The loss of religious sacralization and how to get it back without spiritualism

If we take the word “metastasis,” the spread of something, like a disease, from an initial site to a different or secondary site, and apply it to the split between the material and the spiritual, we can see the numerous problems this led to, not the least of which was, ironically and tragically, the decline of religion.

The liberals and progressives more or less rejected religion mainly because science could find no trace of the spiritual or a spiritual God. And they were right! But they were wrong to reject religion and God.

Rather than killing religion and God we should have gone back to the point of the metastasis and rejected the the split between the material and the spiritual. There is no non-material God but we can reach ascending levels of supermaterial Godhood. Real Godhood is reached by material evolution, and not by the symbolic experience of god reached in the ascetic practices of the traditional religions.

We needed to transform religion and God, not kill them. That was the real conservative project missed by the conservatives, and missed by Nietzsche, the abused father of postmodernism, who affirmed only new values created by individual supermen. Having no religion and no God modern men lost the sacralization of their morals, values, cultures, long-term goals, and even their survival.

How to get it back? The philosophy of theological materialism begins the process.

Basic intentions, motives, and views of theological materialism

When survival and reproduction breaks down then human nature, being constant, develops better versions of order and stability usually revising the old order. Revising the old order works best when it retains the best of the past even as it changes, which defines conservatism.

Civilization has sought order and stability because order and stability work best in survival and reproductive success. So human beings develop religions and political philosophies to make order and stability sacred.

Human nature has been constant in human history, but biology has been more constant in evolving human nature in the first place. The same problems keep coming up throughout human history because human nature and nature itself are basically constant.

We are at the stage or point in time when the West needs to revise its old order. Religions and political philosophy need to move deeper into the biology of social behavior. The old gods and the old political philosophies can be retained but biologized.

Theological materialism declares that religion and science can aid life in evolving toward ever-ascending levels of Godhood, and political philosophy needs to reflect that revision. The old inward God experienced by the ascetics from blocking material desires can be retained in the Inward Path but transformed in the Outward Path of material evolution to real Godhood.

In place of the multicultural multi-ethnic states, which competing groups are making wastelands, we need to form ethnostates. For example, the U.S. Constitutional separation of powers and states can be legally strengthened or amended if need be.

All ethnic groups and races, left and right, can affirm basic kin and ethnic-centered human nature and the sacred drive within life to evolve toward Godhood, while adapting to the ups and owns of the outside environment.

Real solutions to social cohesion are taboo

Neither decentralization or centralization will lead to real or long term social cohesion if the population is not homogeneous, that is, of the same general ethnic group. No amount of political or economic planning will change this reality. Having the goal for flourishing individuals and society be only profits, property rights, and individualism (libertarianism), or equality (socialism/communism) is not enough to lead to social cohesion.

Human life is involved in the war of ideas---80 million people died in the Soviet system. But the political correctness of cultural Marxism in the Media and in our schools will not hesitate to ruin the lives or careers of any academic, intellectual, businessman, politician, or artist who dares to suggest that real long term social cohesion works best in ethnically homogeneous societies. The problem with too many of these people is that when they feel their personal power threatened by the truth they will attack, bury, or just be unable to face the truth.

If they really desire flourishing individuals and society and social cohesion they could start by getting off their knees and clearing their heads with the science of sociobiology and the biological foundation of social behavior, and then work out their dissertations or economic, political, cultural programs from there...Ethnostates might then follow.

The “ends of man” are to be found in material evolution in space and time

Evolution is the real expression of history and the real structure of order. The “ends of man” are to be found in material evolution in space and time, not in a non-material transcendence beyond space and time. Non-material transcendence is the dream that blocks or slows down the natural path of material evolution toward supermaterial Godhood.

The religious transcendent school of history has been a veil thrown upon the workings of material evolution toward real Godhood. Religion should not be a blockade upon the evolution of mankind. Religion should affirm the natural path of material evolution toward ever ascending levels of Godhood, helped along by science, human culture, and the biological origin of social behavior, as affirmed in the philosophy of theological materialism.

Ethnostates within the Constitutional system

The separation of powers and states enshrined in the US Constitution could be the best way to develop ethnostates legally without radical, illegal, or violent methods. It would first require reaffirming and even expanding the power of the states and the principle of states rights and federalism; the Constitution now says that the federal government possesses only those powers delegated to it by the United States Constitution, all remaining powers are reserved for the states or the people. But ethnostatism might require an amendment or two to the Constitution. If the states then want to formulate an ethnostate they should be able to do so, and if they don't they don't.

States that want to remain multicultural and multi-racial can do so, but my guess is that people in multicultural and multi-racial states would soon move to states of their own ethnic group. This is where the political battle could legally take place. It will be very difficult, but no more difficult than secessions, or the slow death of distinct races, and it has the benefit of conserving the Constitution and working within the system---unlawful actions usually kill movements.

If we can't develop ethnostates consciously and purposely they will develop unconsciously and less purposely because they are the most natural political configuration for kin-centered and ethnic-centered human nature. Knowledge of ethnostates and the biological origin of social behavior needs to be presented to the people, but this knowledge is slowly, naturally, coming forward in any case, in spite of the corrupt Media and our schools.

Thoughts on Memorial Day

A world where no military forces were needed sounds nice, but that is not reality. Without military protection other countries would eventually try to attack and conquer our nation and enslave our people, or revolutionary armies within the United States would eventually try to overthrow the government. That's just the way it is and the way it has always been.

On this Memorial Day when men and women are honored for sacrificing their lives for this great country we should also be aware that too many of the wars we have been involved in should not have taken place, the military was ordered by priests, philosophers and politicians to fight and die in wars that could have been avoided. Military forces are defensive in nature, and when they are not, when they make “preemptive strikes" attacking nations or organizations that may or may not intend to do harm, then the military moves down the wrong coarse. 

Warriors have too often been treated as disposable material to be expended in war. If the U.S. had been more isolationist, more nationalist, which is the way the Founders envisioned America, the things that triggered US military action might not have sent us to war. The lives lost in Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan probably wouldn't have happened. Pat Buchanan even thinks that both world wars were unnecessary; if not for the blunders of Winston Churchill the horrors of two world wars and the Holocaust might have been largely avoided. (“Churchill, Hitler, and the Unnecessary War : How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World”)

It sounds counter-intuitive but if the military had their choice, and if priests, philosophers and politicians were less involved in wars, there might be powerful armies but fewer wars.

Pulling ourselves out of this age of suicide

But long before this time the suicidal seeds were sown by the metaphysical error of the transcendent view of history, with a view of God as beyond the imminent and sinful material world, which seriously diminished life.

History is the gradual knowledge by man of evolution. The goal of evolving in the material world to supermaterial Godhood need not deprive us of either science or religion. Defining life as internally activating toward evolving to higher and higher forms of life and eventually to Godhood, while also always being shaped by natural outside evolution, may be a bit further than science and religion have wanted to go, but we need to go there.

I find the arguments that evolution is “non-purposive” and random as closed as the religious arguments denying evolution, information is lacking in both arguments. Those who believe in the complete randomness of evolution often make dismissive comments regarding any kind of direction to evolution, usually in footnotes to show its unimportance to the text, but then the footnote’s are often emotional and long, protesting too much.

 

I see evolution moving inevitably in a pattern, even though it has its random elements, and the pattern has a discernible direction, in spite of instances of stagnation and retreat, toward “higher and higher more effective living forms,” as Cattell put it. We are activated from within to live and successfully survive and reproduce in every cell of the body, reacting and adapting to the various environments we live in.

Material evolution comes before God because evolution leads toward Godhood. That makes evolution sacred. This is not an evolution without sacred purpose. Religion and science need not be lost. In the Twofold Path we can conservatively retain the old first inward impression of a transcendent God now understood as transformed in the outward path of material evolution to supermaterial Godhood.

I would call this age “the age of suicide.” We have been talked into this baleful behavior and brainwashed by the Media and the Schools into opening our borders and our cultures to a variety of ethnic and racial groups who have naturally proceeded to change Western culture to the point where we feel so alienated from our traditions that we are now dying faster than being born.

To pull ourselves out of this age of suicide we need to understand that although there is nothing beyond immanent material existence, material existence evolves toward ever-ascending levels Godhood. We need to become in harmony with that goal, and help it along; it is the most sacred goal of life, for all ethnic groups and races.

The destruction of young actresses by Hollywood and cultural Marxism

Hollywood and Show Biz are characterized by excessive indulgence in pleasure and luxury, which defines decadence. Combine that with the Media and the schools promoting cultural Marxism and we see the causes of the gradual destruction of Hollywood actors and actresses, who most young people emulate. Let's take a look at a few young women in Show Biz.

First there is the trend of young actresses deciding to be gay or bisexual. A few years ago that included Lindsay Lohan---along with her excessive indulgence in drugs. Then there was Ellen Page, Kirsten Stewart, and the internet phenom Alexis Zall. Before that there was comedian Ellen DeGeneres and her actress girlfriend or wife, and Jodie Foster before that. Most of the newly minted lesbians quickly lost their healthy looks and became pale and drawn, as if the life was sucked out if them. Ellen Page now looks seriously ill, and Alexis Zall went from a lively healthy girl to a pale little thing with dark circles under her eyes. Lindsay Lohan never really recovered. Kristen Stewart at least has become a talented actress, but she usually looks and dresses like a homeless person. More recently redhead Bella Thorn has put a ring through her nose and usually looks like she has gone without sleep for a week, though I don't know if she has declared herself bisexual yet or not. I suppose we will have to see the “Stranger Things” phenom Millie Bobby Brown follow the same sort of road.

But then we have those young actresses who seem to have escaped the drugs and the decadence, like Emma Watson---although she does follow the trend of having a long string of sexual partners. Watson went to good colleges but was there brainwashed in the whole charade of radical feminism. I doubt if she had one course in the biological origin of social behavior, and if she did it was probably portrayed only as patriarchal crime. The reality of the biology of real human nature utterly destroys the claims of radical feminism, but no one reads them or teaches them.

I won't go into the number of young men destroyed by Hollywood and Show Biz, I feel more angry and protective about the destruction of young women. But nothing much is being done about it. Measures to protect young people from Hollywood and Show Biz are seen as only hateful...Well, to quote the degenerate Bob Dylan, “a hard rain is going to fall.”

Brilliant degeneracy

" The question is to what extent is judgment life-promoting, life-preserving, species preserving, perhaps species cultivating." (Nietzsche, BGE)

I call them brilliant degenerates, ten percent or so of modern artists and writers, including film makers, who are seductive, full of flash and wit, and yet are still subtle, not heavy handed. They use their brilliant degeneracy to sell values and morals that are, well, degenerate.

As I've written here before, libertarianism among businessmen shares some of the blame for the brilliant degeneracy of modern art. Concentrating almost exclusively on making a god of individualism and the freedom to make money came back to bite them when the Hollywood moguls and leftist publishers and producers of New York and Los Angeles, as well as the academic world, exploited American freedom and deformed a formerly traditional conservative culture to fit their leftist cultural agendas. The Hollywood moguls and leftist publishers found that they could personally make big money but also change culture in a culturally Marxist direction. They marched through the institutions and they won the cultural war. It was brilliant. Burke and Kirk's "moral imagination" among artists now is applied only to the political correctness of cultural Marxism.

At its essence brilliant degeneracy is the will to power of those who do not know or want to escape or block real human nature and the values that implies. And so they brilliantly attack tradition and traditional human nature derived from the biological origin of social behavior. Healthy uncorrupted artists would do the opposite and critique the brilliant degenerates with subtlety and wit. Healthy uncorrupted artists know that real tradition and conservatism believes in change and progress but only while retaining the best of the past.

I guess the counter-march through the institutions has to begin with the first steps. So where are the marchers? Perhaps some of those libertarian conservative businessmen who were hoodwinked by making a god of individualism and money will finance the recovery of the arts---there is even money to be made in it. That could help redeem them and redeem the time.

Western people seem too depressed to breed or maintain their cultures anymore, as we see reported almost daily and gleefully in the demographic statistics of the Big Corrupt Media. Western people now see and hear post-modern culture created by loud and angry people who usually do not share their same genetic or cultural traits. The hard reality is, as the people change the culture changes. Conserving Western culture means conserving Western people.

It is really the Left that is stupid and vulgar not Trump or Trump supporters

The Left has a stupid way of judging President Trump: modern democrats and the Left judge what is superior almost solely by "politically correctness,” that is, by the cultural Marxism they were taught in corrupted schools that Trump didn't attend.

People tend to think the ends, the goals that one seeks to achieve, are seen or foretold in the means to that goal. There is snobbery involved in the hatred of Trump because Trump's manner and way of talking don't conform to politically correctness; President Trump is often coarse and arrogant in his behavior, or in his means, and the Left think the ends that Trump has in mind must therefore also be vulgar, that is, economic nationalism, bringing manufacturing and jobs back to America, protecting our borders etc, must be vulgar.

The problem for the Left is that most of the people who live between the coasts think and act like Trump, and vote for Trump, which is often defined as populism or populist nationalism. In other words the people either have not been corrupted by the corrupted schools and the corrupted Media, or they just don't buy the lies of politically correctness and cultural Marxism preached in our schools and in the Media.

It is really the Left that is stupid and vulgar, not Trump or Trump supporters.

Modern liberalism has unsuccessfully tried to rid human beings of being human and what to do about it

The emphasis of modern liberalism on the sameness, equality, etc. of ethnic groups or races has had little effect on making them the same or equal. Without judging the superiority or inferiority of either, the differences between matriarchal blacks in the U. S. and patriarchal whites is starkly different, almost like being from different planets, and that is only one example of the differences in culture and personality, all of which are mainly the result of the biological and genetic origin of our social behavior, which modern liberalism refuses to acknowledge. Various levels of differences apply to all ethnic groups and racial groups whose different traits and personalities were developed or evolved in distinctly different environments.

When ethnic groups didn't melt together and become happy liberals the liberals came up with the concept of “multiculturalism.” But that hasn't led to order, harmony, or equal respect between the races but to even more ethnocentrism, and increasing suicidal traits. Why hasn't multiculturalism worked? Because the differences between ethnic groups and racial groups in personalty and culture are mainly the result of the deep biological and genetic origin of our social behavior; we are not only different but we are competitive in seeking the survival and reproduction of our own genetic traits.

So again, without judging the superiority or inferiority of ethnic groups or races, it is time to try a common sense solution to the unofficial civil war raging between ethnic groups or races, in spite of religion, science, capitalism, socialism, libertarianism, multiculturalism, etc etc. Human nature IS ethnocentric and has been since humans became humans. Group-selection was the best or only way for individuals to successfully survive, so altruism, or being for others, was naturally limited to kin and ethnic groups and not much beyond that because they share the same genes which strive for survival and reproductive success. Trying to rid human nature and culture of the deep-seated preference for kin and ethnic group is like trying to rid human beings of being human. That is inhumane and cruel.

Reality points toward the political/cultural solution of ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. It is a conservative transformation---not revolution---which can bring about the sociopolitical or political/cultural structure most in harmony with real human nature. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, and protected from the inevitable marauders by federalism.

Without judging the superiority or inferiority of any ethnic group, we need to optimize, not block, the gene expression we inherited from our ancient human ancestors, not only in what we eat (eg. paleo diet) and how we exercise, but in which cultures and political systems we create. This is what truly bolsters our physical and mental health. We have gotten far away from the real human nature we inherited from our ancestors and we need to get back to a healthy expression of who we are. The biological origin of our social behavior actually ends the intellectual defense of postmodern relativism, equality, and multiculturalism.

Dealing with bias in anthropology and paleontology

Anthropology, the scientific study of humans and human behavior and societies, and  paleontology, the study of fossils to determine organisms' evolution and interactions, have become more complicated every year, especially for layman. But some of the complication comes from bias, which is especially frustrating for layman interested in finding out how we evolved and how we came to be who we are. Science is of course supposed to be unbiased but the bias seems to follow from the innate kin and ethnic-centered human nature of scientists who uphold their own ethnic history.

For many centuries in the West the history of man, civilization, languages, etc, was believed to have begun in the Judaic-Christian Garden of Eden, perhaps in southern Mesopotamia. Then people like Max Müller (1823-1900) discovered that there was a common ancestry or origin in language and culture between the Vedic Indians and Europeans, which soon set off opposition to the Judaic-Christian Semitic view of history. This opposition in anthropology and paleontology seems to have continued to the present, although it is never mentioned. The work of Soviet, Chinese, and Euro-American anthropologists and paleontologists seem to be biased toward upholding their own ethnic history. And since World War Two any talk a common ancestry or origin in language and culture between the Vedic Indians and Europeans is mainly taboo, since the Nazis were also interested in the subject.

 

So if we want to know who we are and where we came what are we to do?  We are left to our own layman judgements regarding who to believe or who to be skeptical of.  Personally, if I can discern that the scientist seems to affirm the biological origin of social behavior I'll take their ideas more seriously.  But it's all very frustrating and disappointing.

What are the permanent things in reality?

Eliot and Kirk say the permanent things are “more than natural, more than private, more than human.” Really?

Conservatism cannot be purposefully built without naturalism. And we need not lose religion with naturalism if it is a religion built on the biological evolution of life to supermaterial Godhood.

Eliot and Kirk go on to say that “men will never be Gods.” Yes they will. No “tragic sense” of an irremediably fallen man is necessary or real. What is tragic is the Great Spiritual Blockade put up by non-materialism against the biological origin of social behavior.

Political philosophy traditionally stems from ethics and ethics from religion, but which religious philosophy? We do need to bond our societies with the sacred, but which sacred?

Real conservatism doesn't die with the affirmation of our material evolution to supermaterial Godhood, evolution naturally conserves the best of the past as we continue to seek the best in evolving toward ever-ascending levels of Godhood. True conservatism and permanence is built on that.

Our moral beliefs certainly rest on a natural foundation

We are only marginally free, we have free choices within determined paths.

Nature is where all the action comes from, and human nature is part of nature. We are not free of nature, why would we want to be?

It is nature itself that brings men to say that we are free or can be free of nature, which is consciously or unconsciously a lie caused by the natural will to power of men.

Religion and philosophy don't exist without thinking, but thinking doesn't exist without nature.

Our moral beliefs certainly rest on a natural foundation, “spiritual” foundations come from the natural foundation of human nature, and to deny it is foolish or cowardly.

Nature is the arbiter of truth, and Christianity and other religions are a product of nature.

“Rights” derive from evolving nature not from Gods or religions. Gods, rights, and religions derive from evolving nature.

Evolution creates the process of history, history does not create evolution. Darwin is a better guide to history than Hegel.

You have heard that “only a God can save us,” but only becoming in harmony with our natural material evolution to supermaterial Godhood can save us.

The driving intention of evolution

Natural selection is a law of nature, the Darwinists’ “invisible factor.” As a selector, natural selection has a driving intention. And that driving intention can eventually lead to the evolution of the highest or greatest success of natural selection in survival and reproduction, which can be defined as Godhood.

Then when we ask the question what drives that intention behind the natural selection of life, you see that there is an activation to that driving intention. I think that activation, which I call Tirips, is a material activation, not spiritual, and it best and most deeply defines “life” itself, however the chemistry involved is labeled---and it also brings long term sacred purpose and goals to material evolution.

That explains the deep phenomena of evolution and religion; I personally believe it is true and make it the basis for the future religion portrayed in the philosophy of theological materialism.

Science and religion don't yet approve of this philosophy, but I do. It could bring the two long time opponents, religion and philosophy, back together again, and aid in our sacred evolution.

Improving Tocqueville

If we had no existing institutions or traditions we could, like Plato, think of building some sort of aristocracy of merit. But Tocqueville thought that the “conservative function renovates old values with improved faiths.” I believe the conservative function mirrors evolution in the same way human beings retained the reptilian and mammalian brain even as they evolved the neo-cortex atop them.

We have inherited a democratic republic in need of renovation and improved faith, tearing it all down in radical revolution is destruction not change. Democracy only works well locally and we can get back to local democracy. We can also improve localism with the homogeneity of forming ethnostates, which can be built upon the constitutional separation of powers and states; that will put us in harmony with real kin-and-ethnic-centered human nature.

Tocqueville thought that “materialism” could ruin America, but I would rather disparage the wild "consumerism" of America and not make “materialism” a bad word. In considering change and democracy Tocqueville said that God or Providence paved the way for change in the world. I could agree with that if we were talking about material evolution, because it is material evolution that leads toward supermaterial Godhood, and for that reason I don't disparage theological materialism.

The reconciliation of opposites that the conservative “fusionists” applied left out biology, specifically sociobiology, and that seems to have doomed them

Much of this had to do with the objections of the neoconservatives who would label anyone who mentioned biology or the biological origin of social behavior a racist, which could destroy careers.

Much of the objection also came from the Catholic conservatives who could not reconcile the the biological origin of social behavior with the spiritual origin of social behavior, especially the idea that religion was the consequence of the biological origin of social behavior seeking bonding order for better survival.

The inherent chutzpah of the neoconservatives claimed Pat Buchanan was anti-Semitic and kicked Pat, who is a realist not an anti-Semite, out of the conservative journal “National Review,” which had been overwhelmed with well organized neoconservatives, like many conservative institutions.

So what is to be done? Is conservative fusionism over? Not for me. The biological origin of our social behavior actually ends the intellectual defense of postmodern relativism and the cultural Marxist ideologues. But it also takes some of the virtue-signaling away from conservatives. Fusionism needs the reconciliation of the opposites of spiritualism and materialism, and virtually no-one wants to go there. It means grounding conservatism in the biological origin of social behavior, and no one wants to go there either---the Alt right will go there but most of them reject conservatism.

The biological origin of our social behavior brings forward the idea of ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, based on real kin and ethnic-centered human nature, which in the U. S. could even be established legally with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected by federalism.

The goal of materially evolving to Godhood need not deprive us of either science or religion. As I wrote yesterday, the fusion of the Twofold Path in theological materialism respects the philosophy of conservatism and retains the "non-material" Inward Path of traditional religion, but transforms it in the Outward Path of material and supermaterial evolution to real Godhood. The traditional peak material experience of God reached inwardly by blocking material desires is seen as the first preliminary experience of Godhood now understood as reached by material and supermaterial evolution. The old testaments of traditional religions are retained but transformed in the new evolutionary religious commitments.

Human nature is not inescapably sinful and fallen

It was nefarious of traditional religion to try to bond the people to traditional religion by declaring that human nature is inescapably sinful and fallen, to stop us from disobeying the edicts of traditional religion.

And what did they define as sinful and the fallen nature of man? They defined the very heart of real human nature as sinful, such as being too kin-centered, hierarchical, ethnocentric, or xenophobic, and they attacked group-selection (and ethnic selection) as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection---although they did affirm other basic traits of real human nature, like being gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, and marriage-making (reluctantly). And religious ascetics then made being free of all material desires the most virtuous life.

People were confined by religion to declaring virtuous slogans akin to the slogans of the French revolution, like “liberty, equality, fraternity,” which do not relate to real human nature.

But defining human nature as being inescapably sinful and fallen was not enough for them so they created the evil-of-evil, Satan, to stand for all the elements of human nature mentioned above which got in the way of their religious morals and values.

The religious philosophy of theological materialism does not pull those nasty metaphysical tricks on people. We can become ever-ascending gods by way of material and supermaterial evolution by applying and nurturing the very materialism that traditional religion calls inescapably sinful. Materially evolving toward ever-ascending levels of Godhood is the opposite of satanic, it is sacred life rising to its highest sacred purpose.

Even so, the Twofold Path in theological materialism respects the philosophy of conservatism and therefore retains the "non-material" Inward Path of traditional religion, but transforms it in the Outward Path of material and supermaterial evolution to real Godhood. The peak material experience of God reached inwardly by blocking material desires is seen as the first preliminary experience of Godhood now understood as reached by material and supermaterial evolution. The old testaments of traditional religions are retained but transformed in the new evolutionary religious commitments.

No one can agree on what universal rights are mainly because no one can agree on what human nature is

What we have today is cultural and economic imperialism based on the flawed definitions of human nature leading to flawed definitions of universal rights. Errors in political and cultural philosophy stem from this.

The heart of the ethnopluralism hypothesis is the rights of ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates based on the sociobiological definition of human nature and universal rights.  Human nature is now and has been for tens of thousands of years basically kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other conservative things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

What does this indicate regarding human nature and universal rights? It indicates that realism affirms ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. What we have now are various forms of cultural and economic imperialism and supremacy.  Our age of nuclear weapons makes cultural and economic imperialism and supremacy unworkable and very dangerous. “International law” needs to affirm the rights of ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. The time of multicultural multi-ethnic states is over.

An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected by federalism. It will not be easy, it may require a few constitutional amendments to give more power to the states to move toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates.

But an ethnopluralism of ethnostates is far preferable to the political dissimulations we have today based on flawed definitions of human nature and universal rights which have brought us radically destructive civil disruptions, or even civil war, now increasing across the world within unworkable multicultural multi-ethnic societies demanding that we “all get along” living in the same space.

At this time only the “Alt right” has shown the courage to affirm ethnostates, but they often turn their backs on conservatism and the valuable assets of tradition, and they too often attack their own country and affirm radicalism and revolution (some even choose Putin's Russia over the West), leading to more of the same marauding cultural and economic imperialism and supremacy, contrary to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates and conflicting with the sociobiological definition of human nature and universal rights.

The vital changes toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates need to be done legally, constitutional, patriotically, and not by radical revolutionary means which almost never work and usually cause great biological and cultural convulsions in life.

Tariff cold wars with China and provoked real wars with Iran

In the present tariff wars we will see if greedy global Western capitalism can hold out against greedy economic nationalist Chinese communism.

More concerning is the Israel/Saudi/U.S. provoked real war against Iran.

A dangerous time.

Sociobiologically transformed religion and science

Reason, supposedly the god of the left, and spirit/soul the god of the religious right, along with their politics, need to be adjusted to the real biological origin of our social behavior.

Reason does not rule human nature any more than the traditional soul/spirit does, the biological origin of human social behavior rules human nature, which includes reason and the spirit/soul.

Religion and science are part of human nature, not the origin of human nature, although religion comes closer to the total view of human nature because it doesn't define reason as God.

Traditional, religious, and conservative morals and values harmonize quite well with the sociobiological view of human nature as being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

Conservatives and modern liberals need to transform there squabbling views of human nature with the ongoing sociobiological knowledge and wisdom of Charles Darwin and Edward O. Wilson which can deepen both conservatism and modern liberalism, not destroy them.

The soul/spirit of religion needs to be understood not as non-material but as the material activation within every cell of the body (Tirips) to survive and reproduce successfully and evolve toward the ultimate success of supermaterial Godhood.

Invented utopias of the left or the right won't be found on earth or even in the stars, but steady material evolution toward always ascending levels of Godhood can be found if real human nature is unblocked and then guided by a sociobiologically transformed religion and science (see theological materialism).

What good is it to become rich if you and your descendants die in foreign wars fought for commerce?

The free enterprise system was a great social invention almost miraculously driving up the standard of living for everyone, but as often happens with human inventions the free enterprise system has been hypertrophied into a monster of destruction. The saying “wars fought for commerce” says it all about where the free enterprise system and bloated capitalism have gone.

All religions said something like: “one's love for God must exceed his love for all material things.” Other than religious fundamentalists, and those who give lip service to the idea that wealth can further God’s realm on this planet, all religions have faded and the values of the money-making monster control everything---even Communists China has joined the money-making monster, although they operate more like the old Talmudic idea that interest-free loans apply only to loans made to other Chinese and not to persons who are not Chinese.

Modern liberals copy the religious idea that wealth can further God’s realm on this planet only they do it without God or religion and they make big government the distributor of wealth, with economists and bureaucrats as priests. Libertarians and Republicans consider the individual as king and allow individuals to seek wealth largely unimpeded by social scruples.

The global Wall Street “libertarians” have allowed and promoted open border immigration (which the global left also pushes for different reasons) because they believe that money-making is at the epitome of all social behavior.

Economic nationalism and tariffs, which President Trump has had the courage to promote, makes deeper sense on the biological level. We need to retain the great free enterprise system but what good is it to become rich if you and your descendants die in foreign wars fought for commerce?

Who really knows where we will go from here, but real human nature will have its way, and real human nature tends to lead naturally to decentralism, regionalism, localism, and eventually to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates.

Ultimately our wealth is a means to materially evolve toward supermaterial Godhood, which is the transformed religious way to redeem and perfect the world.

Toward a deeper and more realistic conservatism

Real human nature is the real “wisdom of the species,” it is a wisdom deeper than the abstractions of religion, philosophy, or science, it is the wisdom that evolved the biological origin of our social behavior over many thousands of years.

Edmund Burke, T.S. Eliot, and Russell Kirk were superlative conservative intellectuals but they could have deepened, not rejected, conservatism if they could have affirmed the science of sociobiology.

The Darwinist science of sociobiology has basically found that throughout human history to this day human nature has been basically kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection. Cultures can operate for a time with behavior that goes against this human nature, with such experiments as Marxism, but cultures are eventually pulled back by the biological and genetic leash of real human nature to cultures that better reflect real human nature, and humans then work within and adapt to the environments they find themselves living in. “The genes are like the keyboard on which the song of life is played, but the pianist is the social environment,” John Cacioppo said. “It helps determine which genes are turned on or off.”

Not long ago the great sociobiologist E.O. Wilson affirmed group-selection over individual selection---as the "Boston Globe" put it: “Wilson is not arguing that members of certain species don't sacrifice themselves for the benefit of their relatives. They do. But it's his position that kinship and relatedness aren't essential in causing the development of advanced social behaviors like altruism---that the reason such behaviors catch on is that they're evolutionarily advantageous on a group level. That socially advanced organisms end up favoring their kin, Wilson argues, is a byproduct of their group membership, not the cause.” Research backs up this position. I would agree with this as long as it is also understood that group-selection, altruism, and conservatism have favored ethnically related groups over more distant unrelated groups, social harmony and survival success  come from ethnic homogeneity, and not without it---there is a natural continuum of altruism, concern for the world comes well after concern for ones own people and ones own land.

The idea on the left of a "living Constitution" leans toward the evolutionary side of human nature, toward evolutionary rights---but not revolutionary rights which some on the left and the right encourage. And the left today, in contrast to the apotheosis of the individual rights by conservatives, tracks the rights of various groups or ethnic groups, which is in harmony with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection in human nature. But the left then goes on to champion multiculturalism and the rights of almost every kind of social perversion, like a gender-free world, which are not at all in harmony with real human nature, and many on the left don't even think there is a biological human nature believing human nature springs only from ones environmental upbringing.

The reality derived from the wisdom of real human nature points toward the political/cultural solution of the ethnopluralism hypothesis, often written about here. It is a conservative transformation---not revolution---which will bring about an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, the political/cultural structure most in harmony with the wisdom of real human nature. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected by federalism. It may require a few constitutional amendments to give more power to the states to move toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, and the ethnostates would have to be defended from marauding imperialists, globalists and supremacists, but an ethnopluralism of ethnostates will bring a deeper and more realistic conservatism for all groups.

Hollywood has been wildly successful in the destruction of traditional Western culture

It is more entertaining to the masses to attack a culture than to affirm a culture and Hollywood has become an evil genius at entertainingly destroying traditional Western culture. Hollywood has been very successful in promoting and establishing their own degenerate garbage culture in America---and getting very rich in the process.

Then that destruction was combined with the destruction of traditional Western culture in virtually all of our schools. A majority of our young people have bought it all. We can see why Hollywood is the most dangerous organization in America today.

Hollywood was very cunning to at first sell only wholesome patriotic movies and television before and just after World War Two; they took their time to get to the point to where they now sell only hedonism, sex, drugs, and revolution. When Hollywood does temporarily put aside its constant attacks against Western culture its favorite default worldview is cultural Marxism, which is just another more academic attack against Western culture. 
 

This quote from Joseoph Goebbels shows that Hollywood learned from its greatest enemy (or was it the other way around?): “ We shall reach our goal, when we have the power to laugh as we destroy, as we smash whatever was sacred to us as tradition, as education, and as human affection.”

Traditional Western culture is in serious trouble. What can we do about it? We could try to do to Hollywood what they did to us, destroy their culture; but in the long term it is better to just work on legally establishing ethnostates, and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates in America. Hollywood might even then have their own ethnostate to pollute---New York? Los Angeles?

Future Politics

To expand on Burke and other conservatives, all men have equal rights, but all men are not equal, and all men do not have equal rights to things. All men have a basic inherited human nature which has been affirmed by tradition and now empirically explained by sociobiology as being basically kin-centered, gender defined, heterosexual, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, among other conservative things, with group-selection (the origin of altruism) as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

When left to be who they really all men and women prefer self, kin, and ethnic group over others, and do so to advance their own unique gene pools relating to the reality of the biological origin of our social behavior.

Human history, human nature, and human social behavior instinctively and logically lead to the cultural expression of localism, regionalism, ethnostates, and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, with some sort of federalism to protect them from marauding imperialists and supremacists who always appear.  This can be done legally, conservatively, attached to such existing things as the constitutional separation of powers and states. It may not be an easy transformation, but it is the right transformation. 

So are we ready? (he claps his hands with enthusiasm) No? Well, okay, then we can work toward being ready; we have the natural flow of nature and human nature on our side.

Then we can get on with ongoing evolution, which is sacred, within the natural order of things.

Rising from dispossession?

Increasingly stripped of a real sense of identity whites are also losing their sense of place and time. Some of the blame for this dispossession goes to whites who did little or nothing to stop it, but most of the blame goes to the Mass Media and our schools who have played a bold and dirty game in the dispossession of white culture. It has become illegal, politically incorrect, or labeled “hate speech” for whites to object to being stripped of their identity. 

What is America doing about the dispossession of white culture? The Mass Media has recently given us three Black women as winners in the Miss USA, Miss Teen, and Miss America beauty contests. Yesterday at the decadent Met Gala, Pop star Lady Gaga entered in a pink dress, then publicly stripped to a black dress underneath, then another pink dress under that, and finally stripped to her underwear. Twitter was alive with the question “Who Left the Starbucks Coffee Cup” in the hit HBO series “Game of Thrones.” And good old white boys drunkenly cheered on millionaire black athletes.

Is it over for whites? Offense usually beats defense in these social games. We can't blame other races and ethnic groups for exercising their own wills to power when every cell in the human body demands survival and reproductive success. This natural activation can be blocked, subverted, or it can be unknown to us, but it can't legitimately be intellectually or instinctively denied. Any existing social and cultural methods we try, including minority power organizations, as well as the academic brainwashing of postmodernism, come down to the natural drive to biologically and genetically advance ourselves, our kin,  related ethnic group, locality, and nation. So it's not over for whites, even though the Mass Media and our schools want it to be over.

Comparing evolution with cultural Marxism and traditional conservatism

It's not that the Mass Media can't distinguish between freedom and license, they support license or revolt in their desire to dissolve and destroy traditional America, although of course they never openly admit it.

The cry of liberty, equality, and fraternity of the French Revolution like the cry of the Mass Media today only works in regions and states with ethnically homogeneous people, and even then it is difficult since virtually nothing is equal. It is really a cry of the will to power of the promoters. Even Edmund Burke, whose writings probably kept the French Revolution from destroying England, did not emphasize enough the importance of ethnic homogeneity in retaining social order.

The problem when comparing the cultural Marxists with traditional conservatives is that conservatives are too skeptical of evolution and change, and cultural Marxists are too skeptical of tradition and order.

The biological origin of our social behavior actually ends the intellectual defense of postmodern relativism and the cultural Marxist ideologues. But it also takes some of the virtue-signaling away from conservatives. Group-selection, altruism, and conservatism have favored genetically related groups over more distantly related groups. There is a natural continuum of altruism, concern for the world comes after concern for ones own land and people. 

Change is as important as tradition and order but conservatives emphasize tradition and order over change. Charles Darwin and evolution had not yet had their impact on men's minds in Burke's time---and still haven't, for the most part, 137 years since Darwin died. 

This strongly suggests that real human nature leads naturally to the cultural expression of regionalism, localism, and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected by some sort of federalism. Given who we are this appears to be the best way we can optimize the gene expression we inherited from our human ancestors not to mention the best way to survive and prosper.

Then to ground this worldview as deeply as possible we need a religious philosophy to express the material evolution of life to supermaterial Godhood, as seen in the philosophy of theological materialism, with the cultural forms, bonding, traditions, and order which can enhance ongoing evolution for all of us. We can conservatively retain but transform the old inward God of the mind to the outward Godhood reached through ascending levels of material and supermaterial evolution.

Cultural Marxism is a mass psychosis promoted by the Big Media and by our schools

Cultural Marxism is a mass psychosis promoted by the Big Media and by our schools resulting in the abnormal condition of the mind having difficulties determining what is real and what is not. What an evil thing to do to a people!

What the mass psychosis of cultural Marxism does is cause the people to abandon what they are, and what human nature actually is, which is in reality kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection. This human nature evolved over great time through trial and error because it was successful in survival and reproduction.

How long the mass psychosis of cultural Marxism can operate with behavior that goes against real human nature remains to be seen, but history shows that cultures are eventually pulled back (but sometimes yanked back with force) by the biological and genetic leash of real human nature to cultures that better reflect real human nature, and people then work within and adapt to the environments they find themselves living in.

The degree to which you believe that the mass psychosis of cultural Marxism is consciously and purposely inflicted on the people to weaken, enslave, or destroy them, (and by whom) determines whether you will be labeled paranoid, a hate group, or merely suspicious. But the mass psychosis of cultural Marxism, mild or unhinged, is certainly related to the will to power of those who promote it, and that prominently includes the Big Media and our schools, or those who own or control these institutions. Borderfree globalists such as the neoconservatives also at least indirectly affirm this mass psychosis because when the people have difficulties determining what is real and what is not they are easier to exploit economically.

Minus ethnic connections, individualism and localism are mainly just words and ideas that do not bond well

It is not enough to advocate individualism and localism as the old Agrarians did, and as present paleoconservatives now do, to try to bring an alienated and fragmented multicultural multi-ethnic societies together again. Minus ethnic connections, individualism and localism are mainly just words and ideas that do not bond well. If literature and the arts are missing ethnic connections they are weaker than when they include ethnic identity.

Blacks and Jews identify with their ethnicity and it has made them stronger. For long stretches of their history ethnic bonding, even in religion, was all the Jews had, and they continue to successfully hold to ethnocentrism even as it has become politically taboo for other ethnic groups to do so.

The social experiment of trying to jam people together into one happy multicultural multi-ethnic space has not worked well at all; alienation, fragmented, and competition between ethnic groups has increased.

When people are allowed to recognize the natural social bonding advantages of affirming ethnicity, then the locality, the academic world, the arts, politics, and even science can better aid in ending alienation and fragmentation. Human nature just is kin-centered and ethnocentric, among other conservative traits, and humans create cultures that relate to their ethnically distinctive needs.

Each distinctive ethnic group deserves its own ethnostate where the academic world, the arts, politics, and even science can more successfully and naturally bond together and flourish. Human nature is biologically, genetically, and culturally kin-centered and ethnocentric because such bonding has been the most successful in survival and reproduction, and also helps in avoiding the alienation and fragmentation that we see today, especially in white societies which have been hit the hardest by the multicultural multi-ethnic experiment.

The renewal and transition needed in conservatism

Russell Kirk reminds us that American conservatism needs to continue to defend our culture which was substantially inherited from the British, our language, rule of law, individualism, customs, etc.. Kirk, and his mentor Edmund Burke, also saw that conservatism needs to be always renewed with original art and other political/cultural changes. I would call these changes "imaginative affirmations."

What we really are, what we choose as our social persona, what we culturally choose to conserve, and how we define conservatism, work much more harmoniously together the better we define real human nature. The vital renewal needed in conservatism of original art and other political/cultural changes---and even more desperately needed in modern liberalism---is to affirm human nature as empirically explained by sociobiology.

We don't want a phony conservatism. It seems to me that "phonies" are mainly bad actors who cannot make their social persona look genuine, they are putting on a social face that obviously does not reflect their true thoughts and feelings. Generally people who present themselves socially as they really are are only young children, acknowledged geniuses, or very old people.

Whether we all know it or not human nature is basical kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection. When real human nature as empirically explained by sociobiology is included in the conservative renewal of original art and other political/cultural changes, then our social personas, what we culturally choose to conserve, and how we define conservatism, will work much more harmoniously together.

Then we will have a clearer picture of why we will need an ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions established in the United States, legally developed from our constitutional separation of powers and states, to relate to the growing variety of ethnic groups in America with different genetic pools and different agendas. It will not be easy but it is far preferable to radical Marxism or Fascism, or political dissimulations based on flawed definitions of human nature that have brought us radically destructive civil disruptions, and even civil war, and which are now increasing across the world within unworkable multicultural (multi-ethnic) societies demanding that "we all get along."