to gas. The beginning world-cosmos originally can have been in the material form of vibrating atoms of light, then as the world cooled the forms of matter changed to their other forms of matter and those various forms of matter interacted and selected in evolutionary ways, eventually evolving us. Matter evolved to be materially activated from within toward metabolism, growth, reproduction, which suggests direction toward an end, at least toward survival and reproductive success, or evolutionary success in the world...No need for spiritualism in that dynamic. Energy or light is not God, it's a primitive form of matter. The deepest drive of “life” is toward evolving in the material world to ascending levels of Godhood, supermaterial Godhood, which is also the zenith of success in material life.

Theological materialism instinctively and logically suggests totality, more than a total work of art (“Gesamtkunstwerk”), more a total religion which can include all distinctive groups politically living and evolving toward Godhood in an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, with as much social order as is possible given real kin and ethnic centered human nature, and retaining their uniqueness.

The philosophy of theological materialism sounds fantastical, unreal, phantasmagorical, but it is also down to earth, material, practical, and we determinedly need it in our increasingly chaotic world.

Better to talk of un-assimilating differences rather than superiority/inferiority

As the racial protests and riots continue and the rioters stupidly destroy their own neighborhoods and businesses (with help from international radicals) the taboo subject of IQ differences comes up. But even as I admire the courage of the authors for attempting the truth on the taboo subject of IQ differences, if it leads to more attempts at the supremacy or imperial dominance of one race over all others, whether noble, chosen or savage, it is a bad survival and reproductive strategy, especially in today's overcrowded world, because the unincluded groups always gang up on and defeat the supremacy-claiming group, and on it goes.

It would be better long-term strategy to promote an ethnopluralism of ethnostates adapted from the constitutional separation of powers and states, and better to talk of un-assimilating differences rather than about superiority/inferiority. Real upward evolution probably likes the variety of ethnostates better anyway, and they certainly fit well with real human nature, which is primarily kin and ethnic centered.

Conservatives have not realized that multiculturalism has made their nations too diverse for nationalism to take hold

If they want to revive America conservative's need to make a serious study of the evolutionary science of sociobiology. Read Edward O. Wilson's books, he is as accessible as Marx, and much wiser. Don't study “political science” until you first study sociobiology. The evolutionary sciences should be taught front and center in the humanities. Why isn't sociobiology featured in the humanities? You know the answer, sociobiology is not politically correct in that nefarious culturally Marxist sense which is taught in all our colleges and universities.

The biological origin of our social behavior, as empirically explained by sociobiology, actually ends the intellectual defense of the modern liberals and the postmodern relativists. As long as we are alive every cell in our body demands survival and reproductive success. This natural activation can be blocked, subverted, or it can be unknown to us, but it can't legitimately be intellectually or instinctively denied. Any existing values or "relativity" of values come from the various social and cultural methods we try (including postmodernism) to unconsciously or consciously biologically and genetically advance our kin, related ethnic group, locality and nation.

So the path is open to American conservatives and nationalists to adapt the American constitutional separation of powers and states to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. Real human nature and natural rights relate very well to primary group-selection, with individual selection as secondary, which can be affirmed in the constitutional separation of powers and states with regional ethnostates. In the natural configuration of ethnostates human nature can be free to be as it is, kin-selecting, group-selecting, and even xenophobic, while being protected by federalism.

Will Tucker Carlson who is conservative and raves against ethnocentrism every night on television go there? Conservative's have not realized yet that multiculturalism has made their nations too diverse for nationalism to take hold, and their universalist religion will not allow them to affirm the biological origin of social behavior and ethnocentrism as basic to real human nature. Modern liberals think nationalism and ethnocentrism are evil and they suicidally embrace open border universalism. So reforming the Western world will be a grim undertaking.

America and the West is in full identity crisis

Watching our congressional representatives and some of our police taking a knee in obeisance to the Black Lives Matter movement, which is a black power movement, clearly shows us that America and the West is in full identity crisis, caused mainly by the schools and the Media, who have successfully imposed a radical deracination or displacement of American culture with a cultural Marxism that affirms nonwhites over whites, disguised as a call for equality.

The schools and the Media have transformed students and citizens into identifying with a rootless universal “humanity” replacing the way American's naturally identified with their own ancestors and traditions and their own genetic ethnic/racial roots. How can America and the West find its way out of its serious identity crisis when the schools and the Media, who mainly caused the identity crises, won't even allow calling it an identity crisis?

The reality of multicultural multi-ethnic societies is that they are a zero sum game where the gain of one ethnic group is offset by the loss of another ethnic group, as we see whites now dying faster than being born while other races are breeding faster than dying.

Real human nature is ethnocentric, not with one group overall superior or inferior but with different talents, never equal, because for many thousands of years right up to our present time group selection, or ethnic altruism, was the best way to be successful in survival and reproduction. So human nature became genetically kin-centered and ethnic-centered, even xenophobic, as well as being genetically gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, and religious-making, with group-selection and ethnic selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

Is their a way out of our serious identity crisis? Yes, if we will take it.  A true natural rights or civil rights movement would promote an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc., and defended by a defensive federalism. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states. That is the most humane solution to our deepening identity crisis.

The destruction and re-construction of identity

If you don't know who are, you are weaker and less healthy than you should be. But when your identity has been denied to you it is not all your fault.

We have been cut off from our biological and cultural roots and thus from our real selves. Biology and cultural fit together, or should, and it works the same for all ethnic or racial groups, because the biological origin of social behavior and human nature are basically the same for all groups; we are genetically kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, among other conservative things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection followed by individual selection.

Cultural identity and tradition are not enough, they need to be joined with your biological/genetic and racial identity. You are a victim of the destruction of your identity if your whole identity is denied to you.

Our culturally Marxist culture today denies us the knowledge of our real identities, this is especially true now for whites who are taught in virtually all the schools and in the Media that our history and our race is evil, while at the same time praising and championing the identify and history of the minority races. This has led to much civil unrest.

The remedy for the loss of identity for all ethnic and racial groups and for the civil unrest it causes, is not to try to destroy all ethnic/racial identities and create a non-biological Marxist identity, or even to create a non-biological religious identity, and the remedy is not to have one group gain supremacy over others; the deepest and truest remedy is to adapt our Constitutional separation of powers and states to a deeper sociobiological knowledge of real human nature. When real kin and ethnic-centered human nature is allowed to be what it is, it naturally leads to regionalism, localism, general conservative values, eventually ethnostates, and finally an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected from marauding imperialists, supremacists, and global money grubbers, with a defensive federalism.