As we all again react to the latest
chemical bombing atrocity in Syria, I ask the question: What would
happen if we told all parties in the middle-east that we want nothing
more to do with any of you?
Would Iran take over the middle-east
all the way to Syria? Would Israel then bomb the hell out of Iran?
Would Russia come in on the side of Iran? Israel would of course
demand that the U.S. come in on their side. But we would just say to
all parties in the middle-east, "figure it out among yourselves
who is going to sell us the oil and we will buy it, meanwhile we
want nothing more to do with any of you." If we were a friend to Russia we would urge them not to get trapped in the havoc of middle-east.
We might then begin to pursue the
foreign policy suggested by Srdja Trifkovic: "Now is the time to
effect a pan-European entente that embraces the whole of the Northern
Hemisphere, from the British Isles to Vladivostok to the Americas.
Trump has (had? ed.) an historic opportunity to pave the way for a
genuine Northern Alliance of Russia, Europe, and the United States,
as all three are facing similar existential demographic and
ideological (primarily jihadist) threats in the decades ahead.
In an uncertain and ever more brutal world, the Northerners must find
a way of banding together, lest they be defeated separately..""
(Dismantling the Empire," from "Chronicles,"
January 2017)
Meanwhile at home we could expand the
constitutional separation of powers and states and begin to create an
ethnopluralism of ethnostates in line with regions and states. There is even a way for the old Christian idea of subsidiarity (localism is more
efficient and beautiful) and the Alt-Right to join forces in
developing an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. Then we can protect the
whole in no uncertain military terms. In trading with the world we
could pursue economic nationalism.
Some version of this always
happens anyway, given human nature.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment