Friday, February 17, 2017
Why don't conservatives affirm the deep-conservatism of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates?
According to "Modern Age,"
the essential conservative journal, conservatism reforms what is bent
or broken in tradition while preserving what is valuable in
tradition. Conservatism is against one-size-fits-all ideologies and
for independent centers of power and local control.
I believe conservatism needs to deepen
itself to include the reform of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates,
which harmonizes with real traditions derived from real human nature,
which remains largely kin-centered and ethnocentric.
Conservatism is against all ideologies of universalism and points out
the contradiction of postmodernism in its belief that all ideas and
values are relative, with the exception of the idea just stated. But
then conservatism goes on to affirm the universalism of Christianity.
This universalism of
Christianity---which promotes the idea that we are all equal under
God---is really not much concerned with human differences but is
concerned with experiencing the universal Father Within, and it is
this which seems to be behind conservatives ignoring or rejecting an
ethnopluralism of ethnostates.
An ethnopluralism of ethnostates is a
reform within the conservative tradition, which affirms independent
centers of power and local control based on real human nature, which
remains largely kin-centered and ethnocentric and not universally the
same.
Ethnic groups naturally compete, since
group-selection remains the primary unit of human selection, as it
has been throughout human history. Traditional conservatism needs to
see how real human nature can naturally be more harmonious in
ethnostates.
The constitutional separation of powers
and states in America could conservatively accommodate regions and states gradually
moving toward being the ethnostates they tend to be anyway, with
perhaps only a few amendments to the constitution.
Whatever peace is humanly possible
becomes more possible when independent centers of power and local
control are based on real human nature, which remains largely
kin-centered and ethnocentric, leading instinctively and logically toward an
ethnopluralism of ethnostates.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment