Back to the natural instincts

"Instincts" have become a dirty word for modern liberals mainly because natural instincts come from the biological and genetic origin of most of our social behavior. Modern liberals embrace universal egalitarian fantasies with little or no connection to the natural instincts or to human nature.

The flower children of the 1960's did not go back to the natural instincts, they embraced opposing egalitarian fantasies with no connection to the natural instincts or to real human nature. The Baby Boomers still hold these positions today (and still smoke weed on the weekends).

Allan Carlson quoted the phrase by Burke, "wisdom without reflection." That could define the natural genetic instincts. Burke said the French Revolution was " a spectacle of politicians to gratify the schemes of visionary politicians." Modern liberalism follows the fantasies of the French Revolution, not the wisdom of sociobiology. The schemes of the cultural Marxists today are at least as bad.

Even the smallest change in human nature and our DNA structure, for example, in our immune system, took hundreds of thousands of years (now we have genetic engineering which is more rapid) And our natural instincts still remain kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of selection.

If we want to get back to the instinctive channeling of natural instincts and back to real human nature, our education needs to move back to (really forward to) the wisdom of the political/cultural solution of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, where different ethnic cultures and groups can politically and culturally conduct themselves the way they want to, according to their natural instincts, in their own states within our Democratic Republic, perhaps with only a few amendments to the constitutional separation of powers and states, which already exists but is not followed.