It's the genes, stupid

Real conservatives, paleoconservatives, rightly blame the Frankfurt School for the anti-white racism of postmodernism and modern liberalism, but it is essentially human nature that is kin-centered and ethnocentric, which leads to xenophobia, but virtually no conservative will mention it. Why is that? I think it might be the universalist way of defining human beings in Christianity---we are all equal under God---which keeps conservatives from mentioning the genetic origin of most our social behavior, including racism. Of course Marxism says the same thing minus the religious references.

The people who originated the Frankfurt School, refugees to America from Germany in the 1930's, in fact led to one ethnic group competing with another by way of ideology. This led to postmodernism and modern liberalism, which has led to the so-called "anarchists" we now see rioting almost every day in the streets. And they are not really anarchists, as paleoconservative Chilton Williamson recently pointed out, it is an anti-white fascism on the left.

But conservatives, including Williamson and Pat Buchanan, who are otherwise the best we have, continue to blame our racial problems on the "dividers" born of the Frankfurt School rather than "blaming" ethnocentric human nature. Calling real human nature evil will not make it go away, and we can't make it go away short of thousands of years of changing the genetic pool.

This is where the political philosophy of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates needs to enter the political world. The Constitutional separation of powers and states in the USA could even be legally adapted to this realism. But both liberals and conservatives condemn this solution, so I suppose it will be awhile before we see conservatives put a sign up saying: It's the genes, stupid.