Wednesday, April 20, 2016
Freedom Misunderstood Leads to Chaos
“Freedom” has been vital in the
West but it has also been seriously misunderstood in regard to real
human nature. The Enlightenment, which our Founders were fond of,
concentrated on individual freedom or liberty. And the ancient
Greeks, who our Founders were also fond of, sought to constrain vice and
folly with virtues which were not always connected to real human
nature.
The deepest and real constraints on
human nature come from the “constraints” of biology. There is a
strong biological component to basic human nature which is mainly
denied in the modern world, but was also denied in the ancient world.
Freedom without external constraints does not change the internal
constraints of human nature and biology, even in the free West.
Real human nature is not evil. Human
beings are “constrained” by a biologically determined human
nature which includes being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded,
heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even
xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with
group-selection as the primary unit of selection. These are traditional values. Modern liberalism
has needed authoritarianism and coercion to implement the increasing
number of “rights” which go against real human nature.
Freedom and virtue have to relate to the biological direction of evolving life, which becomes more of an
affirmation than a free choice. Individuals are not really free to do
anything they want, even before constraints are put on them by social
institutions. Civilized laws need to harmonize with or affirm real
human nature, not impede human nature---impeding human nature does
not work well in any case.
Even rational judgment which the
Greeks liked so much cannot really move beyond the constraints of
human nature, although it has often been tried. The highest point of
ourselves is not “reason” but is the material/supermaterial
Spirit-Will within life, which activates life to evolve toward
Godhood, and reason may or may not understand this teleological direction or
end-goal.
It is through such sciences as
sociobiology more than through moral reasoning that we can understand
whatever freedom we actually have, which means an understanding of
the choices we may have within the constraints of determinism.
Freedom and virtue relate to understanding the choices we may have
within the constraints of determinism. When we have “self control”
what are we really controlling? We don't govern the passions so much
as we affirm determined elements of human nature, which really can't
be escaped, and why would we want to escape them?
Politics can pay attention not only to
freedom within determinism but to the direction of freedom, which is
also largely determined. This brings religion forward as a foundation
for politics, because the end of politics is conditioned by the goals
of evolving life, which is Godhood.
And this is how ethnopluralism enters
the philosophy of theological materialism, as the best way to reach
the goals of both politics and religion, while living in a crowded
world of competing ethnic cultures, who are basically governed by a
human nature designed for survival and reproductive success, but more deeply seeking success in evolving toward Godhood.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment