Friday, November 23, 2012
Shaping birthrates and genetics
I believe we need to improve the
intelligence and character of our leaders in all fields, but the
average person also needs to rise in intelligence and character.
Raymond Cattell courageously wrote about shaping birthrates and
improving intelligence and character in leaders, but also shaping traits
toward fitting the occupational and cultural needs of a given
society.
Shaping against negative genetic traits
should already be taking place to rid ourselves of the terrible
suffering of the worst diseases. We still intervene socio-medically
in saving negative traits that cause great suffering, which means we no
longer have the often harsh natural selection of birth rates that we had in
Paleolithic times.
Those who have trans-valued the humanness of shaping genetics into being defined as evil are almost
criminal in what they have done. It is our ethical duty to recognize
future generations. Many of those who object to genetic shaping in
society take full advantage of genetic science in their own lives, marriages and groups.
"Assortative mating,” where people
tend to choose people like themselves, for example, with similar
I.Q.'S, whether high or low, needs to have full freedom, and this can apply to similar people within
regions and small states as well---this is the most natural thing in
nature. There are always exceptional individuals who rise out of
exceptional conditions which must be acknowledged, but it is time to pay attention to statistics
and biology in improving social and genetic fitness. China was
thinking statistically about starvation with its one-child policy.
As readers know I consider this is a
religious mission since we need to evolve all the way to
Godhood in the cosmos.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment