Friday, January 19, 2018
"The field is the sole governing agency of the particle."
There is no such thing as “non-physical phenomena,” there are only the forces developed by physical phenomena, all of which we might not yet be aware of.
I am not a physicist but I am presumptuous enough to believe that the “forces” Max Planck, Einstein and Tesla spoke of are all material.
Energy, frequency, and vibration in the universe are not the secrets of the universe, it is matter, discovered and undiscovered, which drives those forces.
Is not the field which "governs" the particle created by the interaction of material forces? The field is not spiritual. In the same way gravity or electric forces are not spiritual, they are brought about by material objects.
Science has refused to see it but randomness to explain evolution is not enough, at least not for me. Randomness seems inadequate to explain the development of form and order, and the timeless movement from simplicity to complexity. I see a material inward activation as a “force”and it is not a non-physical force. In the same way the forces of energy which vibrate the particles are a material force “activating” material particles.
The only “duality” I see, which is not really a duality, is the inward dynamism of a material Spirit-Will or Will-Spirit of life, which I call Tirips, activating material life to evolve in the world toward supermaterial Godhood, shaped by endless sometimes random outside evolution---perhaps that is the force physicists look for.
Wednesday, January 17, 2018
Sociobiologist E.O.Wilson explained altruism this way: "Within groups, selfish individuals beat altruistic individuals, but groups of altruists beat groups of selfish individuals."
The standard definition of altruism exploits modern liberalism in saying only that altruism is the unselfish interest in the welfare of others, missing the fact that altruism was developed as behavior that (1) helped genetically related kin and group survive and reproduce successfully, and because (2) group selection was more successful for individuals in the long term.
Unselfishness toward the whole world applies or works only out at the weakest edges of altruism if the world is seriously threatened, which is why universalist religions and political philosophies have not created peace and love in the world.
If altruism was understood as it really exists in human nature we would set up an ethnopluralism of ethnostates and advocate localism, which would relate to realistic bonding between people in groups. We might even have a religion that does not promote universalist non-materialism, and have a real Godhood evolved to in the material world, as described in the philosophy of theological materialism.
Tuesday, January 16, 2018
"History is rewritten, memory is transformed." James O. Tate
Liberals don't have the copyright on transforming culture, deep conservatism knows that the real task is to know what to leave in, what to transform, and what to leave out.
The deepest conservatism understands that it is the people and territory of the people who create the culture that needs to be preserved if the culture is to be preserved.
Modern liberalism followed the Frankfurt School cabal who created the culture of postmodernism (along with Nietzsche) consciously or unconsciously to advance themselves, which eventually took over the academic world and then the culture of the West as cultural Marxism.
To remove all the inherited traditions of a people will doom not only the culture but the people of the culture. But before we call this will to successful survival and reproduction evil we need to know that it is natural and a vital part of human nature to create cultures that advance a people.
It is from this perspective that comes the call for the transformation of the constitutional separation of powers and states in the U. S. toward and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, which will conserve the cultures of the U.S. but more importantly will conserve the people who create the cultures of the ethnostates within the Republic. The descendants of Frankfurt School cabal might even have their own ethnostate---as long as it wouldn't bother the others.
This seems most fair and in harmony with real human nature.
Sunday, January 14, 2018
Is there a solution to the social problems caused by the dangerous lies and complications of the digital age?
The digital age or information age is very vulnerable to liars who use fake social accounts, internet bots, trolls, disinformation, hacking, disguised donations to the right or the left, etc. to discredit and even destroy whoever they want to destroy.
A frustrated West asks, is it free speech? Is it propaganda? And what can be done about it? Will the West and the world have to become less free to become less vulnerable to the manipulation that is destroying us?
Dropping out of it all and returning to conservative individual and family virtues and values, or becoming libertarian and allowing virtually anything, or using force to block all freedom as the far right and far left would do, are unsatisfactory solutions to the digital age lairs who are manipulating and destroying us.
Regular readers know that my ideas on this devilishly complicated problem involve thinking in "politically incorrect" terms, that is, thinking in ways contrary to the cultural Marxism that has been hoisted upon the West.
Beneath the lies of the digital age we can see natural competition between groups that are more nationally and ethnically connected than connected to anything else: Russians versus Americans, Israelis versus Iranians, black versus white, left versus right---which is mainly minority ethnic groups versus whites--and various combinations and alliances between these groups.
This natural reality points toward a conservative transformation---not revolution---which I see coming, where different ethnic groups can politically and culturally conduct themselves according to who they actually are, in their own states or ethnostates---in our case within a Democratic Republic perhaps with only a few amendments to the constitutional separation of powers and states. We would need to retain federalism and balance the states together because we need the geopolitical heft of a large nation to defend ourselves in the big world.
That is the sociopolitical or political/cultural structure most in harmony with real human nature, which developed many thousands of years ago and remains kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection,
With natural competition between groups more harmoniously contained in ethnostates we all would be less vulnerable to the liars of the digital age who wish to discredit and even destroy whoever they want to destroy... they would have what they naturally and unconsciously want, and each would protect themselves from empire builders.
Saturday, January 13, 2018
I was as guilty as the populist/nationalists of moving beyond realism in my hopes for President Trump. We now see that President Trump has gradually moved toward the neoconservatives and the Saudi and Israeli lobbies (if he wasn't with them all along), who are persistent in there swampy behavior. And there is not much we can do about Trump showing his vulgar egocentric side.
It is realistic now to see that our wishes for American First policies, economic nationalism, no-longer being the policemen of the world, bringing the troops home from places which can afford their own defense, closing our open borders, bringing our factories home, ect., all fired by Trump promises, were too much to hope for. Trump will do as much as he can to fulfill his promises, which will not be enough. Trump is Trump and our enemies are many.
But if the effete West can survive the next few decades we can at least hope to pick up the pieces of a failed nation and start again, perhaps the next time with an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, the most harmonious social structure in harmony with real human nature, which can be legally formed out of our constitutional separation of powers and states.
Friday, January 12, 2018
The response of those from countries referred to as "s---holes" by President Trump (which was a bigoted thing to say) should be: "It may seem like a s---hole to you but it is our s---hole. And further more we don't want to immigrate to your abundant nation, we want to maintain and even build up our own unique culture and nation."
Demographics suggest that if we want to stop the open immigration of "workers" into our country we should concentrate on technology which will take the place of immigrant workers. I heard a financial analyst suggest this as a solution for Japan's dying population, since they wisely don't allow immigration to destroy their homogeneous but dying homeland.
In a related demographic problem, we weren't as wise as Japan in maintaining an orderly homogeneous population, and so the U.S. can also think of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates as a solution to our present and future demographic problems, which could even be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, and protected by federalism.
It is treating diverse groups with respect to advocate a homeland to keep them intact and thriving and living in a more natural harmony. This is the opposite of bigotry, as multiculturalists and globalists like to label it, it is treating diverse groups with respect. Human nature remains kin-centered and ethnocentric in spite of years of endless propaganda and even force used to try to make us all the same.
Thursday, January 11, 2018
The most important thing lost in modern culture, which may end up bringing tragic loss, is knowledge of the biological origin of social behavior, a knowledge recently examined (actually reexamined) in the field of sociobiology.
From out of this ignorance, or this burying of knowledge, comes the recent four-letter word cursing of our President by Robert De Niro, or the sad angry slide of actresses from an almost sensible feminism to blaming white men for everything (eg, Emma Watson) and affirming bi-sexuality, lesbianism, etc.
Too many people benefit (at least in the short term) from keeping us ignorant of the biological origin of our social behavior, which would shed much light on the false knowledge of postmodernism, cultural Marxism, and political correctness, which people have used to ride to power.
But the fact is, human nature remains as it has always been: kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.
Cultures can operate for a time with behavior that goes against this human nature, with such experiments as cultural Marxism, but culture is eventually pulled back by the biological and genetic leash of real human nature to cultures that better reflect real human nature.
For example, given real human nature, an ethnopluralism of ethnostates seems like the best political configuration for humans beings to live within. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could even be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected by federalism.
So the biological origin of social behavior is a very important thing to promote. Weaker intellectuals are discouraged from doing so due to charges of "racism" etc. hurled against them, but people need to become aware of the scams of modern culture if the West and its citizens are ever to be saved.
Wednesday, January 10, 2018
Postmodernism grew out of Schopenhauer and Nietzsche, they both believed that there was no absolute truth only perspectives and fabrications.
I don't think we can "will" nothingness, we only think we can. We can't not be activated to live and evolve unless we are dead.
I think the activation,Tirips, is ultimately to live and evolve toward Godhood, which looks more like absolute truth than a relativity of values. It looks more like the point of life, or where good and evil come from.
The "I" within, is Tirips, and it is more like an Id than an ego, more like a Super-Id activating life to evolve toward Godhood, and that does not indicate a relativity of values.
Dualities fall away as the old idea of the spiritual folds into the material activation to evolve toward Godhood, rather than the other way around.
The activation of Tirips is more than a mental process, it is physical activation perhaps within every cell of the body, influencing the mental process. This does not indicate relativity because the activation fundamentally seeks the ultimate success in survival and reproduction, which is Godhood. That defines a divine purpose and direction, not a relative perspective or fabrication.
Tuesday, January 09, 2018
We can retain religion, we can have Godhood, we can have ethics, embodiment, and transformation, but if we want reality in these things we cannot have transcendence of the material world. We "transcend" toward Godhood through material evolution.
The painting by Raphael, "The School of Athens,"of Plato pointing toward the heavens and Aristotle pointing toward the earth illustrates the false duality running through human history, although that wasn't Raphael's meaning.
There is the supermaterial, there is Godhood, but these divine things are evolved to in the material, not spiritual world. This means that science and religion have been falsely separated and need not be.
It is better to call spiritualism what it is, and is not, than to try to synthesize materialism into spiritualism by keeping it in a system of duality, as the great intellectual fathers of the church tried to do,
But with the Twofold Path conservatives and traditionalists need not reject the spiritual Inward Path of desire-free ascetic living, which can be seen as the first human inward glimpses of real Godhood now understood as reached in the Outward Path of material evolution.
Monday, January 08, 2018
The actresses at the Golden Globe awards didn't dress like clean-cut prostitutes showing lots of thigh and bare breasts, as they usually do, they wore black in solidarity with their victimized sisters, which ironically showed the sense of modesty they usually avoid. Then they lectured men like prudish mothers or priggish sisters regarding how they demand to be treated.
The Hollywood feminists have chosen Oprah Winfrey as the head of a new African-American matriarchy, harkening way back to BC times before the West was created by Indo-European patriarchies. And effete liberal men bow to this atavism.
And while I'm at it, I also don't buy the present movie trend of super-females kicking ass and wasting all men who confront them, no matter what size they are. That's as unreal and stupid as the emotional versions of Marxism they never stop peddling, usually not even knowing it's Marxism.
This brainwashing of women (and men) has come mostly from our colleges and universities, and from Hollywood and the Big Media who exploit it. The actresses and feminists don't see the bad consequences of the gender games they play, and Western men don't have the balls to tell them.
But if the feminists and their Big Media friends continue to push these abnormalities of real human nature the West will crumble, rotten doors (if there are any doors left) will be kicked in by, say, Islamic terrorists, or leftist fascists, who will immediately brutalize all women (by Western standards) and only laugh at the feminists or superwomen who object to it.
These comments come from a man who treats women with respect as a gentleman, not at all like Harvey Weinstein, who pimped women. If these woman were healthy they would purge Weinstein and his cabal, not us. Destroy us and they lose their real protection---although they are so addled now that they don't think they need protection.
Sunday, January 07, 2018
When is conservative subtlety just not enough? Talking about "growing political and regional disunity" in the U.S. (Chronicles ) without mentioning the core of social disunity coming from ethnic and racial disunity seems like talking about religion without mentioning the soul or spirit.
Does there come a time when the biological origin of much of our social behavior has to be mentioned if we are to successfully solve our social problems? Ethnic and racial competition and disharmony are not evil they are natural elements of real human nature.
Subtlety is one important conservative element in politics and in art, missing the real solution is another. We eventually will need ethnostates as "contiguous regional republics," which happens anyway after the fall of empires.
Even so, I see the importance of using subtlety regarding such a volatile subject, especially in a society so heavily brainwashed with the political correctness of cultural Marxism. But someone has to be politically incorrect on this subject.
Saturday, January 06, 2018
It's not easy to counter billionaires who seek to dissolve nation states and borders so that they, the one-percent, can rule. It probably takes billionaires to counter billionaires. National governments have billions to counter billionaires if they wish to, but national governments are often controlled by other billionaires.
So we can only do the work of deep-conservatism with our best efforts and talents, perhaps attract a billionaire or two, a political party, or a government, or most importantly talented individuals who see common sense, reason, and hope for the future in our worldview. Doing nothing is anti-life. Optimism springs eternal and naturally from life and evolution.
Life can evolve toward Godhood if we let it, and help it.
Friday, January 05, 2018
It still seems to me that it was "out of Africa" for pre-human ancestors, like Homo erectus. Then the evolution of the various subspecies or races in various climates that the pre-humans migrated to, with inter-mating between them here and there. Then at some point it was back to Africa for a now modern human, who then later migrated out of Africa again (perhaps this would then be the real "out of Africa" migration of anatomically modern humans. ) I don't have the dates or DNA proof for this, this is not my field---but obviously that never stops me.
What I see now on this subject just doesn't feel right, there is too much fear, or politics, in the interpretation of data... I am willing to change this old idea when something else looks and feels right.
President Trump seems to have recognized that there needs to be exemptions from wide-open free trade agreements for national security reasons, not only for the vital commodities used in manufacturing military necessities, but also for national security reasons we need a repudiation of wide-open borders, drug trafficking, millions of jobs lost to China, Mexico, etc. Speaking of China, their transformation from Mao's strict communism to an enterprising version of national socialism seems very much aware of having trade and other exemptions for national security and national sovereignty reasons, and they have been doing quite well, at least for now.
But why is economics the only field given concern with national security? Social order and harmony within the nation is also a matter of national security and national sovereignty. If the nation is being gradually torn apart by imposing multiculturalism and cultural Marxism that is perhaps an even more important matter of national security.
I believe this reality and this need for social order and harmony within the nation eventually points toward the political/cultural solution of ethnopluralism. This is the sociopolitical or political/cultural structure most in harmony with real human nature, which developed many thousands of years ago. We remain kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection. Cultures can operate for a time with behavior that goes against this human nature, with such experiments as Marxism, but culture is eventually pulled back by the biological and genetic leash of real human nature to cultures that better reflect real human nature, where humans can then work within and adapt to the environments they find themselves living in
It is a conservative transformation---not revolution---which can legally bring about an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, where different ethnic groups can politically and culturally conduct themselves according to who they actually are, in their own states within our Democratic Republic, perhaps with only a few amendments to the constitutional separation of powers and states. But for national security reasons we will need to retain federalism and balance the states together because we need the geopolitical heft of a large nation to defend ourselves in the big world.
Thursday, January 04, 2018
Conservatives rightly blame postmodernism and its creation of subcultures and a relativity of values for the fall of Western culture, but that alone does not explain the fall.
Homogeneity defined merely as the middle and upper classes reading the same books and listening to the same music was not the only homogeneity fractured, it was also the ethnic homogeneity of Northern Europeans reading the same books and listening to the same music which was usurped by other naturally competing ethnic groups and cultures.
So why can't even paleo and traditional conservatives admit this since we won't recover from a problem if we can't mention its main causes?
It seems to be a combination of fear of being called a racist, and from the non-material, spiritual, universalism inherent in Christianity, or from both. Careers can be destroyed if one is labeled a racist, and crossing basic tenets of ones religion is too traumatic for most folks. Also the successful leftist propaganda of labeling race-affirming as "race hate" was helped along by real race haters usually not of the tradition-sustaining middle and upper classes. The Alt-right seems to have grown from its willingness to mention "race."
The biological origin of much of our social behavior needs to be admitted if we wish to save or revive Western culture. And God need not be lost when real supermaterial Godhood is understood as evolved to in the material world where successful survival and reproduction have always come from group and ethnic selection.
We need to find a way for this real human nature to allow all groups to prosper, which I believe will come from an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. protected by federalism.
Tuesday, January 02, 2018
Schopenhauer said that his philosophy was the unfolding of a single thought. Theological materialism also unfolds a single thought, but it is the opposite of not only Schopenhauer but opposite many of the religious ascetics.
There is divine purpose inherent in life, which Schopenhauer denied, and it is a purpose very much connected to the material and supermaterial world. "Life" is activated to evolve in the material world of joy and suffering toward Godhood, which is a thoroughly optimistic single thought.
The drive, will, spirit, or activation within life, which I call Tirips, is material, not spiritual, and it defines the essence of life as seeking the zenith of success in survival and reproduction, or Godhood.
This activation of life is not an "evil" Id, we can be conscious or unconscious of it. It is more like a Super-Id seeking to activate life toward Godhood, which we can either help or hinder.
Humans see anthropomorphic endings and beginnings, but we do not have an elevated status in nature, however we can evolve toward higher beings within the structures and strictures of outside natural evolution. It is an endless evolution toward higher and higher Godhoods.
Human civilizations and cultures project from this single idea of life evolving toward Godhood, which organizes not only life but the whole universe.
Monday, January 01, 2018
I see two kinds of liberals, those who accept the "reality" that the Big Media tells them is reality, and those who more or less know reality but find reality inconvenient and therefore manipulate reality.
The manipulated reality has been to sell moral relativism, sexual freedom, equality, and culturally malleable identity, and it has been successful! The West is a brutalized mess!
So can we bring the West back to reality? The way the manipulators did it was to march through the institutions, as the leftist Gramsci told them to do, until they controlled the institutions. Alain de Benoist suggested this way to the Alt-right years ago.
But reality is harder to sell than the unreality of moral relativism, sexual freedom, and equality. Conservatives are not as good at lying as the manipulators of reality, who lie with great chutzpah. Is that why force is so often used?
Well, it has to be done legally and not radically, conservatives don't destroy what works. For example, in the U.S. we can transform the constitutional separation of powers and states into regions of ethnostates, more in line with the reality of human nature, which continues to prefer kin and ethnic group, and group selection. That movement has to get going, difficult as it is.
Sunday, December 31, 2017
The globalism and universalism promoted by the techie-turned-billionaires Tim Cook of Apple and Zuckerberg of Facebook, who are the new effete version of robber barons, is based on a fusion of libertarianism and cultural Marxism, which means their globalism is based on a faulty view of human nature.
Altruism, supposedly the selfless concern for the well-being of others, is in reality based on a hierarchical genetic scale of caring for others, beginning strongest with kin, and moving out to ethnic group, region, state, nation, and at the weakest end of altruism: globalism. That is why the various attempts at empire building and universalism don't last long and do not bring harmony or peace---even universal religions couldn't bring harmony or peace for the same reason.
Global harmony and peace will not come from Cook/Apple/Zuckerberg/Facebook because their bonding "goals" are at the weakest and virtually unworkable end of the hierarchy of altruism. Cook and Zuckerberg push the global "human rights" of libertarian/cultural Marxism because they benefit most from them, which is why they promote their faulty altruism, although the dissolute Cook at least seems naively unconscious of this.
What will bring the best chance for peace and harmony in the world is a political/cultural solution based in a realistic understanding of altruism and the hierarchy of altruism, and its limits. That is, large empires, large nations, and now global corporations eventually devolve back to localism and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, in line with real human nature. That is the direction we need to go in.
Saturday, December 30, 2017
Nietzsche made power the end-goal, Marx (communist) and Mises (libertarian) made money the end-goal, Freud made sex the end-goal, with other thinkers making "happiness" their end-goal, etc..
There is nothing wrong with money, sex, and power, but there is something wrong with making them the end-goal of life.
Religion rightly made God the end-goal, but their God was non-material and spiritual rather than supermaterial, and that end-goal was experienced as an inward state of bliss, or Father-Within, reached by blocking or detaching themselves from power, sex or money, at least by serious ascetics---small bliss replaced by large bliss but on the same hedonistic continuum.
The end-goal of theological materialism is to evolve in the material world to supermaterial Godhood, where money, sex or power, and culture in general, are subordinate yet important aids in attaining that sacred end-goal.
Human nature harmoniously corresponds to this hierarchy of values and morals, with life materially activated from within to evolve toward the zenith of successful survival, which is supermaterial Godhood, while interacting with outside changes from natural selection and ongoing evolution.
Friday, December 29, 2017
When God was defined as not material, spiritual, and not of this world, that led to the idea that life is only meant not to suffer, and not-suffering is attained by way of detachment from the material world because desires bring suffering. That is the hedonistic position held by most ascetics, although they don't put it quite that way.
The Vedas, Buddha and Christ defined satisfaction as basically the ascetic cessation of suffering caused by the material world of material desires seeking satisfaction. Their God was a blissfully inward God reached only by way of the cessation of desires.
"A thousand pleasures do not compensate for one pain," said a hedonistic Petrarch, which could have been the theme song of traditional religious gurus.
"A thousand pleasures do not compensate for one pain," said a hedonistic Petrarch, which could have been the theme song of traditional religious gurus.
But when you define Godhood as in and of the material world and reached only through material and supermaterial evolution, then life and the world are seen as more than suffering.
That is the difference between traditional theology and theological materialism. The first is thoroughly pessimistic the second is thoroughly optimistic.
Life has no purpose if life is seen only as suffering needed to be blocked or detached from.
Godhood can be attained by the pains and pleasures of rising material evolution, which brings purpose back to life, and not merely death.
Even so, we can conservatively retain those first attempts at defining Godhood as we transform them, which is the Twofold Path.
Even so, we can conservatively retain those first attempts at defining Godhood as we transform them, which is the Twofold Path.
Thursday, December 28, 2017
I could probably now make the broad statement that since the 1960's most college educated Americans have been destroyed by the brainwashing of cultural Marxism, and what college didn't destroy the Big Media did, which means these people are virtually useless for saving the nation.
So now we have soccer moms and dads feminizing there sons and masculating (?) their daughters even though the genders are in fact quite different and largely genetically determined. Nerds can fight wars behind computer terminals, although any serious threats still require the super-masculine special forces.
"Bullying" has become the trendy social cause for soccer moms. As far as I remember there was always a playground code of never allowing someone to pick on someone smaller, although weak effort was called out in no uncertain terms. Busing ghetto kids to the suburb or vice versa is probably the main bullying problem, but it is politically incorrect to say so.
So here we sit. There was still enough votes from the unindoctrinated folks to elect Donald Trump, who promised economic nationalism and other conservative things, but the demographics of the open-border degenerates could soon stop that movement.
Can we recover? Perhaps we will only be able to pick up the pieces of real conservative behavior left over after the fall. But that could be good, especially if the next time we create the deep conservatism of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, which the constitutional separation of powers and states could legally accommodate.