Saturday, July 08, 2017
The return to human nature in conservatism
The always excellent James Kalb
recently wrote about "returning to type" (Chronicles),
which I would rather call the return to human nature. But
conservatives (I consider myself a conservative) have had problems
absorbing the science of sociobiology, so the conservative return to
type has had problems.
Traditional conservatism has retained
values and morals that relate to the sociobiological view of human
nature, or vice versa, but has remained almost hostile to Darwin and
the Neo-Darwinism of sociobiology and the biological origin of much
of our social behavior, when they should have added it.
What perhaps stopped them or blocked
them was what I call the Great Spiritual Blockade as well as the
materialism or philosophical naturalism of science. The traditional
God was non-material and reaching Godhood involved blocking the
desires of the flesh, best accomplished in monasteries or on mountain
tops. So religion and conservatism faded.
In our time almost all art, literature,
philosophy, even religion have rejected or denied the deepest
elements of human nature (deep conservatism), some more than others.
Kinship and ethnic identity have clashed with the universalism of
religion (and the cultural form of Marxism), which blocked the values
of kinship and ethnic identity in both religion and in secular
culture, and our people have absorbed it, since it is all they see in
the Media and is all they are taught in school.
Even the smallest change in human
nature, in our DNA structure---for example, in our immune
system---took hundreds of thousands of years (now we have genetic
engineering which is more rapid). But still we all
remain kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual
marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and
religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the
primary unit of selection. Rational and instinctive channeling of
human nature and human drives, or education in general, need to move
in this direction.
And religion needs to move there too,
while retaining all the elements of real human nature inherent in
conservatism. In theological materialism Godhood is seen as evolved
to in the material and supermaterial world. This brings religion and
cultural life back to nature, and back to real human nature,
synthesized with science. Politically it suggest an ethnopluralism of
ethnostates, which conservatives can adapt to the constitutional
separation of powers and states.
I believe we will eventually go there, if we can survive.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment