Minus ethnic connections, individualism and localism are mainly just words and ideas that do not bond well

It is not enough to advocate individualism and localism as the old Agrarians did, and as present paleoconservatives now do, to try to bring an alienated and fragmented multicultural multi-ethnic societies together again. Minus ethnic connections, individualism and localism are mainly just words and ideas that do not bond well. If literature and the arts are missing ethnic connections they are weaker than when they include ethnic identity.

Blacks and Jews identify with their ethnicity and it has made them stronger. For long stretches of their history ethnic bonding, even in religion, was all the Jews had, and they continue to successfully hold to ethnocentrism even as it has become politically taboo for other ethnic groups to do so.

The social experiment of trying to jam people together into one happy multicultural multi-ethnic space has not worked well at all; alienation, fragmented, and competition between ethnic groups has increased.

When people are allowed to recognize the natural social bonding advantages of affirming ethnicity, then the locality, the academic world, the arts, politics, and even science can better aid in ending alienation and fragmentation. Human nature just is kin-centered and ethnocentric, among other conservative traits, and humans create cultures that relate to their ethnically distinctive needs.

Each distinctive ethnic group deserves its own ethnostate where the academic world, the arts, politics, and even science can more successfully and naturally bond together and flourish. Human nature is biologically, genetically, and culturally kin-centered and ethnocentric because such bonding has been the most successful in survival and reproduction, and also helps in avoiding the alienation and fragmentation that we see today, especially in white societies which have been hit the hardest by the multicultural multi-ethnic experiment.