Thursday, July 28, 2016
When the people change the culture changes
Conservatives will acknowledged that
America is not merely an idea but a place, which is more than
liberalism will acknowledge, but conservatives will not take the next
step and acknowledge that America is based in the ethos, the
character, tone and guiding beliefs of Northern Europeans. Even the
Ancient Greeks and Romans were founded by Indo-European migrants from
the Northeast. Some scholars think that Christianity was influenced
by Northeastern non-materialism and altruism (think of Vedism) which
then became opposed to the materialism of the money-changers in the
middle-east.
The main reason conservatives will not
take the next step and acknowledge this biological origin of social
behavior seems to be the fear of being called racist, which has been
exploited by the left---an exploitation that has increased since
World War Two.
The weakness or flaw in Northern
European people is based in the very thing that saved them in the
cold survival conditions of the North: namely altruism. It was not a
universal altruism at all,
it was altruism based in the group-selection of their own ethnic
culture, and it became a genetic trait over time. Northasians evolved
this same trait even more so than Northern Europeans due to even more
severe survival conditions.
Universal altruism has been
exploited by the left by promoting the impossible and unnatural universal
altruism of cultural Marxism. The universalism of Christianity also
played into his exploitation by stretching group-selection beyond
real human nature. It is ironic and frustrating to find that the
exploiters of altruism and universalism are usually motivated
(sometimes unconsciously) by the ethnic preferences and will to power
of their own people.
So this brings us to the title of this
piece: when the people change the culture changes. Open borders and
open immigration come from this exploitation of altruism. Readers of
this blog know that the only way I see to make peace out of this
disharmony is through ethnopluralism, that is, regions and states set
aside for distinctly different ethnic cultures and then protected by
some sort of federalism, not unlike the U. S. constitutional
separation of powers and states. It is long beyond the time when one
noble or chosen ethnic culture can claim imperial dominance over all
others---the world gangs up on such foolishness and destroys it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment