Monday, May 22, 2017
Mending both conservatism and progressivism
I have found conservatives more
practical and realistic than progressives, but when conservatives go
on to congratulate themselves on not being "ideological" or
on avoiding pie-in-the-sky formulations, I think of their heaven as Utopian and ideological as the Marxist goal of one day
being "more than we really are."
Progressives
make a big mistake in not paying attention to tradition, which
follows, or should follow, real human nature. But
conservatives make a mistake in not paying enough attention to the
Enlightenment, which has gradually and scientifically refined the
traditional definition of human nature without rejecting it---at
least the science of sociobiology has done this.
Human nature remains kin-centered,
gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making,
hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making,
among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of
successful selection,
followed by individual selection. How do ideologies and religions
harmonize with real human nature and the biological origin of much of
cultural behavior?
Progressive tend to believe that human
beings are completely malleable for virtually any social behavior,
whereas conservatives believe that human nature is determined to seek
non-material spiritual things. The God of conservatives is
non-material and spiritual, but the "God" of progressives
is also a non-material Idea, and is therefore "spiritual."
Theological materialism uses
"progressive means for conservative ends", as someone put it, which is a good definition
of conservatism. Conservatives brag that a complex ideological future is not in our hands in answer to progressives who say it is. The
reality is some of both. Traditional ideas of Godhood need to be
joined with the evolutionary sciences: we evolve in the material
world to supermaterial Godhood, and our aiding in that sacred mission is
the synthesis of conservatism and progressivism.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment