When we look at long-term evolution what is important in choosing wives and husbands?

Do women judge the status of men as more important than looks perhaps knowing that their children will have a better chance in life with a high status husband? This would happen a bit less now with more independent working women. And young women seem less class conscious and looks tend to be rated higher with them than status---but this changes as women get older. And high status people often choose beauty over status and low status people often choose status over beauty. When we look at long-term evolution what is important in choosing wives and husbands?

In the long term, group selection has been more successful than individual selection. As Raymond Cattell and Edward Wilson have said, evolution proceeds ultimately by natural selection among groups, which determines and is determined by natural selection among individuals, genetically and culturally. The only ultimate test of the fitness and progress of a group's culture-genetic make-up is whether it survives, historically.

As Wilson put it: "Within groups, selfish individuals beat altruistic individuals, but groups of altruists beat groups of selfish individuals." Cattell believed that the key to evaluating the individual and the group was for society to have a way to understand the difference between socially gifted work and anti-socially gifted work. Cattell sees survival to be as dependent on genetic as cultural bases, and one change of present values indicated is in a more enthusiastic pursuit of eugenics. This involves the acceptance of genetic individual differences, without envy or malicious obstruction, and of better education for the gifted.

Cattell sees two kinds of cultural developments : p-culture" which adapts as outlets for our frustrations, as in poetry, music, and drama, and "r-culture" which actually fits us to the environment, as in engineering, medicine, and science. P-culture may be training for r-culture, as well as for temporary emotional adjustment; but it is primarily by r-culture that we survive.

Ultimately our sexual choices will be or should be affected by these traits.

The healthy political, psychological, and biological coordination of our three brains

Conservatives and traditionalist's tend to pay more attention to the whole brain and the whole person by affirming the territoriality and social hierarchies of the reptilian brain, the group and family concerns of the mammalian brain, as well as the reasoning of the Neo-cortex.

Modern liberalism tends to pay more attention to the Neo-cortex, the higher brain, with their Utopian egalitarianism, even if their tendency toward hedonism looks more primitive.

A more complete cultural and psychological health comes from coordinating with the biological origin of our social behavior and real human nature, which is kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

We can then complete our political, psychological, and biological coordination by forming or reforming ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates; an ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected from imperial marauders and supremacists by federalism.

Harmonizing the whole brain provides a healthier more natural coordination of the nervous system, with less personal and cultural neurosis perhaps caused at least in part from uncoordinated signals coming in from the three brains.

The return to sanity as politics

Insanity is defined as a state of mind which prevents normal perception, behavior, or social interaction; being mentally ill. If we have the courage to see it, that defines our modern culture.

Virtually all the accepted talk, schools, media, legislation, art, all the propaganda, all the brainwashing, has to do with a human nature that does not exist. Ending inequality, ending racism, ending gender differences, ending heterosexual marriage-making, ending group-selection or ethnic selection, all indicate a crazy state of mind.

This insanity has led to various groups seeking compensation for humans being human, revenge for real human nature being kin-centered, gender defined, and ethnocentric, with group-selection as the primary unit of selection.

Whole governments have become involved with “never again'”compensation for past wrongs, reparations, affirmative action, etc, when these compensations and reparations are mainly forms of reverse racism and are really exploitation's of the insanity of our modern cultures---as well as being ignoble behavior. A healthy people do not spend all their time in revenge and resentment.

The way out of this mess, this insanity, is to first affirm and accept that human nature really is genetically kin-centered, gender defined, heterosexual marriage-making, ethnocentric, religious-making, and with group-selection as the primary unit of selection.

We need to discard, reject, shitcan, but ultimately cure the insanity of multicultural/multi-ethnic societies, that is, no longer try to jam distinctively different ethnic groups together in the same living space and then demand that they all get along, even making laws against not doing it, when human nature makes it impossible. 

Always beneath the surface of this insanity lurks the sane (but short-term thinking) will to power of the perpetrators of this multicultural/multi-ethnic insanity, along with their cuckolded supporters. 

To return to sanity as politics what we need is an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, which is the best political configuration for humans beings to live within, given real human nature.  An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be established legally in the United States from out of our constitutional separation of powers and states, and protected from marauding supremacists and imperialists by federalism.

Appropriating cultural appropriation

The left is stupid to open the cultural appropriation can of worms, blaming whites for culturally appropriating nonwhite cultures, such as going after a white high school girl for wearing a Chinese cheongsam to her high school prom; although it was stupid and even suicidal of whites to abandon their own culture in the first place, cheered on of course by the media and the schools.

White Western culture has been unrestrainedly appropriated and copied by every ethnic group in the world but whites have said nothing about it, probably for fear of opening that other can of worms called “racism.”

But if we think about it a little deeper we end up saying more power to the ethnic identity movement, it could help revive White Western culture which has been dying largely do to whites culturally appropriating nonwhite cultures. Whites can appropriate cultural appropriation.

We will probably end up with ethnostates in the long run, which is the best and perhaps only way to end the increasing ethnic squabbling in unworkable multicultural societies. Human nature remains biologically kin and ethnic-centered, and that is healthy and good.

No psychologically healthy person would call it “hate” when a person applauds and defends their own ethnic group and its history

No psychologically healthy person would call it “hate” when a person applauds and defends their own ethnic group and its history, but that is what many liberal whites are saying about whites who defend whites. And the liberals are doing even more, they are championing other ethnic groups and races even as they attack their own ethnic group.

Show business and Hollywood are increasingly showing nonwhites as heroes and whites as villains. White men and boys now watch professional sports dominated by nonwhites and are encouraged to admire them. Beauty contests are now being won by nonwhite women. And this is synchronized with what our schools are teaching us about evil white history...This is being thrown at the ethnic group who largely created the Western world!

I am not saying that nonwhites are wrong or evil to advance their own ethnic group or wrong to try to be successful in survival and reproduction, they are healthy to do so. What I am saying is that liberal whites are psychologically unhealthy when they call it “hate” for whites to applaud and defend their own ethnic group and its history. Human nature has been affirmed throughout human history to this day as being basically kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of selection.

Some bold men have been comparing what the liberals are doing to cuckoldry, the term used in evolutionary biology for males who are unwittingly investing parental effort in offspring that are not genetically their own.

Those who promote the hatred of whites by whites in the Media are the most responsible for the growing hatred of whites, and they are responsible for whites unwittingly investing in and applauding groups that are not genetically or culturally their own. In doing so the Media, of course, advances themselves and their own ethnic group.

Such is life in the West today...

Modern liberalism has unsuccessfully tried to rid human beings of being human and what to do about it

The emphasis of modern liberalism on the sameness, equality, etc. of ethnic groups or races has had little effect on making them the same or equal. Without judging the superiority or inferiority of either, the differences between matriarchal blacks in the U. S. and patriarchal whites is starkly different, almost like being from different planets, and that is only one example of the differences in culture and personality, all of which are mainly the result of the biological and genetic origin of our social behavior, which modern liberalism refuses to acknowledge. Various levels of differences apply to all ethnic groups and racial groups whose different traits and personalities were developed or evolved in distinctly different environments.

When ethnic groups didn't melt together and become happy liberals the liberals came up with the concept of “multiculturalism.” But that hasn't led to order, harmony, or equal respect between the races but to even more ethnocentrism, and increasing suicidal traits. Why hasn't multiculturalism worked? Because the differences between ethnic groups and racial groups in personalty and culture are mainly the result of the deep biological and genetic origin of our social behavior; we are not only different but we are competitive in seeking the survival and reproduction of our own genetic traits.

So again, without judging the superiority or inferiority of ethnic groups or races, it is time to try a common sense solution to the unofficial civil war raging between ethnic groups or races, in spite of religion, science, capitalism, socialism, libertarianism, multiculturalism, etc etc. Human nature IS ethnocentric and has been since humans became humans. Group-selection was the best or only way for individuals to successfully survive, so altruism, or being for others, was naturally limited to kin and ethnic groups and not much beyond that because they share the same genes which strive for survival and reproductive success. Trying to rid human nature and culture of the deep-seated preference for kin and ethnic group is like trying to rid human beings of being human. That is inhumane and cruel.

Reality points toward the political/cultural solution of ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. It is a conservative transformation---not revolution---which can bring about the sociopolitical or political/cultural structure most in harmony with real human nature. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, and protected from the inevitable marauders by federalism.

Without judging the superiority or inferiority of any ethnic group, we need to optimize, not block, the gene expression we inherited from our ancient human ancestors, not only in what we eat (eg. paleo diet) and how we exercise, but in which cultures and political systems we create. This is what truly bolsters our physical and mental health. We have gotten far away from the real human nature we inherited from our ancestors and we need to get back to a healthy expression of who we are. The biological origin of our social behavior actually ends the intellectual defense of postmodern relativism, equality, and multiculturalism.

Hollywood has been wildly successful in the destruction of traditional Western culture

It is more entertaining to the masses to attack a culture than to affirm a culture and Hollywood has become an evil genius at entertainingly destroying traditional Western culture. Hollywood has been very successful in promoting and establishing their own degenerate garbage culture in America---and getting very rich in the process.

Then that destruction was combined with the destruction of traditional Western culture in virtually all of our schools. A majority of our young people have bought it all. We can see why Hollywood is the most dangerous organization in America today.

Hollywood was very cunning to at first sell only wholesome patriotic movies and television before and just after World War Two; they took their time to get to the point to where they now sell only hedonism, sex, drugs, and revolution. When Hollywood does temporarily put aside its constant attacks against Western culture its favorite default worldview is cultural Marxism, which is just another more academic attack against Western culture. 
 

This quote from Joseoph Goebbels shows that Hollywood learned from its greatest enemy (or was it the other way around?): “ We shall reach our goal, when we have the power to laugh as we destroy, as we smash whatever was sacred to us as tradition, as education, and as human affection.”

Traditional Western culture is in serious trouble. What can we do about it? We could try to do to Hollywood what they did to us, destroy their culture; but in the long term it is better to just work on legally establishing ethnostates, and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates in America. Hollywood might even then have their own ethnostate to pollute---New York? Los Angeles?

The popularization of legalizing marijuana is only part of the larger movement to promote hedonism and the degeneracy of all standards in the West

It is easy to see how the charge of "conspiracy" develops when you look at such things as the growing popularity of legalizing marijuana in the face of empirical knowledge concerning marijuana, mental illness, and violence. People diagnosed with cannabis use disorder accounted for eleven percent of all cases of psychosis, or a break from reality, in emergency rooms in 2014, and people who use cannabis have a 50 percent chance of becoming violently paranoid, which is four times higher than those with psychosis who didn't use marijuana. And marijuana use continues to increase in America. (see "Marijuana, mental illness, and violence," by Alex Berenson, Imprimis)

The popularization of legalizing marijuana is only part of the larger movement to promote hedonism and the degeneracy of all standards in the West, which went into overdrive in the 1960's. But the conspiracy is more like several powerful independent groups conspiring together, or going in the same direction, but going in the same direction only as long as it serves the individual group.

The biggest conspirators have been the Big Media, Hollywood, and virtually all of our schools, who have been conspiring together, or at least going in the same direction, promoting hedonism and the degeneracy of all standards in the West. Why?

I assume that private power has had control over political institutions more or less for some time. Private fortunes have outstripped public governments, and private corporations provide money to politicians who then represent them.  Acts of immoral deception can be buried in such motto's as "by any means necessary" or "by way of deception." Naive Christian's think, "by golly, those motto's do not mean immoral means." The deceivers and conspirators know that American's tend to cling to the old military idea of moral leadership ("tell the truth and shoot strait.") or the Christian idea that leadership is moral leadership, and this is cunningly exploited.

Meanwhile competition between groups continues. Individual groups with ethnic connections as well as economic connections seem to have stronger bonds and more success than groups with only economic connections. The biggest problems come from imperialism and the supremacy of one group over all the others.

I don't see the individualism of libertarianism as the best way to counter the hedonism and the degeneracy of all standards in the West. Ethics and morals have always been created by the group ethics of mutual love and self-sacrifice, not by individualism. The best solution I see is for people to demand decentralization, small separate states, or better yet ethnostates, with their independence protected by a light federalism. Powerful men as well as the unpowerful need to see that it is in their own best interest to support and protect a decentralized world where hedonism and the degeneracy of all standards are easier to prevent.

Why Marxism, radical feminism, homosexuality, and postmodern relativism eventually lead to biologically and culturally diseased societies

We have to admit that survival success in advanced modern societies is so much easier now than the environments that developed traditional human nature, which evolved because traditional human nature was most successful in survival and reproduction. And so such nontraditional things as Marxism, radical feminism, the promotion of homosexuality, and postmodern relativism can rise with less immediate danger to our survival, at least in the short term.

Human nature as empirically explained by sociobiology remains basically kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection. Even the smallest change in human nature and our DNA structure, for example, in our immune system, took hundreds of thousands of years---although genetic engineering may speed that up.

Even in advanced modern societies where survival is easier, the dangers of Marxism (demanding equality for the unequal), radical feminism (demanding biologically unnatural roles for women), homosexuality (demanding unnatural sexual life styles) and postmodern relativism (demanding an unnatural relativity of values) will eventually lead to biologically and culturally diseased societies.

Cultures can operate for a time with behavior that goes against human nature with such experiments as these but the cultures are eventually pulled back by the biological and genetic leash of real human nature to cultures that better reflect real human nature, and humans then work within and adapt to the environments they find themselves living, and very slowly change.

The importance of individual and ethnic self-esteem in sports

I'm all for merit, people selected on the basis of their ability, in all fields, but it is now considered politically incorrect or bigoted to even ask the question: what is it doing to the general self esteem of white men in the U.S., especially young white men, when both amateur and professional basketball and football have become an exclusive celebration of black athletes---sports that once featured white athletes? Think of the college football National Championships, the NBA basketball finals, college basketball March Madness ( in the Final Four this weekend), and increasingly the Superbowl.

You might object that the Stanley Cup in hockey, the Indianapolis 500, the Boston Marathon, or the winter Olympic games are mainly celebrations of white athletes, but you know they don't come close to the sports madness and ratings status of the finals in amateur and professional basketball and football. The liberal Media goes all out for these celebrations.

What about white teens who seem to be increasingly reduced to playing geeky computer games, smoking marijuana, and getting fat, while their fathers sit on couches or in sports bars drinking beer and loudly partaking in the exclusive celebration of black athletes? (It doesn't seem to be as prevalent in Europe.)

Do we really need studies like the following to tell us about the importance individual and ethnic self-esteem?: Study Finds That Blacks With Strong Racial Identity Are Happier, or, Ethnic identity gives teens daily happiness boost.

Just saying.

Different ethnic groups create different cultures because they are different. That is good, variety is good, but multicultural-multi-ethnic societies lead to a zero sum game where the gain of one player is offset by the loss of another player. Given kin and ethnic-centered human nature the best way to develop real individual and ethnic self-esteem in sports---or culture in general---is to provide ethnostates for each ethnic group. That is the reality of human nature, politically incorrect or not.

The exploitation of altruistic-empathy is killing us

It's ironic that modern liberals who deny any genetic bases to our social behavior are applying a hypertrophied version of the genetically-derived trait of altruistic-empathy in their multiculturalism or multi-racialism.

Northern Europeans seem prone to this fatal flaw which seems to have developed from what was originally a genetically-derived survival tactic in the harsh climate of the North. The Northern Chinese and Japanese seem free of this hypertrophied suicidal cuckoldry perhaps because the climate they were evolved in was much harsher and more unforgiving than the more moderate climate of, say, Scandinavia.

Scandinavian's seem especially suicidal in opening their borders and their societies to "multiculturalism" or multi-racialism, which has been quickly destroying them in an epidemic of rape, murder and social chaos---the Swedes only smile at this tragedy and make it a crime to object to the suicide.

It has also been absolute evil genius on the part of those in the media and the schools who exploited this white altruistic-empathy in their films, television, and books---they must think we are total fools.

The trait of altruistic-empathy was evolved to successfully advance the genes of kin and ethnic group who shared the same genes, it was not evolved to advance multiculturalism or multi-racialism. We see the tragic consequences of this great mistake/exploitation in the biological and cultural destruction of the Western world now taking place...

The only way I can see back to biological, psychological, cultural, and social health is to return to natural ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, in harmony with real human nature. Will our fatal flaw kill us before we recover? We also evolved from warrior cultures that did not give up easily.

The Diet

Paleolithic Diet

by Dr. Loren Cordain

"The Paleolithic Diet is based on eating foods that our Paleolithic ancestors ate. The "Paleolithic" refers to the Paleolithic Era, which is a formal time period on Geologic Time Charts from about 2,500,000 years ago to about 10,000 years ago. The premise is that during the Paleolithic, we evolved a specific genome that has only changed 0.01 per cent in these last 10,000 years. However, during this recent time span mass agriculture, grains/grain products, sugars/sugar products, dairy/dairy products, and a plethora of processed foods have all been introduced as a regular part of the human diet. We are not eating the foods we are genetically and physiologically adapted to eat (99.9% of our genetic profile is still Paleolithic); and the discordance is an underlying cause for much of the "diseases of civilization", "syndrome X", obesity, and  "diseases of old age" that are so epidemic in our society today.

As Dr. Cordain and others' scientific research reveal - the evolutionary, genetic, and clinical evidence point to a natural (i.e., unprocessed foods), omnivorous diet as the healthiest way to eat. Dr. Cordain's research shows that 70% of the average caloric intake of Americans is from foods that did not even exist for our Paleolithic ancestors. This discordance is having tremendously negative health consequences for our society as a whole.

Our genes determine our optimum diet, and our genes evolved according to the environments in which our ancient ancestors lived, including the foods they ate. Our Paleolithic ancestors did not eat just one single diet, but rather they ate within a range of natural, unprocessed diets - depending on variables like geography, climate, competition, ecologic niche, season, and glaciations. All of these Paleolithic diets did share some universal characteristics, though:
Paleolithic Diet - the ingredients

1) The vegetable sources were:

· Plants
· Roots and tubers
· Berries
· Fruits
· Nuts
The most obvious plant food missing is grains and grain products. If you can concentrate on fresh versions of the plants above - and eliminate or drastically reduce grains, grain products, sugars, and sugar products - you will be well on your way to eating the plants that fit your genetic consitution.

2) The animal sources were:
·Wild terrestrial animals (including the muscle tissue, fat and organs, although the total amount of fat and the fatty acid composition were quite different than that found in modern domestic animals).
· Fowl
· Insects
· Fish and seafood
· Eggs"

more here