I know it is politically
incorrect to hate anything, but if hate is defined as intense or
passionate dislike then I don't mind admitting that I hate modern
liberals, who, along with other phony virtue signaling, push their
syrup on hate which is usually only an attempt to keep sane people
from criticizing their asinine version of liberalism.
Modern liberals know nothing about real human nature, the Media and there corrupted teachers don't even believe there is a biologically derived human nature, they think everything we are is created by the environment or by nurturing, which is really their asinine culturally Marxist version of human life.
I am against the idea of racial supremacy, but the liberal declaration of “hate speech” is often only someone standing up for their own ethnic group, and usually the virtue signaling is promoted by minority ethnic groups who have no problem loudly declaring the supremacy of their own group. There is a big difference between caring about ones ethnic identity and hating other ethnic identities, but these have been carefully linked together by the corrupt academy and the Big Media. If we have to hate something we should hate the diabolical and corrupt taboos against affirming ethnic identity.
That is why ethnopluralism is one of the things featured on this blog as a healthy way to deal with the natural differences and competitions between ethnic groups, not to hate one another but to affirm regions and states set aside for distinct ethnic people and cultures so that they can be what they are. In the U. S. this could be accomplished not by way of radical revolution but through adapting---not overturning---the U.S. constitutional separation of powers and states with an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected from marauding imperialists, supremacists, and global money grubbers, by a light federalism.
That would do more than religion or modern politics have done to curb hate.
Modern liberals know nothing about real human nature, the Media and there corrupted teachers don't even believe there is a biologically derived human nature, they think everything we are is created by the environment or by nurturing, which is really their asinine culturally Marxist version of human life.
I am against the idea of racial supremacy, but the liberal declaration of “hate speech” is often only someone standing up for their own ethnic group, and usually the virtue signaling is promoted by minority ethnic groups who have no problem loudly declaring the supremacy of their own group. There is a big difference between caring about ones ethnic identity and hating other ethnic identities, but these have been carefully linked together by the corrupt academy and the Big Media. If we have to hate something we should hate the diabolical and corrupt taboos against affirming ethnic identity.
That is why ethnopluralism is one of the things featured on this blog as a healthy way to deal with the natural differences and competitions between ethnic groups, not to hate one another but to affirm regions and states set aside for distinct ethnic people and cultures so that they can be what they are. In the U. S. this could be accomplished not by way of radical revolution but through adapting---not overturning---the U.S. constitutional separation of powers and states with an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected from marauding imperialists, supremacists, and global money grubbers, by a light federalism.
That would do more than religion or modern politics have done to curb hate.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment