Sunday, October 09, 2016
The next meaning of life, religion, and science
There can still be design and teleology
without spiritualism, and there can still be Godhood and religion
without spiritualism. I do not agree with Edward O. Wilson, one of my
favorite scientists, when he says that religion and science should no
longer try to overlap and only science is required to explain the
meaning of life. ("The meaning of Life," Wilson).
Life has within it an activation which
really best defines "life," an activating force (material or
supermaterial) activating life always to live, survive, and reproduce---within an
outside environment of selection in the world---but also always seeking to live and evolve toward ultimate success, which supposedly
will bring virtually eternal success and virtually eternal
representation for life, defined as Godhood. This is the real goal and meaning of
life.
As to how it all began, how the cosmos
began "in the first place," I see no reason to believe, no
proof, that there ever was a beginning or end. Beginnings and ends
are the product (or wish) of human understanding. I assume there was
no beginning and will be no ending to life and evolution.
I see the rise of cyborgs and
trans-humanism as somewhat of a suicidal movement preferring
artificial life to real life, probably brought about by the loss of
meaning and direction, due to the loss of religion. There is also the
natural wills to power of the technoids who develop these things.
This is not the future I see, although artificial intelligence can be
an aid in the evolution of life. But the answer to this great
downgrading of real evolving life is not to bring back the same
religious, non-material, spiritual, explanations of life, meaning and
direction. Men remain afraid of real biology, genetics and human evolution.
We can retain the Enlightenment unification of science and religion, while transforming both.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment