Wednesday, September 21, 2016
Understanding reality requires the teaching of sociobiology in the humanities
If we define education as the growing
understanding of reality it is not enough to teach the old classical
tradition and the Christian faith. That of course would be a great
improvement over the cultural Marxism now taught. But reality
requires the teaching of sociobiology not only in the sciences but in
the humanities. If we want to understand reality we need to
understand the depths of the biological origin of much of social
behavior.
Where do we come from? Why are we here?
Who are we? These questions need to include the sociobiological
definition of human nature, which remains kin-centered, gender
defined, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical,
ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, with
group-selection as the primary unit of successful
selection.
This deepened view needs to be taught along with
the traditional great books of the world. But the negative spin on
the Enlightenment which traditional, classical, and religious
education now teaches needs to change. Sociobiology would not have
developed without the Enlightenment.
At the heart of education is the
affirmation of identity, and not the identity of cultural Marxism
which is now taught in our schools. Our biological ethnic identity is
no small thing, it largely determines who we are and how we conduct
our cultures. Teaching sociobiology can fill this empty gap.
Perhaps when we once again define
education as the growing understanding of reality, that reality will
include an ethnopluralism of ethnostates which protect who we are and
where we live, for all ethnic cultures. As we move in and out of
dark ages this is the inevitable future which real human nature
always moves toward.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment