Sunday, January 03, 2016
Can anything be done about the degeneration of the patron?
In a democratic republic how can we
patronize the best art and culture when our patrons tend to be the depraved
swindlers and vulgar loudmouths of Hollywood and New York? It leads
to thinking about the temptation of aristocracies, which supposedly
patronize the very best creative people.
We have witnessed the downfall of art and culture
promoted by the Big Media (and postmodern academic frauds), patronized by predatory global corporations who control the culture. Can anything be done about the
degeneration of the patron if one wants to work within the system we
have?
As usual I see the separation of ethnic
cultures within ethnopluralism as the best chance of developing
patrons with better taste. Then the plebeian-bourgeoisie newly rich will not have national and imperial power over
all cultures.
With ethnopluralism distinctive
cultures will have a longer-term chance to rise in their own regions,
protected by federalism. This could be accommodated by the
separation of powers and states in the U. S. Constitution. Some
states could promote aristocratic patrons within a democratic republic, and even the loudmouths could have their own culture.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment