Tuesday, October 16, 2018

How and why I consider myself an American evolutionary conservative patriot who salutes the flag


It's almost a given that young people on the Left or the Right tend toward radical and revolutionary politics, but it is not merely because they lack broader knowledge of the world; young people are at the stage in life where they will be competing with one another for power and success, whereas older people can be more conservative because they have achieved something to conserve. So both groups are instinctively correct in relating to the biological origin of their social behavior.

The best societies and cultures find ways to channel the new into the old, which is the classically conservative thing to do. Evolution can supersede but does not replace or reject conservatism. The evolution of life is enhanced by the order of conservatism---as we advance we retain the best of the past. Edmund Burke and Russell Kirk said that society is a community of souls, joining the dead, the living, and those yet unborn---and that is too powerful and natural a thing to overlook or reject.

As I have said here before, the main problem I have with both Kirk and the Alt Right is their lack of respect for biological evolution. Although the Alt Right formerly respected the biological origin of social behavior, their embrace of the Traditionalist School, influenced by the Russian Aleksandr Dugin, diminished their respect for material evolution.

With that in mind, I think the Alt-Right in America needs to be channeled toward more American conservative ends and not toward the Eurasian traditionalism it has been embracing. Kirk's conservative philosophy can keep us from wholeheartedly joining the Alt Right philosophy and the Alt Right from wholeheartedly joining Kirk.

Then there is that weird Vedic business of cycles that the Traditionalist School embraces, which really demeans the idea of evolution and progress---they harken way back and prefer a pre-Christian golden spiritual age. Kirk and Burke had a better take on how conservatism brings the new in while keeping what is best of the past.

So I embrace Kirk's view of the American conservative separation of powers and states---against empires---while affirming a legal conservative adaptation of that separation to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, in line with the kin and ethnic-centered biological origin of human nature and social behavior.

My religious philosophy of theological materialism, which both Kirk's philosophy and the Traditionalist School haven't affirmed, is grounded in the biological evolution of life to supermaterial Godhood, as well as the biological origin of our social behavior (which includes religion). Theological materialism welcomes the cultural and biological new while assuredly and conservatively retaining the best of our cultural and biological past---I call it deep-conservatism and ordered evolution.

As to the Left they are simply fools who when young are Marxist revolutionaries and when old become luke-warm socialists, and neither have a clue as to what human nature really is or does.

That is how and why I consider myself an American evolutionary conservative patriot who salutes the flag.

Monday, October 15, 2018

The taboo that is still dooming us


Two things doom us to dissatisfaction, or worse to a fall: when we overemphasize being-for-oneself, as in libertarianism and superindividualism, and on the other hand when we overemphasize being-for-another, as in the universalist religions and in modern liberalism/Marxism.

Satisfaction and social stability come more naturally when we can affirm the biological origin of our social behavior, that is, when we see as E. O. Wilson said that in human life and survival "within groups, selfish individuals beat altruistic individuals, but groups of altruists beat groups of selfish individuals." That brings whatever natural coordination we can have to harmonize the process of being-for-oneself and being-for-another.

The obfuscated arguments regarding individual/social doom or satisfaction by Hegel and Marx, Nietzsche, the postmodernists, and the feminists are simply overcome by the instinctive and rational affirmation of the biological origin of our social behavior. How interesting that this remains a taboo view.

I suppose it remains taboo because the biological origin of our social behavior points toward a human nature that goes against modern liberalism, cultural Marxism and globalist corporations, in affirming real human nature as being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

That directly and naturally shows the way toward the populist nationalism now rising in the West, and later toward an ethnopluralism of smaller ethnostates, and not toward the globalized corporations or Marxist/fascist dictatorships now preferred by the corrupted elite.  We will get there, but we will be stupid and devious in getting there, as usual.

Sunday, October 14, 2018

The garbage culture created over the past 100 years or so goes against all normal and natural human traits


Reading and then watching the news this morning this was my thought: the old adage "as the people change the culture changes" was not paid attention to mainly because the people who were changing our culture into garbage were rising to power on the ashes of the garbage they created and didn't want us to see it that way. So now we have garbage newspapers, garbage television, garbage commercials, garbage movies, garbage books, garbage politicians, garbage global businesses---and on and on.

So how do I define "garbage?" Things that are contemptibly worthless, inferior, and vile, which go against normal human nature and normal human behavior. Human nature has been affirmed throughout human history to this day as being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

The garbage culture that has been created over the past 100 years or so---as the will to power of garbage creators---goes against all of those normal and natural human traits, other than the will to power of the garbage creators.

The only thing to do is to go back to what we really are as human beings. The biological origin of our social behavior actually ends the intellectual defense of postmodern garbage culture, but of course the powers behind the garbage culture don't want you to think that way.

Real human nature and normal human behavior affirms in general the populist nationalism now trying to rise in the corrupted West, and after that the reality points toward the political/cultural solution of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. It is a conservative transformation---not radical revolution or civil war I hope---in harmony with real human nature, which could be adapted and established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected by federalism.

Saturday, October 13, 2018

How to reconcile pluralism with ethnocentrism


How can we reconcile pluralism with ethnocentrism? The answer: ethnopluralism. That is the way to harmonize the primarily kin-centered/ethnocentric altruism of real human nature.

Simple enough, right? Wrong. Human beings are very clever and often devious in advancing themselves. A prime example: one ethnocentric group will try to advance itself over other groups by defining ethnocentrism as evil! That is like calling human nature itself evil. Civil rights movements have used that tactic for years, which has created a reverse racial discrimination!

Wouldn't it be far better and far more just to establish a "universal" ethnopluralism of ethnostates? In the U. S. that could even work by conservatively adapting the constitutional separation of powers and states to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected by federalism.

That now seems to require cultural victory over the Big Media, the academic world, modern liberalism (which is cultural Marxism), globalism in general, and even the quixotic universalism of some versions of religion.

Impossible? When truth is on the side of real nature and when lies are seen as lies, truth does eventually come out, although it often requires martyrs and heroes.

Friday, October 12, 2018

Hegel defines a spiritual non-material idea, and that is the same old problem


Hegel’s definition of beauty is “the sensible shining forth of the idea” Idea? Hegel defines a spiritual non-material idea, and that is the same old problem that goes all the way back to ancient religion and philosophy.

Ideas depend on evolved matter which creates ideas, not the other way around. Without the body and the material brain there would be no ideas or definitions of "spiritualism." Spiritualism is an idea thought up in the material ingredients of the mind. Even the God-Within is a blissful material experience by way of ascetically blocking material drives and desires---most of the gurus teach it that way.

But before spiritualists and idealist's become agitated over the loss of their favorite fantasy: Godhood and the philosophical "zenith" are not lost, theological materialism affirms them---but they are material, or more precisely, supermaterial. And Godhood is evolved to in the material/supermaterial world. Conservatism remains viable.

But before we rush to the very human idea of "final" endings: evolution and devolution never end, there will always be gods and universes evolving, arriving, rising and falling.

So in theological materialism we have nothing to lose but our deification of ideas and spiritualism, and we have a grand material synthesis of religion and science to gain, along with real Godhood.

Thursday, October 11, 2018

Consequences of the power needs of intellectuals


I admit that my life mainly involves engaging the intellect, but I can see that the big problem for generations has been to rely upon what Honneth called "a purely cognitive capacity of understanding" which has often bypassed reality. That applies to the history of religion all the way to postmodern philosophy, which have largely ignored or bypassed Darwinism and sociobiology when it could have resolved ongoing intellectual charades.

This seems to relate to the primal power needs of intellectuals who gain all their power from intellectualism, especially academics: admitting the biological origin of our social behavior would reveal the shallowness of their intellectual games and their utopias and it might simplify intellectualism to the point where intellectuals wouldn't be needed to explain life to us, the great unwashed might not need them, and horror of horrors, the evolutionary sciences might get all the grants.

But more important than loss of the perks of intellectuals, our cultures could come out from under the doom of modern liberalism and cultural Marxism. When humans are allowed to return to natural life and evolution they could actually be happy and not feel alienated.

Religion and political harmony need not be lost or coarsened when the biological origin of social behavior it affirmed. We could then see the political justice and good sense for us all in developing an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, in line with kin-centered and ethnocentric human nature. And going even deeper, we could affirm the evolution of material life all the way to supermaterial Godhood. That should be long-term thinking enough for anyone.

This is a natural intellectual construction with its feet on the ground not much needing intellectual middlemen to interpret.

Wednesday, October 10, 2018

Ethnopluralism is not fascism


Ethnopluralism is not fascism. The world is too populated and power is to fluid for any one group to enslave all the other groups; the consequences of trying to do so will be "too dangerous to its temporary beneficiaries," as E. O. Wilson put it. In other words the crowded world will gang up on and destroy any racial group that claims exclusive rule over all the other groups.

Given the kin-centered and ethnocentric nature of real human nature, we can affirm a "universal" ethnopluralism of ethnostates. It turns out that biological variety is better for survival in the long run, as we learned from the potato famine in Ireland where having only one variety of potato caused devastation. Human variety is good for evolution, especially for those of us who want materially life to evolve toward Godhood.

Universal modern liberalism, which has become cultural Marxism, is a foolish dream that causes great suffering as it is goes against real human nature, which naturally arranges itself into ethnostates and not into one imperial fascist state which uses force to unnaturally rule.

But as we move, or if we move, toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates we can do so conservatively. Human nature is classically conservative in being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

Cultures can operate for a time with behavior that goes against this human nature, with such experiments as Marxism, but cultures are eventually pulled back by the biological and genetic leash of real human nature to cultures that better reflect real human nature, and humans then work within and adapt to the environments they find themselves living in.

An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could even be established legally and conservatively in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected by federalism. It may require a few constitutional amendments to give more power to the states to move toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates---no radical revolution or violence is advocated or necessary, only the natural and rational affirmation of what we actually are, and to what we can become.

Tuesday, October 09, 2018

What is missing in religion and science?


There is less than optimal primal satisfaction in affirming only material desire or only survival and reproductive success, and myths and religion came in to fill the gap. But religion offers a phantom spiritualism, and science offers a Godless goalless world of evolution.

Optimal primal satisfaction can come from seeing and eventually experiencing the zenith of Godhood in material and supermaterial evolution---a Godhood that is very much in the world. That is the theological materialism which both religion and science have alienated.

Theological materialism can synthesize religion and science but also bring political philosophy, culture, the arts, back to an alienated people. Perhaps we can even surpass the Ancient Greeks?

The blocking point is of course the resistance from both religion and science to the Godhood goal of successful material evolution, as well as the rejection of the inward material activation of life toward that sacred Godhood goal, which activates in every cell of the body, along with the flow of natural selection and evolution.

But I think we will get there, eventually, if we can survive the fundamental dramas of life on earth.

Monday, October 08, 2018

The Democrats will stop at nothing to destroy the West, their "morality" justifies the destruction


"The Democrats have become the party of the neurotics, the misfits, the maladjusted, the perverted, the freaks, and the aggrieved who despise whatever—and whoever—is healthy, sane, and normal in this country." Chilton Williamson Jr. (Chronicles, Sept 2018)

But the freaks and misfits don't really benefit from the Democrats, other than by feeding their own afflictions, like drug addicts. Who does benefit? The Big Media, Hollywood, the academic world, and globalist's like billionaire George Soros (GyÃrgy Schwartz) who feed off the destruction of the West. The neoconservative's do pretty well too undermining the healthy, sane, and normal economic nationalism and populism now trying to rise in the West.

The Democrats and the string pullers behind them need to be exposed for who they are. They will stop at nothing to destroy the West, their "morality" justifies the destruction.

Sunday, October 07, 2018

Let's move out from under the ignorance and lies regarding the deepest currents of history


Contrary to religious writer George Weigel the deepest currents of history do not flow through culture, the deepest currents of history flow through biology---biology is at the origin of our social behavior. Both liberals and conservatives make this error (though conservative's less so). Why do they do it?

Religion and political philosophy within in our culture have interpreted culture from spiritual and ideologically abstract perspectives which have, intentionally or not, undermined the biology origin of our social behavior.

Then there is the bias and blockage of the biological perspective since the suffering caused by World War Two, and the fall of fascism and Nazism.

But suffering does not justify ignoring, biasing, and blocking the truth, to do that causes even more suffering in the future. We cannot heal culture or develop a healthy natural culture based in bias and lies.

The real biology origin of our social behavior defines real human nature as being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, among other conservative things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection. What does that suggest when the bias and blockage of the truth is removed?

It suggests ethnostates, and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates to deal with growing, and competing, multi-ethnic societies; it also suggests a protecting federalism to safeguard all ethnostates against inevitable marauding imperialists. The U. S. even has a constitutional separation of powers and states to adapt to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates.

Let's move out from under the ignorance or lies regarding the deepest currents of history.

Saturday, October 06, 2018

Why does the Big Media say virtually nothing about China being national socialist?


Here is the big question regarding China: why does the Big Media say virtually nothing about China being national socialist (yes Nazi) when national socialism is otherwise proclaimed across the West as the rebirth of Satan and his minions? Anyone who is honest can see (and even say?) that China is a national socialist country: China criminalizes miscegenation and criminalizes citizenship for non-Chinese, they enforce sterilizations and eugenic programs which allow only genetically superior embryos planted in mothers, they create but also steal technology and resources from the rest of the world which they believe they are entitled to because they think their county is superior to all other countries, etc etc. (actually patriotism and genetic engineering doesn't sound that bad to me)

So why does the Big Media say virtually nothing about China being national socialist? The answer is that the people who normally shout the loudest about the evils of national socialism have been making big money from their investments in China. They are the globalists who killed manufacturing in America so they could pocket the difference in labor costs when they sell the junk they have made in China back to America. They could care less about America or Americans---they traitorously aid and abet the Chinese competitors and enemies of America for their own benefit. That looks like real evil to me.

I am happy that president Trump has the brass to try to slow them down.

Friday, October 05, 2018

There is no real conflict between being moral and satisfying natural needs


There is no real conflict between being moral and satisfying natural needs, the conflict is a humanly manufactured conflict in the ontology and epistemology of most ideologies and religions.

Morality derives entirely from natural needs and spiritualism ultimately takes away natural morality. But theological materialism brings both morality and Godhood back to natural morality, by affirming the Godhood evolved to in the material world.

But both religion and science still need to affirm the material inward activation of life toward Godhood, which works along with outside material evolution and natural selection.

Just as the pleasure or happiness derived from eating food is driven by the deeper requirements of successful survival, the drive to survival and reproductive success is driven by the deeper need of evolving toward Godhood as the zenith of success and purpose in evolution---so contrary to many philosophers happiness is a secondary goal. Naturalism includes the activation toward higher evolution all the way to real Godhood.

Can absolute perfection be reached? No, perfection in evolution is never final, at least not until Godhood is attained, and even then evolution most likely continues endlessly with no ending and no beginning, with higher Gods always arriving.

Can we make the transformation to this reality? It will require courage.

Only a battling President like Trump with his own kind of chutzpah could stand up to the special interest groups


Only a battling President with his own kind of chutzpah, from Queens in the jungle of New York City, could stand up to Hollywood, the academia world, global corporations, and other special interest groups, who think of America only as the place for their greedy ambition to gain power and dominance over the people and culture of traditional America. And they have largely succeeded.

Their arrogant ambition has hidden behind the monstrous fantasy of cultural Marxism, and they have created mainly decadence, degeneracy and immorality which has weakened the resolve of a formerly moral people.

President Trump has some big personality faults, but at least half of America, mostly people living between the decadent coasts, are saying: "more power to him!"

Thursday, October 04, 2018

What was once called paranoid is now called truth


For years the right was judged as being paranoid for saying that the Big Media has a leftist bias; now many American's accept that assessment, especially since President Trump took up that position. I think we can now say that most things that the right were once called paranoid for are now understood as the truth.

What else has the right been called paranoid or worse for? Hollywood. The academic world. Special interest lobbyists in Washington. Globalism. The right has been correct in its assessment of the bias and depravity of those institutions.

The alt right is now being called paranoid for proclaiming what may be future truths, one of which has got to be the biological origin of most of our social behavior, which, given human nature, logically and instinctively suggests ethnostates or an ethnopluralism of ethnostates as the healthiest political configuration; in the U. S. this could even be adapted to the constitutional separation of powers and states.

The villainy of the left is seen in how years ago the Media, Hollywood, ect. began by playing up to popular conservative sentiments, which they didn't believe, and how they have now become swaggering and arrogant in promoting a deep cultural decadence, with a few cloudy sentiments on freedom and equality thrown in to lighten their depravity. Their arrogance and endless lies will doom them, as it always does.

So the battle between the left and right is on, and it seems to me that the right has mostly truth on their side. The left are believers in fantasies, they can be great lairs, and they will stop at absolutely nothing to win the cultural battle.

Wednesday, October 03, 2018

The condition of American Representative Democracy is foul


When yesterday, once again, Hillary "the Hellion" Clinton accused President Trump (and his followers) of being racist and sexist (among other standard culturally Marxist things) she had no clue that she was accusing Trump of displaying real human nature.

Human nature was, is, and remains, genetically kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other conservative things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection and survival.

Can American democracy ever be made healthy? What fools these Democrats be (and many Republicans.) If we cannot get the money out of the political system, democracy will not work. The Representatives in our Representative Democracy represent special interest lobbyists, not us.

Then there is the other big problem of a growing disparity between distinctly different and expanding ethnic groups who are bitterly competing with one another at the expense of national harmony. No establishment party is addressing this reality---the Democrats actually encourage the differences.

As is said here often, the only humane way I can see out of the foul condition of American Representative Democracy is to eventually develop an ethnopluralism of ethnostates from out of our existing constitutional separation of powers and states, where real and natural human nature can be affirmed. I do believe that this will happen anyway as it happens with all empires when they inevitably fall apart. Wouldn't it be great if this could be accomplished rationally, legally and peacefully, which is the way I, for one, would insist on it being done.

Is this the inevitable foul fate of open democracies? The ancient Greeks thought so.

Tuesday, October 02, 2018

Adapting Hegel's grand synthesis to natural reality


We can see the way the Ancient Greeks developed the individual sacrificing to the universal, as seen in Greek tragedy, which lost the individual to the universal, and on to the Romans who brought the individual to the legal, and the medieval losing the material to a universal spiritual, and now the postmodern way of trying to make the individual the universal, with each historical movement losing one vital bond or another in the synthesis.

The universal realistically and naturalistically bonds with individual genetic drives and desires even at the furthest and weakest end of altruism, or being-for-others, as the earth and the universe itself must survive if the individual is to survive, and then altruism gains strength moving from the universal to the nation, ethnostate, ethnic group, kin and self, becoming ever stronger altruistically in genetically-activated bonding due to ever closer and therefore stronger genetic relatedness.

Next we can see how real human nature has been affirmed throughout human history to this day as being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

This logically and naturally points toward the political/cultural solution of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. It is a conservative transformation---not revolution---which can bring about a sociopolitical or political/cultural structure most in harmony with the real human nature and natural universal evolution. "Within groups, selfish individuals beat altruistic individuals, but groups of altruists beat groups of selfish individuals." E.O. Wilson

In theological materialism the universal exists in both the material Tirips, which is the material activation within life toward evolving to supermaterial Godhood, which works along with outside perhaps sometimes random natural evolution---and the universal also exists in individual knowledge.

So we can altruistically synthesize and bond with the individual, kin, ethnic group, ethnostate, nation, earth, and the universal, without resorting to a non-material, un-bonding,  "spiritual/universal," and we can realistically bond with the real supermaterial Godhood at the zenith of material evolution, without losing any of these bonds.

Monday, October 01, 2018

When we consider the long term path of evolution the conservative view is not "tragic"


Some conservative's argue that the biological origin of social behavior is "tragic" whereas the liberal view of the "social construct" (culture creates gender etc) is "utopian."

I agree that the modern liberal social construct is utopian, although a better word would be delusion, but when we consider the long term path of evolution the conservative view is not "tragic."

When we logically and instinctively expand the path of life and material evolution to its zenith of Godhood, from consciousness to higher and higher consciousness and complexity, that is not a tragic view.

The heroic evolutionary path will include tragedies and triumphs, as evolution conservatively keeps the best of the past as we evolve. The church is not burned down, which would be tragic, but the non-material ascetics may at least be put in their secondary place---the Inward Path to the material God-Within is only a symbolic glimpse of the Outward Path of material evolution to supermaterial Godhood.

Sunday, September 30, 2018

How universalism loses its utopianism in universal ethnostates


Liberals want a bottomless "universalism," but "universal ethnostates" are the most naturalistic and realistic way to define universalism.

Kin-centeredness is almost an individualistic kind of altruism or being-for-others, but one where the self can know itself even as it knows others. This idea is further extended in the sociobiological affirmation of the biological origin of social behavior, as written about in this genetically-derived social or group affirmation by sociobiologist E. O. Wilson: "Within groups, selfish individuals beat altruistic individuals, but groups of altruists beat groups of selfish individuals," leading to success in survival and reproduction.

Ethnostatism stands at the furthest reach of effective altruism or being-or others without losing or alienating the self and kin. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates represents the realistic extent of naturalistic social or political universalism, where being-for-others need not alienate self and kin.

The universalism of liberalism expands beyond real altruism and moves back to the self in the form of individualistic and selfish global corporations or political Marxism, with no biological or genetic ties to real altruism, so they soon socially fall apart.

Science and reason have also often led to the withdrawal into individual reasoning, which tends to take the place of bonding with others. Religious asceticism does this too seeking individual enlightenment that tends to downplay materialism and biology, ironically even as it touts a grudging form of material universalism: "If you must marry I suppose that is better than burning in hell," St. Paul more or less said.

However, science and reason move back to a realistic form of being-for-others in the sociobiological affirmation of the biological origin of social behavior, seen in genetically-derived social or group affirmation. And religion moves back to real altruism and bonding when Godhood is understood as evolved to in the material, not spiritual, world. That is how universalism loses its utopianism in universal ethnostates.

Saturday, September 29, 2018

Why the "advise and consent" mission of the Congressional hearings on Judge Kavanaugh have become a "search and destroy" mission


The politically incorrect saying that "as the people change the culture changes" helps explain why the "advise and consent" mission of the Congressional hearings on Judge Kavanaugh have become a "search and destroy" mission. The biological or genetic origin of most of our social behavior is a taboo subject.

Although it is virtually illegal to say it, Northern Europeans founded America and its cultural and legal traditions, and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (who leads the search and destroy mission of the Kavanaugh hearings) as well as Cory Booker and Kamala Harris come from Jewish and Black traditions which are distinctively different traditions from the Northern European traditions. There is also the standard politics of resentment that minorities always feel toward majorities. And of course there are the usual benighted white liberals also on the panel who have bought into the politics of minority resentment.

Get used to it, there are many Hispanics rising and arriving, as well as Islamic Somalis and other minority ethnic groups, who will continue to change American culture away from its Northern European character, tone and guiding beliefs. Ben Franklin said, more or less, that America could be America only as long as we could keep it, and we haven't kept it.

Is there a way out of the tragic national mistake of cultural Marxism that has been foisted on America, which is tearing us apart and bringing us closer to racial/ethnic civil war? The flat reality is that as the people change the culture changes. Cultures can operate for a time with behavior that goes against human nature, with such experiments as Marxism, but cultures are eventually pulled back by the biological and genetic leash of real human nature to cultures that better reflect kin-centered and ethnocentric human nature.

As a realist this tells me that an ethnopluralism of ethnostates is the best political configuration for us to live within. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, with a protecting federalism. I think that is where we are headed, one way or another; but I believe that the legal and nonviolent way is the way it needs to be developed.

Friday, September 28, 2018

Shouting at Hegel


Reading Hegel and his painfully pedantic but worthy attempts at synthesizing the individual and the group and the group and the universal is an absurd exercise. At one point I shouted out loud: "The biological origin of social behavior answers your dilemma!"

The endless word-making and verbiage of Hegel and those who try to explain Hegel (and this could apply to Nietzsche too) are simply answered by the famous statement of the father of the evolutionary science of sociobiology, E.O.Wilson: "Within groups, selfish individuals beat altruistic individuals, but groups of altruists beat groups of selfish individuals."

Religious and political universalism sits weakly and lightly at the furthest end of altruism, or being-for-others, which is why world peace and harmony are so difficult. And as for Hegel's universal Spirit or entirely spiritual God, it does not exists---but Godhood does exist or can exist as a supermaterial object or objects at the zenith of material evolution.

We don't need to lose religion, Godhood, or morality, the biological origin of social behavior can be expanded to high culture, which may not create the ideal world of philosophers and ascetics but it will create a real natural world with the possibility of evolving all the way to Godhood.

We can arrange ourselves in a protected ethnopluralism of ethnostates, in harmony with our genetically kin-centered and ethnocentric human nature---not Hegel's imperial state, and not the state of Marx, or Hitler---then we can evolve, with variety, toward Godhood.  Let the haggling  academics have an international research center objectively directed to that worldview.

Thursday, September 27, 2018

Thoughts while watching the Judge Kavanaugh accuser on television


Whether Judge Kavanaugh is guilty or not guilty of the charges against him, the fact is that Western men, white men, are being weakened and overcome by a combination of academics, lesbians, minority races, the Big Media, and Hollywood, but the West will not be taken over by that decadent motley group; it will more likely be a take over by Islamic revolutionaries with a combination of conquest through immigration as well as by traditional non-western patriarchal behavior. The revolutionaries will laugh at such feminist things as the American "Me Too" movement, and dismiss such things as the Judge Kavanaugh accuser of attempted rape....What do you bet that fascism from the right or left will rise to counter the revolutionaries, which the decadent motley group now hate almost as much as they hate Western white men.

How the Three Covenants are amenable to liberals, conservatives, scientists and religionists


Political philosophers talk of ideologies, religious philosophers talk of covenants, they can be combined in the Third Covenant, the Cosmic Covenant.

If I can go back in the weeds a bit, in the past I wrote of Three Covenants and how in the First Covenant of Primordial Tradition the Spirit and Soul of the Inward Path were understood as existing  in the blood, that is, as being passed on only racially and tribally to a chosen eg. (Jewish) or noble (Aryan) people. Then Jesus Christ (and Eastern masters) brought the knowledge that the spirit and Soul-Within need not be understood and affirmed only racially or tribally but could be understood and followed by any race, any people, universally, provided they were taught the proper way to see or experience the God Within; Christianity said we were “Chosen” through faith in Christ not chosen by blood. That was the Second Covenant. Theological materialism (and the projected Theoevolutionary Church) affirms the mission and path of the Third Covenant, the Cosmic Covenant of the Evolutionary Outward Path, which revitalizes Primordial Tradition, Christianity, Hinduism etc. by once again affirming the First Covenant of genetic and biological qualities within our material evolution to supermaterial Godhood as applied to the Outward Path of material evolution to supermaterial Godhood. Yet also, as in the Second Covenant, this is applied to all people, all nations, all races, all people, living in their own states or ethnostates with access to knowledge of the material evolution to Godhood. That is the Twofold Path synthesis of the Three Covenants in theological materialism.

The Third Covenant acknowledges the biological origin of our social behavior and can end the intellectual separation between political ideologies and religious covenants, pointing toward the religious/political/cultural solution of the ethnopluralism hypothesis, often written about here. It is a conservative transformation---not revolution---that can bring about an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, which is the sociopolitical or political/cultural structure most in harmony with kin-centered and ethnocentric real human nature developed many thousands of years ago and remaining with us today. Each ethnostate, each ethnic group, each race, can have access to knowledge of the sacred material evolution to supermaterial Godhood, and can pursue that sacred evolution in their own way in their own states, in the variety that is conducive to evolution, perhaps aided by nonpartisan international sociobiological research centers, as Raymond Cattell suggested.

I see this as a traditional and conservative and not a revolutionary undertaking, as the Covenants affirm, and it is amenable to liberals and conservatives, scientists and religionists.

Tuesday, September 25, 2018

Representative democracy in America is not working, is there a solution?


As I watch the Kavanaugh supreme court nomination circus I can't help thinking that representative democracy in America is not working. When we ask why representative democracy in America has become corrupted the best and most honest answer I can find is that distinctively different people or ethnic groups bring distinctively different behavior which brings distinctively different political methods and distinctively different cultures and ethics. We now have different ethnic groups with distinctively different biological and social agendas, and all of them are naturally competing with different methods of competing, and it is mainly that which has naturally corrupted representative democracy in America.

If we are honest we can see that a white Anglo Saxon protestant is going to have different methods of living and competing even than an Irishmen living next door, yet alone a Jewish or African or Hispanic American, based on the biological or genetic origin of most of our social behavior. As the demographics of the country changes the culture changes or gets corrupted from its original form. Money and lobbies enter Washington and politicians are corrupted to the point where they don't represent the people who elected them.

Can representative democracy in America be saved? As a conservative I hope so because I don't believe in radical revolutions. The only way I can think of to salvage America and representative democracy in America is to first admit that multiculturalism has not worked, different ethnic groups have for the most part not "melted," they have naturally and vigorously competed, which has led to the present corruption of representative democracy in America.

But this does not have to lead to radical revolution; if we are courageously honest it shows us that, given real human nature, an ethnopluralism of ethnostates is the best political configuration for distinctively different ethic groups to live within and to tolerably get along. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be established legally in the United States with our existing constitutional separation of powers and states, protected from marauding empires by a protective form of federalism.  It may require a few constitutional amendments to give more power to the states to move toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates.

The political dissimulations we now live under, such as cultural Marxism, based on flawed definitions of human nature, have brought us civil disruptions, or even civil war, and the great frustrations could descend into various forms of fascism on the right or the left, which is what usually happens when nations fall apart as we are falling apart.

Given reality I see no better conservative solution.  Do you?

Monday, September 24, 2018

Nature isn't enough for many theologians and philosophers


Nature isn't enough for many theologians and philosophers. What utter arrogance. Nature created and developed what they are, including their religions, their spirituality, and their supercilious absolutes.

They define their highest values and moralities as beyond nature, and they define human nature as something nature doesn't recognize, which vastly underestimates nature.

Although humans can become neurotic or psychotic enough to be suicidal, it is impossible to shake off the demands of nature, why would we want to?

Even altruism, the basis of most traditional values and morality, is grounded in advancing the gene pool which we are related to. Granted, that limits the reach of "unselfish" concern for others at about the ethnic group, but that is no good reason to invent a spiritual universal altruism which does not exist, especially since there are better ways than Marxism or ascetic monasteries to help people live together more harmoniously, such as an ethnopluralism of ethnostates which protects the people and the states against marauding empires.

The zenith of most definitions of power and greatness is defined as Godly or as Godhood, but Godhood is evolved to in nature by way of the material evolution of life to supermaterial Godhood! We don't even lose Godhood or religion when we lose arrogant spiritualism or bogus idealism!

I suspect that nature is working unconsciously, or sometimes consciously, with the inventors of Marxism, ascetic monasteries, etc. as a way to advance the practitioners of Marxism, ascetic monasteries, etc.

The Great Spiritual Blockade against life materially evolving toward Godhood will one day end and we may then say as Shakespeare had Puck saying: "Shall we their fond pageant see? Lord, what fools these mortals be!"

Sunday, September 23, 2018

Evolution, order, conservatism, and the misidentification of the diabolical


Material evolution is like jazz or classical improvisation which does not reject the great music of the past but improvises new versions of the classics. That is the real definition of order. That also defines conservatism and not a traditionalism that refuses to adapt or change or spends too much time harkening back to some golden age.

If I were to accept the standard idea of the diabolical, which most religions use to scare their followers into following their dictates, and if I was to accept the definition of the diabolical as being separated from "the order," I would define true order as the path of natural evolution, which means changing while keeping the best of the past. The diabolical might then be defined as blocking material evolution with a spiritualism that does not approve of the material world or of material evolution.

But most importantly, real Godhood and religion are not lost if we affirm a supermaterial Godhood evolved to in the material world. The "triumph over evil" fundamentally becomes the triumph over the dark cloud of asceticism and spiritualism which has blocked material evolution to real Godhood. Morality and values are ultimately involved in helping not hindering the evolution of material life toward supermaterial Godhood.

Saturday, September 22, 2018

How theological materialism defines faith


Inspired by the models or pattern-making of Hegel, I define "faith" as projecting the realities of the natural world and the world of science into the utmost future. As I said yesterday, in theological materialism I see evolution moving inevitably in a pattern, even though it has its random elements, and the pattern has a discernible direction, in spite of instances of stagnation and retreat, toward higher and higher more effective living forms, ending in supermaterial Godhood. "Faith" derives from projecting the realities of the natural world and the world of science into that future.

That faith can add to the noble way of overcoming selfishness and being-for-itself as well as overcoming anthropomorphism in predicting the future. But perhaps even more importantly we can avoid having faith in an absolute spiritualism which removes itself from the realities of the natural world and the world of science---alas, even Hegel couldn't avoid that kind of faith.

That is also the rational, and instinctive, way to identify the individual with the future of the group or the collective---I hesitate to identify with the "Absolute" mainly because I don't think evolution ever ends, there are always Gods evolving and arriving at the zenith of success in survival and reproduction.

Friday, September 21, 2018

Godhood is not lost if the material world is all that exists because the material world evolves to Godhood


If the material world is all that there is (which includes the supermaterial world) this does not mean that the world is a nihilistic void or a horror story, as the spiritualist's want us to believe. Even Godhood is not lost if the material world is all that exists because the material world evolves to Godhood, with or without our help, although our help could speed up a very slow process (eg. the genetic sciences) and prevent many wrong turns that are damaging to life.

The horror story of Satan has been conjured up to define the fate of the world if the world doesn't bend the knee to sacred spiritualism. What is sacred is the material world evolving to supermaterial Godhood. Even science, one of the marvels of man, is afraid to posit the Godhood goal of material evolution---I suppose they don't want to give any credence to religion at all or to there being a direction to the random evolution they prefer. I see evolution moving inevitably in a pattern, even though it has its random elements, and the pattern has a discernible direction, in spite of instances of stagnation and retreat, toward “higher and higher more effective living forms,”as Cattell once put it.

And the moral world is also not lost if the material world is all that there is. Traditional religious values and morality originally came from the natural material world. The evolutionary science of sociobiology has showed us that human nature evolved in the material world to be kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, with group-selection creating altruism as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection; religious views of human nature and morality look much the same as that, although human nature is also ethnocentric and even xenophobic which the universalism of spiritualism could not accept.

We can say goodbye to Satan and to those who tell us that without spiritualism the material world leads only to a nihilistic void---that is the real horror story. If the world is a battleground between the forces of materialism and spiritualism, only a very few materialists are applying their greatest argument or armament against the spiritualists, which is the path of material evolution to real Godhood---a Great Spiritual Blockade has been put up against it.

Thursday, September 20, 2018

Real cultural altruism is not produced by libertarian individualism or by universalist Marxism but by an ethnopluralism of ethnostates


Altruism, unselfish concern for others, originated and remains working in human nature as bonding best with those who share the same genetic pool as oneself, that way altruism helps advance one own related genes, so it's not quite an unselfish as we think it is.

It is through the group, that is, the ethnic/racial group (leftist boo) that the individual acquires the reality of real social bonding after the alienation of both libertarian individualism and collectivist/universalist Marxism.

We move beyond the reality of standard human nature and altruism when we move beyond the natural altruism of the ethnic/racial group. We did evolve the abnormal ability to occasionally move beyond  natural ethnic altruism for times when we might need to, say, bond with earth allies who are not closely related to protect ourselves from unearthly extraterrestrial invaders, but that is abnormal hyper-altruism not evolved for normal living in natural human conditions.

Healthy human culture needs to rescue us from the alienation of our bogus culturally Marxist societies as well as from libertarian hyper-individualism, by declaring that ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all (rightist boo) are not "evil" but are liberating.

This is the tradition that conservatives as well as liberals need to return to if they really want people to show "unselfish' concern for others. The bogus cultural Marxism we live under has alienated us, tore us apart, and increasingly caused civil unrest and eventually civil war between naturally competing groups.

As is said here often an ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could even be established legally in the United States by adapting our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected from each other, or from marauding imperial forces, by a lighter form of mainly protective federalism.

I do believe we will eventually get-up-and-go to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates voluntarily and rationally (which I advocate) or unvoluntarily and violently (which I don't advocate) because it is a return to what we actually are as human beings.

Wednesday, September 19, 2018

Godhood without spiritualism


There isn't a real difference between the subject and the object, just as there isn't a difference between materialism and spiritualism, and here is why: they are material or supermaterial subjects/objects evolved to different levels of evolution, and there is no real spiritual.

In the past God and the spiritual have been only expressions of the states of the material mind and body, with ascetics experiencing bodily bliss from blocking all material desires and calling that bliss "god." And philosophers have conjured up thought-games that falsely define "ideas" as beyond the material body, or spiritual. There is no separation between the material world and the "eternal" other than differences in levels of material evolution, and it has been human wish-fulfillment to call it so.

This means that the philosophy of theological materialism can describe real Godhood without the usual fictions and without requiring the false separation between religion and science, which can and should join together. But both religion and science will need to affirm the inward material direction of material evolution toward Godhood, which has environmental starts, stops, and sideways going along the evolutionary path toward supermaterial Godhood. Life seeks the zenith of successful survival and reproduction, which eventually defines the subjects and objects of supermaterial Godhood.

Tuesday, September 18, 2018

I could stomach the Emmy Awards last night for only a few minutes at a time


These arrogant fools don't even seem to realize that they are losing the audience who used to adore them and pay for their lavish life styles. They have now re-acquiried the low-life reputations they used to have back in more civilized times when actresses and actors were considered only slightly above hookers and wandering vagabonds.

These actresses, actors, and directors sold their bodies and minds for fame----even their "me-too" movement and their half-learned cultural Marxism can't redeem them now.

Good riddance. We need a new center for respectable, moral, theater and the arts. And no past producers need apply.

How cultural Marxism and universalism destroy us


The statement that the state "absorbs but does not destroy the individual" (Eliot Jurist) is more realistically accomplished by the genetically related group, that is, the ethnic/racial group and the ethnostate, and not the universal multicultural state. Modern cultural Marxism and universalism casts off the individual from the group and unmoors the group from the individual.

There certainly can be healthy competition between individuals in a healthy ethnostate, but selection between groups is where selection finally takes place, as the famous quote by E. O Wilson says: "Within groups, selfish individuals beat altruistic individuals, but groups of altruists beat groups of selfish individuals."

If the evolutionary science of sociobiology was positively taught in our schools and political science departments then cultural Marxism and leftist universalism would be seen for the flim flam con game that they are. Then next could come recognition for the political configuration of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, in harmony with real kin and ethnic-centered human nature and the biological origin of most of our social behavior.

This simplifying and fair-minded intellectual and political path is now blocked by the cultural Marxism and universalism of the academic world and the Big Media, and even blocked by universalized religions that promote collectivism and universalism. This blockade up-anchors both the group and the individual while allowing the group promoting the flim flam con game of cultural Marxism and universalism to hypocritically prosper over the other weakened groups...Nasty, nefarious, but true.

Monday, September 17, 2018

Spiritualism created the idea of Satan and horror not materialism


The invention of Satan and horror comes from the spiritual religious worldview and not from the material religious worldview. Spiritual ascetics believe that ultimately materialism leads to nothingness while spiritualism leads to a non-material spiritual God. But that is fundamentally upside-down: the material world is evolving toward real Godhood and the non-material spiritual God does not exists other than as an inward experience of bliss confounded by ascetics as God.

The problem for the philosophy of theological materialism, which I affirm, is that, so far, religion and science will not affirm that the path of material evolution leads to real supermaterial Godhood, even though we see that the material world has been evolving over great time from the simple to the complex and toward more and more consciousness, with starts and stops along the way.

"Life" itself is defined as the internal manifestation of growth through metabolism, reproduction, and the power of adaptation to the outside environment, but life also ultimately and endlessly seeks the zenith of successful survival and reproduction, and that zenith defines real Godhood. Spiritualism doesn't enter into this path.

However the wisdom of conservatism doesn't reject the spiritual view of God; in the Twofold Path the old Inward Path is retained but transformed in the Outward Path of material evolution to supermaterial Godhood.

Spiritualism created the idea of Satan and horror not materialism. Materialism leads to real Godhood not spiritualism. The curse hurled by spiritualism at materialism calling materialism satanic and the originator of horror has lost its potency.

Sunday, September 16, 2018

The present trend of hypertrophied feminism will only prevail as long as America and the West don't need territorial defending


I don't define the loudmouth leftist Joe Biden as a "bully" when he says he would like to take President Trump outside and beat him up because he says Trump is a "bully." Neither one of them are "bullies," they are just assertive and aggressive males, and Biden is hypocritically promoting himself by signaling the exaggerations of modern day feminism.

I wish women well and want them to be the very best they can be, but like the Marxists, the feminists have ignored the biological origin our social behavior and explain social and gender differences as entirely environmentally caused; that makes me lose respect for Marxists, feminists or whoever believes it, including Biden.  And our past president Obama always struck me as demagogically appealing to the matriarchy he was raised in---remember his wimpy and inept exercise video? Good lord. 

Our mostly black professional football gladiators seem to be the only males allowed to be assertive and aggressive without being called "bullies."  I suppose that's due to  Affirmative Action programs for minorities, who soon won't be minorities largely do to the Marxists and feminists.

Anyway, "men and women have different body structures, sexual systems and biological responses and processes "(differencebetween.net), and only fools and demagogues deny it. The present trend of hypertrophied feminism will only prevail as long as America and the West don't need territorial defending. When we do, our excellent Special Forces will not be nearly enough in number to defend the West against assertive and aggressive males who hate the West. The assertive and aggressive Islamic Afghans are still going strong and remain undefeated even by the superpowers---and they aren't much bemused by feminism.