Imperialism, totalitarianism, radical
civil war, fascism, all are linked to the far right and far left
because nothing short of force can make distinctively different
racial groups live together peacefully, or accept one group lording
it over all the others. It is not in basic human nature to do
so. Stalin, Hitler, Mao were short lived. So the political schemes of
the far right and far left don't work, at least not for long.
The moral high ground goes to
ethnopluralism, that is, territories of ethnostates for different
ethnic cultures, protected internally and externally by some sort of
federalism. Ethnopluralism can even appeal to modern liberals once
they move out from under the political correctness of
“multiculturalism,” which moronically tries to jam distinctly
different people together in one space and then is surprised when
they don't all get along.
Then there can be the accommodation of
traditionalists, conservatives, and patriots with the U.S.
constitutional separation of powers and states, which could legally
and even peacefully accommodate the slow move toward regional
ethnostates.
Ethnopluralism could even prove Oswald
Spengler wrong in his civilizations of seasons, because imperialism
always breaks back down into ethnostates which are about as permanent
and natural as any civilization can be if we can maintain them, because they relate so well to real human nature which remains kin-centered, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, with group-selection as the primary unit of selection.
So how long will it take for ethnopluralism
to rise in popularity? To answer with an answer: how soon can the
power of the Big Banks and the Big Media be weakened?
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment