How religion and political philosophy do not relate to real human nature

I mainly study human nature and and how it relates to religion and political philosophy, and I have found that religion and political philosophy do not much relate to real human nature other than having natural biological wills to power behind their social behavior, which they often disguise or are not aware of. I know that is a deeply reductionist thing to say about our civilization and culture but other than a few sociobiologists and maverick ethnostatists who admit the biological origin of our social behavior I find it to be true.

Political problems are not at root economic problems (Capitalism, Marxism), and political problems are not at root cultural problems (customs, arts, social institutions), political problems are at root biological problems relating to the biological origin of our social behavior. People instinctively knows this to be true, although it has become politically incorrect to say it, and that taboo, ironically, is itself the result of biological competition consciously or unconsciously hiding real motives.

Cultures can operate for a time with behavior that goes against real human nature with such experiments as cultural Marxism but cultures are eventually pulled back by the biological and genetic leash of real human nature to cultures that better reflect human nature, and humans then work within and adapt to the environments they find themselves living.

Even in advanced modern societies where survival is easier, Marxism (demanding equality for the unequal), radical feminism (demanding biologically unnatural roles for women), homosexuality (demanding biologically unnatural sexual life styles) and postmodern relativism (demanding a biologically unnatural relativity of values), are social behavior that goes against real human nature, which remains basically as it has always been, kin-centered, gender defined, heterosexual, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, among other traditional things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

Given who we are and given what human nature really is there should by now be politicians openly advocating ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates in harmony with the growing variety of ethnic groups in America with different genetic pools and different competing agendas. Relating to the Constitutional separation of powers and states we could be advocating an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected with a light federalism from marauding imperialism and supremacism, which always appears.

Where are the politicians and intellectuals who should by now be trying to deal with political problems that are at root biological problems relating to the biological origin of our social behavior? They are not to be seen on Fox News and certainly not seen in the Big Media which pushes cultural Marxism. Even conservative intellectual journals won't affirm the biological origin of our social behavior, perhaps because they are afraid it will upend the idea that political problems are at root religious problems not biological problems. Or it could simply be the desire not to be crucified professionally and personally by the prevailing political correctness of the ruling cultural Marxism. 

As to political problems being at root religious problems, the material evolution to supermaterial Godhood as seen in the philosophy of theological materialism covers that gap without rejecting  the biological origin of our social behavior.