How Nietzsche could have avoided his radical philosophy

Nietzsche's project could be understood in terms of what is defined here as the Twofold Path, only Nietzsche wanted to extirpate, throw out, the Involutionary Inward Path because he saw it as the opposite of nature, which it is. The Inward Path to the Father Within promotes unnatural values because it blocks the natural instincts and desires so as to experience the bliss of desirelessness in the symbolic-experience of the Father Within.

But Nietzsche might have approved of the Evolutionary Outward Path because it brings back “moral naturalism,” as seen in the material and supermaterail evolution to real Godhood. Nietzsche saw a vitalistic will-to-power in nature with no religions goal whereas the Outward Path sees the activating Spirit-Will-To-Godhood, which is shaped on the outside by natural evolution.

Also Nietzsche did not equate moral naturalism with the Inward Path symbolic-experience of the Outward Path Godhood reached through evolution. The result: Nietzsche had to become a radical, an anti-Christ, a revolutionary, and even a moral relativist, which eventually fathered postmodern philosophers and many other modern cultural creations---the rejection of moral art for example.

The Twofold Path calls for Ordered Evolution in harmony with a Revitalized Conservatism. The God of the Inward Path is retained as a forebearer of real Godhood reached in the Outward Path of material and supermaterial evolution. Moral naturalism this way rises from the Great Spiritual Blockade without throwing religion out. But the Sacred goal is essentially not to save Nietzsche but to save our evolution to real Godhood.