Why the doctrines of multiculturalism and globalism are clearly not working

This will sound quite cynical, and of course politically incorrect, but I think what successfully motivates people is not so much doctrines or theories but the composition or makeup of the people in the groups who affirm the doctrines.

Whether the doctrine is religious, philosophical, occult, or whatever, the chances of the doctrines successfully motivating the people are much better when the group itself is in harmony with real human nature.

This means that the natural human preferences of kin and ethnic selection, and the success of group-selection over individual selection, are what bonds the group best even more than the doctrines or theories of the group.

Before someone jumps in here with the charge of bigotry or racism, the superiority or inferiority of the groups have little to do with their bonding success. I am describing real human nature here and not the fantasies of, say, cultural Marxism or modern liberalism.

Think of the various successful religious, philosophical and political groups in human history, even the supposedly "international" groups, and they will, at least at first, have been of the same kin or ethnic group, and they often fell apart or were corrupted when the original composition of the people in the group changed.

This is the foundation behind the political philosophy of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. If you want a win-win motivational reality, your doctrines will include having groups, states, and regions composed of homogeneous kin and ethnic groups. (In the U.S. the Constitutional separation of powers and states could be legally adapted to this.)

This is mainly why the doctrines of multiculturalism and globalism are clearly not bonding people together and are leading increasingly to civil disruptions and even civil war.

Can we face this reality, will we be allowed to face this reality, or must we all fall apart first?