Monday, May 09, 2016
Why the ethnopluralism hypothesis for America?
What is the disposition of a people
before you write a constitution, asked Orestes Brownson. But did he
fully answer the question? “Disposition” is based in human nature
which creates culture, customs, and religions, and human nature is
based on the largely biological origin of cultural behavior. This has
been called the”unwritten law.” When laws are divided from these
unwritten laws civilizations don't last long.
In our Constitution, powers are
separate, and states are separate,
but can be unified in the case of war by federalism. This relates very well to real human nature, which
remains kin-centered, ethnic-centered, even ethnocentric, no matter what modern
liberalism tries to tell us. Big government is not affirmed, even as
we are citizens of both the state and the nation.
Individualism works as a secondary
selection process which finds its real success in the success of the
group. We are united not in individualism but
in our states and nation. This is basic human nature with its mix of the individual and
the social group. Our nation was created by separate states (colonies)
consenting to the federal government, and secession, as in our tragic
civil war, is not needed when the states are given the right power.
This explains how the
ethnopluralism hypothesis now comes forward as the way to save our
nation from increasingly warring ethnic cultures (and this is happening more in
Europe), while keeping our constitution and our states intact.
Individual regions and states can gradually be grounded in natural
ethnic cultures, united by our version of federalism. No civil war,
no secession, no radical revolution is necessary.
This is the way of real human nature. This is the way our civilization can
last a very long time. Without it we may tear ourselves apart, and after much suffering, reform into natural ethnostates, as all fallen empires do.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment