Why should big media monopolies be exempt from monopoly laws?

"The real enemy is the salons of the chattering classes and in the nation's newsrooms." Justin Raimondo

Honesty is only an act put on by the Big Media, politicians, and statesmen, who make the late actor Marlon Brando look like an amateur. They want a global world with no borders which they can control, and they do not care how many people they have to ruin or kill to get it. That is the cold reality. The old code of the gentleman, or Christian virtues, are considered naive---only the military hangs on to a few of those old codes.

Can anything be be done about the big media monopolies?  Can names and affiliations be be named? Can the finagling lawyers be useful for a change?

As Carl Gibson of "Reader Supported News" put it a few years ago: "...There's an easy fix that doesn't involve new legislation or Constitutional amendments: make the government do its job...We have antitrust laws already in place that broke up colossal monopolies like the kind Standard Oil had in its heyday. Why should big media monopolies be exempt from those laws?...By breaking up big media companies into smaller entities that are forced to compete with each other, we'll end up with fairer, more accurate coverage, and a more informed voting public. And, chances are good that a more informed public will undo past mistakes of voting for politicians who sold them out..."

And why not break up the new Social Media monopolies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter, who  were corrupted once they attained power---or they have been lying about being an alternative to the Big Media.