Wednesday, June 28, 2017
Redefining altruism in the natural order of conservatism
In the natural order, human nature is
primarily kin and group-centered (ethnocentric ) and to demand
otherwise goes against the natural order. Yes we have to care about
the wider world but that caring exists at the farther end of the
natural order of altruism. The way Christ's commandment that we
should love our neighbor as ourselves can be defined as within the
natural order is if it is defined as loving our real neighbor.
The Catholic principle of subsidiarity---a central authority should
perform only those tasks which cannot be performed at a more local
level, Wikipedia---has to take into account this sociobiological
definition of human nature.
The wise constitutional separation of
powers and states in the U. S. is harmonious with altruism in the
natural order. But to deepen our commitment to acting within the
natural order, those powers and states need to, gradually, become
ethnostates within an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. Subsidiarity and
solidarity need to work within the parameters of real human nature
which is kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual
marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and
religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the
primary unit of selection.
When Catholics and other religions miss
this natural sociobiological view of altruism they tend to make big
mistakes. Real conservatism, deep conservatism, needs to
include Darwin, who was in effect ejected from conservatism by William Buckley and
others, and soon conservatism degenerated into neoconservatism, which
was/is almost as far outside the natural order as Marxism.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment