How both conservatism and progress are affirmed
With populism the preference for
localism and regionalism and the desire for conservative stability
turn out to be the best environment for steady evolutionary progress,
because good and bad genetic or cultural mutations can, in more
stable societies, show themselves and be more quickly yet permanently
incorporated. Biology is the current on which we are all carried.
One of the biggest errors in
conservative philosophy has been the attack on the idea of
"progress." It need not have been so. Both stable populism
and evolving progressivism can be affirmed together when
ethnocentrism, or group selection, is understood as a central trait
of real human nature and evolution, more influential in survival and
reproductive success than individual selection.
Conservatives being against "progress"
derived essentially from a misunderstanding of the ancient practise
of ascetics (Hindus, Buddhists, Christians) who were against all
material desires because this was required in their efforts to see or
experience the God or Father Within, and it had little or nothing to
do with policing material progress. The "fall of man" was
directly related to turning away from the desire-free ascetic inward path, and had virtually nothing to do with life itself
being "evil."
In
theological materialism the limits
and restraints on moral behavior come from the requirements of the
Outward Path of material evolution to real Godhood, that is, the
Godhood only first glimpsed by the ascetics in the Inward Path. Both
traditional religion and progress are not rejected, they are
transformed in theological materialism.
And politically, radical revolution is
also not necessary, at least in America, where an ethnopluralism of
ethnostates, in line with real human nature, could be accommodated by
the constitutional separation of powers and states.
No comments:
Post a Comment