Monday, May 23, 2016
How much can a system-philosophy change without destroying itself?
I think conservatism can offer more radical or revolutionary change, or transformations, of old systems and
philosophies than conservatives think it can. But it might be going
too far to speak of “creative destruction,” which is usually only destruction. It's not “out with
the old, in with the new.” I would argue that St. Thomas radically
transformed old Aristotle while retaining him, and Jesus radically
transformed Judaism while retaining it.
How many truly great radical thinkers have come
out of school tests, quizzes, study groups, or even expert
mentorships? Most of the new technology geeks, entrepreneurs, and
humanities nerds completely ignore biological human nature in their
worldviews. What great wisdom or knowledge can come from
that?
Inoculating too much of the new with
the old can destroy the old. But I think we can fuse the old with the
radically new, which is what creative deep-conservatism requires. We humans
still retain the reptile and fish brain along with the new cortex.
That tends to be how natural evolution works.
The Twofold Path in theological materialism is a retention of the very old Involuntary
Inward Path of traditional religion, while radically transforming it in the Evolutionary Outward Path. The Inward Path leading to
the symbolic experience of the God or Father Within---which was the
central ascetic goal of traditional religions---is retained but transformed radically in the Evolutionary Outward Path of material
evolution to real Godhood.
Theological materialism strains the old system a bit at first, but then smoothly harmonizes with it. Modern life, science, evolution, can this way be included in religion, whereas modern culture
is destroying religion and reducing the world to only indulgence and debauchery.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment