Thursday, April 20, 2017
Can irresponsible libertarianism be restrained?
I am thinking here of the
libertarianism of billionaire philanthropists, globalism, the Big
Media, and the academic world.
Aside from the
damage done by globalism to the health and sovereignty
of nations, we have billionaires like Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg
giving millions to their preferred causes, and the money is often tax
deductible. They can then shape policy far more than the ordinary
citizen can. And the policies they pursue are almost always
irresponsibly libertarian, which is at bottom nihilistic, amoral, and
superindividualistic, with a leaning toward limousine liberalism.
Can't you just hear the always unmodulated voice of Gates, or the
pipsqueaking of Zuckerberg as they preach to us?
Then
their is the influence of the Big Media directing our culture far
more than school or religion. Awhile back they promoted the wisdom of
Bob Dylan and now it's people like Kanye
West, who the kids
quote because nothing else is presented to them. Shakespeare and
Burke are out. And this stupidity is backed by the the academic world
who have rejected Anglo-American classical culture and replaced it
with the nihilism and relativism of libertarianism leaning toward
cultural Marxism.
Was this cultural
destruction purposefully destructive or just plain stupid? It's both. As I say
here often, it is not enough to dismantle the "bureaucratic,
managerial, corporatist, and globalist state" as real
conservatives want to do (and as we thought President Trump would try
to do). But assuming these things can be done, what then? We have to
allow real human nature to adjust the American constitutional
separation of powers and states toward an ethnopluralism of
ethnostates. Real culture will then return for all groups and not merely for billionaire philanthropists, globalism, the Big
Media, and the academic world, who have destroyed Western culture.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment