Monday, October 17, 2016
Is the future foreseeable?
Yes the future is foreseeable if we
include real human nature in the prediction, many conservatives
and most modern liberals do not. This is why both parties now look much
the same in advocating globalism, open borders, and equality, which
have little connection to real human nature.
What works for kin and ethnic groups
does not work beyond them. Altruism, the behavior that benefits
another supposedly at ones own expense, really advances those who are
genetically related to the altruist, with the world far down on the
preference list.
Religion attempted to expand this
natural altruism beyond kin and ethnic group by denying real human
nature and hypertrophying altruism to include the whole world, which
did not work in stopping wars or halting group competition because it
denied or covered up real human nature. Nietzsche thought this was
the will to power of the priests.
This does not mean an end to
traditional religion but it does mean a transformation of religion,
as seen in theological materialism. And this does not mean an end to the constitutional separation of powers and states but does
mean a transformation, as seen in an ethnopluralism of ethnostates.
If we look for social and political
structures which harmonize with real altruism and real human nature
then an ethnopluralism of ethnostates rises to reality. Empires have
always broken back down into natural ethnopluralism, often after
doing much damage to human beings and the earth.
As the world gradually returns to an
ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected by some kind of federalism
(not fascist feudalism), we will have to be vigilant because
individual kin and ethnic groups will seek to dominate even
ethnopluralism, because that is what human nature does.
If you want realist policy, this is
realism.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment