Saturday, November 26, 2016
The Deeper Kind of Conservatism
Politically incorrect as it is to say,
I think some individuals are more capable of handling freedom and
responsibility than others, and I think this may also apply to
ethnic groups---but in saying that I must quickly add that I am not
talking about superiority or inferiority, I am simply talking about
differences between people.
This necessarily relates to
demographics and immigration policies which have a great deal to do
with the tone of the culture: as the people change the culture
changes. It has been a lie to say, as the cultural Marxism of
political correctness says, that all individuals and groups are the
same with only slight unimportant differences in skin color.
I don't think the "civil rights"
movement had as much to do with seeking equality as it did with
seeking superiority---it is seeking supremacy far more than
ethnocentrism which causes the defamation and discrimination that
modern liberals constantly go on about.
But conservatives don't seem to fully
realize that it is not enough to tell distinctly different
individuals and groups to better handle freedom and responsibility by
affirming conservatism and tradition.
This is why I advocate an
ethnopluralism of ethnostates, which can be conservatively
accommodated by the constitutional separation of powers and states,
where different ethnic groups and individuals can develop the
cultures that best suit them, with federalism protecting the whole.
That is the deeper kind of conservatism.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment