Wednesday, November 21, 2012
Tragic and non-tragic cultures
Thinking in Nietzschian terms about one
element defining tragic cultures, where the highest ideals will not
always be gained by sacrificing heroes, the Theoevolutionary
Church is a tragic religion in having the worldview of evolving all the way
to Godhood in the cosmos, which will not
always be gained by sacrificing heroes.
This is not the case with most modern
religions which have become more Socratic than tragic, even if they
didn't start out that way. Islam and Judaism seem to be more tragic, at
least in their more extreme forms, in fighting against odds for
dominance in the world.
Modern politics seems Socratic or
commercial and not tragic in spirit. The modern military is usually
under the control of commercial interests where it loses much of its
old tragic ethos.
Tragic cultures can more readily
poeticize their mythological images, which can lead to much greater
art than Socratic or commercial cultures.
Is the antithesis of tragic cultures
barbarism as early Nietzsche thought? It does seem that a
trans-valuation has taken place where Socratic and commercial
cultures are now considered higher than tragic cultures.
Perhaps it would be more politically
correct to speak of “adventurous cultures” rather than tragic
culture, as Raymond Cattell did, but I like the more poetic old term.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment