Why would we want to think it is good to take the position of not-being subordinated-to-purposes?

Traditional religion and philosophy claim that they are “not-being-subordinated-to-purposes,” but that position is where their big problem comes from, that big spiritual blockade has damaged the material evolution to real supermaterial Godhood.

Philosophers and theologian's are subordinated to the purposes of their own spiritual ideology. Political conservatives do the same thing claiming they are not-being-subordinated-to-ideological-purposes when at bottom they are subordinated to the same spiritual ideology.

It is arrogant to assume we cannot be subordinated-to-purposes when daily life, religion, and philosophy are essentially activated by the deep biological origin of are social behavior. Why would we want to think it is good to take the anti-life position of not-being subordinated-to-purposes?

It seems to have originally derived from religious founders and gurus seeking the peak material experience of the spirit or god-within but claiming it was an experience beyond the material world and not-subordinated-to-material-purposes. It was an experience brought about by blocking or overcoming all the material desires of life---and then telling us to do the same---I'm sorry but that's like a drug addict pushing a great high.

The ferocious irony of this is that the evolution of the material world is the way to reach real Godhood: real religion and science can take up that great goal, aiding life in that sacred evolution, not blocking it.