The police and the soldier are primary actors on whose backs cities, nations, and cultures rise

The majority of liberals, socialists, communists, and anarchists in liberal American cities who seek to defund and weaken the police are stunningly ignorant of real human nature. The police and the soldier who protect the land, the material space, from lawlessness and disorder make it possible for there to be a city and a culture at all. Priests cannot be priests without the protection of the police and the soldier, the professors who brainwash students with cultural Marxism wouldn't be able to do that without the police and the soldiers protecting the material space of the colleges and universities. 

The police and the soldier are primary actors on whose backs cities and nations rise and through whom cultural and spiritual values are protected and carried on. And the liberals, socialists, communists, and anarchists in liberal American cities want to defund and weaken the police!?

Only the Antifa leadership of this stunningly ignorant mob of liberals, socialists, communists, and anarchists know what they are doing when they preach defunding or weakening the police and the soldier: they want to destroy the traditional cultural and spiritual values of America which the police and soldiers protect.

We are in a beginning war of Western civilization versus barbarism and the Antifa leadership of the stunningly ignorant protesting and rioting mob seeks the death of Western civilization.

What is hidden beneath the multicultural and egalitarian lies of the Media and the schools

The natural genetic will to power of individuals and groups as usual is hidden beneath the multicultural and egalitarian lies of the Media and the schools, which led to the loud ignorance of the people regarding the racial protests and riots we have been witnessing the past week.

Here is the predicament: real human nature is ethnocentric or racist, we are different from one another, never equal, because for many thousands of years right up to our present time group selection, or ethnic altruism, was the best way to be successful in survival and reproduction. So human nature became genetically kin-centered and ethnic-centered, even xenophobic, as well as being genetically gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, and religious-making, with group-selection and ethnic selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

The U.S. has spent billions of dollars and tried endless government programs trying to do away with the will to power of ethnocentric human nature without success. What happens in reality, hidden beneath the multicultural and egalitarian lies, is a zero sum game where one race rises at the expense of another.

A true natural rights or civil rights movement would promote an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc., and defended by some sort of federalism. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states.

It turns out that in advocating for ethnostates both white Wilmot Robertson and black Louis Farrakhan had a more humane solution to the race problem than the sainted Martin Luther King's call for multicultural equality.

The best long-term way to civilize us all

What if angry whites returned the same mau-mauing, denouncing, intimidating, rioting, and trashing of blacks that the blacks have done to whites and white properties over the past week?

Given real kin and ethnocentric human nature the best long-term way to civilize us all is to gradually and legally separate the racial combatants into ethnostates.

Will we be able to overcome the very successful culturally Marxist brainwashing by all our schools and the Media?

The demand for real natural rights should lead to a legal American constitutional separation of powers and states into regional ethnostates, where real human nature could be free to be as kin-selecting and ethnocentric as we have always been since paleolithic times, protected by federalism.

We wont have much peace or civil order until we do.

School busing was a future-mutant

School busing began in the 1960's and 1970's and by the 1980's it had faded away when even blacks objected to busing their children to white schools and began advocating support for all black schools. But school busing was a future-mutant which could have been predicted by kin and ethnic centered human nature, so the basic instigating drives will come again in the future.

Modern liberal elites, who hypocritically sent their kids to private white schools, promoted busing, so the mandate for integrating the schools fell on poor whites and blacks who could not afford to send their kids to private schools. Unlike suburban white cuckolds, the poor and lower middle-class whites (future Trumpers) openly objected to busing, it was their children who suffered the bad consequences, violence etc, from busing.

Multiculturalism works little better than busing because people naturally separate into ethnic and racial neighborhoods, even though the suburban liberals, the media, and the schools are still pushing integration. Human nature IS universally and genetically kin-centered, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, among other conservative things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, so we need a better solution than insisting on jamming distinctly different ethic groups and races into the same living space.

We can adapt our Constitutional separation of powers and states to a deeper sociobiological affirmation of regionalism, localism, general conservative values, eventually ethnostates, and finally an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected from marauding imperialists, supremacists, and global money grubbers, with a defensive federalism.

That is how we may conservatively retain the American union of different ethnic groups and races.

The real cause of fragmentation of our society and the rise of the Trump voter which cannot be mentioned

It has been mainly the loss of ethnic connections among whites in America that has brought about the fragmentation of our society, the loss of social institutions, and the general alienation of Americans. Whites have not been allowed to even speak of their ethnicity or race yet alone be proud of it. This has not applied to rise of nonwhites in America who can proclaim their ethnicity loudly and constantly---and this has been exploited by the Big Media and in all our schools.

Any objective or honest person has to admit that it was mainly whites who built the social institutions of America which are now failing right along with the loss of ethnic connections among whites and the rise of ethnic connections among nonwhites who mostly support leftist movements. The biological origin of social behavior and the preferences for kin and ethnic group cannot be mentioned, only euphemisms or vague expressions for white ethnicity can be used, because white ethnicity is now thought to be offensive. The explains the real cause of fragmentation of our society and the rise of the Trump voter which cannot be mentioned.

The way out of this mess is not more of the same “multiculturalism” which has only benefited nonwhites and their handlers. The way out of this mess is to develop an ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions that would be fair to all groups and could be established, legally, in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected from marauding imperialists, supremacists, and money grubbers, with a light federalism.

Michelle Obama proved once again that she is largely ignorant of real human nature in a recent speech in Chicago

Like her food-obsessed friend Oprah, Michelle Obama proved once again that she is largely ignorant of real human nature in a recent speech in Chicago, where she blamed “white flight” on evil white racism. But since all her heroes in the civil rights movement were also largely ignorant of real human nature her condescending matriarchal speech was understandable.

White flight is not just because human nature is biologically and genetically ethnocentric, which has been established in evolutionary sciences like sociobiology---explaining why people tend to prefer to live in neighborhoods of their own kind who share the same gene pool and same culture---white flight is also because of the crime rate in black neighborhoods. Though blacks are 24 percent of New York City’s population, they committed 68.5 percent of all murders, rapes, robberies, and assaults in the city last year, and the statistics in Chicago are similar. Falling housing prices in white flight neighborhoods should also be mentioned.

The U.S. has spent billions of dollars and tried endless government programs trying to do away with ethnocentric human nature without success. What happens instead is a zero sum game where one race rises at the expense of another, as happened in the Affirmative Action program. It turns out that in advocating an ethnostate for blacks, the Nation of Islam's Louis Farrakhan had a better solution to the race problem than the sainted Martin Luther King.

A real civil rights movement would promote an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, where each ethnostate is protected from marauding imperialists and supremacists---black, white, or brown---by some sort of federalism. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states.

When the Oprahs and Michelle's get on that band wagon we will have real civil rights for all groups. Don't hold your breath but it will come as surely as human nature exists.

Dealing with the fascist “antifa” movement

The title of the left-wing militant group “antifa” is a lie in claiming to be anti-fascist when they themselves are fascist in trying to violently close down the free speech rally in Minneapolis last night for President Trump. But lies are the basis of the postmodern nonsense they were taught in our colleges and universities, the lie that all truth is relative and is only the will to power, so lies can be used to obtain power. They don't seem to care that it makes their own truth a relative truth.

Vying for power is not wrong but when power is used for causes, like Marxism, which reject the biological origin of social behavior and damage the true and natural process of successful survival and reproduction, even for the liars, then it is wrong.

Let the antifa fools have their free rallies, but the very first sign of them using violence to try to shut down the freedom of speech of another group, arrest them all and throw them in jail, even if the army is needed to help the police. And don't allow amoral lawyers to manipulate the laws in favor of the fascist antifa.

If we can't do that then the amoral and immoral will to power of lies and liars will destroy us.

The real ethnic problems come from supremacism, not from ethnocentrism

The dictionary definition of racism is “the belief that different races possess distinct characteristics, abilities, or qualities, especially so as to distinguish them as inferior or superior to one another.” In the increasing charges of “racism” now being hurled against people on the right, the first part of that definition is bypassed for the second part. But the charge of racism is also often underhandedly used as the racist will to power of one race over another---often the most ethnocentric or racist people make the most noise against racism.

Here is the predicament: real human nature is ethnocentric or racist because for many thousands of years right up to our present time group selection, or group altruism, was the best way to be successful in survival and reproduction. So human nature became genetically kin-centered and ethnic-centered, even xenophobic, as well as being genetically gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, and religious-making, with group-selection and ethnic selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

The real ethnic problems come from supremacism, from applying the second part of that definition of racism, from distinguishing races as inferior or superior to one another. That might have worked for survival success in very difficult times, in hunter gatherer times, but in our overpopulated world today claiming supremacism and imperialism is countered by all other groups ganging up on and destroying the upstart supremacist.

It is better to think of ethnic groups and races as different and distinct from one another, and as only inferior or superior to one another in different areas. The racial problems we are now having in multicultural societies comes from claims or acts of supremacism and imperialism, from claims of being the only nobles or the only chosen, and from our real genetic ethnocentric human nature.  Distinctly different ethnic groups aren't melting together they are competing. This was predicable.

So what it to be done? My readers know what I think: real human nature leads naturally to the cultural expression of regionalism, localism, ethnostates, and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected by some sort of federalism. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected by federalism. Given who we are this also appears to be the best way we can optimize the gene expression we inherited from our human ancestors.

People of color better go slow in waking up the white giant to identity politics

Do people of color really want to create racial or identity politics? I suppose now seems like a good time to bring up their racial causes because whites have their hands tied behind their backs and can't talk about white racial concerns—it's even against the law in some countries! But whites are a powerful force, after all, they largely created the Western world, so people of color better go slow in waking up the white giant to identity politics.

Panderers and cuckolds for President 6/27/2019

It was embarrassing for our country to watch the panderers and cuckolds at the Democratic debate for president last night. No subtly at all there. It was like vote buying, I almost expected the fools to start throwing twenty dollar bills at the audience. There is law against vote buying (42 USCS § 1973i(c)---maybe it needs to be expanded.

Symbolic of the Democrats is Beto O'Rourke, who in the Texas of old would have been banished to the edge of town as a silly fool for being a traitor to his own people. But like most Democrats of his age goofy “Beto” (a common Spanish nickname of course) is an overly enthusiastic panderer and cuckold for any race, ethnic group, culture, or country other than his own.

Elizabeth Warren is just a better educated version of O'Rourke, if being a socialist can be called being better educated---she is just a more polished panderer and cuckold. Joe Biden is an unctuous idiot. President Trump should be able to beat these people fairly easily, if he himself can keep from pandering to those who want him to go to war with Iran, or those who don't want him to put tariffs on their virtually traitorous global importing businesses.

Real solutions to social cohesion are taboo

Neither decentralization or centralization will lead to real or long term social cohesion if the population is not homogeneous, that is, of the same general ethnic group. No amount of political or economic planning will change this reality. Having the goal for flourishing individuals and society be only profits, property rights, and individualism (libertarianism), or equality (socialism/communism) is not enough to lead to social cohesion.

Human life is involved in the war of ideas---80 million people died in the Soviet system. But the political correctness of cultural Marxism in the Media and in our schools will not hesitate to ruin the lives or careers of any academic, intellectual, businessman, politician, or artist who dares to suggest that real long term social cohesion works best in ethnically homogeneous societies. The problem with too many of these people is that when they feel their personal power threatened by the truth they will attack, bury, or just be unable to face the truth.

If they really desire flourishing individuals and society and social cohesion they could start by getting off their knees and clearing their heads with the science of sociobiology and the biological foundation of social behavior, and then work out their dissertations or economic, political, cultural programs from there...Ethnostates might then follow.

Ethnostates within the Constitutional system

The separation of powers and states enshrined in the US Constitution could be the best way to develop ethnostates legally without radical, illegal, or violent methods. It would first require reaffirming and even expanding the power of the states and the principle of states rights and federalism; the Constitution now says that the federal government possesses only those powers delegated to it by the United States Constitution, all remaining powers are reserved for the states or the people. But ethnostatism might require an amendment or two to the Constitution. If the states then want to formulate an ethnostate they should be able to do so, and if they don't they don't.

States that want to remain multicultural and multi-racial can do so, but my guess is that people in multicultural and multi-racial states would soon move to states of their own ethnic group. This is where the political battle could legally take place. It will be very difficult, but no more difficult than secessions, or the slow death of distinct races, and it has the benefit of conserving the Constitution and working within the system---unlawful actions usually kill movements.

If we can't develop ethnostates consciously and purposely they will develop unconsciously and less purposely because they are the most natural political configuration for kin-centered and ethnic-centered human nature. Knowledge of ethnostates and the biological origin of social behavior needs to be presented to the people, but this knowledge is slowly, naturally, coming forward in any case, in spite of the corrupt Media and our schools.

Modern liberalism has unsuccessfully tried to rid human beings of being human and what to do about it

The emphasis of modern liberalism on the sameness, equality, etc. of ethnic groups or races has had little effect on making them the same or equal. Without judging the superiority or inferiority of either, the differences between matriarchal blacks in the U. S. and patriarchal whites is starkly different, almost like being from different planets, and that is only one example of the differences in culture and personality, all of which are mainly the result of the biological and genetic origin of our social behavior, which modern liberalism refuses to acknowledge. Various levels of differences apply to all ethnic groups and racial groups whose different traits and personalities were developed or evolved in distinctly different environments.

When ethnic groups didn't melt together and become happy liberals the liberals came up with the concept of “multiculturalism.” But that hasn't led to order, harmony, or equal respect between the races but to even more ethnocentrism, and increasing suicidal traits. Why hasn't multiculturalism worked? Because the differences between ethnic groups and racial groups in personalty and culture are mainly the result of the deep biological and genetic origin of our social behavior; we are not only different but we are competitive in seeking the survival and reproduction of our own genetic traits.

So again, without judging the superiority or inferiority of ethnic groups or races, it is time to try a common sense solution to the unofficial civil war raging between ethnic groups or races, in spite of religion, science, capitalism, socialism, libertarianism, multiculturalism, etc etc. Human nature IS ethnocentric and has been since humans became humans. Group-selection was the best or only way for individuals to successfully survive, so altruism, or being for others, was naturally limited to kin and ethnic groups and not much beyond that because they share the same genes which strive for survival and reproductive success. Trying to rid human nature and culture of the deep-seated preference for kin and ethnic group is like trying to rid human beings of being human. That is inhumane and cruel.

Reality points toward the political/cultural solution of ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. It is a conservative transformation---not revolution---which can bring about the sociopolitical or political/cultural structure most in harmony with real human nature. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, and protected from the inevitable marauders by federalism.

Without judging the superiority or inferiority of any ethnic group, we need to optimize, not block, the gene expression we inherited from our ancient human ancestors, not only in what we eat (eg. paleo diet) and how we exercise, but in which cultures and political systems we create. This is what truly bolsters our physical and mental health. We have gotten far away from the real human nature we inherited from our ancestors and we need to get back to a healthy expression of who we are. The biological origin of our social behavior actually ends the intellectual defense of postmodern relativism, equality, and multiculturalism.

Dreams of assimilation don't take into account the biological origin of social behavior

Both Kirkian conservatives and modern liberals made the tragic political mistake in assuming, hoping really, that assimilation would take place between the distinctly different ethnic groups who were allowed to immigrate into America, based on the idea that culture, the British culture, is the main feature of the nation, and the faulty idea that the ethnicity of America is secondary. Later liberals developed the idea of having one multicultural multi-ethnic society where all would supposedly get along well together without all assimilating into one British culture and without all speaking English, as the Kirkian's insisted we do.

The problem with both political approaches is they don't take into account the biological origin of social behavior or that ethnic groups are made up of distinctive genes and genetic pools which develop distinctive cultures to advance those distinctive ethnic genetic pools. In reality it is a zero sum game where the gain of one ethnic group is offset by the loss of another ethnic group; they do not assimilate unless they are close ethnic cousins, even if there is some assimilation from interbreeding around the edges.

Blacks have been in America for several hundred years (forced here in slavery) and billions of dollars continue to be spent helping them assimilate without much success, although some of the lack of success comes from natural resentment at being enslaved. The advent of multicultural multi-ethnic societies only increased and affirmed non-assimilation. Millions of Hispanics too have naturally insisted on keeping their language and culture because ethnic groups are made up of distinctive genes and genetic pools which develop distinctive cultures to advance those distinctive ethnic genetic pools.

The last hope for those who want the whole world to assimilate into one group is to declare that interbreeding will make the whole world coffee-colored where we all get along. But that is not how the world works. Ethnic groups develop distinctive cultures to advance distinctive genetic pools in what becomes mainly a zero sum game of competition and survival.

Better to realize at last that the best way to deal with our deep-seated differences and our  ignorant immigration policies is to affirm a reinvigoration of the Constitutional separation of powers and states, this time in harmony with the growing variety of ethnic groups in America with different genetic pools and different agendas who could develop an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, in harmony with real human nature... But these vital changes need to be done legally, constitutional, and not by radical revolutionary means which almost never work and cause great biological and cultural harm.

Hollywood lies to the common man and the academic world lies to the educated

Hollywood lies to the common man and the academic world lies to the educated, and we therefore have a culture of lies because Hollywood and the academic world virtually control popular culture.

One example: Movies and television now almost always portray whites as criminals and blacks and other minorities as heroes, which is a lie about real crime statistics. Of the approximately 660,000 crimes of interracial violence that involved blacks and whites in 2013, blacks were the perpetrators 85 percent of the time. This meant a black person was 27 times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa. A Hispanic was eight times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa.

These lies demoralize young whites, anger older whites, and embolden hatred of whites by blacks and minorities, which is what they are designed to do because the lies are the will to power of Hollywood and the academic world who have ridden to power on the backs of blacks and minorities.

The lies in the academic world are the lies of cultural Marxism which include the destruction of family, male against female, class against class, and concentration of power in a culturally Marxist big government. And of course the lies bring more power to Hollywood and the academic world.

Joe Biden's video today announcing his run for president in 2020 indicates what the emphasis will be on both sides of the contest

Biden will declare that President Trump is a racist and Trump will try to prove that he is not a racist, and so the corrupt Big Media will get what it wants, all the candidates falling all over themselves to appeal to minority and liberal votes. Nothing will be said on either side about the racism of minorities, which is every bit as strong as white racism, if not stronger.

Both sides will play dirty using demagoguery, appealing to the desires and prejudices of minorities, which only causes more race hatred, although Trump will appeal more to forgotten whites. No one will have the courage to tell the truth about race hatred: in 2013, of the approximately 660,000 crimes of interracial violence that involved blacks and whites, blacks were the perpetrators 85 percent of the time. This meant a black person was 27 times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa. A Hispanic was eight times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa. ("The Color of Crime")

So it looks like nothing much will change, Western culture will continue to decline mainly at the hands of "leaders" who make false claims and promises in order to gain power. But real human nature remains genetically kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, territorial, and even xenophobic, among other mostly conservative things. This being the reality, an ethnopluralism of ethnostates seems like the most humane political structure for all races, but it remains politically incorrect to say so.

The establishment and the elite smugly believe they can handle multicultural multi-ethnic societies

The establishment and the elite smugly believe that they can handle the differences between different ethnic groups by (counter-intuitively) promoting multicultural multi-ethnic societies, with the help of the Big Media, Hollywood, and the public schools, even as they also (incongruously) promote the integration of ethnic groups into one happy coffee-colored world.

The reality of multicultural multi-ethnic societies is that they are a zero sum game where the gain of one ethnic group is offset by the loss of another ethnic group, as we see from the fact that whites are now dying faster than being born while other races are breeding faster than dying.

Why is it a zero sum game? It is the reality because human nature is deeply, genetically, kin-centered and ethnocentric, among other traditional traits, because it has been the best way for us and our genes to survive and reproduce successfully since humans became humans. Culture's grew up around this biological origin of our social behavior.

What do multicultural multi-ethnic societies mean for our future? Social disruptions, sometimes violent, leading to fascism on the right or the left to keep order? Ethnic secessions? The most logical, instinctive, and natural solution, given real human nature, will be to conservatively retain the U. S. Constitutional separation of powers and states but expand the decentralization into allowing the forming of ethnostates, an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected from marauding supremacists and imperialists by a light federalism.

Will we choose the most logical, instinctive, and natural solution of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates? Human nature says we will, one way or another, peacefully or unpeacefully...I think it should best be done legally and conservatively.

The popularization of legalizing marijuana is only part of the larger movement to promote hedonism and the degeneracy of all standards in the West

It is easy to see how the charge of "conspiracy" develops when you look at such things as the growing popularity of legalizing marijuana in the face of empirical knowledge concerning marijuana, mental illness, and violence. People diagnosed with cannabis use disorder accounted for eleven percent of all cases of psychosis, or a break from reality, in emergency rooms in 2014, and people who use cannabis have a 50 percent chance of becoming violently paranoid, which is four times higher than those with psychosis who didn't use marijuana. And marijuana use continues to increase in America. (see "Marijuana, mental illness, and violence," by Alex Berenson, Imprimis)

The popularization of legalizing marijuana is only part of the larger movement to promote hedonism and the degeneracy of all standards in the West, which went into overdrive in the 1960's. But the conspiracy is more like several powerful independent groups conspiring together, or going in the same direction, but going in the same direction only as long as it serves the individual group.

The biggest conspirators have been the Big Media, Hollywood, and virtually all of our schools, who have been conspiring together, or at least going in the same direction, promoting hedonism and the degeneracy of all standards in the West. Why?

I assume that private power has had control over political institutions more or less for some time. Private fortunes have outstripped public governments, and private corporations provide money to politicians who then represent them.  Acts of immoral deception can be buried in such motto's as "by any means necessary" or "by way of deception." Naive Christian's think, "by golly, those motto's do not mean immoral means." The deceivers and conspirators know that American's tend to cling to the old military idea of moral leadership ("tell the truth and shoot strait.") or the Christian idea that leadership is moral leadership, and this is cunningly exploited.

Meanwhile competition between groups continues. Individual groups with ethnic connections as well as economic connections seem to have stronger bonds and more success than groups with only economic connections. The biggest problems come from imperialism and the supremacy of one group over all the others.

I don't see the individualism of libertarianism as the best way to counter the hedonism and the degeneracy of all standards in the West. Ethics and morals have always been created by the group ethics of mutual love and self-sacrifice, not by individualism. The best solution I see is for people to demand decentralization, small separate states, or better yet ethnostates, with their independence protected by a light federalism. Powerful men as well as the unpowerful need to see that it is in their own best interest to support and protect a decentralized world where hedonism and the degeneracy of all standards are easier to prevent.

Trump's suicidal idea of flooding sanctuary cities with illegal immigrants

Trump's idea of flooding sanctuary cities with illegal immigrants just to get back at those foolish cities is the kind of short-term thinking of one who is ignorant of the fact that a surfeit of immigrants, legal or illegal, from our southern border will soon change our culture into a southern border culture.  It may not be consciously suicidal, just ignorant, but it is still suicidal. When will we get politicians who understand the biological origin of social behavior? It better be soon or we will lose our nation.

Can we surpass the political philosophy of the ancients?

Can we surpass the political philosophy of the ancients? I don't see why not, as long as we realize that we are standing on their shoulders.

When the Founders of America created the constitutional separation of powers and states they did not think we would become a multicultural multi-ethnic state, they assumed we would remain ethnically and culturally Northern European. If they had known the future they might have provided for ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates.

They also didn't have Darwin and his grand evolutionary worldview, or the sociobiological discoveries of the biological origin of social behavior.

To accommodate the kin and ethnic-centered heart of basic human nature we can affirm a re-invigoration of federalism, this time in harmony with the growing variety of competing ethnic groups in America with different genetic pools and different agendas. Federalism and the Constitutional separation of powers and states can develop an ethnopluralism of ethnostates.

But this needs to be develop legally, not with civil war, or even with secessions, which could endanger the federal protection needed for all ethnostates in a world that continues to have marauding nations with imperial ambitions.

With only a few amendments we would still be conservatively standing on the shoulders of the Founders, and we would have a more assured future.