Sunday, April 02, 2017
The opposite means of attaining Godhood in theological materialism
Traditional religious founders defined
the soul and god as the absence of gross material desires, what
Schopenhauer called the absence of willing, a state not connected to
desiring material life. This was a deeply negative worldview and
definition of god. The religious founders (Schopenhauer and Kant too)
also linked this state of no-desire to the most "objective"
kind of knowing.
That ascetic inward path is the
opposite means of attaining Godhood from theological materialism, which
brings life back to religion, and does not do so grudgingly, as St.
Paul did, saying to a follower, in effect, "well, if you must
get married than I suppose that is better than rejecting religion
entirely."
The "essence" in theological
materialism is called the Spirit-Will---although it is a material
drive within material life---and it activates the desires of material
life to evolve toward the highest success in survival and
reproduction, defined as Godhood, working within whatever the natural
environment may be, at any given time in the cosmos.
Unlike the views of the religious
founders, and unlike Schopenhauer and Kant, the blocking of the will
and the secession of all desires---and thereby the sucession, at
least temporarily, of both desire and suffering---can only be seen as
a symbolic glimpse of what it is like to fulfill sacred
desires. But then, there appears to be no end to evolving life, no
end to higher evolution, and so there are always gods arising and
evolving in the cosmos, which has no end, and probably no beginning.
This is a worthy positive view of reality, fit for
man and gods.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment