Sunday, May 07, 2017
Affirming while amending the Founders; radical revolution is not necessary
In the same way that I believe
ethnopluralism is inevitable so also natural aristocracies of merit
are inevitable, because they are based in real human nature, which
remains kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual
marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and
religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the
primary unit of successful
selection, followed by individual selection.
Chilton Williamson reminds us (May 2017
"Chronicles") of how our second President John Adams
believed in natural aristocracies, as Jefferson did, and how Adams
affirmed a representative Republic and not universal suffrage. The
House and Senate would check the power of a few and not advance their
own power. The House would be for the "Many" and the Senate
for the "Few," and the Senate would keep the House healthy. Adams also praised peace and harmony
over mere efficiency and growth. He seemed to anticipate that
modern man would be bourgeois... I believe we need to renew economic
nationalism.
It can all be legal, constitutional, and
deeply conservative. We can affirm while amending the Constitution.
Radical revolution is not necessary and is to be strongly avoided.
Finally for the longest term health and
success we need to transform, not reject, religion with evolutionary theology, where the Inward Path of traditional religion is retained
but transformed in the Outward Path of material evolution to real
supermaterial Godhood.
The question is, can we return to the
views of our Founders while also amending the constitutional
separation of powers and states to become an ethnopluralism of
ethnostates, more in line with real human nature and real human
behavior? I say we have no healthy choice but to try---we are going
down now at an increasing pace. Our disharmonic
diversity has made it necessary.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment