The Three Covenants of Deep Conservatism

Reblog from June 29, 2010

Because we see the solid ecumenical connection of the Involutionary Inward Path in the Revealed Religions, we give credit to the Jewish and the Brahmanic-Zoroastrian religions for retaining the ancient perennial religion throughout human history. Almost alone in the West, the Jews retained the ancient perennial wisdom of Egypt and Babylon, in the face of exile and rejection. And the Hindus have retained the most ancient Vedas and the Yogic schools, which harken back to the original homeland of perhaps the original proto-Indo-European perennial religion.

But what we do Not affirm is Imperial Religion, or an imperial race, or defining any people as Noble Aryan or Chosen Jew alone. The introduction of the Evolutionary Outward Path, and the Twofold Path, corrects the metaphysical error of having only the one path to the God Within, the Involutionary Inward Path. In the Theoevolutionary Church, all people, all races have the right, indeed the Covenant, to evolve in the Evolutionary Outward Path to the Godhood first seen in the Inward Path, with variety and voluntary separation if they choose, in small virtually independent ethnostates protected by light federalism.

The Jews and Hindus established the First Covenant, where the Spirit and Soul of the Inward Path were understood tribally, racially in the blood. In the Second Covenant, Buddha and Christ brought the knowledge that the Soul-Within need not be understood racially or tribally but could be understood by any race, any people, universally, provided they were taught the proper way, applying the proper deeds, to see the God Within. The Third Covenant is the mission affirmed by the Theoevolutionary Church, where both Primordial Tradition and Christianity are revitalized by once again addressing the First Covenant, and the vital biological, genetic qualities in our evolution to Godhood, which is applied to the Evolutionary Outward Path of material evolution to Godhood. We do not see the need to go back to the tribal religions themselves which have mostly passed away. And also, as in the Second Covenant, this is applied to all people, all nations, all races, all should have access to knowledge of the evolution to God. In the Twofold Path we affirm the ancient Involutionary Inward Path of identifying with the Second Covenant God-Within, whom we are evolving to materially become while applying the First Covenant in an ethnopluralism of ethnostates in the Outward Path...This affirms real conservatism, or as I call it, deep conservatism.

Posted by Kenneth Lloyd Anderson at Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Is there a highest level of human social civilization?

Real human nature is violated by attempts to make everyone the same and to jam distinctly different people together into the same state, because human nature remains deeply kin-centered and ethnocentric, among other mostly traditional traits.

The natural will to kin and ethnic survival and reproductive success often leads one group to promote the supremacy of their own group over other groups, which is how colonialism and empires develop.

But we can see from the rise and fall of rightist or leftist empires in history that they fall apart and decentralize into an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. So why not go to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates in the first place? This could bring whatever peace and harmony is possible for human beings.

I think the highest level of human social civilization will come when human beings consciously form themselves into an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, bypassing the cycles of the rise and fall of empires, and then devote themselves with variety to evolving in the material world to supermaterial Godhood.

Word fluff and the logic of the material

Call it the logic of the material: the material physical object takes precedence over its definition or meaning, regardless of whether the material physical object is fully understood. The material object is grasped by its materiality. Definition and meaning can come later but they are always less important than the material object in itself. When this logic of the material is applied to religion or philosophy we can see how far away from the actual material object these fields have become, even to the point of there being no real material object behind the definitions. Religious or philosophical definitions of God and truth would be an example of this idealism or spiritualism.  But God and truth need not therefore be rejected as only word fluff, divine things can be brought back to material reality. For example, in theological materialism, real material/supermaterial Godhood is understood as being evolved to in continually higher stages of material evolution in the real material world. Human nature, which helps develop political and cultural things, can this way be grounded in the real world.

The strongest instincts of life call out for the saving of the people and the country

Could it be that the country has been miss-educated for too long to be saved? All the schools have been teaching (really brainwashing) cultural Marxism to everyone---with the help of the Big Media---at least since the 1960's, and we see the debilitating results everywhere.

Traditional and conservative intellectuals have tried to counter this decline but few people read them (Fox News is mainly neoconservative and globalist). Only the people who didn't take school seriously and ignored politics, preferring sports or auto racing, retain some sense of cultural health, but not much.

What can be done? Many of those middle-of-the-country people voted for Trump, who promised economic nationalism to bring their jobs back, and who said he would bring the troops home, and the people are still waiting for that.

Many people are dropping out and home-schooling to avoid the insanity of the public schools. What if those dropouts could do as the 1960's dropouts did and eventually march through the institutions and reverse the cultural Marxism? I know, I know, that sounds impossible, but who would have thought the hippies would conquer? Of course they had the Big Media on their side and the conservatives don't. Why not build a new, conservative/nationalist, Big Media alongside the degenerate one?

And then beneath all that rescuing is the deep conservative change which you often hear about here: legally adapting (not radically) our constitutional separation of powers and states to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected by federalism and economic nationalism, in harmony with real human nature which remains kin-centered and ethnocentric. That would make us ready for a long and successful future.

Could it be that the country has been miss-educated for too long to be saved? No, we can save the country, the strongest instincts of life call out for the saving of the people and their country.

The natural sequence of altruistic priorities of real human nature

Individual, kin, ethnic group, region, state, nation, world, universe, Godhood---this is how a natural political subsidiary would harmonize with the natural sequence of the altruistic genetic priorities of real human nature. When political philosophy synchronizes with this sequence then we can have nations of light federal systems protecting the variety and independence of decentralized regions and states or ethnostates. When this philosophy is also bonded in a religion dedicated to life materially evolving to Godhood, it seems to me that then we will be approaching a whole, complete, and long-lasting worldview. But human beings tend to be more a lying and scheming species than a wise species and long-term religions and philosophies are often blocked by short-term selfish people who need to be reformed.

What is sin?

Sin is the intentional transgression of the divine and natural laws of the evolution of material life toward Godhood. This is also defined as ignorance. It has not been easy for humanity to discern the divine and natural laws, which is mainly why they have been transgressed.

When a sports culture, or political culture, strays too far away from behavior that benefits the people

Sports have been the one place where modern men can escape the political correctness of cultural Marxism, but professional sports have changed over the years as the athletes changed from white to black athletes. That's not a racist statement it's just a fact. Sports are a microcosm of the larger political reality showing us that as the people change the culture changes. The gentleman sports of English and American culture changed to barbarian and savage professional sports.

But what has not changed is the biological and genetic origin of most of our social behavior, and we are just now beginning to see men pulling away from professional sports---due to the latest unpatriotic behavior of black athletes. When a sports culture, or political culture, strays too far away from behavior that enhances the successful survival and reproduction of a people then the culture is pulled back, consciously or unconsciously, to cultural behavior that benefits the people who partake in the culture.

The conscious media-driven attempt to demoralize white men

More and more feminist women are conspiring with minorities to attack white masculinity in general, but also to attack meritocracies. which men tend to prefer. And this is approved of by the academic world.

Nurturing, which is a primary trait of women, and is genetically, not culturally created, becomes a problem when it is applied to social and political issues that are not related to caring for ones kin and friends.

When feminist women and minorities attack the masculine trait of defense and protectiveness---which is also genetically not culturally created---the nation becomes vulnerable internally and externally to attacks by real enemies.

I'm for women and minorities getting equal pay for equal work, but attacking meritocracies, which men prefer, by declaring that businesses with more women and minorities do better than meritocracies makes sense only if the meritocracies are full of assholes.

I could go on and on with other examples, such as professional sports now dominated by preening black millionaires who object to our nations flag, or how about the now popular internet porn sites filled with blacks with large appendages and white women declaring the wonder of it all.

I'm not a racial supremacist but this sure looks like a conscious media-driven attempt to demoralize white men.

Nothingness and goallessness seen as in error

Darwin, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Wilson all brilliantly described activating dynamics behind human life, but none really described material evolution to Godhood as the goal of those life dynamics. Schopenhauer saw an irrational will behind everything which needed to be blocked, Nietzsche found an irrational will-to-power which needed to be let free, and Darwin and Wilson found the drive to survival and reproductive success behind life. Some of these men rejected or down-played religious views regarding the drives of life---in explaining life, religion itself had already been largely put aside by the material sciences.

In theological materialism religion is revived, but the entirely spiritual Godhood is understood as an entirely material and supermaterial Godhood. The goal of the inward activation of life (called here the spirit-will although it is material) is to evolve to a succession of material/supermaterial Godhoods, seen as the zenith of success in survival and evolution, while working unconscionably and then consciously with the ebb and flow of outside evolution. Science works with religion in this sacred quest.  In the Twofold Path the old religions are seen as the first Inward Path glimpses of God, and are retained, but now transformed in the Outward Path of material evolution to real Godhood.

How real reform not radicalism is the preferred way of deep conservatism

The entire establishment, democrat and republican, are dismayed by President Trump, but if they succeed in removing him from office they may be a lot more dismayed. Our nation may fall further into civil disorder because the radical right will claim that conservative reform will not save America or the West and radicalism, not reform, is necessary. And that is dismaying to deep conservatives.

The fact is Blacks, Whites, Jews, Hispanics, etc. have had problems getting along together not because they are bigoted or hateful but because ethnocentrism or group-selection is instinctively and genetically a deep part of human nature---it was the behavior that allowed these groups to survive successfully during the time when human nature was formed, and it is still very much with us today. Its not a culturally learned trait.

But no one wants to define human nature accurately in that way and it has become politically incorrect to do so. That will only strengthen the radical right and the radical left in response. Deep conservatives seek to stop denying kin-centered, ethnocentric and group-selecting real human nature and believe this could lead to real reform, not radicalism or revolution.

For example, deep conservatism thinks that the existing constitutional separation of powers and states in the US could be gradually and legally adapted to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates and regions, finally in harmony with real, traditional, human nature. Otherwise the radicals may succeed, at least in their usual short-term way.

Is President Trump an Aspy?

Some of us like the fact that President Trump doesn't act like a typical politician, but the Big Media constantly attacks Trump for his inappropriate social skills, his repetitive behavior, etc. I think of Joe Scarborough and Mika who day after day are obsessed with attacking Trump.

Here are some of the traits on the autism spectrum: a tendency to discuss self rather than others, inability to understand social/emotional issues or nonliteral phrases, lack of eye contact or reciprocal conversation, obsession with specific, often unusual, topics, one-sided conversations, etc (Autism Speaks)

If President Trump was an Aspy would that put the Big Media in a politically incorrect bind? I doubt it, they would go after Trump anyway---they would probably use it as an medical excuse to impeach him.

Trump's Handlers?

President Trump is now being accused of being weak and vacillating for scraping the Iran deal by passing the decision back to Congress. But what if Trump is being clever because he knows Congress won't cross the Israeli lobby who want to destroy Iran, so he won't have to take the blame alone for scraping the Iran deal?

The one area where Trump does seem consistent is in supporting Israel, even to the point of turning his back on the nationalism that got him elected. He was going to move away from the neoconservatives and bring the troops and the corporations home. He was going to stop going abroad in search of monsters, who seem to have been defined by Israel. The Big Media will not even speak on this subject---one would think they share the same handlers?

Will populist nationalism have to wait for another leader more courageous than Trump, one more like Pat Buchanan, who was probably destroyed by the same handlers who Trump now fortifies?

I am not anti-Semitic, I believe Israel should  have its own secure ethnostate, like every other distinctive ethnic group. Israel doesn't have to always be walking on the edge of disaster praising its own chutzpah, even though it thinks it requires that behavior.  Empire building with international intrigues by all parties has got to be curbed, and real decentralization has got to happen, if any of us are going to survive and evolve on this planet.

Falsely claiming that we are all the same will not stop wars

I watched Henry Louis Gates, Jr. this morning telling an adoring Charlie Rose how humans are 99.99 genetically the same and therefore how ridiculous and stupid it is that humans have all these wars and all this pain between races. I'm thinking, how wise and scientific Affirmative Action has made Harvard professors like Gates.  It's hard to believe that Henry Louis Gates, Jr. and Edward O. Wilson walk the same halls at Harvard.

One mutation of one gene can cause, say, dwarfism. We share 60 percent of our genes with fruit flies. One gene-pair out of 20,000 genes makes the difference between men and women, but it is a regulatory gene telling many other genes what to do.  Chimps are said be 99% identical in DNA to humans.  Little difference between us there? Apparently without even knowing it, Gates proves the point that minuscule changes in genes causes huge differences that explain why competing genetic pools of ethnic groups continue to compete for survival and reproductive success.

Wars are bad and destructive. We all stop evolving during wars. But falsely claiming that we are all the same will not stop wars. What will at least slow down wars is admitting that we are all different and we need our own space, our own ethnostates or regions, rather than jamming distinctly different people together in one multi-ethnic space and telling us the big lie that we are all the same and we should all get along. Who is causing the trouble here?

The best political configuration for humans beings to live within

Are we blind to the forces that rule us? I think Charles Darwin and now E. O. Wilson have defined the forces that rule us better than religion or philosophy did. Religion created invisible non-material forces controlling life, and philosophy obfuscated with mind games. Homo sapien or Homo mendaciter?

In any case, after many centuries of empirical and intuitive study, the evolutionary sociobiological definition of human nature defines human nature as being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection. Cultures can operate for a time with behavior that goes against this human nature, with such experiments as Marxism, but culture is eventually pulled back by the biological and genetic leash of real human nature to cultures that better reflect real human nature, and humans then work within and adapt to the environments they find themselves living in.

This shows that an ethnopluralism of ethnostates is the best political configuration for humans beings to live within. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could even be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected by federalism. It may require a few constitutional amendments to give more power to the states to move toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. It will not be easy at all, but it is far preferable to radical Marxism or Fascism, or the political dissimulations based on flawed definitions of human nature which have brought us radically destructive civil disruptions, or even civil war, and which are now increasing across the world within unworkable multicultural (multi-ethnic) societies demanding that we all get along.

If the abuse of freedom of the press, by the press, is irreparable than America is irreparable

Is it being "authoritarian" to want to curb the over-sized and corrupt power of the Big Media? I suppose that question is linked to curbing the power of the global big business drive to create a border-less world, controlled by them. Is that giving-in to Jean Revel's "totalitarian temptation?"

The Big Media has been falsely shouting fire in a crowded theater. If the abuse of freedom of the press, by the press, is irreparable than America is irreparable. There are bright people in America who should be able to figure out a legal way to curb the power of the Big Media, by breaking up monopolies, etc.

Trump is now nearly destroyed by the very swamp he sought to drain. I suppose Trump suffers from what the Greeks called hubris---but the huge task to save America and the West requires the boldness of a hero. That is what the populist nationalism and economic nationalism of Trump was all about.

America can be saved without calling for a Stalin or Hitler, cant it? I think so. It was the survival instinct, not a desire for totalitarianism, that caused the people who live between the decadent coasts in America to elect Donald Trump.

The idealistic realism of theological materialism

Neoconservative Leo Strauss used the term "idealistic realism," which became empire building and was not conservative. But I would keep the term and describe theological materialism as idealistic realism.

In the Twofold Path, the Outward Path of evolving toward Godhood is defined as realism and materialism/supermaterialism, while still conservatively retaining the ancient Inward Path to the God Within, which was the first ascetic symbolic experience of God.

In the Outward Path real Godhood can be reached and is reached by evolved living beings at the zenith of material evolution, which is not an inward-only, non-material, spiritual idealism, and not a Marxian political classless Utopia, and also not a neoconservative cabal-led world empire.

On earth we can set ourselves up in an ethnopluralism of ethnostates as the most equitable way to evolve and harmonize with real human nature, which remains kin-centered and ethnocentric in spite of widespread cynical idealistic propaganda saying otherwise.

That is the idealistic realism of theological materialism.

Contrary to conservatives, leftists, feminists, and postmodernists, reality does not exist outside the material world

The subject of gender has been obfuscated by postmodernism, which denies or overlooks the biological or genetic origin of most of our social behavior. That lie, which often denies that there is a human nature, allows leftists, feminists, etc, to claim that human behavior is completely malleable through social conditioning. And so we have such present ludicrous trends as transgenderism, cultural Marxism, etc.

Theological materialism shares the same traditions, values and morals as conservatism, but Godhood is understood and defined materially or supermaterially as that which life evolves to become in the material world. So conservatives obfuscate too when they claim that real tradition and order is founded not in material nature but in a non-material spiritual God.

Contrary to conservatives, leftists, feminists, and postmodernists, reality does not exist in ideologies or religions outside the material world. Godhood and order do exist, or can exist, but are entirely material and within an evolutionary world. Human competitions and battles, anarchism as well as order, even Godhood, find order only within evolving nature, and searching outside of nature leads to dead ends.

All empires fall and become an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, and that is good

The main principle of our latest empire, globalism in business, is to increase the pile of money. God is defined as money. The arrogant claim is then even made that what is good for global business is good for all people, since money brings all things. So national borders, cultures, and people fall to money.

This corrupt state of affairs in the world does not call for the venalities and totalitarian solutions of Marxism or fascism on the right, which are at least as bad as globalism in business. What is needed is the devolution, decentralization, and de-monopolization of globalism in business toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected by various forms of federalism, in line with real human nature.

Globalism in business of course strongly and violently objects to this solution, and still attracts the best minds who make money their God too, since other gods are rejected. But this will change as globalism in business increasingly causes the loss of borders, cultures and people, which creates social chaos. People will then begin to recognize that the best way to save ourselves and the world is by moving toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, which affirms kin-centered, gender defined, marriage-making, ethnocentric, even xenophobic and group-selecting human nature.  All empires fall and become an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, and that is good.

At last a Hollywood producer is called out for serial abuse of women

I don't usually praise the feminists, mainly because they deny or overlook the biological origin of gender differences, which are considerable, but I doubt if Harvey Weinstein would have been called out without the feminist influence.

It's hard to believe that a Hollywood producer is actually being revealed for the serial abuse of women, which Hollywood producers have been doing since Hollywood began. Some of the women were destroyed by the abuse---(who cares, they were only gentile women, right Harvey?)

A material way to define the Spirit-Within and the Soul-Within

If we want to consider a material dwelling place for the Spirit and Soul within, after centuries of mystics talking about them as non-material, the left brain might represent where the Soul is, which is the language and symbol side of the brain, the Apollonian brain, representing the Soul not the Spirit. The Spirit, which is also material, is represented in the right brain, the artistic, intuitive, even Dionysian brain, which could be called the Spark of the Soul since that is what it does in activating life, perhaps in all the cells of the body, to evolve toward Godhood.. Both “brains” work together in first seeing and experiencing God, the Father Within, symbolically, and later in attaining real Godhood through material evolution.

The Soul-Within could be called the Zenith of the mind and as such it is probably represented in the prefrontal cortex, not the limbic system that is blocked by mystics in order to "see" the Soul. We could say that the Spirit is represented in the right brain, which is the Zenith of the Soul, and activates both the Inward Path of the Soul and the Outward Path of the Spirit. The Soul and Spirit must then interact with outside natural evolution on the path of the material evolution of life toward supermaterial Godhood.
 

This allows a rational way to retain the Soul and Spirit of traditional religion, which is conservatively desired in theological materialism, and is seen in the Twofold Path.

In the Twofold Path, involutionary traditional religion is represented in the Inward Path to the symbolic God-Within, the first way humans saw God, and the Outward Path represents the evolution of material life to real, not symbolic, supermaterial Godhood, in the distant future.

Why has Western culture deferred to political correctness or cultural Marxism?

It is biology driving political correctness or cultural Marxism, as it does most social behavior, which Marxism cunningly or stupidly denies. Cultural Marxism is Marxist ideology and critical theory cunningly applied to the social sciences, but it is really the will to power of at least the elite of cultural Marxism, and it is a hidden drive to survival and reproductive success.

There are of course the useful idiots who promote cultural Marxism having been indoctrinated in virtually all our schools, as well as constant bias by the corrupt Big Media promoting the same propaganda in a more superficial way to the public.

We are too crowded and is too late---and it is immoral---to think of one group conquering all the other groups, whether it be cultural Marxists or fascists on the right, with some kind of throwback empire. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates is the most equitable way for all of us to live now.

Real human nature and the fundamental drives and instincts of human nature strongly suggest the political configuration of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. For conservatives this means adapting the already existing constitutional separation of powers and states toward ethnostates, in harmony with real kin-centered and ethnocentric human nature.

It is not the fundamental biological drives to power or survival success that are wrong, it's the exploitation of those natural drives that is wrong, and even evil. So ending the political correctness of cultural Marxism, or at least greatly curbing it, is vital if we want to save the West.

The best Trump tweet so far: investigate the corrupt power of the Big Media

This morning President Trump tweeted: "Why Isn't the Senate Intel Committee looking into the Fake News Networks in OUR country to see why so much of our news is just made up-FAKE! "

Now that would be the most important domestic thing Trump could do to try to save the West. The corrupt Big Media is the daily wing of the radical, postmodern thinkers who are intent on destroying the foundation and structure of the Western world, and are indoctrinating especially our young people with their perverse cultural Marxism.

If Trump is going to politically martyr himself to any cause, breaking up the monopoly power of the Big Media and exposing their virtual treason of attempting to overthrow the state and the president is the best cause. The way things are going Trump may not have long to do it. He has the guts to do it if he listens to his instincts.

An underground attempt to stop any Tillerson deal with Iran?

I'll bet the recent "news" that Secretary of State Rex Tillerson once called President Trump a "moron" was first initiated as an underground Israeli/Saudi attempt to stop any Tillerson deal with Iran, because the Israeli/Saudi's want the USA to destroy Iran, not deal with them, and they usually get what they want.

The Israeli/Saudi's know the Media will broadcast this nonsense because they know the Media hates Trump, and they know that overly-defensive Trump might fire Tillerson and hire a Secretary of State more pleasing to their wishes. Who knows if it will work, but this sort of thing often does work.

Trump is a useful moron to the Israeli/Saudi's, but so he---sort of---was to those of us who wanted to see economic nationalism established, which Trump promised. But we don't control most of the government and the Big Media as they do, so I suppose Iran is as doomed as economic nationalism.

Jazz, Plato, and Biology

Plato was right about the seductive aspects of art, but philosophy, including Plato's philosophy, is also seductive. Both art and philosophy can stir the senses and emotions and inflame man's character and culture.

For example, I have enjoyed jazz music even though the jazz scene has been permeated with drugs, illicit sex, and the opposite of the traditional morality I uphold. "Kind of Blue" by Miles, Coltrane, Cannonball Adderley, Bill Evans, etc, may be the best jazz recording ever made.  But jazz has also been the will-to-power of African-Americans, many who, like Miles Davis, hated whites.

Jazz also eventually became the will-to-power-of African-Americans over whites. And we saw that whites who liked jazz music also tended to affirm the will to power of blacks over whites, much like postmodernism was teaching whites to hate whites in our colleges. This was a decadent seduction.

I came to understand that it is completely natural for art and culture to be "used" to advance a people or a particular ethnic group since all social behavior has a biological and genetic origin.  And about the same time I came to understand the negative seductive nature of jazz.  Rap is now doing much the same thing to young whites who seem to be especially prone to such seduction.

I think Plato was wrong in placing spiritual abstract forms above material life and material art and culture. I believe that life evolves to Godhood only in the material and supermaterial world and it is Plato's Forms that are unreal.

As to jazz, I still listen to it, along with European classical music, and I see the seductive nature of both.  But it is the idealists and abstractors who are the real negative seducers.

Mind is not better than matter; I am therefore I think

Contrary to Kant, mind is not better than matter, matter takes on the form it does from looking at it with our material minds. Matter is there whether we see it or not, even if we see it with our “limited” senses. In any case, mind is also matter. Is this believed by faith alone?

Neuroscience has shown that that all our feelings and emotions have an exact physical/material source or reaction in the brain. A "soul" would be, or is, a part of the material body, for example, an activating will-spirit within life essentially defining "life" is material.

When I turn the old epistemological saying around and say, I am therefore I think, this implies that matter exists or I would not be thinking about it, or with it. If anything matter is therefore “better” than mind.

Life is the existential experience of matter, categories like mind come later. Theological Materialism rests on this base: matter-with-mind evolves to Supermatter-with-Supermind, or Godhood. There is no duality between "God" and matter because there is no "spiritual," but there is supermaterial which matter can evolve to become, defined as Godhood.

The mass shooting in Las Vegas last night leads to many thoughts and questions

Will the increasing violence by foreign and domestic terrorists, along with the so-called Antifa ( Anti-fascism) riots on the left, and the increasing civil and racial disruptions in our cities, eventually lead to a police state or military state on the left or on the right, supposedly to protect our citizens, and will this be used by those who want to take legal guns away from the citizens?

Are we seeing that freedom requires responsible citizens, but more than that, are we seeing that freedom relies upon people who can actually live in harmony with one another, which requires a large degree of homogeneity, that is, at least the same language, same general nationality, perhaps the same religion, and a high degree of localism?  That logically and instinctively leads to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates protected in their independence by federalism, not police states...But which will come first, a police state on the left or the right, or since that never works for long, an ethnopluralism of ethnostates?

...In any case, we now mourn the dead and wounded in Las Vegas.

"Equality" as political dissimulation

It is "equality" as political dissimulation that is the problem, groups seeking power and dominance are completely natural. The social task becomes how to deal with the natural will to power of various ethnic groups and individuals, which is what religions and ideologies have concerned themselves with.

African Americans play the equality and victim game now, the Jewish people played it before African Americans, and whites did it before Jews. Even a few African Americans now admit that Affirmative Action has resulted in discrimination against whites and Asians.

Much depends on the definition of human nature. If you think human nature is completely malleable and can be changed by culture into anything you desire---such as complete equality for all---then you have the left dissimulation, whereas the right thinks human nature is more fixed the further right you go.

Science and common sense have been slowly better defining human nature since the time of the Ancient Greeks or the Ancient Vedic Indians, and now we have the science of sociobiology, which has empirically shown us that basic human nature across the world is kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection.

This reveals to those who are willing to see it that seeking "equality" is political dissimulation, and it also says that it's time to apply what has been tearing us apart, that is, our differences and our wills to power, to putting us back together again.

An ethnopluralism of ethnostates and regions could be established legally in the United States due to our constitutional separation of powers and states. It may require a few constitutional amendments to give more power to the states to move toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. It will not be easy, but it is far preferable to the political dissimulation of equality that has brought us radically destructive civil disruptions, or even civil war, and which is, naturally, now increasing within unworkable multicultural (multi-ethnic) societies.

People before places or ideas

Traditional conservatives talk about the two visions of America as being between those who believe in "places" (Jeffersonians) and those who believe in "ideas (Hamiltonians)" and how modern liberals and neoconservatives talk only of abstract ideas, whereas places come before ideas.

But people come before places or ideas in defining a nation. Places and ideas are important but it is the people who essentially make a nation and culture what it is. Does it really have to be said that a European will create a culture different from a Chinese who will create a culture different than an African, irregardless of where they live or what ideas they may have? 

How did such common sense become politically incorrect?

This mainly stems from the liberal, and even conservative, blockade of knowledge of the biological or genetic origin of most of our social behavior, which does not fit their abstract "ideas" about the malleability of human nature and culture.

This misplaced hierarchy of values also explains why the saving political solution, of adapting the already existing constitutional separation of powers and states toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, continues to be left out of discussions regarding the solution to our growing civil disruptions.

Given real human nature, which remains naturally kin-centered, ethnocentric, and xenophobic, an ethnopluralism of ethnostates is how whatever real harmony between human beings is possibly. Our elites don't think this way, globalism has made them too rich to want to see this reality. But that may change out of necessity.

Similarities and differences with Zoroastrian Asha

Theological materialism believes in a world of evolution, which some have called “flux.” Like Indian Vedic Hinduism, Zoroastrianism is very old and was very influential in other old religions, and Zoroastrian's called this world of flux “Asha,” which defines how the real world works. Zoroastrian's seek to live in accordance with asha or how the world works according to their best knowledge, which leaves them more open to science and new knowledge.

There is the “idea” of existence in theological materialism and the projected Theoevolutionary Church (TC) but actual existence is central. Existence changes through material, not spiritual, evolution. Truth defines even the changes, yet truth itself is not existence, it is only the idea of existence.

But outward material evolution and natural selection are also activated from within to evolve toward Godhood (the zenith of successful survival and reproduction) by an inward activation called here the spirit or will or spirit-will, which is also material.

TC seeks to live in accordance with the evolution of material existence, which is our essential asha or flux. The core of material evolution also leaves us very open to science and change. It is evolution that leads to real Godhood...and that Zoroastrian's probably wouldn't define as the way to Godhood any more than Traditionalists do, but new knowledge of asha says it is true.

Even so, the Inward Paths of traditional religions need not be rejected, they are retained in the Twofold Path and seen as the first human glimpses or understandings of God, now superseded by the Outward Path of material evolution to supermaterial Godhood. And that is living in accordance with new knowledge of asha or evolution.

It's the genes, stupid

Real conservatives, paleoconservatives, rightly blame the Frankfurt School for the anti-white racism of postmodernism and modern liberalism, but it is essentially human nature that is kin-centered and ethnocentric, which leads to xenophobia, but virtually no conservative will mention it. Why is that? I think it might be the universalist way of defining human beings in Christianity---we are all equal under God---which keeps conservatives from mentioning the genetic origin of most our social behavior, including racism. Of course Marxism says the same thing minus the religious references.

The people who originated the Frankfurt School, refugees to America from Germany in the 1930's, in fact led to one ethnic group competing with another by way of ideology. This led to postmodernism and modern liberalism, which has led to the so-called "anarchists" we now see rioting almost every day in the streets. And they are not really anarchists, as paleoconservative Chilton Williamson recently pointed out, it is an anti-white fascism on the left.

But conservatives, including Williamson and Pat Buchanan, who are otherwise the best we have, continue to blame our racial problems on the "dividers" born of the Frankfurt School rather than "blaming" ethnocentric human nature. Calling real human nature evil will not make it go away, and we can't make it go away short of thousands of years of changing the genetic pool.

This is where the political philosophy of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates needs to enter the political world. The Constitutional separation of powers and states in the USA could even be legally adapted to this realism. But both liberals and conservatives condemn this solution, so I suppose it will be awhile before we see conservatives put a sign up saying: It's the genes, stupid.

Is there a way out of the complicated corruption of our culture?

To add to the Big Media corruption mentioned here yesterday, it is looking like Russia really did corrupt social media like Facebook and Twitter with political propaganda. And so we have to include Russia in the older corruption of the Big Media by Saudi Arabia and Israel, which has been going on for years. But the old exploiting media probably doesn't mind seeing the tech companies taken down a bit, even though they are both leftist, because the new tech companies have been destroying the old media.

Add to this the influence of Russia on the Alt-Right in the West, which one would suppose would be patriotic but has been influenced by Putin and the Russian philosopher Dugin into hating the West and promoting Russia becoming an imperial power again. Then of course we have our own neoconservatives who are not really conservative and have been corrupting real conservatism for years with their bias toward wars that do not benefit America but do benefit Israel, Saudi Arabia, and various global corporations (at least in the short term.)

It's hard to tell anymore who really stands for America and the American people. But we do know that these corrupting forces are tearing America apart. How will America be put back together again, or can it be put together again?

If we are honest and a little courageous we admit that real human nature works best living in a natural ethnopluralism of ethnostates, in harmony with real kin-centric and ethnocentric human nature. So the best future choice I see for America is to separate all the warring factions and the big destructive monopolies by adapting the already existing Constitutional separation of powers and states toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. I do think this will gradually and legally become a future movement, if not for rational reasons then from common sense.

One of the main things that made America great is now destroying us

Like many people I still ease into the day with my coffee watching television news, even though I usually head off to the shower muttering something like "F...... idiots." The printed word---although it is not much better---comes later when I am more awake.

The owners of the Big Media monopolies, which now include Big Internet monopolies, don't have a problem at all with fake, biased, and unethical news. And more people cutting cable TV has so far not stopped the Big Media monopolies from destroying our culture.

I see little being done to stop the Big Media monopolies, which only proves the corrupt power of the Big Media, who can, and often do, destroy any Senator, Congressmen, businessman, or artist who seriously takes them on.

One of the main things that made America great has been our freedom, including our Media freedom, but it is now the very thing that is destroying us. The Big Media really is a plotting and scheming cabal. 

But rather than taking away freedom of the press in order to stop the corruption of the Big Media we really do have to break up the Big Media monopolies.  If we don't we will one day see a dictatorship succumbing to the totalitarian temptation and taking away our freedom, which might even be welcomed by an embittered people.

Real religion seeking real Godhood by way of real material evolution

We evolve in the material world to supermaterial Godhood. Old nature can join evolutionized religion, not as the Deism of the Enlightenment which was really atheistic, and not as religion taken over by political ideology, but as real religion seeking real Godhood by way of real material evolution.

I would say the Enlightenment was 50 percent right in affirming science, and traditional religion was 50 percent right in affirming religion, but the Enlightenment was 50 percent wrong in smearing religion, and religion was 50 percent wrong in smearing science.

It is true that attempts were made to synthesizes these things. The Enlightenment affirmed Deism with God defined as nature, and religion tried bringing more rationalism into religion, but they really didn't like each other much, and that dislike grew worse as science advanced and religion faded.

Theological materialism retains religion and Godhood but religion and Godhood are reformed by evolutionized religion, philosophy and politics, which is different from the Teilhard de Chardin project to evolutionize religion while retaining an entirely non-material, spiritual, trinitarian God.

We don't look to experience merely the symbolic God Within the human brain or heart, as traditional religion has done---although this is retained in the Inward Path---the Twofold Path seeks to save religion not destroy religion.

Taking a knee for reality?

It will sound ridiculous, I know---and it is of course politically incorrect---but it would be more realistic if when the America flag is presented black athletes were taking a knee for having their own ethnostate within the USA---that would bring real equality. A few black nationalists still promote that, don't they? And of course real equality would allow whites to have their own ethnostate too. But rather than this the Big Media and the academic world are ignorantly, or purposely, pushing civil war between distinctly different ethnic groups, not equality.

What would realistically define "equality" would be an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, which could actually be accommodated by the Constitutional separation of powers and states in the USA. The cultural Marxism now taught (really brainwashed) in our schools and constantly promoted by the corrupt Big Media will never bring "equality." The equality promoted by modern liberalism has nothing to do with real human nature, which remains as it has always been, kin-centered, ethnocentric, and yes even xenophobic. When will we take a knee for that reality? Or do we prefer civil war?

Can exoteric and esoteric wars be stopped or at least managed?

With the importance of science acknowledged, which traditionalists only grudgingly support if at all, I suppose the old Hindu myth of a Lord Maitreya or World Teacher arriving every two thousand years to found a new updated religion is too much to swallow.

But can exoteric and esoteric wars be stopped or at least managed, that is, conventional religious and political wars, as well as the underground esoteric wars between so-called black and white adepts? (see Kerry Bolton's latest book)

Human nature being what it is we probably cannot stop competitive wars, but it seems to me that wars can be managed with rejuvenated religions and politically philosophies that finally take into account basic kin-centered and ethnic-affirming real human nature, without resorting to hopeless idealism.

The Twofold Path of theological materialism, the Involutionary and Evolutionary, and the projected Theoevolutionary Church, written about here, as well as the ethnopluralism hypothesis projecting an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected in their evolutionary independence by forms of federalism, are my suggestions, my offering, (my mission) for trying to manage exoteric and esoteric wars.

The Inward Path retains the traditional, symbolic, ascetic (material) experience of the God Within, while the Outward Path reanimates it by affirming the material evolution of life to real supermaterial Godhood. And the the ethnopluralism hypothesis conservatively protects kin and ethnic-centered real human nature and the human traditions that derive from it, with an ethnopluralism of ethnostates.

I know of no better worldview offered to manage exoteric and esoteric wars without resorting to hopeless idealism. This is religion, philosophy, science and culture ultimately brought together to affirm the gradual material evolution of competitive life toward real Godhood.

We can keep God and religion, but we need to reform the religious terms

To go once more unto the breach, or into the weeds: life can only manifest from the material world, which is not "dark" and is not a duality or a spiritual trinity.

What looks like a "trinity" is the inside material forces working within the individual material life form, and the evolutionary forces outside of individual life forms. But I see the essential material activation of life as coming from within material life.

That activating drive of the spirit-will within life is not spiritual but is material, and there is not a duality here either. What does look more like a duality is the outside forces of evolution that effect the individual life forms.

For example, the sun helps engender life where it can, but the sun itself is non-dual. The sun like all life is influenced by outside electromagnetic and gravitational forces itself, but the inward drive of the sun is not spiritual and is never separate from its material form (and the less-evolved sun is not God as the ancients hoped but almost the opposite of evolved Godhood.)

So why "life?" What defines life? Life seeks or is activated toward ultimate success in survival and reproduction, which ends up being Godhood. Life seeks Godhood, that defines life essentially.

It is the inward spirit-will, which is material and is never separate from its host, that makes life "life," as life contends with the evolutionary forces of outside life.

All the religions say that life seeks a non-material spiritual end, which they define as a non-material God---they captured the seeking and the end right but they got the substance and the means of attaining Godhood wrong.

We can keep God and religion, but we need to reform the religious terms.

Why the doctrines of multiculturalism and globalism are clearly not working

This will sound quite cynical, and of course politically incorrect, but I think what successfully motivates people is not so much doctrines or theories but the composition or makeup of the people in the groups who affirm the doctrines.

Whether the doctrine is religious, philosophical, occult, or whatever, the chances of the doctrines successfully motivating the people are much better when the group itself is in harmony with real human nature.

This means that the natural human preferences of kin and ethnic selection, and the success of group-selection over individual selection, are what bonds the group best even more than the doctrines or theories of the group.

Before someone jumps in here with the charge of bigotry or racism, the superiority or inferiority of the groups have little to do with their bonding success. I am describing real human nature here and not the fantasies of, say, cultural Marxism or modern liberalism.

Think of the various successful religious, philosophical and political groups in human history, even the supposedly "international" groups, and they will, at least at first, have been of the same kin or ethnic group, and they often fell apart or were corrupted when the original composition of the people in the group changed.

This is the foundation behind the political philosophy of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. If you want a win-win motivational reality, your doctrines will include having groups, states, and regions composed of homogeneous kin and ethnic groups. (In the U.S. the Constitutional separation of powers and states could be legally adapted to this.)

This is mainly why the doctrines of multiculturalism and globalism are clearly not bonding people together and are leading increasingly to civil disruptions and even civil war.

Can we face this reality, will we be allowed to face this reality, or must we all fall apart first?

The arrogant and dangerous fools at the Emmy Awards last night

Somehow America has got to do something about the arrogant and dangerous fools we saw at the Emmy Awards last night. It's the gloating and condescending arrogance that's so hard to take, and delivered by beautiful people---although now we are seeing more Star Wars freaks.

Hollywood has been exploiting and corrupting beautiful people for years, especially blonds. They come innocently, one after the other, from places like the Midwest, and they end up playing prostitutes and proudly giving the finger to the world. Now all the mean girls are blonds. What's with that?

Hollywood promotes everything that has nothing whatever to do with real human nature, but unlike the ugly nerdy professors who promote the same garbage, the Hollywood zoo does it with beauty and emotional effectiveness. The one hopeful sign is that people have been tuning out television and movies and turning to alternative Internet sites.

I wish somehow another show-business could rise alongside the declining Hollywood zoo, but build it in the Midwest, and make it a rule that any producer found abusing actresses would be neutered. Let's see films that affirm real human nature which is---according to science and common sense---genetically and culturally conservative and traditional.

The deepest way to counter the false reality

I suppose the counter-reality began way back when the religious world of spiritual ideas and symbolism took over the material world of real objects. This was probably the rough beginning of the Utopian idea that if you change the environment you can change humanity.

This counter-reality continued later with the Enlightenment in thinking that reason and philosophy could make humanity infinitely malleable. Later the sciences found that there was a genetic base to human behavior, so we can't blame the Enlightenment entirely for modern liberalism.

That early unfinished Enlightenment led to the Jacobin-Masonic-induced French Revolution and the continuing idea that if you change the environment you can change people into anything you like. (see Kerry Bolton's latest book on the history occult groups).

Modern liberalism followed from this counter-reality which denied almost completely any genetic involvement in human behavior. Nazism with its ideas on genetic supremacy did not help the countering of the false reality.

But enlightened science carried on, as it does, and has now clearly affirmed the biological and genetic origin of most of our social behavior (see E. O. Wilson's work in sociobiology). But the pull of effete religion and modern liberalism---and an elite who mostly benefit from it----still block this reality.

The counter-reality runs as deep as the spiritual religions, which need to become material/supermaterial religions to aid in the evolution of material life toward real supermaterial Godhood, which involves first the genes and then the environment. I am not against religion and tradition, I consider myself a conservative, but the return and reform of religion from imaginary ideas to real living objects is the deepest way to counter the false reality.

Where Buchanan and Bannon get it wrong

Pat Buchanan at least gives some credence to the ethnic origin of much of our culture, but both Buchanan and Steve Bannon are mistaken when they define the far right as merely a bunch of clowns. The far right are wrong when they speak of racial supremacy, but they are right when they speak of the biological or genetic origin of much of our social behavior.

Economic nationalism alone will not make America great again unless we also pay attention to the solid sociobiological sciences which have been empirically showing us for years that human nature remains kin-centered, ethnocentric, group-selecting, and different from one another. If we try to ignore our differences with false ideas of universalism and egalitarianism we eventually and naturally have civil unrest or even civil war between competing ethnic groups.

The real political problem is to figure out how to harmonize distinctly different and competing ethnic groups in our crowded world, and this is where the philosophy of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates comes in. Revolution is not necessary in the United States, the constitutional separation of powers and states can be legally adapted to ethnostates. Economic nationalism and federalism can then protect the whole. But economic nationalism alone will fall without the provision of  ethnostates, where real human nature can be what it actually is.

Think outside the box to reform the box

Revolutionaries usually have no interest in the box or in reforming the box, they think they can think better than thousands of generations of people who created the traditional boxes.

I think the overused term "think outside the box" was incomplete and should be "think outside the box to reform the box."

Most of our traditions were established before the Darwinian evolution was discovered, and conservatives have been rightly wary of Darwin being used by revolutionaries. But the neo-Darwinism of the science of sociobiology has found human nature and the biological origin of most of our social behavior to mainly follow the traditional ways of human nature.

As defined here often, the science of sociobiology has found human nature to be kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection. Darwin thought outside the box but his findings can reform the box.

The reality of evolution, sociobiology, and tradition, point toward the political/cultural solution of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. It is a conservative transformation---not revolution---that is coming, eventually, which will bring about an ethnopluralism with different ethnic groups politically and culturally conducting themselves the way they want to in their own states, even within our Democratic Republic, perhaps with only a few amendments to the constitutional separation of powers and states.

Why should big media monopolies be exempt from monopoly laws?

"The real enemy is the salons of the chattering classes and in the nation's newsrooms." Justin Raimondo

Honesty is only an act put on by the Big Media, politicians, and statesmen, who make the late actor Marlon Brando look like an amateur. They want a global world with no borders which they can control, and they do not care how many people they have to ruin or kill to get it. That is the cold reality. The old code of the gentleman, or Christian virtues, are considered naive---only the military hangs on to a few of those old codes.

Can anything be be done about the big media monopolies?  Can names and affiliations be be named? Can the finagling lawyers be useful for a change?

As Carl Gibson of "Reader Supported News" put it a few years ago: "...There's an easy fix that doesn't involve new legislation or Constitutional amendments: make the government do its job...We have antitrust laws already in place that broke up colossal monopolies like the kind Standard Oil had in its heyday. Why should big media monopolies be exempt from those laws?...By breaking up big media companies into smaller entities that are forced to compete with each other, we'll end up with fairer, more accurate coverage, and a more informed voting public. And, chances are good that a more informed public will undo past mistakes of voting for politicians who sold them out..."

And why not break up the new Social Media monopolies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter, who  were corrupted once they attained power---or they have been lying about being an alternative to the Big Media.

The unspoken benefit the Big Media receives from covering these demoralizing disasters

Yes, there is life-saving heroism in the disaster coverage by the Big Media of hurricanes, September 11th, etc, which is good, but the 24-hour disaster coverage is mostly demoralizing to the nation.

The unspoken benefit the Big Media receives from covering these demoralizing disasters is to establish a nurturing, feminine (pre-feminist), giving, ethos in the people, who can then better accept the global ideologies, the erasing of all borders and nations, and the destruction of all the bonds of real human nature, which the Big Media incessantly promotes.

Contrary to the standard lie, the Big Media are not so much giving the people what the people want as they are giving the people what the Media wants.

Freedom of the press has been almost thoroughly corrupted in the West and will have to be reformed. But if freedom of the press is one day destroyed rather than reformed---which is not desired although many people will welcome it---it will be mainly due to the great lies, corruption, and subversion by the Big Media.

Closing down the carnival of nerd intellectual con men

First the Romans then the Christians conquered or mediated the folkways of the pagan West. Many of the mediations were good, but some were not. The Romans brought the reason of the Greeks, and the Christians toned down the violence, which was good. But these things hypertrophied into supposedly rational fantasies of universal egalitarianism, and a spiritual heaven which rejected all materialism, at least for the priests.

Now we have the carnival of nerd intellectual con men in academia, mainly in the humanities, who have beguiled the people with global ideologies that seek to erase all borders and nations, and all the bonds of real human nature. Why do we allow these nerd con-men men to rule us?...Well, I suppose all of the rubes weren't conned, they were the ones who voted for Trump---(who now seems to have been conned by the neoconservatives.

What we need is a cultural superstructure which relates to the natural structure of real human nature, that is, the real human nature of being kin-centered, ethnocentric, and even xenophobic, among other traditional things, which in the past had led to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, before the Romans, Christians and nerd intellectuals changed the superstructure into utopian fantasies with little or no resemblance to real human nature.

An ethnopluralism of ethnostates, written about here almost every day, is the superstructure of culture needed to rise over the structure of real human nature. Conservatives need not fear, our real constitutional separation of powers and states can be adapted to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, and to real economic nationalism, in harmony with real human nature. But it probably means closing down the carnival of nerd intellectuals.

After the vampires have destroyed us

"The liberal media loves the neocons"

The epigraph by Aaron Wolf of "Chronicles" says it all. But I'll add a few thoughts.

The liberal Big Media is bad enough but the neoconservatives are worse because they lie about their ideology and motives, which are much the same as the liberals.

Beneath the words and noise of both is the desire to dechristianize the West and culturally and biologically destroy Euro-Americans, or at least enslave them. They have almost succeeded as Euro-Americans are now dying faster than being born and becoming a minority.

The only positive thought I have on this is that after the vampires have destroyed the corrupt empire we will have the chance to begin again, this time with a real constitutional separation of powers and states, adapting our constitution to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, and real economic nationalism, in harmony with real human nature. The vampires may then have their own cave to shit in.

Back to the natural instincts

"Instincts" have become a dirty word for modern liberals mainly because natural instincts come from the biological and genetic origin of most of our social behavior. Modern liberals embrace universal egalitarian fantasies with little or no connection to the natural instincts or to human nature.

The flower children of the 1960's did not go back to the natural instincts, they embraced opposing egalitarian fantasies with no connection to the natural instincts or to real human nature. The Baby Boomers still hold these positions today (and still smoke weed on the weekends).

Allan Carlson quoted the phrase by Burke, "wisdom without reflection." That could define the natural genetic instincts. Burke said the French Revolution was " a spectacle of politicians to gratify the schemes of visionary politicians." Modern liberalism follows the fantasies of the French Revolution, not the wisdom of sociobiology. The schemes of the cultural Marxists today are at least as bad.

Even the smallest change in human nature and our DNA structure, for example, in our immune system, took hundreds of thousands of years (now we have genetic engineering which is more rapid) And our natural instincts still remain kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of selection.

If we want to get back to the instinctive channeling of natural instincts and back to real human nature, our education needs to move back to (really forward to) the wisdom of the political/cultural solution of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, where different ethnic cultures and groups can politically and culturally conduct themselves the way they want to, according to their natural instincts, in their own states within our Democratic Republic, perhaps with only a few amendments to the constitutional separation of powers and states, which already exists but is not followed.

Seeking to define essential life

Speaking of human life: an inward material Spirit-Will helps activate/develop the material body, and activates/develops the material mind, which develops/creates words and cultural actions, and this vitally interacts with the natural world and the various outside changes to the mind and body of natural selection in evolution. Life is essentially deterministic in seeking to evolve toward Godhood as the zenith of successful evolution and natural selection, and this defines the actions of essential life. This suggests that the right or healthy human action is to become in harmony, individually and culturally, with the materially-activated Spirit-Will and the evolution of life toward Godhood. This is examined in the philosophy of theological materialism which reforms but does not reject both the standard scientific and religious perspectives regarding life and the direction of life.

The Big Media and the educational system have made us stupid and suicidal regarding immigration and DACA

When you can brainwash a damaging counter  feeling of "deep sympathy and sorrow for another who is stricken by misfortune, accompanied by a strong desire to alleviate the suffering," which defines compassion, that has to be considered wildly successful brainwashing by the Big Media and the educational system.

Many Americans want to let "Dreamer" immigrants, mainly from Latin America, eventually permanently into America to live, where they will reproduce at a far higher number than American citizens, who are now dying faster than being born. A Latin American people will create a Latin America culture, as they are doing in Californians and Texas. Our Euro-Amercan culture will become a Latin American culture.

In every human culture ever studied, human nature included, among other things, kin-selection preferences, localism, and ethnocentrism. If culture proposes to not include these things, the culture does not last long and it will always return to these things. These traits of real human nature also happen to be at the core of conservatism and tradition, whereas many of these traits are missing in, say, communism, post-modernism, and modern liberalism.

Our immigration policy is a serious thing to conservatives because they know, or should know, that when the people change the culture changes. It is that simple.

I have heard people seriously say  "So what if American culture changes with immigration, what's so great about America?"...and then they recite the standard liberal list of things wrong with America. Have the Big Media and the educational system made us that stupid and suicidal? Yes they have, and that is power.

What is missing and needs to be included in Conservatism

By not much appreciating science, traditionalism has not seemed to notice that the science of sociobiology, which has deeply examined the biological origin of much of our social behavior, and has largely upheld the traditional view of human nature, finding that human nature is: kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection.

In defining a nation, modern conservatives have mainly left out the importance of ethnic unity, which has made the modern right schizophrenic. They uphold the importance of unity and order but not the order and unity that comes in a traditional nation from ethnic homogeneity. The Right supports progressive ideas on individualism and multiculturalism even as they support a tradition which was skeptical of these things, seeing in them the will to power of both revolutionary ideas and self-centered capitalism. ( Claude Polin writes well of the schizophrenic Right in the September 2017 "Chronicles")

I call myself a conservative rather than a traditionalist because the conservatives seem to better understand the need for change within tradition (Burke certainty did). Conservatives need to affirm and adapt the legal constitutional separation of powers and states in the U.S. to include traditional ethnostates, that is, an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. Otherwise the U.S. will split apart in civil war no matter how much we talk about getting along together.

This seems to be the direction the corrupt empires of today are going, although it is considered politically incorrect to say it. Neoconservatives in the U.S are still trying to hold on to the empire by sabotaging the conservative instincts of President Trump, with increasing success.  But real human nature always returns, which the father of sociobiology, E.O.Wilson, compared to being on a genetic leash.

Was the demographic destruction of the West ignorant or deliberate?

The demographic destruction of the West since the 1960's was mostly deliberate, as cultural Marxism began to be successful as a weapon to destroy Western people and Western culture through immigration policies, Big Media propaganda, and a corrupt academic world.

Those who objected to the West committing suicide were called racist and bigots and not allowed on T.V., but they were largely right. Now only a few Eastern European countries. eg, Poland and Hungary, refuse to commit immigration suicide. But England and Germany are committing suicide, and they could have Islamic Sharia law before too long. The U.S. is being encouraged to commit suicide too and is being ever more successful at doing it.

The only hope I see is if Western people can manage to establish an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, avoiding war between distinctly different groups and cultures who will not or cannot assimilate. That will admit the reality of human nature which remains kin-centered and ethnocentric, among other traditional things. The constitutional separation of powers and states in the U.S. could adapt to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates.

Those who have been successfully promoting the suicide of the West will then find themselves in their own ethnostates, if they are lucky.

Tradition and conservatism do not escape universalism when applied to Christianity

The Left has of course used universalism to try to ruin Western culture by demanding universal equality in virtually all areas. This is why I think tradition and conservatism have to be based in the biology of real human nature.

In the hierarchy of values of real human nature, universalism comes last behind kin, ethnic group, city, state, region, and nation. Universalism applies when the larger world threatens the life of human beings who are normally concerned with local happenings.

But in many religions and ideologies universalism comes first, which has given them problems in selling universalism, because altruism (selflessness) was mainly evolved in human nature for local concerns, for kin and ethnic group. Even force has not worked to change human nature over the long term.

The prevailing cultural Marxism has been tearing down Western culture by demanding universal equality based on the relativity of all values. But it is the biological base of tradition and conservatism more than the universalism of Christianity that can best defend the West against the false values.

So conservatives and traditionalists will need to understand and affirm the science of sociobiology, especially the work of E.O.Wilson, if they want to save Western culture from cultural Marxism. It is from this biological base of human nature that conservatives will be able to adapt the constitutional separation of powers and states toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, at last bringing human values in harmony with real human nature, and avert civil war.