Sunday, July 24, 2016
Who really prefers garbage for art? Who prefers decay for a nation?
People say Frederic Chopin is too
familiar, too much played, too popular, so why don't new composers
create new works with the same romantic ethos?
One of the main reason is because
composers don't have the inspiration of nationalism anymore, that is,
a religious or nationalist political vision (but not uncreative
propaganda like socialist realism), as Poland was to Chopin or
Germany to Wagner. Since nationalism has been lost we have had
rubbish for art.
With the inherent nationalism of
ethnopluralism established in America or Europe, with a thousand
ethnic cultures living in ethnic states and regions and protected by
a light federalism, we would have a variety of potentially great art
inspired by the natural ethnocentrism inherent in real human nature.
Why fight against human nature in art
philosophy when it creates the greatest art as well as the most well
loved nations? Who really prefers garbage for art? Who prefers decay
for a nation? Fire them, as Donald Trump might say, the sooner the
better.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment