Sunday, April 30, 2017
Expanding conservatism to include an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, or deep-conservatism
I would like to see the conservatism of
Russell Kirk and George Kennan expanded to include an ethnopluralism
of ethnostates, which I call deep-conservatism.
Kirk and Kennan were against
nation-building while not seeking to replace Soviet communism with
Western economic globalism. (see essay by Chilton
Williamson Jr. in the May 2017 "Chronicles")
Kirk and Kennan were for preserving
diversity and economic independence, but they did not directly expand
that wisdom to the deep conservatism of an ethnopluralism of
ethnostates.
Even with the ruling civic and
political propaganda of cultural Marxism, modern liberalism and
global neoconservative, human nature remains as it has always been,
kin-centered, ethnocentric and group-selecting.
This naturally points conservatism
toward and ethnopluralism of ethnostates, which could be harmonized
with the conservative constitutional separation of powers and states,
at least in the U.S., protected by deeper versions of federalism and subsidiarity.
Perhaps the universalism inherent in
Christian conservatism keeps conservatives from including ethnostates
within conservatism---ethnostates may have diverse religions.
I think theological materialism works
well with deep-conservatism because traditional religions are
maintained but their inward paths to the symbolic God Within are
updated and transformed in the outward path of material evolution to
real supermaterial Godhood.
Expanding conservatism to include an
ethnopluralism of ethnostates, or deep-conservatism, would work
harmoniously with this sacred evolutionary mission. Religion, materialism,
science and politics could finally come together.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment