Progress (evolution) and puritanism (conservatism)

Progress (evolution) and puritanism (conservatism) can go together in political philosophy but only when the puritanism is first grounded in the biological origin of social behavior, or the survival and reproductive success of any given ethnic group; there is no better way to synthesize the contending elements of progress and puritanism: and it is the most import and way to retain conservatism. Babbitt and Kirk neglected it. But alas, it remains a “politically incorrect” taboo subject, so conservatism fades away along with the ethnic groups.

Toward a realistic national identity

 The acceptance of human biodiversity and the biological origin of social behavior is the best and perhaps only way for humans to define a national identity, not to first define a nation by religion, culture, creed, or principles. We have to admit that the different human races possess heritable differences do to localized group inbreeding through many generations, and that our behavior, intelligence, and personalities are to a large extent heritable. All races biologically inherit differences in behavior, intelligence, and personalities, and they usually and instinctively prefer their own kind. Until we openly face and accept the reality of human biodiversity and the biological origin of social behavior we will only be playing around with weak or unworkable solution's to our dangerous social problems.

I affirm the legal way to arrive at an ethnopluralism of ethnostates that synchronize or conform to real human nature. I think the instinctive and logical social outcome of discovering and defining real human nature, which is primarily biologically kin-centered and ethnic-centered, naturally leads to regionalism, localism, general conservative values, eventually ethnostates, and finally, if we're wise, an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red.

Regional autonomy within the current constitutional system, with a federalism designed to keep ethnostates safe from marauders, seems like the way to begin to save America, and indeed save the Western world. Ethnostates won't happen soon, culturally affirming the biological origin of social behavior still lags far behind and is fraught with political mind traps, but I have no doubt that if real human nature is allowed to be what it is it will lead to localism, regionalism, and eventually to ethnostates.

when human behavior is seen from the realistic biological origin of social behavior

All races are “systemically racist” when human behavior is seen from the realistic biological origin of social behavior. The Black Lives Matter movement which has been loudly accusing all whites of being racist is driven by the very same systemic black racism, and we are not going to solve any racial problems until we admit this.

The biological origin of social behavior which was introduced with Darwin and later sociobiology showed us that real human nature is and has always been genetically kin and ethnic centered (ie. racist and ethnocentric) with group selection or ethnic selection as the main unit of successful survival and reproduction, followed by individual selection. America has not successfully united different races and ethnic groups, we are naturally fragmenting into a nation of competing races in a zero game where the gains of one ethnic group is offset by the losses of another ethnic group, with much cruel social discord in the process. But all is not lost.

As one historian put it, what formerly divided us can put us back together again. It would be far more realistic to talk of un-assimilating differences rather than about superiority/inferiority. A true natural rights or civil rights movement would promote ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established, legally, in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states.

The cultural Marxists and the Black Lives Matter movement are encouraging the thing they are most against: white racism

William Lind pointed out that the older version of Marxism concentrated on putting workers and peasants over capitalists, landlords, and the bourgeoisie, whereas Cultural Marxism and the the Black Lives Matter movement have been seeking to put women, blacks, and gays over men, whites, and straights by using psychological conditioning designed to generate self-hatred among males, whites, and straights.

It's diabolical because when males, whites, and straights stand up themselves they are really standing up for the very existence of their race and gender, which opens themselves up to the charge of being racists. So the cultural Marxists and the Black Lives Matter movement are really encouraging the thing they are most against: white racism.

All races are “systemically racist” when human behavior is seen from the realistic biological origin of social behavior. The Black Lives Matter movement which has been loudly accusing all whites of being racist is driven by the very same systemic black racism.

Real human nature is and has always been genetically kin and ethnic centered with ethnic selection as the main unit of successful survival and reproduction, followed by individual selection. We are naturally fragmenting into a nation of competing races in a zero game where the gains of one ethnic group is offset by the losses of another ethnic group, with much cruel social discord in the process. America has not successfully united different races and ethnic groups. But all is not lost.

As one historian put it, what formerly divided us can put us back together again. It would be far more realistic to talk of un-assimilating differences rather than about superiority/inferiority. A true natural rights or civil rights movement would promote ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established, legally, in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states.

Liberalism is irrational, populism is rational

Contrary to prevailing opinion today liberalism is irrational, populism is rational. Liberal's typically look down their noses at Trumpians thinking them complete irrational idiots, when the truth is it is the liberals who are the irrational idiots in promoting postmodernism, Marxism, feminism, multiculturalism, which are mainly irrational absurdities, lies, and undisguised wills to power---and these things are astoundingly taught in virtually all our schools and reflected throughout the media.

The postmodern idea that everything is socially constructed (but not postmodernism?) is almost psychotic. The explanation for the freakish victory of postmodernism, Marxism, feminism, etc. in the academic world and in the media is that the relativism and power philosophy of postmodernism was not successfully countered by the academic traditional conservatives because they could not fully accept their best defense, which is the broadly biological origin of our social behavior, taught by the scientific synthesis of sociobiology. They could not even affirm religion as essentially having been a better way to socially bond groups together (altruism) for successful survival and reproduction. And so postmodernism won the academic power war.

The biological origin of our social behavior, as empirically explained by sociobiology, actually ends the intellectual defense of postmodern relativism. As long as we are alive every cell in our body demands survival and reproductive success. This natural activation can be blocked, subverted, or it can be unknown to us, but it can't legitimately be intellectually or instinctively denied. Human nature is biologically kin-centered and ethnic-centered, even xenophobic, as well as being genetically gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, and religious-making, with group-selection and ethnic selection as the primary unit of successful selection followed by individual selection.. The populists have rationally championed kin, related ethnic group, locality and nation, the liberals have irrationally not.

The fall of Afghanistan to the uber-territorial warrior Taliban at the hands of the nurturing girly men of the Biden administration

 The Biden administration is stuffed with super angry, leftist feminists, like Biden advisor Susan Rice, who probably scares the hell out of weak-minded Biden himself, as well as dominating the girly men of the Biden administration, like Antony Blinken, our 71st United States secretary of state.

This is what happens to empires that are infected with leftists gender politics and with social behavior that does not correspond to real human nature, which is is genetically gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, and religious-making, as well as being biologically kin-centered and ethnic-centered, even xenophobic, with group-selection and ethnic selection as the primary unit of successful selection followed by individual selection.

The fall of Afghanistan to the uber-territorial warrior Taliban at the hands of the nurturing girly men of the Biden administration encapsulates in miniature the features of the fall of empires.

All races are “systemically racist”

All races are “systemically racist” when human behavior is seen from the realistic biological origin of social behavior. The Black Lives Matter movement which has been loudly accusing all whites of being racist is driven by the very same systemic black racism, and we are not going to solve any racial problems until we admit this.

The biological origin of social behavior which was introduced with Darwin and later sociobiology showed us that real human nature is and has always been genetically kin and ethnic centered (ie. racist and ethnocentric) with group selection or ethnic selection as the main unit of successful survival and reproduction, followed by individual selection. America has not successfully united different races and ethnic groups, we are naturally fragmenting into a nation of competing races in a zero game where the gains of one ethnic group is offset by the losses of another ethnic group, with much cruel social discord in the process. But all is not lost.

As one historian put it, what formerly divided us can put us back together again. It would be far more realistic to talk of un-assimilating differences rather than about superiority/inferiority. A true natural rights or civil rights movement would promote ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established, legally, in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states.

Western political philosophy has wrongly placed the individual as the most basic metaphysical and political unit

Western political philosophy has wrongly placed the individual as the most basic metaphysical and political unit, and now its coming back to bite us. The neo-Darwinist science of sociobiology was not around when the great political philosophers did their thinking.

Here are some quotes from sociobiologists:

"Within groups, selfish individuals beat altruistic individuals, but groups of altruists beat groups of selfish individuals." (David Sloan Wilson)

“Hereditary altruists form groups so cooperative and well-organized as to out-compete non-altruists groups.” (E.O. Wilson “The Social Conquest of the Earth.”)

"The genes hold culture on a leash. The leash is very long, but inevitably values will be constrained in accordance with their effects on the human gene pool. The brain is a product of evolution. Human behavior . .is the circuitous technique by which human genetic material has been and will be kept intact. " Edward O. Wilson

---

As I repeat here often: Human nature evolved to prefer kin and ethnic group because those traits were more successful in survival and reproduction for individuals and groups. Even altruism, being for others, was created as the preference for kin and ethnic group; altruism weakens as we move out toward universalism, which is the main reason why communism, socialism, and globalism don't work well.

Evolutionary conservatism adds to and deepens basic paleoconservatism by affirming the biological origin of social behavior as defined mainly by the science of sociobiology. Human nature is biologically kin-centered and ethnic-centered, even xenophobic, as well as being genetically gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, and religious-making, with group-selection and ethnic selection as the primary unit of successful selection followed by individual selection. Alas, like the liberals and neoconservatives even the paleoconservatives block or conceal the ethnic-centered and xenophobic parts of human nature.

Evolutionary conservatism believes that if real kin and ethnic-centered human nature was allowed to be what it is, it would naturally lead to regionalism, localism, general conservative values, eventually ethnostates, and finally an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc., and defended by a defensive federalism. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states.

How the West is increasingly lost to the foundation of real human nature and human behavior

We all, whether we know it or not, left and right, follow the directive of the biological origin of social behavior. But the left is more lost from this foundation than the right, because many on the left---but even some on the right---consider the biological origin of social behavior an evil idea, which really means that they think human nature and human behavior are evil.

The Marxist change in direction of modern Western culture does not follow the prompting of the biological origin of human social behavior and believes instead that nurturing and the environment alone account for human behavior. Never the less they are driven by the same biological origin of social behavior seen in their biological wills to power.

Here is a pithy quote from the great sociobiologist Edward O. Wilson: “I see no way out of the problems that...tribalism creates other than humans just becoming more honest and fully aware of themselves....The genes hold culture on a leash. The leash is very long, but inevitably values will be constrained in accordance with their effects on the human gene pool. The brain is a product of evolution. Human behavior . .is the circuitous technique by which human genetic material has been and will be kept intact. Morality has no other demonstrable ultimate function."

An ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups is merely applied biology. A true natural rights or civil rights movement would promote ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established, legally, in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states.

Both the left and the right fall apart in their ultimate answers to racism

Charles Murray can't be accused of cowardliness in his work on the biological origin of intelligence, but neither can the Marxist Black Lives Matter movement in affirming that there can be racism behind human behavior. But both fall apart in their ultimate answers to racism.

Charles Murray believes American individualism is the answer to racism or group-selection, and the Black Lives Matter movement believe that only whites can be racist or group-selecting.

Charles Darwin himself argued for group selection believing that tribes of moral men “have an immense advantage” over "fractious bands of pirates''. E. O. Wilson of Harvard University (the father of sociobiology) and David Sloan Wilson (no relation) of Binghamton University affirm group selection, although selection takes place on multiple levels simultaneously. This can be summed up in the pithy comment: “Selfishness beats altruism within groups. Altruistic groups beat selfish groups.”

The biological origin of social behavior which came with Darwin and later sociobiology shows that real human nature is and has been genetically kin and ethnic centered (ie. racist and ethnocentric) with group selection as the main unit of successful survival and reproduction, followed by individual selection. America has not successfully united different races and ethnic groups, we are naturally fragmenting into a nation of competing races in a zero game where the gains of one ethnic group is offset by the losses of another ethnic group, with much cruel social discord in the process. But all is not lost.

We need to gradually realize the reality that multicultural multi-ethnic societies just don't work. The twenty first century could be the century of the rise of ethnostatism. As one historian put it, what formerly divided us can put us back together again. It would be far more realistic to talk of un-assimilating differences rather than about superiority/inferiority. A true natural rights or civil rights movement would promote ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc.

“Wonderful theory, wrong species”

It's not that dumb-ass modern liberals (global socialists) and our senile president don't know that open borders and an indiscriminate unending flow of migrants will change America because as the people change the culture changes, it's that the dumb-ass modern liberals don't care if the country or culture changes. And conservatives are not much help because they won't admit the biological origin of our social behavior.

Harvard biologist Edward Wilson said of Marxism: “Wonderful theory, wrong species...The genes hold culture on a leash. The leash is very long, but inevitably values will be constrained in accordance with their effects on the human gene pool.” Dutton said modern liberalism or universalist humanitarianism is ultimately a losing strategy, as it is “unable to sustain high levels of in-group cooperation...Humanitarian groups invariably waste their precious reproductive potential helping out free riders who give them nothing in return...” And Rothbard said, “Behind the honeyed but patently absurd pleas for equality is a ruthless drive for placing themselves (the elite) at the top of a new hierarchy of power.”

An evolving society that wants to maintain its boundaries and traditions would see the good sense in ethnopluralism

 Establishing an ethnopluralism of ethnostates certainly is a volatile idea, at least in these times when few even admit the biological origin of social behavior. A review by Gregory M. Collins (“The Princes of Prudence,” Modern Age, Spring 2020) comparing the prudence of Burke and Lincoln reminded me of how important the dance between change and tradition will be in establishing an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. As an evolutionary conservative I believe we eventually need to gradually and legally transform the constitutional separation of powers and states into an ethnopluralism of ethnostates.

Everyone likes to claim the brilliant conservative Edmund Burke as one of their own, and I do too if we can imagine Burke with an upgrading of his views on traditional human nature, having studied sociobiology.  Sociobiologist's could claim Burke too, if they absorb Burke's idea that we are to take things as they actually are. This leads to the truths which sociobiology has been coming up with since Darwin. In every human culture ever studied, human nature included kin-selection preferences, incest taboos, marriage, hierarchy, division of labor, gender differentiation, localism, and ethnocentrism, and most important to political considerations, group or ethnic selection remains the main unit of selection. If cultures propose to not include these things they don't last long, and they always return to these things. And these traits are at the core of conservatism and tradition.

An evolving society that wants to maintain its boundaries and traditions would see the good sense in ethnopluralism, which separates powers, regions, and states in an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, in accord with real human nature. Conservatively the U.S. constitutional principal of the separation of powers and states could accommodate ethnopluralism, protected by federalism.

Evolutionary sociobiology can be applied to the religious sacred goal of aiding evolution as it moves toward the zenith of truth, beauty and goodness in material/supermaterial evolution. Conservatism is seen in retaining the symbolic traditional peak religious experiences of the Inward Path, as affirmed by Christ, Buddha and others, transformed in the Outward Path of material evolution to ascending levels of real Godhood.

The uses and abuses of racism

Another Black was shot by police yesterday while resisting arrest in Minneapolis Minnesota, one of the most liberal and accommodating states for minorities (eg. 20,000 Somalis refugees (and growing), and 63,619 Hmong refugees (and growing) in addition to many Blacks and Hispanics). The usual chaos and destruction has followed on the streets.

Things are getting worse between the races in America. How can we conservatively retain the American union as we deal with our increasingly ethnically diverse society? Can we avoid radical racial revolution and yet adapt to the increasingly violent racial and cultural differences in America?

The great dilemma, absurdity, and tragedy is that human nature is racist and ethnocentric and has been since humans became humans, as the evolutionary sciences like sociobiology have been trying to tell us for years. This knowledge is missing mainly because “racism” has been sold as being racial supremacism, as a means to power for minorities.

What is missing today is knowledge of the biological origin of social behavior which came with Darwin and later sociobiology showing that real human nature is and has been genetically kin and ethnic centered with group selection as the main unit of successful survival and reproduction, followed by individual selection.

Things look hopeless. But we can't settle for hopeless. If real human nature was allowed to be what it is, it would naturally lead to regionalism, localism, eventually ethnostates, and finally an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected from marauding imperialists, supremacists, and global money grubbers, with a defensive federalism. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established, legally, in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states.

The military and military values that ultimately save us all

It is a deeply reductionist thing to say about our civilization and culture but, other than a few sociobiologists and maverick nationalists or ethnostatists who admit the biological origin of our social behavior, no one speaks of it. In spite of the many different value systems developed by humans---mostly due to wills to power---human nature has been and remains genetically ethnocentric, even xenophobic, as well as being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, with group-selection as the primary unit of selection, followed by individual-selection. People instinctively know that the biological origin of our social behavior is true, although it has become politically incorrect to say it, and that taboo, ironically, is itself the result of biological competition consciously or unconsciously hiding real motives.

In the long history of human beings the military and military values were the last refuge, the final resort, which allowed us ultimately to survive and reproduce successfully. Peaceful times come, but the final resort, the last refuge, has always been the willingness of humans to defend their group in armed competitions with other human beings, ultimately for survival and reproductive success. This has not changed in all of history.

But the West has changed, the West no longer sees that the military and military values remain the last refuge, the final resort. The recent fad of defunding local police are an offshoot of this suicidal behavior. We still need the core military values of loyalty, duty, respect, selfless service, honor, integrity, and personal courage---preferably for every man, even nonmilitary men. Movements like cultural Marxism (demanding equality for the unequal), radical feminism (demanding biologically unnatural roles for women), homosexuality (demanding biologically unnatural sexual life styles) and postmodern relativism (demanding a biologically unnatural relativity of values), go directly against real human nature and destroy the military and military values that ultimately save us all.

They are killing our country and our culture

 Our actually senile president has appointed his constantly giggling vice president to deal with the crisis on the Mexican border, which was caused by the actions of the president himself and his foolish but dangerous handlers. These leftists are treacherous and even traitorous but they try to pass themselves off as great humanitarians as they open our borders to poor diseased Mexican and South American migrants, at the bidding of even more treacherous businessmen looking for cheap labor, and perfidious democratic operators looking to secure new leftist voters. They are killing our country and our culture with their cultural Marxism, while they attack traditional families and promote instead lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer rights. Even when they are white they seek to overcome and replace whites and white culture with nonwhites and nonwhite culture. And the corrupt media and the schools are their cheerleaders. What can we do to stop them in a democracy when these dangerous leftist fools commit voter fraud to win?

Human nature has been and remains genetically ethnocentric, even xenophobic, as well as being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, with group-selection as the primary unit of selection, followed by individual-selection. The real challenge of ethnocentric and xenophobic human nature is to move beyond the supremacism that has plagued it. This suggest that if the noble statesman of the future see guardianship of the state as trying to avoid sedition, discord, and civil war, they will honor the biological origin of social behavior by taking on the damaging racial competitions disguised as calls for equality etc., and advocate the creation of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, in harmony with real human nature. Then they will protect each ethnostate from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, chosenists, Marxists, etc. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established, legally, in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states.

The "cancel culture" movement is a disguised cancel people movement

The“cancel culture” movement, like the Black Lives Matter movement, is more than rabble-rousing Marxist claptrap, the cancel culture movement like the Black Lives Matter movement is a disguised cancel people movement, that is, cancel the white creators of the culture.

Culture is mainly the result of the biological origin of social behavior. Affirming the biological origin of social behavior is an antidote to the often absurd abstractions of 19^th and 20^th century ideologies or even to traditional claims of moral superiority. The biological origin of social behavior suggests that real kin and ethnic-centered human nature leads naturally to regionalism, localism, conservatism, and eventually an ethnopluralism of ethnostates.

Then we might be rid of these dangerous cultural disguises for canceling people or canceling ethnic groups which has plagued us for centuries.

Tucker Carlson sounds like a woke liberal when he describes racism

Like the neoconservatives Tucker Carlson insists that “race and skin color” should not be included in conservatism or in American politics, like the political left he denies or is ignorant of the biological origin of social behavior. Carlson rightly advocates judging people by merit and he rightly affirms the protectionism and anti-interventionism of Trumpism, but he sounds like a woke liberal when he describes racism.

Since Biden was elected president the charges of “systemic racism” have been increasingly hurled at whites by the left and by the media which is then hotly denied by conservatives, and both sides completely deny the biological origin of social behavior. The blacks and the left won't admit that there is any racism behind their motives any more than the whites will admit any systemic white racism, and racism continues to be confounded with supremacism.

Real human nature has always preferred kin and related ethnic group  because this preference was successful in survival and reproduction, so it was instinctively, genetically, retained within basic human nature. Ethnic groups of related genes have numerous reasons for cooperating more successfully and harmoniously than with other ethnic groups. As Edward O. Wilson said, "The genes hold culture on a leash. The leash is very long, but inevitably values will be constrained in accordance with their effects on the human gene pool.”

It would be far more realistic to admit unassimilating differences rather than talking about the superiority/inferiority of different races. As one courageous historian put it, what formerly divided us can put us back together again. A true natural rights or civil rights movement would promote ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc. Ethnostates could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states..Now that is conservatism.

The delusions of politically correctness in America

 The elite media, schools, big business, and politicians have unanimously declared a new version of gender, race, and identity, even though 75 million American's voted for Trump and his traditional values, as he lost what may have been a rigged election. Male sex offenders who identity as females can now use women's bathrooms, a New York Times writer can write that “white people are bullshit” and “cancel white people” and suffer no consequences. And suicidal white liberals go along with this madness canceling out their own people and their own culture.

The power of the cultural influence of the media and the schools is seen in their ability to overrule basic biological/genetically determined human nature. Human nature is universally biologically kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, which normally leads to cultural behavior that naturally goes against the cultural Marxism, nihilism, and hedonism we see in United States and the West today. What power the media and the schools have had!

The choice now seems to be to have the country fall apart with civil disruptions and even civil war between naturally competing ethnic/racial groups, or to seek to amend the U. S. Constitution by adapting the constitutional separation of powers and states to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. All elements of the demographics in America, all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, could then be what they naturally are, protected in their own ethnostates from marauding imperialists, supremacists, and global money grubbers. I prefer the legal constitutional path toward ethnostates. History shows that given human nature that's what happens anyway, one way or another, consciously or unconsciously.

The same great denial of the biological origin of social behavior by both the democrats and republicans is destroying us

Since Biden was elected president the charges of “systemic racism” have been increasingly hurled at whites by the left and by the media which is then hotly denied by conservatives, and both sides completely deny the biological origin of social behavior. The blacks and the left won't admit that there is any racism behind their motives any more than the whites will admit any systemic white racism, and racism continues to be confounded with supremacism.

The reality is that human nature has been ethnocentrc and racialist since humans became humans because in the old tribal days ethnic or group-selection was the best way for individuals to successfully survive, so altruism, or being for others, was naturally limited mainly to kin and ethnic group because they shared the same genes which strive for successful survival and reproduction. Those genes are still with us today. (see the science of sociobiology)

But as one historian put it, what formerly divided us can put us back together again. It would be far more realistic to talk of un-assimilating differences rather than about superiority/inferiority. A true natural rights or civil rights movement would promote ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc.

The same great denial of the biological origin of social behavior by both the democrats and republicans is destroying us.

Why non-college graduates who voted for Trump are actually politically wiser than the college graduates who voted for Biden

The big divide in America today is between college graduates who voted for Biden and and non-college graduates who voted for Trump. That's a big problem for America because the college educated have been thoroughly brainwashed. And the percentage of non-college graduates is falling as the number of college graduates is rising.

High European art and culture has been virtually replaced in our colleges and universities by the political correctness of cultural Marxism. As Boyd Cathey put it, our colleges and universities teach---really brainwash---"racial oppression by the white race of black and brown people, and sexual oppression by men of women. Thus, reading our history and literature to discover deeply embedded examples of “racism” and “white supremacy,” and of “male exploitation” and the “oppression of women,” has become the central characteristic of the college-classroom experience...Cultural Marxist ideologues inculcate the theories of “critical race theory” and the “feminization of history,” to students who have already, in most cases, endured years of poor education and early indoctrination in our public schools. They have been “softened up” for this process..." (Chronicles, Nov 2018.)

And the corruption of the Media in America is at bottom also the consequence of decades of teaching a dumbed-down version of "postmodernism" and cultural Marxism to journalists and cultural influencers.

The non-college graduates for the most part have absorbed the reality of the biological origin of social behavior, which says that human nature is genetically ethnocentric, even xenophobic, as well as being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, with group-selection as the primary unit of selection, followed by individual-selection---even if they do not know that this view of human nature was largely affirmed by Darwin and later by sociobiology.

So the reality is that non-college graduates who voted for Trump (and college grads who have managed to avoid the Cultural Marxist brainwashing) are actually politically wiser than the college graduates who voted for Biden and who think of non-college graduates as a bunch of deplorable rubes.