The future politics of ethnostatism will need to first lawfully march through the institutions

Italian communist Antonio Gramsci (1891–1937) described how the state and ruling capitalist class – the bourgeoisie – “use cultural institutions to maintain power in capitalist societies. The bourgeoisie, in Gramsci's view, develops a hegemonic culture using ideology rather than violence, economic force, or coercion. Hegemonic culture propagates its own values and norms so that they become the "common sense” values of all and thus maintain the status quo. Hegemonic power is therefore used to maintain consent to the capitalist order, rather than coercive power using force to maintain order. This cultural hegemony is produced and reproduced by the dominant class through the institutions that form the superstructure.” (Wikipedia)

This was summarized by the phrase “a march through the institutions” (schools, the media, government, etc.) which was brilliantly accomplished in the 1960's by the counter-cultural left, which has now successfully replaced traditional culture in America and the West with various versions of cultural Marxism.

The New Right in France saw the sense of using this strategy for the Right, and I affirm this commom sense strategy for the task of rationally and instinctively channeling education and human cultures to move in the natural and integrated direction of the evolutionary sciences. The biological origin of our social behavior actually ends the intellectual defense of postmodern relativism and the cultural Marxist ideologues. But it also takes some of the virtue-signaling away from conservatives. 

The science of sociobiology has shown us that the natural order evolved a human nature that is genetically kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other conservative things, with group-selection as the primary unit of selection, followed by individual selection. That is almost the opposite of cultural Marxism and modern liberalism. It shows us that given real human nature an ethnopluralism of ethnostates is instinctively and rationally the best political configuration for humans beings to live within. 

But any future effective politics which affirms ethnostatism and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates will need to first legally march through the institutions. This calls for enormous almost inhuman patience, but if the cultural institutions and the people have not affirmed the political and social philosophy, radical, unlawful, or violent action usually leads nowhere or brings only more destructive violence.