Sunday, January 10, 2016
The true and beautiful are simple, restrained and proportioned
I have an intuition, more like an
instinct, that the true and beautiful are simple, in both philosophy
and art. Complexity often means being unclear about truth and
beauty. But paradoxically to simplify seems to mean carefully
detailing the true and the beautiful, which usually means eliminating
superfluous or showy details.
Looking beyond my own instincts about
the true and the beautiful, this relates to the “classical” ideal
preferring simplicity, restraint and proportion, which has had
universal validity over time.
Much of modern philosophy, art, and
poetry is full of showy complexity and is often not even concerned
with truth, meaning, or beauty. Postmodernism usually claims that
this is because the truth is complex, unclear, relative, and not
simple, restrained or proportioned. But my instinct tells me that if
a thing is unclear or not understood, not simple, it is usually not the truth, and
not beautiful.
Evolutionary realism, the term I have
been using in art philosophy, follows this instinct or intuition
toward simplicity, restraint and proportion. This might also be
applied to guiding the future material evolution of life toward
supermaterial Godhood. Godhood is seen as the zenith of beauty, truth
and goodness, and applying this definition Godhood would contain the
zenith of simplicity, restraint and proportion.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment