Saturday, January 19, 2019
I think theologians and philosophers have made a confusing mess of the concept of "subject and object." To me this comes down to theologians and philosophers thinking that the "idea" is supreme. God in religion and the Absolute in philosophy are seen as abstract ideas, though theologians and philosophers don't often say it that way.
A long time ago William of Ockham (1287-1347) thought he had cleared up most of this problem with the doctrine that "universals or general ideas are mere names without any corresponding reality, and that only particular objects exist; properties, numbers, and sets are thought of as merely features of the way of considering the things that exist." But then the church dreamers, affirming "realism" and spiritualism, insisted that "universals or abstract concepts have an objective or absolute existence...and that universals have their own reality... first outlined by Plato's doctrine of “forms” or ideas." (Oxford Dictionary).
So we end up with religion and philosophy moving away from real life, real subjects and objects, and hiding away from the biological origin of human social behavior, which includes religion and philosophy.
But here is the good news for those who hide away in monasteries or universities protecting their abstract views of god in religion and the absolute in philosophy: ideas are secondary to living subjects or objects, the idea only tries to describe or define subjects and objects. Godhood and religion can be retained but Godhood is a material/supermaterial object or objects/subject or subjects, materially evolved to in the very material world.
Friday, January 18, 2019
If people accuse Hegel's philosophy of being "political propaganda" (Kojeve) then what would they say about religion and philosophy as biological propaganda, which it is?
That isn't an overly reductive statement, it is a basic truth about human and animal life which is hidden mainly because it discloses real intentions related to gaining power.
How can we fix our troubled world with different factions scheming and fighting wars for power if we won't speak about the primary causes?
When we find the courage and the smarts to admit the biological origin of our social behavior then we can have a much better chance of finding longer term harmony.
Both communism and capitalism may more easily see that a world of ethnostates, or as I put it an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, is the closest we may come to longer term political harmony in line with real kin and ethnic-centered human nature.
Then we can get on with affirming the sacred, all of us, with all our differences centered on evolving toward Godhood.
That is utopian thinking with its feet on real ground.
Thursday, January 17, 2019
"Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and unto God the things that are God's" Jesus said in the gospels, and that set the relationship between Christianity, secular government, and society. But it did not work well, with Caesar gaining by it, because it was a compromise between the authentic ascetic life of Jesus and non-ascetic life of Caesar, between celibacy and non-celibacy, between real life and spiritual monastic life. This all goes back to the ancient metaphysical error in the Vedas and the Bible, east and west, of separating the spiritual from the material.
Godhood is material or supermaterial and evolved to in the necessarily non-ascetic material and supermaterial world. Godhood and religion are not lost in affirming this theological materialism; the fatal compromise between the authentic ascetic life of Jesus and authentic non-ascetic life of Caesar then become unnecessary. Rather than the unwinnable competition between celibacy and non-celibacy, mankind can center on shepherding or guiding the birth of offspring toward the material evolution of man to supermaterial Godhood...That's a noble task both priest and scientist can work together on.
When will we start?
Wednesday, January 16, 2019
Tuesday, January 15, 2019
Traditional conservatism is right in trying to religiously harness human nature but wrong in the type of harness applied, and this is mainly due to the view of a "fallen human nature."
Traditional conservatism agrees for the most part with the scientific sociobiological view of human nature---or perhaps I should say that the scientific sociobiological view of human nature agrees with traditional conservatism---in human nature across the world being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.
But the "religious-making" of traditional conservatism falls down (like modern liberalism) in not including ethnocentrism, xenophobia, and fundamental materialism as an important and healthy part of human nature. Traditional conservatism excludes these things mainly due to their view of human nature as having fallen from the very ascetic Christ who was the most perfect man with a perfect nature. It is those basic materialistic parts of human nature that need to be religiously harnessed or guided rather than called unimportant, or cut out of human nature, or called evil.
And here is where the traditional conservative view of god needs to be transformed rather than murdered, by seeing Godhood as material or supermaterial and as evolved to in the material world. The "fallen" human nature, the ethnocentrism, xenophobia, and the fundamental materialism of real human nature can be seen as not fallen but the very traits involved in our evolution toward real Godhood; those are the attributes of human nature that need to be harnessed or guided by both priests and evolutionary scientists toward evolving to Godhood in our very material world (applying, for example, an ethnopluralism of ethnostates). To call these things evil or fallen is to block the upward path to real Godhood.
Is traditional conservatism headed like a tragic drama toward suffering extreme distress or sorrow and the downfall of the main character? If traditional conservatism can transform its view of Godhood from the spiritual to the evolutionary material/supermaterial, and revise its view of fallen man, then it has a chance to not only survive but reach the Godhood it has so fervently sought. If not we may see a real traditional conservative tragedy unfold.
Monday, January 14, 2019
"The nature of experience is the nature of phenomenology." Heidegger
Regarding the above quote it seems to me that when speculating on future phenomenological experience it needs to always be tied to, grounded in, and dependent on the future evolved body, or future evolved biology, then we can take it more seriously, without moving out into the lala-land of so called "realism" that sees universals or abstract concepts as having an objective or absolute existence, which has led to so much nonsense in religion and philosophy, beginning with the Hindus and Plato.
Most arcane, occult, or ascetic schools of religious philosophy, complete with hierarchies of initiates, are existing in a glaze of delusion.
Theological materialism speculates on real, particular, evolved objects not on a narcosis of mere names for God without any corresponding reality. Theological materialism speculates on a Godhood based on, tied to, grounded in, and dependent on future evolved bodies, or future evolved biology, and sees a Godhood which even nominalism would not reject as being a mere name or number without any matching reality.
Sunday, January 13, 2019
I'll start with a long pithy quote from "Lost Generations" by Chilton Williamson Jr., Chronicles, December 2018....."The Greatest Generation gave the country President Eisenhower’s “military-industrial complex,” C. Wright Mills’ “power elite,” and Riesman-Glazer-and-Denney’s “lonely crowd”; a synthetic and comprehensive “popular culture” produced following commercial formulae by bowdlerizers, vulgarizers, marketers, ad men, pollsters, and other immoralists and cynics as the antithesis of a healthy folk culture; the trivialization of religious thought and observance and the nihilism embraced by the Beats in America and the Existentialists in Paris; and the destruction of the American university system by social levelers in the academy and elsewhere, and bureaucratic agencies in the federal government seeking to appropriate what was at the time called “higher learning” for utilitarian purposes, most of them related to national “defense.” Worst of all was the Sixties Generation, which the Greatest Generation bequeathed to their country during the postwar Baby Boom and raised to young adulthood in the cultural wasteland they created after 1945 and that some of their progeny to their credit rejected, though the barbaric culture with which they intended, in their ignorance, to replace the banal one did them no credit at all. Possibly the Greatest Generation, preoccupied in the 1930’s by economic deprivation and by global war in the 40’s, never had a chance in maturity to learn civilization in the traditional sense of the word. If so, they too were a lost generation: lost, like their parents but differently, to modernity—the narrow and shallow ethos of the new materialist, secular, and technocratic industrial society that had no recollection of, or use for, the former high civilization of the Christian West..."
Williamson ends his essay saying: "The Lost Generation didn’t have smartphones, but—just like Generation Z and every generation in between the two—it didn’t have God, either."
Williamson has it right in indicating that the fall of religion is directly related to the fall of America and the West, but I don't believe the reaffirmation of religion can go back to the traditional religion which began to die way back in the Renaissance and the Enlightenment, and then really began to fall with Darwin's evolutionary worldview. These were not evil developments, they were human moves toward deep truths, most importantly concerning the biological origin our social behavior.
Good conservatism retains the best of the past, and also changes, but with religion traditional conservatism doesn't change much at all. I think that the lost generations, brilliantly defined above by Williamson, can be found again in religion, but the traditional, non-material, spiritual, ascetically-defined god aided by priests, needs to be transformed by the supermaterial Godhood reached in material/supermaterial evolution, aided by both priests and scientists.
The old traditional Inward Path of finding and experiencing a symbolic god after ascetically blocking material desires can be conservatively retained but transformed in the Outward Path of material evolution toward real Godhood. Life is activated inwardly by the sacred drive to survive and reproduce successfully, while living and adapting to the pressures of the outside environment; life itself at its deepest always aims to attain the zenith of success in survival and reproduction, which is Godhood.
The past is important but the future is more important. The past can help tell us how the present came to be, and the past can show us the patterns of how the future may develop, but the past, present and future most deeply depend on the biological origin of our social behavior and the deep supermaterial goal of Godhood which material life seeks.
Saturday, January 12, 2019
Hegel thought true satisfaction requires a union of the finite with the infinite, according to Eliot Jurist, but I believe that demonstrates how human's always think in human terms, seeing only beginnings and endings in their human lives they define the universe as having a first beginning and define Godhood as a final ending.
I see no first beginning and no final ending, which doesn't kill religion or Godhood, as science often tells us it does, but it does require a transformation of religion and Godhood. We evolve to an unending series of material/supermaterial Godhoods in the material and supermaterial world, with no beginning and no end.
That means we will get our religious and scientific satisfactions not from dreaming about a union of the finite with the infinite but from reaching different levels of Godhood by way of material evolution---which is the sacred task of future religion and science.
You will need a stout heart and a durable ego to sell this religious/scientific overview to people today. But it's worth it; civilization never lasts long without religion.
Friday, January 11, 2019
The big problem is that the lefty-hedonists do not connect their morality to the biological origin of our social behavior
Bob Dylan had a sort of genius for creating songs that stick in your head and he now still represents to me many of our hippie-lefty-scruffy-slightly-stoned youth, but he also embodies many of the baby boomers who still get weepy (and stoned) about leftist causes, at least on weekends.
Dylan morphed from a Jewish boy born and raised in northern Minnesota to a rather weird-looking, southern-drawling, blues man, complete with gravely voice probably brought on by heavy drug use.
Weed is supposed to be so mild but I have seen the heavy use of weed change the personalities of people, change the way their voice sounds, and the way their mind works, apparently permanently.
But beyond that serious problem it is the idiotic leftist/hedonistic philosophy of Dylan, shared by sanctimonious people like the Clinton's and the Obama's, and all the lefties in the Media, as well as the lefty baby boomers, which has caused the most damage to American culture.
The big problem is that the lefty-hedonists do not connect their morality to the biological origin of our social behavior---they even declare that such a connection is racist and bigoted. Dylan has created many dopey songs about it. And the pedantic professors who taught most of them this culturally Marxist politically correct garbage are busy doing the same thing to the next generation.
Real human nature remains kin and ethnic-centered, and even xenophobic, but real human nature has been blocked by these decadent lefties, which is mainly what has brought American culture and the West into steep decline. So the natural and biologically-derived movement toward populism, conservatism, nationalism, and even ethnostatism now must struggle against these established idiots to save the West.
Thursday, January 10, 2019
"Mutuality" rather than "submission" is the key idea in adapting the constitutional separation of powers and states to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected by some kind of federalism. That is the political and cultural adaptation to manage the no-longer homogeneous (and growing more so) American population, and it has the great advantage of harmonizing with real human nature, which remains kin and ethnic centered in spite of great social and cultural efforts to wipe it out. Egalitarian multiculturalism has been imposed by those who gain temporary power from trying to jam distinctly different people and cultures into the same living space when for the most part they don't assimilate. Seeing and presenting an ethnopluralism of ethnostates as mutuality rather than submission is not only true but a better way to present it. The imperial supremacy of one-people-one-culture in our crowded world simply does not qualify, is unethical, and is bad for the variety preferred in ongoing evolution.
Science and philosophy brought us to the evolution of consciousness, self-consciousness, and reason, and away from spirit, religion and absolute knowing. Hegel tried to bring them back together in a hierarchical philosophical scheme and I believe he would have succeeded if he had brought them all back to material and supermaterial evolution.
When spirit, religion, and absolute knowing are understood as part of material evolution and not as a non-material spiritualism we can then retain the custom of spirit, religion, and absolute knowing.
That is a conservative religious perspective for material evolution in the Western world which is rapidly rejecting religion but can this way include science and religion together in a realistic hierarchical philosophical scheme that retains an evolving Godhood as the zenith of material evolution.
Wednesday, January 09, 2019
I love America and defend it, but I don't defend the Antifa movement which openly seeks to block conservative First Amendment free speech, the LGBTQ+ crazies who think they can circumvent biologically human nature, or the Open Border nuts who openly want to replace Middle American whites. I defend traditional America and the principle of law and order, and I affirm the paleoconservative or traditional conservatives in the desire to conserve the best of the past. But I believe we have to go further than the paleoconservatives or traditional conservatives have wanted to go to save America.
The Left worked on the offensive for years to make this radical transformation of America happen, and the Right has been only weakly defensive toward the Left. The Right being religious (and afraid of being called bigoted) has been reluctant to affirm all of the elements of the biological origin of our social behavior, especially the sociobiological fact that real human nature is kin-centered, ethnocentric and even xenophobic. But the conservatives do accept that human nature is gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, and religious-making. Conservatives tend to overlook the fact that group-selection or ethnocentrism has been the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.
I believe we will need to adapt the constitutional separation of powers and states and decentralize toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. We are no-longer a nation of only Euro-Americans but a nation that the Left gleefully tells us will soon be a land where Euro-Americans are a minority in their own country; and we know as the people and ethnic groups change the culture and politics change toward the new preferences.
An ethnopluralism of ethnostates is the sociopolitical or political/cultural structure most in harmony with real human nature which developed many tens of thousands of years ago and is still very much with us today. I believe we can accomplish this adaptation of the constitutional separation of powers and states to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates within our institutions and through legally established processes. Like the conservatives and as a deep conservative I don't believe in illegal radical revolutions which are almost always snuffed out and care nothing for traditions.
Tuesday, January 08, 2019
If the ongoing evolution of life has the sacred goal of evolving all the way to an ongoing Godhood then freedom and happiness are not the goal they have been propped up to be, but are secondary conditions which happen along the way. "Satisfaction" might be a better word for what we can expect as we continue to evolve toward higher forms.
Freedom and determinism would then be conditioned by that essential activation within life to evolve toward Godhood, which is a deterministic biological activation defining the essence of life; satisfaction would come from bringing life into harmony with what life is in ongoing evolution.
The path of the ongoing evolution of life then adapts to or adjusts to the outside environment, which can sometimes be a random environment of obstacles, but the activation of life to evolve in the material world to supermaterial Godhood---which is also defined as the zenith of success in survival and reproduction---is not random.
Monday, January 07, 2019
On the Golden Globe Awards: Hollywood producers and writers have turned our culture into obscene garbage
While surfing last night I paused at the Golden Globe Awards and I was painfully reminded of how much I loathe Hollywood and the producers of television and film who have turned our culture into obscene garbage. And they have done it not only because the producers and writers are vulgar and talentless but because they purposely wanted to tear down American culture. The one thing these conspirators and betrayers of America are good at is creating cultural destruction and then grabbing what remains of the leftover power.
I especially hate Hollywood and the producers for what they have done to the actresses who we see parading across the stage dressed and acting like street hustlers while chasing fame and fortune controlled by those very same vulgar, talentless, obscene, producers.
Virtually not one healthy thing is promoted by these showbiz rats unless it is a lie, not one thing in politics, art, and not in our corrupted schools; they push only Marxist cultural values while living themselves like organized crime families peddling cultural devastation. Will they, can they, ever be stopped, or do we have to wait until nothing is left of America?
These despicable award shows gleefully poke their dirty fingers in the eyes of the MEGA red hat wearing Trumpians who hate them back with equal passion, but what both may not realize is that those of us who firmly believe in changing things legally and peacefully may not be able to stop the hard rain of fascism on the right or the left from falling.
Sunday, January 06, 2019
We can't solve a problem if we don't know what the problem is, or if we are forbidden to name the problem
I heard a CEO say: " America divided doesn't help America or the world." That seems like common sense, even if you figure in the self-serving nature of a global businessman saying it.
But looking deeper you come across the politically incorrect and therefore uncomfortable fact that different ethnic groups within the same country naturally compete, which leads to natural divisions.
Then the "common sense" statement becomes "a country needs to know when its divisions are unassimilating, and divide accordingly, to avoid civil disruption or even civil war." We may then have a chance of solving the problem of our divisions in a peaceful way, and hold the country together with some sort of federalism that protects the differences and divisions.
But that ethnopluralistic solution is enhanced or aided by a sociobiological understanding of human nature, which remains a "political incorrect" solution, mainly because businessman like the one quoted above and culturally Marxist academics who dominate our schools block the sociobiological understanding of human nature.
As you hear often in this blog, human nature is basically kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection. This definition of human nature basically supports traditional Western values and morals, and it logically and instinctively suggests---at least to a few people---forming an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, which could be peacefully adapted to the constitutional separation of powers and states.
So what or who are the disrupters of this natural solution to present and future divisions in the West? The disrupters are the political left, postmodern philosophy, postmodern art, the Big Media, the academic world, global business, universalist religions, etc. Depressing right? But we can't solve a problem if we don't know what the problem is, or if we are forbidden to name the problem.
Saturday, January 05, 2019
The deep-conservatism of theological materialism is like a symphony that synthesizes past, present and future cycles
Cycles in human history and human behavior do seem to happen based on the natural conflicts between people, as well human reactions to the environment. I think of the deep-conservatism of theological materialism as helping to explain what inevitably happens between extremes and cycles in family, political, and religious structures as the result of such things as compensation and overcompensation for past weaknesses, etc. etc etc.
The order and harmony of that symphony of theological materialism is harmonious because it takes into account real human nature which remains kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other conservative things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection. That defines the real sociobiological human nature which along with nature itself helps create the cycles of human history.
But life is also activated inwardly by the sacred drive to survive and reproduce successfully, while living and adapting to the pressures of the outside environment. Life itself at its deepest always aims to attain the zenith of success in survival and reproduction, which is Godhood, and that defines the sacred activation (Tirips) toward Godhood within life.
That is why I believe the past is important but the future is more important. The past can help tell us how the present came to be, and the past can show us the patterns of how the future may develop. But the past, present and future most deeply depend on the biological origin of social behavior and the deep supermaterial goal of Godhood which material life seeks. This is where I have a problem with the Traditionalist School, which barely even mentions biological evolution, if it mentions evolution at all, while dwelling almost exclusively on the past or on a past golden age of a non-material spiritualism which it fervently wants to return to.
Friday, January 04, 2019
I could agree with Heidegger's remark in 1966 that "only a God can save us," but only if the definition of God is understood as a Godhood we evolve to in the material and supermaterial world.
That transformation of the meaning of Godhood can lead to closing the enduring gap between religion and science and can bring realistic morality and values to our alienated world, based on the biological origin of social behavior.
That view instinctively and rationally does not lead to fascism or one noble or chosen people enslaving all others; our crowded competitive world logically, instinctively, and naturally leads to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, with international sociobiological research centers devoted to helping an ethnopluralism of ethnostates materially and supermaterially evolve toward Godhood.
That is a reformulated Godhood that can save us.
Thursday, January 03, 2019
I see a version of psychosis in many of the white talking heads in the media today indicating impaired contact with reality when they arrogantly and triumphantly declare that white people will soon be a minority in America. It is more than the obvious brown-nosing to trendy minorities, it is suicidal. To arrogantly and even happily announce the decline and death of ones own ethnic group, who share many of your same genes and your same culture, is more than pantywaist cuckoldry, it is sick.
Is there a cure for the behavioral psychosis of ethnic suicide? I suppose so, but it will take years to recover. The overall power of the present media and the academic world who encourage the suicide of white Western culture will need to be curbed. If we want to be logical and fair to all groups we will adapt the constitutional separation of powers and states to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, in line with real human nature, which remains kin and ethnic centered, among other conservative things.
Wednesday, January 02, 2019
We don't need to offer "the body in place of the soul," which was Nietzsche's position according to Eliot Jurist. We can retain and redefine or transform the soul as the material/supermaterial activation (Tirips) toward evolving to Godhood.
In the same way the "will" is identified with that divine material/supermaterial activation. And Godhood also need not be "dead" but can be understood as the zenith of material/supermaterial evolution.
"The truth" didn't originate in academia. Would Thomas Aquinas have synthesized this deep-conservatism in harmony with the evolutionary sciences? Even Teilhard Chardin's view of evolution ended up with the same old non-material spiritual God.
Nietzsche, Heidegger, and the postmodern philosophers, astute as they were, didn't seem to have the testes, or ovaries, to affirm this evolutionary deep-conservatism and their insufficiency helped to cause the present chaos, disorder, and decline of modernity, even in the face of the rise of technology.
That's my cheerful note for the new year...Hey, it is cheerful to me!
Tuesday, January 01, 2019
President Trump has more or less been turning the country back to what Srdja Trifkofic called the "sovereign realism" of pre-1941 America, before the proto-neoconservative Woodrow Wilson began to condescendingly bully the World.
But not being an intellectual and not following fixed patterns of idealism, Trump has retained a few neoconservative advisers who are trying to turn him toward foreign adventures, although Trump's lavish preference for Israel seems to have been there from the start.
So decentralizing America, bringing the troops home, and giving power back to the states where power belongs has been more or less happening, even in the face of the entire media and the entire academic world hating Trump. Trump has so far had the ego to more or less persist.
But sovereign realism and populism can only take us half way back to a sound and sane country. What we face, which sovereign realism and populism have not faced, is the Western and Southwestern states becoming a non-amalgamating Latino territory, and the Black inner cities of the nation continuing to explode in racial conflict and competition.
Real human nature predicts these things will happen because real human nature has the same human preference for kin and ethic/racial groups, which came to be what it is during the millions of years that our ancestors lived in hunting/gathering bands where those genetic preferences were successful in survival and reproduction, so they became part of human nature.
But sovereign realism, populism, and nationalism can be thought of as the first stage of the return to real human nature, and if that can be successful, the next stage will be to adapt our constitutional separation of powers and states to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, which can then accommodate the natural competition between Hispanics, Blacks, and Whites. Otherwise an ethnopluralism of ethnostates will happen illegally and violently, which we do not want. In our overpopulated world the imperialism and fascism of one group making slaves of the others is unrealistic.
Politics, business, the stock market, the arts, etc. are the superstructure built upon that structure of human nature, and their future will eventually accommodate real human nature in any case.
Monday, December 31, 2018
For centuries humans have been rushing to claim that we are beyond the animals, even in effect denying that we are animals, and they have overlooked or ignored the biological origin of social behavior.
Especially since World War Two where one side pushed a selfish version of the biological origin of social behavior we have been dominated by resentment and revenge against the idea. The Gentleman Culture of Europe which could show benevolence and goodwill toward past enemies---influenced by the warrior ethos---has been nowhere to be seen among the cads of politically correctness and cultural Marxism who driven by resentment and revenge now rule our culture.
The subject is blocked mainly because it reveals the hidden motive of the biological will to power activating those who block the subject. Nietzsche was one of first to have the courage to suggest that psychology needs to be biologized, anticipating sociobiology and evolutionary psychology.
Until all the fields place culture on a biological basis, from religion and philosophy to science and art, we will be lost in the over-complication or oversimplification that leads to motley alienation and the decay of modern men and women.
Sunday, December 30, 2018
As Scott Richert of Chronicles aptly put it we need a "countermarch" through the institutions to offset the takeover of the arts, music, film, television, book publishing etc. to counter the cultural Marxism that has deformed (not formed) our culture. But the leftist vultures are not solely responsible for the cultural mess.
Libertarianism among conservative businessmen shares much of the blame because concentrating almost exclusively on making a god of individualism and the freedom to make money came back to bite them when the Hollywood moguls and leftist publishers and producers of New York, as well as the academic world, exploited American freedom and deformed a formerly conservative culture to fit their leftist cultural agendas; they found that they could make big money but also change culture in a culturally Marxist direction. They marched through the institutions and they won the cultural war. It was brilliant.
Now what? Burke and Kirk's "moral imagination" among artists now portrays only the political correctness of cultural Marxism. I guess that countermarch through the institutions has to begin with the first steps. So where are the marchers? Perhaps some of those otherwise conservative businessmen who were hoodwinked by making a god of individualism and money will finance the recovery (there's even money to be made in it). That could redeem them.
Saturday, December 29, 2018
One of the stupid and dangerous things modern culture does is foment against real human nature by incessantly demanding in the media and schools that since people are all equal they must live together in the same living space, which ends up causing more social problems than it helps. People, ethnic groups, races, are certainly not the same, they naturally compete against each other, often causing social disruption which can even lead to civil war.
So why is modern culture so stupid? It is mainly do to the brainwashing of cultural Marxism in the media and in all our schools, but it also has to do with the fact that some individuals gain advantage, at least in the short-term, by pushing the lies. For example, creating "no borders" is the product of global corporations and governments whose leaders become obscenely wealthy at the expense of the rest of the population. The charge of racism and bigotry is hurled at anyone who dares to disagree with the sham of politically correct cultural Marxism, which is even made a crime in many countries
Then there are the intellectuals who affirm such things as libertarianism, which makes a god of individualism, ignorant of, or ignoring, the natural altruism inherent in human nature which genetically favors the group above the individual, without rejecting individual competition within the group, for successful survival.
Modern culture has been swimming up-stream against the strong current of real human nature. Group-selection was the natural way for individuals to successfully survive, and so altruism, or being for others, was naturally limited mainly to kin and ethnic group because they shared the same genes that constantly strive for successful survival. Trying to rid human nature and culture of the deep-seated biological preference for kin and ethnic group is like trying to rid human beings of being human, and that is cruel.
We need to overcome the obstacles that prevent the natural flow of real human nature toward the natural decentralization which favors an ethnopluralism of ethnostates.
Friday, December 28, 2018
Well, I've survived half the holiday season and as usual I could not negotiate a rational discussion with leftist relatives. They believe only in the political correctness they have thoroughly absorbed from the corrupt media and the corrupted culture.
So I move closer to misanthropy, without wanting to go there. What other choice is there living in a world of the multiculturalism of all values, where godhood is defined as the equality of everything? I pull back, think, write, and try to develop thicker skin. But we are genetically kin and group-centered so it's not a comfortable fit.
I know I'm not alone in this dilemma and I feel sympathy for others facing the same thing. Does that means I can avoid misanthropy? I do know that fighting back against the destruction of Western people and adapting old tradition to new sociobiology sustains me.
Thursday, December 27, 2018
Everyone in the country speaking English is advocated by conservatives as a remedy for many of our social problems, but if "everyone" consists of distinctly different ethnic groups speaking the same language that is not enough to create harmony in the land.
Yes, speaking the same language is important, but that shouldn't be used as shell game hiding the importance of biological, genetic, and cultural differences between ethnic groups or races.
Ethnic differences are more disrupting to the nation than not speaking the same language. This is only common sense which cannot be spoken because it moves outside the boundaries of the preference for jamming distinctly different ethnic groups together into the same space and telling them that, since they are all equal, they must get along.
This deceptive culturally Marxist social game---also promoted by the international capitalists---will only work for a time before the whole mishmash naturally splits into an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. How much better it would be if that could be done consciously, legally, and peacefully...Have we evolved enough to be that civilized?