Friday, April 12, 2019
Comparing the political philosophy of Carl Schmitt and Raymond Cattell
Just as feminism is
exploited by groups who wish to advance themselves via the feminist
call for equality, the friend/enemy dynamic of Schmitt is exploited
and hypertrophied by supremacists and imperialists, and those
political balancing acts then become more negative than positive.
When the political
philosophy is evolutionary, competition is valued but is more
controlled and rational. The friend/enemy dynamic remains but means
less than evolutionary development. For
example, Cattell spent years developing ways to determine social
genius from antisocial genius.
After all, if we survive
we will evolve beyond the human species to new species and the
friend/enemy dynamic will be changing, replaced by evolution versus
non-evolution as an ongoing friend/enemy dynamic.
In evolution versus
non-evolution the friend/enemy dynamic is seen as often
leading to supremacism and imperialism, which more readily makes wars
happen, and wars are often more destructive than evolutionary---the
refined chess table of controlled and rational evolution is overturned and
stopped until order is restored.
When we develop
ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates in harmony with kin and ethnic-centered human nature, evolution can take
place more easily with variety in more natural, less volatile, more
harmonious, more homogeneous environments. Federalism can protect
the ethnostates from marauding supremacism and imperialism. And
sociobiological research centers can objectively aid in helping both
friend and enemy to evolve toward Godhood out into the cosmos, which is where the best
political philosophy places its emphasis.
An ethnopluralism of
ethnostates or regions could even be established legally, conservatively, in the
United States with our constitutional separation of powers and
states.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment