How can we limit the lying promoters of modern liberalism and cultural Marxism?

People will always lie, but President Trump is right to call out the fake or lying news. But lying goes way back to ancient differences between castes; warriors were taught not to lie, but merchants not so much, because lying about how much ammunition remained could kill a lot of men, whereas lying about the price of products could merely cheat people.

As warrior societies retreated and merchant societies expanded so did the lies. So we now have the lying Big Media, movies, television, newspapers and of course the lying internet. But deeper than that we have academics who have legitimized lying; post-moderns like Derrida, Foucault, Lyotard, and their lesser American followers, have created what amounts to an elaborate defense of lies by claiming the relativity of truth where only power can decide the difference.

So what can we do about it? Go back to warrior societies? Punish the merchants? Break up the Big Media liars? March through the academies? We have jammed different ethnic/racial groups together in the same living space due to, you guessed it, the lies of multiculturalism, yet still we have people who are naturally or genetically more beholden to their own kin and ethnic group than other groups, so natural competition between groups multiplies the lying.

Developing ethnostates and ethnopluralism within our constitutional separation of powers and states would limit the lies and help solve many of the modern problems we have, such as our increasing alienation, or the civil strife leading to civil war, etc, which the lying promoters of modern liberalism and cultural Marxism have caused.

If we were a healthy country we would stop all immigration, legal and illegal, for a good amount of time

It is already suicidal to accept one million legal immigrants into the United States a year, as we now do, so accepting illegal immigration is idiotic. But immigration policies have not been merely suicidal and idiotic they has been engineered by Big Business---due to flat greed, the Democrats---seeking voting power, and the Media---seeking the destruction of traditional America and Euro-Americans and a Marxist culture run by them.

If we were a healthy country we would stop all immigration, legal and illegal, for a good amount of time, and then choose only immigrants who are able to not only homogeneously integrate into the U.S. but bring something useful to the country.

Will we do that? I hate to be pessimistic, but if we don't, or if we can't, we will surely fall as Rome fell. The eventual solution may be to accept reality and legally split into an ethnopluralism of ethnostates.

The hierarchy of activations: where is the self located?

I agree with Nietzsche in not wanting to locate the self in the ego. I also don't want to locate the primary goal of life in survival and reproductive success, or in happiness, vital as they are. These things are located within a hierarchy of activation in the same way that pleasure from eating food is not the goal but the means to survival, and as survival is not the end-goal but the means to evolve further toward the zenith of survival and reproductive success, which is Godhood.

The self or executive function therefore seems to be located in the material activation to supermaterial Godhood. That sacred material activation (Tirips) then survives within the give and take of outside natural selection and evolution.

This hierarchy of functions is then integrated in healthy individuals and societies. Action leads contemplation in this hierarchy of activations, not the other way around. And the self is not the non-material spiritual goal of the religious/philosophical ascetics.

The political or religious fantasy of all people being the same and all getting along in the same space simply does not work

Racist attacks will continue in a multi-racial/multi-ethic societies because human nature is racist and ethnocentric and has been since humans became humans, and even before that; it was genetically programmed into human nature because that kind of group-solidity helped humans survive and reproduce successfully in a very tough world. No amount of political propaganda against it has stopped it, not even religion has stopped it (some religions even encourage it).  

That is why ethnostates and ethnopluralism is advocated. You cannot jam different racial/ethnic groups together in the same space and expect them to get along, even if human nature is flexible enough to try to do it in a perfunctory way for a short time (or is forced to do it).  Calling it evil has not and will not stop it.  Multi-racial/multi-ethic programs, like Soviet communism---and now cultural Marxism in the U. S.---always soon break back down into ethnostates. In any case, racial/ethnic groups usually move to their own ethnic neighborhoods where they feel more in harmony no matter what they are told in the Media or in school.

The political or religious fantasy of all people being the same and all getting along in the same space simply does not work, and it is long overdo time to admit it. That is why ethnostates and ethnopluralism is advocated, which could even be adapted to the constitutional separation of powers and states in the U. S., and federally protected. If we really want peace and harmony that is the best we can do.

To what extent is judgment life-promoting?

" The question is to what extent is judgment life-promoting, life-preserving, species preserving, perhaps species cultivating." (Nietzsche, BGE)

The perspective in Nietzsche's statement uncomplicates the clutter of philosophy regarding human behavior, the self, and others. Life simply seeks to live but also to continually evolve to higher life. Look at philosophy and psychology from this perspective and you are on the way to personal and social health. Then we can ask the question, what is the best political structure, best art, etc.?

The Nietzsche quotation harmonizes well with the science of sociobiology and its affirmation of the biological origin of social behavior. Marxism, socialism, capitalism, fascism, ect, need to be seen in light of the political/social structure of ethnostates and ethnopluralism, which offer the best and most natural kind of life-promoting, life-preserving, species preserving, and species cultivating, for all groups.

Add to that a religion of evolution, as seen in theological materialism, and you are good to go.

Decentralism As Ethnopluralism (from 2014)

Defending decentralism to help preserve ethic conclaves and regions must never be mistaken for Jim Crow “states rights” regionalism, which gravely hurt the decentralist cause. Ethnic groups are simply different, with various talents which were mentally and physically adapted to the different geographical regions that they evolved within. Decentralism is meant to preserve and elevate ethnic cultures, and not to have one group dominate another.

The Ethnopluralism Hypothesis affirms a decentralized America (and other parts of the world too for that matter) with states and regions as ethnic conclaves, which can be accommodated by the originally decentralizing U.S. Constitution. The national experiment to homogenize different ethnic groups into one motley mishmash has not worked, accept for very close cousin ethnic groups the melting pot didn't melt. This is why multiculturalism began to be promoted, which also didn't work, because all groups were expected to live close together and just “get along”, which they have not done, and will not do.

Throughout human history up to the present time human nature has remained kin-centered, gender defined, age-grading, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, among other traditional things, with group-selection as the primary unit of selection. Human nature generally prefers its own kind and its own cultures, and that needs to be championed not made into something evil.

But there are numerous non- ethnic reasons to support decentralism, as pointed out by Jeff Taylor in his book “Politics of Human Scale,” reviewed by Gerald Russello in the April “Chronicles.” Federalism means “minimalistic government at every level,” broader than the division between national and state governments. “Having many points of power reduces the malevolent reach of any of them.”  This also is the ideal environment for real evolution with variety to take place.

But the centralizing impulses always rise, even among those who promote individual freedom---they end up using big government power to uniformly enforce individualism, when individualism in fact does not trump the central unit of group selection.

Capitalism can be thought of as “the least bad system” because it conforms to real human nature, that is, not man's “sinful nature,” as many conservatives define human nature, but real human nature in the natural world seeking success in survival and reproduction. Decentralism can allow capitalism to continue raising the standard of living for all, as it has done, but it needs to be free of its centralizing and monopolizing impulses, just as big government needs to be.

In great civilizations culture is virtually synonymous with religion, but both culture and religion are developed by various ethnic groups which give them their own special traits. The religion of the future is a religion that affirms human evolution in the Outward Path toward the Godhood (the Father Within) first only symbolically experienced in the Inward Path of traditional religions. We are all evolving toward Godhood with the variety that evolution has always preferred, and we are certainly capable of cooperative competition in this great adventure and mission.

If we begin with the line "the conquest of the United States by...." what words finish that line?

The conquest of the United States by Mexican immigrants? The Israeli-Saudi lobbies? Beneath those powerful triumphs, and ruling them, is what Srdja Trifkovic called the "duopolistic, neolib-neocon system of full-spectrum global dominance."

That dominance has led to the over-replacement level births of non-whites due mainly to welfare largess promoted by the neolib side of the neolib-neocon ruling system. And that in turn has led to the demographic dominance of the Democratic Party who now can control the county, if they vote, which was one of the main reasons why the neolib-neocon's prompted their policies of open borders and multicultural-multiracialism within the U.S.

The other deeper reason activating the neolib-neocon system of full-spectrum global dominance was the natural will to power of the elites within the neolib-neocon system, many of whom are also loyal to countries outside the U.S.---such as the Israeli-Saudi lobbies who influence our foreign policy.

Even if conservative's rally once more with President Trump, the demographic dominance of the Democratic Party will control the culture from now on, and that means the end of traditional conservative governments in the U.S.  So we better think about how nearly half of the country who do not support the neolib-neocon system will survive, given their cultural demoralization and their under-replacement level of births.

To repeat what I wrote yesterday, the biological origin of our social behavior can rise out of our deterioration---assuming we don't destroy ourselves first. I think we will eventually again create the political/cultural structure of ethnostates and ethnopluralism, federally protected, adapted to the constitutional separation of powers and states, which is the political/cultural solution most in harmony with real human nature, and the way out of our slow but rising death.

Who do we blame for the distressed state of America and what can we do about it?

The most blame probably goes to global corporations who are devoted to greed and care virtually nothing about national borders (and they influence governments not to care either), the Big Media in all its forms and affiliations who when they are not simply immoral are cultural Marxists, the academic world who have propagandized the public from kindergarten to grad school to be the same hedonistic Marxists, and unelected deep-state bureaucrats who reflect all of the traits mentioned above.

Those are the people who have championed all the causes that have destroyed traditional American culture. As they went about opening all borders, one way or another, to create their multicultural/multiracial world were they ignorant of the fact that as the people in a culture change the culture changes, or not so much ignorant of what they were destroying as they were just plain greedy, hedonistic, and half-baked fantasizers? Name them, and we name the destroyers. In any case American culture changed and will never return to what it was.  Is it all over for America as we have known it? Yes, because the people have changed due to massive legal and now illegal immigration, and so the culture has changed.

But human nature remains as it always has been. Beneath the present decadence we remain kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other conservative things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection. The defense of real human nature affirms in general the populist nationalism now trying to rise in the corrupted West: we should vote for that cause November 6th.

The biological origin of social behavior can rise and will rise out of our decadence and decay---assuming we don't destroy ourselves first. I think we will eventually again create the political/cultural structure of ethnostates and ethnopluralism, federally protected, which is the political/cultural solution most in harmony with real human nature. The biological origin of our social behavior will eventually end the intellectual defense of cultural Marxism and our postmodern relativistic rot.

The Sacred Way to Attain Godhood (from 2009)

Jesus identified with or made himself God and Judaism and the Romans objected to this. But the Involutionary Inward Path of the older revealed religions made the same tragic mistake, confounding a non-material will or Father-Within with God, which led to a Great Spiritual Blockade against the material world.

Jesus brought the insights of the East to the West (probably via Essene/Vedic connections) and died a martyr in doing so. Now the imbalance of involutionary religions must be balanced with the Evolutionary Outward Path of material evolution to real Godhood. This is the mission of theological materialism and the projected Theoevolutionary Church. I would hope that the advocates of the Outward Path will not be martyrs in bringing the Outward Path to the West or the East.

The Outward Path does not seek to abolish the Inward Path which is the traditional symbolic way to contact Tirips or the activating material will to Godhood, which works along with the outside adaptations of natural selection. The pattern is to balance the Inward Path with the Outward Path as the sacred way to attain Godhood, which is the zenith of success in survival and reproduction at the apex of material/supermaterial evolution.

How traditional religion is conservatively retained and not rejected in the theological materialism of the Theoevolutionary Church (from 2011)

The Traditional Catholic Church essentially follows the Involutionary Inward Path and defines God as pure spirit. "Angels" are seen as having no matter in them, and men have a non-material, spiritual soul in a material body. This is the Inward Path of the Traditional Church as well as the main path of all the revealed religions, east and west.

In the theological materialism of the Theoevolutionary Church, the Inward Path seeks Tirips or the Will to Godhood, which is defined as existing at the zenith of the material mind within man as well as within every cell of the body. Man can see or experience Tirips more deeply in the Inward Path after first blocking all the desires of the flesh. Material Tirips is not the Spirit and is not Godhood but is symbolic of the Godhood reached through material/supermaterial evolution.
 

We are activated to live and evolve by way of the activation of Tirips or the will to Godhood within life, which essentially defines "life," and then life interacts with the outside forces of evolution and natural selection which shapes us genetically and culturally.

Within the theological materialism of the Theoevolutionary Church the Twofold Path leads to the traditional, convergent, material-blockading Inward Path, and the evolutionary, divergent, material-unblocking Outward Path, and sets up the deep conservatism of ordered evolution toward Godhood.

That is how traditional religion is conservatively retained and transformed and not rejected in the theological materialism of the Theoevolutionary Church.

Theological materialism in one paragraph

I realized awhile back that I like to try to write my whole philosophy in one paragraph, it organizes and concentrates the mind---I think Nietzsche said something about liking to do this. Here is my Latest:

Theological materialism renders religion and Godhood concrete, material, and mostly verifiable by observation or experience, but it requires the affirmation of purpose in the inward activation of material evolution to evolve toward supermaterial Godhood, which is the zenith of success in material survival and reproduction. Godhood is not the wholly spiritual God of traditional religion and not the wholly spiritual Absolute of philosophy. The often crude and sometimes seemingly random outside forces of natural evolution and selection, which have been increasingly mapped by science, work or can work in synchronization if not rational harmony with the inward activation of material life to evolve toward Godhood. The old Inward Path of traditional religions of symbolically experiencing the god-within is not rejected but is conservatively seen in the Twofold Path as the first glimpse of Godhood, which is transformed in the Outward Path of material evolution and leads to the supermaterial object or objects of real Godhood.

The Color of Crime

We are overdosed from hearing people of color encouraged by the Big Media angrily bewailing police discrimination and police harassment against them, and how they are unjustifiably stopped and arrested more than whites, etc etc..

Here are some statistics from "The Color of Crime," 2016 revised edition, by Edwin S. Rubenstein, New Century Foundation, https://www.amren.com/

"In 2013, a black was six times more likely than a non-black to commit murder, and 12 times more likely to murder someone of another race than to be murdered by someone of another race.

In 2013, of the approximately 660,000 crimes of interracial violence that involved blacks and whites, blacks were the perpetrators 85 percent of the time. This meant a black person was 27 times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa. A Hispanic was eight times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa

In 2014 in New York City, a black was 31 times more likely than a white to be arrested for murder, and a Hispanic was 12.4 times more likely. For the crime of “shooting” — defined as firing a bullet that hits someone — a black was 98.4 times more likely than a white to be arrested, and a Hispanic was 23.6 times more likely.

If New York City were all white, the murder rate would drop by 91 percent, the robbery rate by 81 percent, and the shootings rate by 97 percent.

In an all-white Chicago, murder would decline 90 percent, rape by 81 percent, and robbery by 90 percent.

Both violent and non-violent crime has been declining in the United States since a high in 1993. 2015 saw a disturbing rise in murder in major American cities that some observers associated with “depolicing” in response to intense media and public scrutiny of police activity."

.....

What kind of a people is it who constantly blame others for their crimes? How can they operate within law abiding democracies?

Yes people of color can be poor but not nearly as poor as people were in the Great Depression who had no welfare checks and stood in soup lines to survive, yet there was no crime like the crime in inner cities today.

And yes there is racial bias, but racial bias on both sides---some of the biggest racists I've heard are people of color, they make rednecks look bland. The corrupt and controlled Media never shows you that side.

Due to the biological origin of most of our social behavior I don't see a lasting way out of this social dilemma other than by developing an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, adapted to the constitutional separation of powers and states, where kin-centered and ethnocentric real human nature won't lead to the kind of crime we are seeing in our multicultural/multiracial cities.

This may be how ethnostates at first will form

I almost think I will jinx it by writing about it, but it gives hope too. It is the ethnic relocation, population drift, or white flight of people all over our country and the world, moving to regions or neighborhoods of their own kind. Even the heavily brainwashed modern liberals are doing it---when they move back to the inner cities to reclaim them they soon create white neighborhoods all over again. This is all the more remarkable because the entire establishment, the government, Big Media, schools, and churches have defined exclusive white fellowship as evil (while other ethnic groups doing the same think are called good.)

It's not a split between social classes, it's a natural ethnic and racial separation. The idea of one multicultural/multiracial nation is passing away in spite of brainwashing and propaganda that has been far more successful than the old Soviets (without having to be propped up with the Gulag.)

White flight, and all ethnic relocation, is not so much a progressive change as it is a return to real human nature which remains kin-centered, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, as well as being gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, and religious-making, among other conservative things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

This may be how ethnostates at first will form, gradually, with a silent nonviolent movement to de facto ethnostates (isn't that historically what whites have always done?) The constitutional separation of powers and states in the U.S. could legally lend itself to this natural population drift, so we are not talking about revolution here.

Keep doing it people, it is deeply instinctive and rational, and it is saving America and other parts of the world from anarchy, civil war and collapse (think of the flight from "Londonistan," recently discussed by Ralph Berry in "Chronicles.")  

And most importantly ethnic regions are not just for whites but for all ethnic groups---we will all be happier and healthier for it.

The realistic way to bring back altruism and being-for-others (but it's politically incorrect)

"Within groups, selfish individuals beat altruistic individuals, but groups of altruists beat groups of selfish individuals." E.O. Wilson

The political and philosophical Left is an inconsistent-intellectualized-abstract-mess when in comes to promoting being-for-others, or altruism---but religion was also devoted to this. They preach universal love which ends up driving people back to narcissistic individualism because they cannot bond with abstract universalism. And so we have more social problems today than we have ever had.

In this crowded world a better way to accommodate altruism or interest in the welfare of others is needed, and this can be better understood sociobiologically in the real hierarchy of altruism that begins with ones kin and moves out to altruism within ones own genetically-related ethnic group, and then from there gradually moves toward "universal" humanity with a far less workable altruism. Raymond Cattell's thinking is helpful on this subject, for example, when the world is threatened then universal altruism more naturally influences human beings, but daily/yearly existence naturally keeps altruism at home where it originated in the first place and works best.

When ethnicity, localism, and the nation are taken out of the social process in the interest of abstract universalist or Enlightenment values (modern liberalism and cultural Marxism) then assimilation and altruism are slowly lost, since the deepest, most real, and most workable altruism comes from local, ethnic, and national connections, and not from a universalism that is usually nothing but airy abstractions, and is mostly used to advance one group over the others by weakening their social bonds.

So if we really want all people to "just get along with one another" we will allow the world and nations to separate into ethnostates and then protect them all from marauding globalists and imperialists. Far from being "evil," ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates are the realistic way to bring back real workable altruism and being-for-others.

Retaining the best of the past in America as we gradually move toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates

In this blog I try to emphasize the importance of retaining the best of the past in America as we gradually move toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, even though at this time ethnostates are just a gleam in the eye.

I emphasize conservative change, an evolutionary conservatism, not radical revolution. Our Constitution contains the separation of powers and states and other wisdom that needs to be retained.

America is a great country which can adapt to the realities of the biological origin of our social behavior, but that does not require radically changing the U. S. into something that it has not been.

We all can envision perfect political utopias, especially when we are young and generally rebelling against the prevailing authority for a place in the world, later we realize the wisdom of applying a general conservatism to keep what is best of the past even as we change.

I know we are falling apart fast, our survival is looking worse every year, cultural Marxism is conquering us, but we can't throw out the best of the American past for a utopian future; the slower way, the legal way, is still the better way, with less overall damage done.

The French Right had the idea, taken from Gramsci, of "marching" through the cultural and academic institutions first before we can change minds. That is a good idea in preparing for cultural change; it may be slower but it can avoid the rashness and mistakes of leaping before knowing.

We need to see the science of sociobiology become dominate in humanities departments, establishing the truths and social implications of the biological origin of our social behavior. That will then filter into the culture.

In political science departments I want to see sociobiologist Edward O. Wilson and ethnostatist Wilmot Robertson taught alongside classically conservative Russel Kirk and Edmund Burke. That would be a school worth attending.

Patriotism and the defense of our great country need to remain in our blood as we move forward. We can affirm our country even as we gradually and legally adapt our regions and states to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates---and not for only one imperial ethnic group---more in harmony with real kin-centered and ethnocentric human nature, which naturally tends to separate us.

Is there a cure for the failure to recognize real human nature and the biological origin of social behavior?

Modern liberalism or cultural Marxism, and even some versions of conservatism, are fueled by the failure to recognize real human nature and the biological origin of social behavior, or by purposefully blockading it.

Why the failure? It's seems to be mainly due to the success of the agitation of grievances, the politics of complaint or resentment developed mostly by minorities, who think or instinctively believe that recognizing the biological origin of social behavior will cause them to lose out to majorities if the majorities don't so easily fall for the politics of grievances.

But thinking more long-term, minorities could see that recognizing real human nature and the biological origin of social behavior instinctively and logically would lead to establishing their own ethnostate and a natural ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all ethnic or racial groups. Nothing could be more true and just to kin-centered and ethnocentric human nature.

The only problem might be that the spoils of the politics of complaint or resentment wouldn't be there; but that is a plus rather than a minus.  Minorities (and majorities) would gain the harmony and joy of developing their own culture based on their own genetic and cultural traits---and in the U. S. with the constitutional separation of powers and states they would be federally protected from marauding imperialists.

With an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, legally and non-violently established, we have nothing important to lose but our alienation and cultural disharmony.

How and why I consider myself an American evolutionary conservative patriot who salutes the flag

It's almost a given that young people on the Left or the Right tend toward radical and revolutionary politics, but it is not merely because they lack broader knowledge of the world; young people are at the stage in life where they will be competing with one another for power and success, whereas older people can be more conservative because they have achieved something to conserve. So both groups are instinctively correct in relating to the biological origin of their social behavior.

The best societies and cultures find ways to channel the new into the old, which is the classically conservative thing to do. Evolution can supersede but does not replace or reject conservatism. The evolution of life is enhanced by the order of conservatism---as we advance we retain the best of the past. Edmund Burke and Russell Kirk said that society is a community of souls, joining the dead, the living, and those yet unborn---and that is too powerful and natural a thing to overlook or reject.

As I have said here before, the main problem I have with both Kirk and the Alt Right is their lack of respect for biological evolution. Although the Alt Right formerly respected the biological origin of social behavior, their embrace of the Traditionalist School, influenced by the Russian Aleksandr Dugin, diminished their respect for material evolution.

With that in mind, I think the Alt-Right in America needs to be channeled toward more American conservative ends and not toward the Eurasian traditionalism it has been embracing. Kirk's conservative philosophy can keep us from wholeheartedly joining the Alt Right philosophy and the Alt Right from wholeheartedly joining Kirk.

Then there is that weird Vedic business of cycles that the Traditionalist School embraces, which really demeans the idea of evolution and progress---they harken way back and prefer a pre-Christian golden spiritual age. Kirk and Burke had a better take on how conservatism brings the new in while keeping what is best of the past.

So I embrace Kirk's view of the American conservative separation of powers and states---against empires---while affirming a legal conservative adaptation of that separation to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, in line with the kin and ethnic-centered biological origin of human nature and social behavior.

My religious philosophy of theological materialism, which both Kirk's philosophy and the Traditionalist School haven't affirmed, is grounded in the biological evolution of life to supermaterial Godhood, as well as the biological origin of our social behavior (which includes religion). Theological materialism welcomes the cultural and biological new while assuredly and conservatively retaining the best of our cultural and biological past---I call it deep-conservatism and ordered evolution.

As to the Left they are simply fools who when young are Marxist revolutionaries and when old become luke-warm socialists, and neither have a clue as to what human nature really is or does.

That is how and why I consider myself an American evolutionary conservative patriot who salutes the flag.

The taboo that is still dooming us

Two things doom us to dissatisfaction, or worse to a fall: when we overemphasize being-for-oneself, as in libertarianism and superindividualism, and on the other hand when we overemphasize being-for-another, as in the universalist religions and in modern liberalism/Marxism.

Satisfaction and social stability come more naturally when we can affirm the biological origin of our social behavior, that is, when we see as E. O. Wilson said that in human life and survival "within groups, selfish individuals beat altruistic individuals, but groups of altruists beat groups of selfish individuals." That brings whatever natural coordination we can have to harmonize the process of being-for-oneself and being-for-another.

The obfuscated arguments regarding individual/social doom or satisfaction by Hegel and Marx, Nietzsche, the postmodernists, and the feminists are simply overcome by the instinctive and rational affirmation of the biological origin of our social behavior. How interesting that this remains a taboo view.

I suppose it remains taboo because the biological origin of our social behavior points toward a human nature that goes against modern liberalism, cultural Marxism and globalist corporations, in affirming real human nature as being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

That directly and naturally shows the way toward the populist nationalism now rising in the West, and later toward an ethnopluralism of smaller ethnostates, and not toward the globalized corporations or Marxist/fascist dictatorships now preferred by the corrupted elite.  We will get there, but we will be stupid and devious in getting there, as usual.

The garbage culture created over the past 100 years or so goes against all normal and natural human traits

Reading and then watching the news this morning this was my thought: the old adage "as the people change the culture changes" was not paid attention to mainly because the people who were changing our culture into garbage were rising to power on the ashes of the garbage they created and didn't want us to see it that way. So now we have garbage newspapers, garbage television, garbage commercials, garbage movies, garbage books, garbage politicians, garbage global businesses---and on and on.

So how do I define "garbage?" Things that are contemptibly worthless, inferior, and vile, which go against normal human nature and normal human behavior. Human nature has been affirmed throughout human history to this day as being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

The garbage culture that has been created over the past 100 years or so---as the will to power of garbage creators---goes against all of those normal and natural human traits, other than the will to power of the garbage creators.

The only thing to do is to go back to what we really are as human beings. The biological origin of our social behavior actually ends the intellectual defense of postmodern garbage culture, but of course the powers behind the garbage culture don't want you to think that way.

Real human nature and normal human behavior affirms in general the populist nationalism now trying to rise in the corrupted West, and after that the reality points toward the political/cultural solution of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. It is a conservative transformation---not radical revolution or civil war I hope---in harmony with real human nature, which could be adapted and established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected by federalism.

How to reconcile pluralism with ethnocentrism

How can we reconcile pluralism with ethnocentrism? The answer: ethnopluralism. That is the way to harmonize the primarily kin-centered/ethnocentric altruism of real human nature.

Simple enough, right? Wrong. Human beings are very clever and often devious in advancing themselves. A prime example: one ethnocentric group will try to advance itself over other groups by defining ethnocentrism as evil! That is like calling human nature itself evil. Civil rights movements have used that tactic for years, which has created a reverse racial discrimination!

Wouldn't it be far better and far more just to establish a "universal" ethnopluralism of ethnostates? In the U. S. that could even work by conservatively adapting the constitutional separation of powers and states to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected by federalism.

That now seems to require cultural victory over the Big Media, the academic world, modern liberalism (which is cultural Marxism), globalism in general, and even the quixotic universalism of some versions of religion.

Impossible? When truth is on the side of real nature and when lies are seen as lies, truth does eventually come out, although it often requires martyrs and heroes.

Hegel defines a spiritual non-material idea, and that is the same old problem

Hegel’s definition of beauty is “the sensible shining forth of the idea” Idea? Hegel defines a spiritual non-material idea, and that is the same old problem that goes all the way back to ancient religion and philosophy.

Ideas depend on evolved matter which creates ideas, not the other way around. Without the body and the material brain there would be no ideas or definitions of "spiritualism." Spiritualism is an idea thought up in the material ingredients of the mind. Even the God-Within is a blissful material experience by way of ascetically blocking material drives and desires---most of the gurus teach it that way.

But before spiritualists and idealist's become agitated over the loss of their favorite fantasy: Godhood and the philosophical "zenith" are not lost, theological materialism affirms them---but they are material, or more precisely, supermaterial. And Godhood is evolved to in the material/supermaterial world. Conservatism remains viable.

But before we rush to the very human idea of "final" endings: evolution and devolution never end, there will always be gods and universes evolving, arriving, rising and falling.

So in theological materialism we have nothing to lose but our deification of ideas and spiritualism, and we have a grand material synthesis of religion and science to gain, along with real Godhood.

Consequences of the power needs of intellectuals

I admit that my life mainly involves engaging the intellect, but I can see that the big problem for generations has been to rely upon what Honneth called "a purely cognitive capacity of understanding" which has often bypassed reality. That applies to the history of religion all the way to postmodern philosophy, which have largely ignored or bypassed Darwinism and sociobiology when it could have resolved ongoing intellectual charades.

This seems to relate to the primal power needs of intellectuals who gain all their power from intellectualism, especially academics: admitting the biological origin of our social behavior would reveal the shallowness of their intellectual games and their utopias and it might simplify intellectualism to the point where intellectuals wouldn't be needed to explain life to us, the great unwashed might not need them, and horror of horrors, the evolutionary sciences might get all the grants.

But more important than loss of the perks of intellectuals, our cultures could come out from under the doom of modern liberalism and cultural Marxism. When humans are allowed to return to natural life and evolution they could actually be happy and not feel alienated.

Religion and political harmony need not be lost or coarsened when the biological origin of social behavior it affirmed. We could then see the political justice and good sense for us all in developing an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, in line with kin-centered and ethnocentric human nature. And going even deeper, we could affirm the evolution of material life all the way to supermaterial Godhood. That should be long-term thinking enough for anyone.

This is a natural intellectual construction with its feet on the ground not much needing intellectual middlemen to interpret.

Ethnopluralism is not fascism

Ethnopluralism is not fascism. The world is too populated and power is to fluid for any one group to enslave all the other groups; the consequences of trying to do so will be "too dangerous to its temporary beneficiaries," as E. O. Wilson put it. In other words the crowded world will gang up on and destroy any racial group that claims exclusive rule over all the other groups.

Given the kin-centered and ethnocentric nature of real human nature, we can affirm a "universal" ethnopluralism of ethnostates. It turns out that biological variety is better for survival in the long run, as we learned from the potato famine in Ireland where having only one variety of potato caused devastation. Human variety is good for evolution, especially for those of us who want materially life to evolve toward Godhood.

Universal modern liberalism, which has become cultural Marxism, is a foolish dream that causes great suffering as it is goes against real human nature, which naturally arranges itself into ethnostates and not into one imperial fascist state which uses force to unnaturally rule.

But as we move, or if we move, toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates we can do so conservatively. Human nature is classically conservative in being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

Cultures can operate for a time with behavior that goes against this human nature, with such experiments as Marxism, but cultures are eventually pulled back by the biological and genetic leash of real human nature to cultures that better reflect real human nature, and humans then work within and adapt to the environments they find themselves living in.

An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could even be established legally and conservatively in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected by federalism. It may require a few constitutional amendments to give more power to the states to move toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates---no radical revolution or violence is advocated or necessary, only the natural and rational affirmation of what we actually are, and to what we can become.

What is missing in religion and science?

There is less than optimal primal satisfaction in affirming only material desire or only survival and reproductive success, and myths and religion came in to fill the gap. But religion offers a phantom spiritualism, and science offers a Godless goalless world of evolution.

Optimal primal satisfaction can come from seeing and eventually experiencing the zenith of Godhood in material and supermaterial evolution---a Godhood that is very much in the world. That is the theological materialism which both religion and science have alienated.

Theological materialism can synthesize religion and science but also bring political philosophy, culture, the arts, back to an alienated people. Perhaps we can even surpass the Ancient Greeks?

The blocking point is of course the resistance from both religion and science to the Godhood goal of successful material evolution, as well as the rejection of the inward material activation of life toward that sacred Godhood goal, which activates in every cell of the body, along with the flow of natural selection and evolution.

But I think we will get there, eventually, if we can survive the fundamental dramas of life on earth.

The Democrats will stop at nothing to destroy the West, their "morality" justifies the destruction

"The Democrats have become the party of the neurotics, the misfits, the maladjusted, the perverted, the freaks, and the aggrieved who despise whatever—and whoever—is healthy, sane, and normal in this country." Chilton Williamson Jr. (Chronicles, Sept 2018)

But the freaks and misfits don't really benefit from the Democrats, other than by feeding their own afflictions, like drug addicts. Who does benefit? The Big Media, Hollywood, the academic world, and globalist's like billionaire George Soros (GyÃrgy Schwartz) who feed off the destruction of the West. The neoconservative's do pretty well too undermining the healthy, sane, and normal economic nationalism and populism now trying to rise in the West.

The Democrats and the string pullers behind them need to be exposed for who they are. They will stop at nothing to destroy the West, their "morality" justifies the destruction.

Let's move out from under the ignorance and lies regarding the deepest currents of history

Contrary to religious writer George Weigel the deepest currents of history do not flow through culture, the deepest currents of history flow through biology---biology is at the origin of our social behavior. Both liberals and conservatives make this error (though conservative's less so). Why do they do it?

Religion and political philosophy within in our culture have interpreted culture from spiritual and ideologically abstract perspectives which have, intentionally or not, undermined the biology origin of our social behavior.

Then there is the bias and blockage of the biological perspective since the suffering caused by World War Two, and the fall of fascism and Nazism.

But suffering does not justify ignoring, biasing, and blocking the truth, to do that causes even more suffering in the future. We cannot heal culture or develop a healthy natural culture based in bias and lies.

The real biology origin of our social behavior defines real human nature as being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, among other conservative things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection. What does that suggest when the bias and blockage of the truth is removed?

It suggests ethnostates, and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates to deal with growing, and competing, multi-ethnic societies; it also suggests a protecting federalism to safeguard all ethnostates against inevitable marauding imperialists. The U. S. even has a constitutional separation of powers and states to adapt to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates.

Let's move out from under the ignorance or lies regarding the deepest currents of history.

Why does the Big Media say virtually nothing about China being national socialist?

Here is the big question regarding China: why does the Big Media say virtually nothing about China being national socialist (yes Nazi) when national socialism is otherwise proclaimed across the West as the rebirth of Satan and his minions? Anyone who is honest can see (and even say?) that China is a national socialist country: China criminalizes miscegenation and criminalizes citizenship for non-Chinese, they enforce sterilizations and eugenic programs which allow only genetically superior embryos planted in mothers, they create but also steal technology and resources from the rest of the world which they believe they are entitled to because they think their county is superior to all other countries, etc etc. (actually patriotism and genetic engineering doesn't sound that bad to me)

So why does the Big Media say virtually nothing about China being national socialist? The answer is that the people who normally shout the loudest about the evils of national socialism have been making big money from their investments in China. They are the globalists who killed manufacturing in America so they could pocket the difference in labor costs when they sell the junk they have made in China back to America. They could care less about America or Americans---they traitorously aid and abet the Chinese competitors and enemies of America for their own benefit. That looks like real evil to me.

I am happy that president Trump has the brass to try to slow them down.

There is no real conflict between being moral and satisfying natural needs

There is no real conflict between being moral and satisfying natural needs, the conflict is a humanly manufactured conflict in the ontology and epistemology of most ideologies and religions.

Morality derives entirely from natural needs and spiritualism ultimately takes away natural morality. But theological materialism brings both morality and Godhood back to natural morality, by affirming the Godhood evolved to in the material world.

But both religion and science still need to affirm the material inward activation of life toward Godhood, which works along with outside material evolution and natural selection.

Just as the pleasure or happiness derived from eating food is driven by the deeper requirements of successful survival, the drive to survival and reproductive success is driven by the deeper need of evolving toward Godhood as the zenith of success and purpose in evolution---so contrary to many philosophers happiness is a secondary goal. Naturalism includes the activation toward higher evolution all the way to real Godhood.

Can absolute perfection be reached? No, perfection in evolution is never final, at least not until Godhood is attained, and even then evolution most likely continues endlessly with no ending and no beginning, with higher Gods always arriving.

Can we make the transformation to this reality? It will require courage.

Only a battling President like Trump with his own kind of chutzpah could stand up to the special interest groups

Only a battling President with his own kind of chutzpah, from Queens in the jungle of New York City, could stand up to Hollywood, the academia world, global corporations, and other special interest groups, who think of America only as the place for their greedy ambition to gain power and dominance over the people and culture of traditional America. And they have largely succeeded.

Their arrogant ambition has hidden behind the monstrous fantasy of cultural Marxism, and they have created mainly decadence, degeneracy and immorality which has weakened the resolve of a formerly moral people.

President Trump has some big personality faults, but at least half of America, mostly people living between the decadent coasts, are saying: "more power to him!"

What was once called paranoid is now called truth

For years the right was judged as being paranoid for saying that the Big Media has a leftist bias; now many American's accept that assessment, especially since President Trump took up that position. I think we can now say that most things that the right were once called paranoid for are now understood as the truth.

What else has the right been called paranoid or worse for? Hollywood. The academic world. Special interest lobbyists in Washington. Globalism. The right has been correct in its assessment of the bias and depravity of those institutions.

The alt right is now being called paranoid for proclaiming what may be future truths, one of which has got to be the biological origin of most of our social behavior, which, given human nature, logically and instinctively suggests ethnostates or an ethnopluralism of ethnostates as the healthiest political configuration; in the U. S. this could even be adapted to the constitutional separation of powers and states.

The villainy of the left is seen in how years ago the Media, Hollywood, ect. began by playing up to popular conservative sentiments, which they didn't believe, and how they have now become swaggering and arrogant in promoting a deep cultural decadence, with a few cloudy sentiments on freedom and equality thrown in to lighten their depravity. Their arrogance and endless lies will doom them, as it always does.

So the battle between the left and right is on, and it seems to me that the right has mostly truth on their side. The left are believers in fantasies, they can be great lairs, and they will stop at absolutely nothing to win the cultural battle.

The condition of American Representative Democracy is foul

When yesterday, once again, Hillary "the Hellion" Clinton accused President Trump (and his followers) of being racist and sexist (among other standard culturally Marxist things) she had no clue that she was accusing Trump of displaying real human nature.

Human nature was, is, and remains, genetically kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other conservative things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection and survival.

Can American democracy ever be made healthy? What fools these Democrats be (and many Republicans.) If we cannot get the money out of the political system, democracy will not work. The Representatives in our Representative Democracy represent special interest lobbyists, not us.

Then there is the other big problem of a growing disparity between distinctly different and expanding ethnic groups who are bitterly competing with one another at the expense of national harmony. No establishment party is addressing this reality---the Democrats actually encourage the differences.

As is said here often, the only humane way I can see out of the foul condition of American Representative Democracy is to eventually develop an ethnopluralism of ethnostates from out of our existing constitutional separation of powers and states, where real and natural human nature can be affirmed. I do believe that this will happen anyway as it happens with all empires when they inevitably fall apart. Wouldn't it be great if this could be accomplished rationally, legally and peacefully, which is the way I, for one, would insist on it being done.

Is this the inevitable foul fate of open democracies? The ancient Greeks thought so.

Adapting Hegel's grand synthesis to natural reality

We can see the way the Ancient Greeks developed the individual sacrificing to the universal, as seen in Greek tragedy, which lost the individual to the universal, and on to the Romans who brought the individual to the legal, and the medieval losing the material to a universal spiritual, and now the postmodern way of trying to make the individual the universal, with each historical movement losing one vital bond or another in the synthesis.

The universal realistically and naturalistically bonds with individual genetic drives and desires even at the furthest and weakest end of altruism, or being-for-others, as the earth and the universe itself must survive if the individual is to survive, and then altruism gains strength moving from the universal to the nation, ethnostate, ethnic group, kin and self, becoming ever stronger altruistically in genetically-activated bonding due to ever closer and therefore stronger genetic relatedness.

Next we can see how real human nature has been affirmed throughout human history to this day as being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

This logically and naturally points toward the political/cultural solution of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. It is a conservative transformation---not revolution---which can bring about a sociopolitical or political/cultural structure most in harmony with the real human nature and natural universal evolution. "Within groups, selfish individuals beat altruistic individuals, but groups of altruists beat groups of selfish individuals." E.O. Wilson

In theological materialism the universal exists in both the material Tirips, which is the material activation within life toward evolving to supermaterial Godhood, which works along with outside perhaps sometimes random natural evolution---and the universal also exists in individual knowledge.

So we can altruistically synthesize and bond with the individual, kin, ethnic group, ethnostate, nation, earth, and the universal, without resorting to a non-material, un-bonding,  "spiritual/universal," and we can realistically bond with the real supermaterial Godhood at the zenith of material evolution, without losing any of these bonds.

When we consider the long term path of evolution the conservative view is not "tragic"

Some conservative's argue that the biological origin of social behavior is "tragic" whereas the liberal view of the "social construct" (culture creates gender etc) is "utopian."

I agree that the modern liberal social construct is utopian, although a better word would be delusion, but when we consider the long term path of evolution the conservative view is not "tragic."

When we logically and instinctively expand the path of life and material evolution to its zenith of Godhood, from consciousness to higher and higher consciousness and complexity, that is not a tragic view.

The heroic evolutionary path will include tragedies and triumphs, as evolution conservatively keeps the best of the past as we evolve. The church is not burned down, which would be tragic, but the non-material ascetics may at least be put in their secondary place---the Inward Path to the material God-Within is only a symbolic glimpse of the Outward Path of material evolution to supermaterial Godhood.