Utopia's can be impractical or
unrealistic schemes of perfection, but dystopia's can be just as
unrealistic in seeing only human misery, oppression and disease. I
think we can have continued human evolution without Huxley's "Brave
new World" of totalitarianism. Marx and Hitler are not the
future if we understand and affirm real human nature and its political implications.
Equality has to be a suspicious concept
if not defined as distinctly different groups and states having an
equal chance to evolve, ideally with aid from strictly objective
international research centers regarding human evolution.
Group-selection and ethnic selection remain the central unit
of survival and reproductive success, and are deeply contained within
real human nature, even if the prevailing cultural Marxism blocks
this knowledge.
Human evolution in the past took place
within an ethnopluralism of ethnostates in harmony with real human
nature, and can again. Federalism and subsidiarity can protect the
whole, in nations and even in democratic republics. If we want to
continue evolving toward real Godhood some things have to be
preferred to other things, in that sense we have to "discriminate."
But that does not require a Brave New World of totalitarianism, it requires an ethnopluralism of ethnostates.
As to the wisdom of conservatism, in
America we can conservatively retain the constitutional separation of
powers and states updated to an ethnopluralism of regions and states,
to better harmonize with real human nature, and better provide for our material
evolution toward Godhood.
Let's see a few novels on this future, more realistic than the utopian/dystopian novels we have seen so far.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment