Saturday, January 02, 2016
The real Fall of morality is the Fall from nature
It is presumptuous to call nature
cruel, are we to judge nature solely by human standards? Nature is
not cruel, nor is human nature. Why would we want to judge nature
that negatively?
Human traditions should not be thought
of as counter-nature, or counter the cruelty of nature, traditions
should be harmonious with nature, when they are not, as in Marxism or
global imperialism, and even some aspects of religion, then that
is cruel.
It is not merely pagan or modernist to
collaborate with the forces of nature, although we do not want to
follow Nietzsche's amoral Dionysus. When we define nature and human
nature more accurately, not as evil, we praise nature. The real Fall
of morality is the Fall from nature.
How can it be idolatrous to see nature
as sacred when we evolve to Godhood in the materiel world by way of
nature, not by the rejection of nature? The early religious sages
rejected material nature to concentrate on the God or Father Within,
but that was the first symbolic glimpse of real Godhood reached
inwardly, which can be retained, but transformed in our material evolution toward real Godhood.
Political philosophy and art follow the
shape of nature and human nature as closely as possible if we wish to
work harmoniously with nature. Marxism and global imperialism do
not, and neither does Nietzschian postmodern philosophy, although they acknowledge the importance of the will-to-power in nature.
What is the contour of human nature?
One phrase says it best: Group-selection, but it is a group-selection juxtaposed with individual and kin-selection, which is not
always a comfortable mix. But group-selection is the primary unit of
successful survival..."Within groups selfish individuals beat altruistic individuals, but groups of altruists beat groups of selfish individuals.." (E.O.Wilson)
This is how we arrive at the political
philosophy of ethnopluralism and make the claim that it is most
harmonious with nature and human nature. We study trained scientists
like E.O.Wilson and less known thinkers like Raymond Cattell, and
Alain de Beniost, but we also examine the ideas of the
paleoconservatives.
As I wrote yesterday, the affirmation of ethnopluralism, which reflects the group-selection of real human nature,
will be the coming political awakening. That is, separate regions and
states set aside for distinct ethnic cultures, protected by a
standard federalism, which could be harmonized legally in the United
States, for example, with the separation of powers and states as seen
in the original U. S. Constitution.
But then we move out of rigid
empiricism, while retaining science, toward the religious philosophy
of theological materialism, all the while seeking to collaborate with
the forces of nature. Nature is the origin of religion, politics and
art.
What is high morality? As the
evolutionary scientists say, morality has always been marked by its
conscious or unconscious affirmation of what is successful in
survival and reproduction, which could be called low morality. High
morality affirms the zenith of success as moving toward or attaining
Godhood, and older morality defines God mainly as an
inward personal experience.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment