Friday, December 20, 2019
The individual and the group in art (from 2012)
The
centrality of group-selection in developing human ethics, as recently
reaffirmed by E.
O. Wilson, brings archetypes and myths back into art and culture,
and tends to downplay individualism. Heroes are individuals, often
with flaws, but they usually defend or affirm the group.
As we return to small
states, and even ethnostates, in a world where single-state
supremacy, imperialism, ect. crumbles, the character, tone and
guiding beliefs of group archetypes and myth will become more
relevant.
With ethnostates there
will be new myths attached to the old. Sacred art is more than about
art only, it is about life and our evolution beyond humans to higher
life, and on to Godhood. It is the affirmation of the sacred that
defines great art across human history, a theme more constant than
the method of affirmation. Folk Art as well as High Art can produce
the same affirmation with different levels of skill and
sophistication.
Artists have the freedom
during creation to produce what they want, which is a freedom that
enhances creativity, but later religion and society have the ethical
right to accept or reject the work of the individual artists, because
life is ultimately more about group effort, survival and evolution
than about the hyper-individualism of one artist.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment