I also see no good reason why there ever was a beginning, a first cause, which requires no less proof than the no beginning perspective.
Friday, August 31, 2012
First and Last Things
Theologically, it seems not to be the
attraction of Godhood that accounts for the evolution of
higher beings, as Teilhard de Chardin suggested, it is the
activation of the material world by the Spirit-Will-To-Godhood that seeks Godhood, which is then shaped by evolution. It seems to have little or nothing
to do with Godhood Itself.
Schopenhauer's will-to-live,
Nietzsche's will-to-power, Bergson's vital force seem closer to
defining the Spirit-Will than any attraction by Godhood pulling
evolution forward.
Unlike the God of St. Thomas
Aquinas, the Spirit-Will contains the cause of life but is not also
the maximum of life. The Spirit-Will contains the goal of Godhood but is
not the goal itself. The maximum of life is the Godhood evolved to
This suggests that Godhood is the
goal of life but not the initiator of life. The Primal
Material seems to be activated by the Spirit-Will, as all life is,
and they seem never to be separated. Then together they define
life evolving to Godhood, first activated by the Spirit-Will, and
then shaped by evolution.
I see no good reason why this cosmic
dynamic cannot go on forever. It seems to be an endless cosmos
with endless room and there are probably always Gods arriving. There may
never be an end to evolving perfection, if there was an end then that
perfection might have no further function and might therefore cease
to exist.
I also see no good reason why there ever was a beginning, a first cause, which requires no less proof than the no beginning perspective.
I also see no good reason why there ever was a beginning, a first cause, which requires no less proof than the no beginning perspective.
What glorious things can evolve, and have
evolved, in the cosmos, over endless time and endless space. We need to consciously, not merely unconsciously, join that sacred cosmic stream.
The older God was seen inwardly, which is fine and needs to be included in the Twofold Path, but real Godhood is evolved to in the cosmos, and we need to get on with it.
Thursday, August 30, 2012
A harmonious inward and outward life
The inward life does not seem to work
so well with the outward life in the great religions and in the great
psychologies, the exciting inward life of St. Thomas Aquinas or Carl Jung is
often at odds with the less exciting outward life.
This is not necessarily so with the
Spirit-Will-To-Godhood in the philosophy of the Theoevolutionary Church. Here the inward activating Spirit-Will requires
outward material life to evolve to Godhood.
This suggests not the volcano of
repression over the inner sexual self of Freud, but harmony and
rhythm with the flow of natural life. It is not merely the sexual
libido that seeks to break free into full expression, it is more
deeply the Spirit-Will-To-Godhood.
Modernity isn't the main problem, as
Traditionalism always suggests, it is disharmony and discord in the
basic instincts. The fullness of human nature need not be repressed
or suppressed as it often is in sentimental modern liberalism. Real
nature, and human nature, prefers truth, beauty and merit, and
sublimating human nature toward these virtues can be more harmonious.
With the Spirit-Will affirmed there is
less inner/outer conflict, yet there is sublimation of the
human forces of sex, aggression and compassion, because the
Spirit-Will has a definite goal to which material life needs to be
guided or sublimated, which ultimately is Godhood.
This sublimation takes the form of
voluntary, non-coercive, culture-genetic selection in reproduction,
in Ordered Evolution, directed toward Godhood, which is at the zenith
of truth, beauty and merit. This culture-genetic dynamic can lead to
real and more natural psychological maturity and fill the spiritual emptiness and
rootlessness of modern life.
Tuesday, August 28, 2012
The evolution of religion
The many vital things offered by the great
religions were not replaced by modern skepticism and existentialism,
and not replaced by the science of sociobiology alone, and not even
by Raymond Cattell's noble attempt to combine science and religion
(Beyondism). The great religions developed large and broad values
and morals over long history which helped humanity literally survive as they sought God. These values were explained but largely rejected by modern
developments in science and philosophy. The problem is that the
great religions are so slow to change they can become stagnant before
they change. This slowness has helped create order in humanity, but
it is always threatened by impatient radical changes.
Modern skepticism, existentialism,
science, sociobiology, and Beyondism generally rejected the great
religions even if they brilliantly explained them, and this rejection tends to
keep these modern fields from becoming a replacement for the large and broad sweep
of the great religions, even if the modern motives were to
try to save humanity from early destruction---but occasionally to try
to advance one group over another.
Rather than rejecting the great
religions, the Twofold Path in the religious philosophy of (TC) affirms the great religions in
evolutionary sociobiology. The Inward Path to the virtual God Within of the great
religions is carried forward in the Outward Path of
material-supermaterial evolution to real Godhood. This also helps retain Ordered Evolution as we evolve toward Godhood.
Order enhances evolution, positive culturo-genetic changes
have time to succeed or fail without destroying the whole sacred adventure to Godhood, first begun by the great religions. The task or the heroic mission is to develop a broad
functioning religion from the religious philosophy of the TC.
Monday, August 27, 2012
Not merely spiritual theology
According to Walter Kaufmann (“Critique
of Religion and Philosophy”) God's answer to Moses was, “I am
who am (He who is).” I think these words can be interpreted as Godhood
being a living object, a supreme object, and not merely a spiritual
definition or mathematical form, a being at the highest point of
material-supermaterial evolution, not a Being beyond being, not a
Gnostic God with no connection to the material world, but a Godhood
arrived at in the world by way of material-supermaterial evolution.
This Godhood might also be seen as, “I am the pure act-of-being” (St.
Thomas) but only if
the act of being is seen as a supermaterial existing object and not
something beyond the actual world. I have an impossible fantasy of
St. Thomas seeing this material-supermaterial Godhood at the end of his life when he
said all his writings seemed like so much straw compared to what he
had seen. He supposedly also asked to hear the 'Song of Solomon” on his death bed,
not theology, and this could be seen as a work examining material
beauty and not merely an analogy of spiritual things---but this is probably not what St. Thomas saw.
This is not the same inward interpretation of
God as Moses, Jesus or Buddha, this is an outward revitalized Godhood,
hypertrophied into the natural world. This is not Augustine's God of
“I am he who never changes.” A Godhood arrived at through
material evolution certainly changes. This is the Godhood of
theological materialism and not merely the God of spiritual theology.
To adapt a saying by St. Anselm, this interpretation both
understands in order to believe, and believes in order to understand.
Both science and faith need to be applied at this time to this worldview.
Sunday, August 26, 2012
The Future Is Permitted
Huxley's “Brave New World” has
intimidated people for long enough, the future is okay. Ethical
responsibility is possible, and likely, regarding future scientific
developments.
Conservatism can believe in Ordered Evolution, radicalism is not necessarily connected to “progress.”
Desacralization need not happen.
It was wrong for Mill, Marx and Darwin
to more or less slay theology and metaphysics. It would have been
better to adapt man's place in nature to to both religion and
science.
Philosophical naturalism is not the
premise to work with, theological materialism is, which includes both philosophical naturalism and theology. Theological materialism is the successor to
theology, by synthesizing philosophical naturalism and theology.
There are “unintended
consequences” in life, but that should not doom us to moldy
corners afraid to move out into the air. It takes a little courage
but courage is a vital virtue. Real compassion requires a longer term perspective.
We can define positive pluralism and
negative pluralism, with positive pluralism embracing completely
natural group selection and small states, within light federations,
whereas negative pluralism bemoans the so-called relativism of
pluralism apparently preferring a uniform humanity. We are all
evolving to Godhood in our own way, and we certainly are capable of
assisting one another along the way.
It is time not to be afraid of the idea
of progress. Comte and Cattell's idea of progress attached to theological materialism can lead evolution to Godhood. God remains
much the same, but the inward God of the great religions is
hypertrophied and revitalized into outward Godhood, with life activated by the
Spirit-Will-To-Godhood, shaped by natural evolution, and reached
through material and supermaterial progress into the future.
Friday, August 24, 2012
A Religious Psychology Theory
History and civilization seem to be
attempts to adjust to the energies and forces of the
Spirit-Will-To-Godhood, which first activates life, and then life is
shaped by evolution. The Spirit-Will is not merely the drive of the
libido of Freud, or the power drive of Nietzsche, or the inner world
projecting into the outer world of Jung. The Spirit-Will is a deeper,
sacred, instinct, the zenith of the instincts. Sex, power and the
psychic life are means to the ends of the Spirit-Will, which has the
goal of evolving all the way to Godhood in the cosmos, and does so by activating material life to evolve to Godhood. How these
things are balanced becomes the task of a “religious physician.”
This is the well we go to for renewal of the modern world.
Thursday, August 23, 2012
Why sociobiological adjustments of sex, aggression and compassion is the sacred path
To seriously consider genetic as well
as cultural adjustments requires a more austere discipline, made more
difficult by not being considered politically correct at this time, as
cultural Marxism continues to lead modern culture, in spite of its
failures. In addition to advocating positive genetic and cultural
improvements in intelligence and health, the three adjustments of
emotions which Raymond Cattell centered on in his science-religion of Beyondism were sex, aggression and
compassion. Cattell believed these things could be changed through
genes and culture. That is, changing such things as the kind of psychopathic
aggression that is simply incapable of learning, or adjusting the
short term types of compassion which seemingly help people in the short
term but does much damage in the long term.
Cattell divided the ethical system of
any group into two parts: “universal” ethical rules necessary for
any group to survive, and the “particular” ethical values
of a particular group. Cattell wanted to have international research
centers to support sociobiology research in these important areas.
I think the Church also needs to be involved in this research since
the sacred goal of long term evolution is Godhood. We believe that the Godhood of evolution is the God
first glimpsed only inwardly by the great religions. Godhood is now seen as attained
through material and supermaterial evolution. Furthermore, the
material world is activated by the Spirit-Will with the goal of
attaining Godhood, and then the material world is shaped by
evolution.
This is the religious-scientific
sacred narrative of the future. In order to attain Godhood in evolution we
will need to sociobiologically adjust sex, aggression and compassion
through genes and culture, similar to what Cattell suggested, but
with the sacred goal of evolving to Godhood. Godhood is the
supermaterial absolute of intelligence, beauty and merit, attained through evolution. But this
needs to be a voluntary mission, without coercion, applied to all
humanity, living in their natural, bonded groups. Real compassion
can help adjust downward trending groups before their extinction or
cultural death.
Although some people will want to avoid such sociobiological ethical
demands, it is the groups with the higher demands who survive in the
long run. Sparta is not my ideal state but Cattell reminds us that austere Sparta defeated
the more permissive Athens after 20 years. We have many thousands of years to go, if we can survive.
Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Bringing back sacredness, myth, romance and heroism
Sacredness, myth, romance and heroism
have largely gone out of our modern culture, and they have also gone
out of religion, philosophy and science. The religious philosophical
mythos of the Theoevolutionary Churchbrings these things back,
with the epic narrative of our evolution to Godhood in the cosmos.
The God first glimpsed inwardly by the
great religions is affirmed and transformed in the outward evolution
of the material-supermaterial world to Godhood. Religion and science
can join in this great adventure. Life evolves upwardly, with great
heroism, with fallings
and risings, all the way to Godhood in the cosmos.
Here is a reason to like the
presocratics: Homer was more right than Plato in
showing the Gods as anthropomorphic, for which Plato banned him from
the Republic---Plato preferred that his highest God to be a
nonmaterial mathematical Form. Godhood is not human but the Gods
have material and supermaterial life.
And this is the God of the great
religions, and this is also the Aristotelian God of Aquinas, but this
is a transformed Godhood from the God that the great religions found
inwardly---now real Godhood is also seen as attained outwardly in evolution.
It may be easier at this point in our
evolution to speak of Godhood as having an absence of flaws regarding
truth, beauty and goodness in comparison to humans. Evolution
explains the progress of these virtues, with Godhood as having
attained the zenith, or absolute, of these things.
Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Buchanan on the sociobiological forces changing the world
The latest column by Pat Buchanan,
“The New World Disorder,” again shows how Buchanan remains the
only conservative political commentator with the courage to see and
speak the truth about the sociobiological forces that are changing
the world, and the necessity of an alternative to the worldview of the neoconservatives, who
continue to create disorder in the world.
No Dualities
Religion and psychology have thought of the inward life as good and valid and outward life has
often been thought of as evil or primitive compared to inward life.
It is important not to see the Twofold Path of the EC as part of the
duality that has plagued religion, philosophy and psychology since
ancient times. The Inward Path is connected to the Outward Path as
the heart is connected to the body. Mind and body are no more
separate than soul and body or spirit and body.
Nietzsche thought the inward priests
and intellectuals hobbled the outward life of people to gain control
over them, but Nietzsche then went too far and rejected much of the
inward life of priests and intellectuals. Nietzsche did not see that
his “will-to-power” was really the material Spirit-Will-to-Godhood connecting the
inward activating Spirit-Will to the outward life of material and
supermaterial evolution to Godhood.
Outward life and object-life need to be revived and given new life over the inward life which only defines or activates life-objects. Godhood is not a concept or number or material-free form, Godhood is the zenith of material and supermaterial object-life evolution. The material Spirit-Will is never separate from the material life it activates.
Monday, August 20, 2012
Mixing science, poetry and religion
Raymond Cattell rightly warned against
combining science and poetry, using the example of the hatred of Karl
Marx for the middle class which strongly influenced his house of
cards economics.
But the emotional satisfaction of
identifying the Father Within, or God Within of traditional religion
with the Godhood attained at the zenith of material evolution is such
a combination of science and poetry. If such a dynamic were not
real, and it is real, it would be brilliant and practical to invent
it.
Such emotional bonding as the Twofold Path can enhance and encourage our successful survival and evolution
out into the cosmos, while avoiding the radical revolutionary break
from traditional religion.
But the fact is, we do claim idealism
and faith at this time as necessary to see and know the zenith of
evolution as Godhood, and to see the Spirit-Will or Tirips as activating life,
which is then shaped by evolution.
This does not need to contradict
science, or future science, which is why it is such a powerful poetic synthesis.
Sunday, August 19, 2012
Affirming progress and order in theological materialism
Religious naysayers against “progress”
have been right some of the time but not all of the time. Marxism
and fascism were brutal negative examples which scared off
conservative intellectuals, as well as secular humanists, and biased
them against ideas of natural progress.
The naysayers have been wrong on
both religious and scientific grounds in attacking the idea of
progress. There has been collective progress not only in human
culture but in human evolution, which can also bring forward a teleological or utopian worldview, in the goal of evolving outwardly all the way to
the Godhood first glimpsed inwardly in traditional
religions.
The religious naysayers have therefore
been blocking progress toward the very Godhood they champion by
blocking the idea of material and supermaterial evolution to real Godhood. Conservatism requires a Revitalized Conservatism that emphasizes the evolution in Ordered Evolution rather than order without
evolution.
Theological materialism is the
successor to both religious naysayers against progress, and
naturalistic secularized science. Theological materialism is
grounded in the the idea of progress within order, while it gives
philosophical naturalism and evolution a sacred foundation. This is original, modern, religious philosophy still tied to tradition in the Twofold Path.
Friday, August 17, 2012
Argument for Godhood
All living things act in a way
attempting to attain survival and reproductive success. Taking this
dynamic to its highest analogy, living things essentially seek to
attain survival and reproductive success in an eternal or
near-eternal way, and this highest success is called Godhood. Natural
evolution is the path of this seeking eternal success in survival and
reproduction, and the Spirit-Will-To Godhood is the activating engine
of material life, which evolution shapes.
Does Godhood therefore preexist in the
Spirit-Will which activated life to evolve to Godhood? Godhood is
the desire of the Spirit-Will, the Spirit-Will seeks Godhood, the
Spirit-Will is not Godhood. The Spirit-Will requires material
evolution as its vehicle to arrive at its supreme goal of Godhood.
Many attempts at evolving to Godhood in the cosmos were not
successful, but there are always new chances in the Primal Beginnings of many cosmos.
This suggests that there is only one
kind of material reality. The mental and mathematical-Platonic live
within the material realities of our minds alone. Even the Soul exists at
the Zenith of our minds as the condition of bliss reached when our
minds and bodies are emptied of all desires of the flesh.
Even the Spirit-Will which activates
material life lives within material life requiring material life to
evolve to Godhood. It is not yet clear if the Spirit-Will can reach beyond the material body, but I doubt it can,
other than through material and supermaterial reproduction.
Thursday, August 16, 2012
The Libido and the Spirit-Will
Civilization was not primarily
developed by way of the repressed energy of the sexual libido, which
was a central insight of Freud. And the desire for successful sexual
survival and reproduction of ones genes is not the sole creator of
civilization, as sociobiology suggests. Sex and reproduction are
secondary to the central instinct which activates life, the
Spirit-Will, or the Spirit-Will-To-Godhood. Life is then shaped by somewhat random natural evolution.
Sex and aggression are sublimated (a
better word than repressed) into building civilizations of evolving
groups of people, but not for survival sake alone, and not only for
healthy sexual balance. We are activated to sexual reproduction and
survival so that we may continue to evolve toward Godhood, out into
the cosmos, beyond the human species, all the way to Godhood.
Tuesday, August 14, 2012
The Voting Dilemma
In
the words of Pat Buchanan writing on Romney's choice of Ryan, I also
believe “people, private institutions, entrepreneurs and businesses
are the creative and energizing forces in society,” unlike Obama,
who essentially believes government is “the engine of prosperity.”
That is a stark difference.
But
I have a very big problem with the globalism and neoconservatism of
Romney and Ryan, who are certainly not the equal of
paleoconservative-economic nationalist, Buchanan, who was nefariously
elbowed out of politics by neocons and Zionists. But is this enough
of a problem not to vote for Romney and Ryan?
Perhaps
we should try to solve our terrible economic troubles first, as Romney/Ryan suggest we do, however, to solve
them also by continuing to gut manufacturing in America, and by going to
war with anyone who will not let us take over the resources of their
nations, seems like pouring fuel on the fire that is devouring the
West. But we may simply be too broke to get involved in foreign entanglements, even if Romney approves of them.
Beyond the philosopher of the future
We have to go beyond Nietzsche's
philosopher of the future, who he defined as being a creative
genius and the center of a value theory. Nietzsche did not really see
our evolution to Godhood as the goal of mankind's individual and
collective efforts, he thought as far as the superman creator of
values, which was not high enough. Even the “high and noble
cultures,” which at least early Nietzsche affirmed, did not
see the goal of Godhood in evolution. The creative genius and
superman are only temporary---although important---stopping off places
along the evolutionary way to Godhood. In a healthy culture with
the long view, all social, religious, government, and educational
arrangements ultimately relate to evolving to Godhood. This is solid ground in defining noble and ignoble cultures.
Monday, August 13, 2012
The wellspring for transformation
The religion, myth and symbols of the the Theoevolutionary Church (TC) are the wellspring for moral,
social and biological transformation. It is both a rational and
romantic religious worldview, with the base of evolution in science, and
the romantic-religious foundation of evolving to Godhood.
This is not a struggle against
capitalists, or proletarians, or other religions, this is a struggle
against devolution and nihilism. This can be done with an Ordered Evolution, which means a Revitalized Conservatism, and not radical
revolution.
The Twofold Path harmonizes with traditional religion---the individual Platonic Inward Path of
tradition is attained through the sociobiological Outward Path to Godhood. The blissful dream world of the Inward Path to the Father Within is realized in
the realistic Outward Path of evolution to Godhood.
Neither Marx nor Augustine were
complete in taking sides on defining “evil”. Evil can come from
both the structure of society and from the selfish id. The inward
therapeutic of psychology is not enough, the outward
sociobiological is also
required.
What matters most in evolution is the
separation of powers---the central dictatorships of the state, and
imperialism, are anti-evolutionary. Small states and even ethnostates
protected by a light federalism, and voluntarily guided by religion and science,
are the way to proceed.
Sunday, August 12, 2012
The Spirit-Will, Free Will and Evolution
The Spirit-Will activates all life to
evolve to Godhood, but outside evolution shapes material life, and in doing
so, the healthier, the more fit, the best, whether in brain or brawn, have success in survival
and reproduction, and can also move upward in evolution. This is not cruelty on the part of nature toward the unsuccessful, this is simply real life and real evolution preferring the best to proceed. The
activation of the Spirit-Will does not assure the evolution to
Godhood, but it seeks for all material life to attain Godhood. This
gives evolution more choice, even more randomness than an absolutely
determined Spirit-Will-material-life would supply. “Free will” is not the Spirit-Will but it acts something like the Spirit-Will in man. Free will is connected to determinative
things so it is not entirely free. We have choices in what we do but they are not
unlimited choices. The goal is determined but the path is freer.
Friday, August 10, 2012
How Christianity and Ordered Evolution are Compatible
Sir Arthur Keith said that “The law
of Christ is incompatible with the law of evolution---as far as the
law of evolution has worked hitherto.” This is like the dilemma
St. Thomas Aquinas faced, when the exhuming of Aristotle's Reason seriously threatened to topple the faith of Christianity.
The Twofold Path in the Theoevolutionary Church makes Christianity compatible with evolution by seeing the Inward God, or the Father Within of Christianity, as the first
intuitive glimpse of the Outward Godhood attained
through material-supermaterial evolution in the cosmos.
But this compatibility is not done simply
as strategy, this is knowing that historical and religious
reality require a long term Ordered Evolution to Godhood, which combines the
importance of Conservatism and Ordered Evolution with progressive evolution.
The Inward God of Christianity is reached by blocking
the mammalian instincts, by blocking “all the desires of the
flesh,” (not dissimilar to the inward God of eastern religions), whereas the Outward Godhood is reached by affirming and
sublimating the drives of biological evolution toward Godhood.
Higher civilizations manage to redirect
mammalian instincts in more spiritual directions, and the zenith of
the instincts, the Spirit-Will, seeks to activate material life to
evolve to Godhood. The Outward Path is like swimming downstream in the current
of life, the Inward Path is like swimming upstream as an ascetic against the
currents of life. These two streams are made compatible when the ascetic Inward God is seen as the precursor to Outward Godhood attained through evolution.
Thursday, August 09, 2012
Regarding the traditional proof of God
It may be an original theological
concept that the Spirit-Will-To-Godhood contains both the cause and
goal of life, since the Spirit-Will is what activates material life
and does so because it seeks the goal of Godhood. The Spirit-Will is
never separate from the material which it activates so there is never
a single, non-material, spiritual cause.
I do not see an unmoved, non-material God as the cause of the world, the Primary Material is periodically
activated by the Primary Spirit-Will from which there is no
separation, and there is always an endless evolution to Godhood, with
many “failures” and fewer successes, and always with new chances.
It seems just as likely that there never is, or was, a “first
cause” or a “one” thing first moving another thing, things may
reasonably go on forever, being moved by the Spirit-Will, and then
shaped by evolution.
The two remaining “occult” entities
in what I consider a naturalistic pattern are the activating
Spirit-Will and Godhood at the zenith of evolution, which I believe
will one day be acknowledged and defined by science---for now they
require “faith” and intellectual intuition.
Wednesday, August 08, 2012
Thoughts on bioconservatism and artificial intelligence in evolution
I think in terms of voluntary,
non-coercive, evolutionary advancement, beginning with screenings for
genetic diseases, genetic counseling, birth control, all
voluntary yet still encouraged. We want to halt devastating diseases
which are passed on, but we also want to encourage healthier and more
intelligent people with good physical and mental health. It
seems odd that one has to affirm these obviously positive things.
I can acknowledge Francis Galton's statement from the late 19th century that human civilization with its easy survival has often thwarted the mechanisms of natural
selection which applied for millions of years---although good modern nutrition can also raise IQ's. When
intelligence declines then civilization as we have known it declines.
IQ correlates with many sociobiological factors, and these
things have indeed been determined objectively by science.
We can exalt the healthy
genius and the talented who have given so much to the average man.
We have a long way to go in our evolution to Godhood, and Godhood is
defined as the zenith or the absolute of intelligence, beauty and merit.
I affirm a bioconservative position on
bioengineering and trans-human evolution. The growth of computers
does not automatically mean that biological evolution will be
superseded by technological evolution, computers are still
autistically intelligent zombies, as David Pearce put it.
I do contrast biological intelligence
with artificial machine intelligence, we are not forced to become
cyborgs, or a combination of human and artificial intelligence, and
we are not forced to accept nonbiological artificial intelligence
ruling over us.
It is true that genetic evolutionary
change is slower at this time than exponentially advancing
computers, but genetic engineering is speeding this up considerably. Computers can be used to help advance
biological humanity, not rule us, and not combine with us.
There will be anarchic bio-hackers seeking to
expand their minds, like those today who experiment with designer
drugs, and perhaps they may need to be regulated---an intelligent sociopath is still a sociopath. There will probably be
future competition between bioconservative evolutionists
and those who radically promote artificial machine
super-intelligence. But competition is part of evolution.
The creation of human civilization
evolved mainly by way of the bonding ethics of group-selection,
and this remains deeply within human nature. Any future evolution
will need to work with human nature in developing political philosophy, not against it, if we are to have the long term evolutionary
success we need. For example, I see a world of thousands of small
states, or ethnostates, protected by a light federalism, and guided
in evolution toward Godhood by religion and science.
We certainly will invent and use higher
and higher technology, but our future successors will be
supermaterial descendants of ourselves and not digital machine monsters run
on computers. The Godhood we are evolving to is not a
superintelligent robot.
It should be made clear at this point that while we can affirm voluntary selective breeding, negative-eugenics (eg. disease curing), genetic engineering, gene therapy, human cloning, germ-line engineering, etc, we cannot affirm the projected man/monster/machine melds of transhuman technologies, and the like. This is where bio-conservative evolutionist's separate from the singularity and transhuman machine philosophies. In any case, human nature, or the nature of life itself, may put up its own obstacles to its own death, or its takeover by machines.
Reckless radicals seem to want to do such things as modify human cells with artificial cells until there is no natural biological identity left, which defines the death of natural life. We do not believe evolution can continue in that way. The Spirit-Will which first activates all life to evolve to Godhood, before natural evolution shapes life, will die if natural life dies.
Although we certainly will be aided by superior machines and technology, we see Godhood as the zenith of natural material-supermaterial evolution, and not a machine-God.
It should be made clear at this point that while we can affirm voluntary selective breeding, negative-eugenics (eg. disease curing), genetic engineering, gene therapy, human cloning, germ-line engineering, etc, we cannot affirm the projected man/monster/machine melds of transhuman technologies, and the like. This is where bio-conservative evolutionist's separate from the singularity and transhuman machine philosophies. In any case, human nature, or the nature of life itself, may put up its own obstacles to its own death, or its takeover by machines.
Reckless radicals seem to want to do such things as modify human cells with artificial cells until there is no natural biological identity left, which defines the death of natural life. We do not believe evolution can continue in that way. The Spirit-Will which first activates all life to evolve to Godhood, before natural evolution shapes life, will die if natural life dies.
Although we certainly will be aided by superior machines and technology, we see Godhood as the zenith of natural material-supermaterial evolution, and not a machine-God.
Tuesday, August 07, 2012
The way out of nihilism: Nietzsche's death of religion was premature
Early Nietzsche saw no way to avoid the
collapse of religion and the subsequent nihilism and
“barbarizing” of culture. He thought that modern science,
naturalism and modern philosophy had been the main culprits in its
demise. In later work Nietzsche proposed a new philosophy or
“religion” of the superman, the transvaluation of all values,
eternal recurrence, the will-to-power.
But Nietzsche's death of religion was premature in light of the development of the synthesis of
Christianity and theological materialism in the Twofold Path of the Theoevolutionary Church. The God of Christianity, the Father Within of
Jesus Christ and the Inward Path, was a traditional, virtual, glimpse
of the real Godhood which can be attained through material and
supermaterial evolution in the Outward Path to Godhood.
This religious philosophy can save
Christianity, and religion in general, and it can give sacred
meaning to science. We are all evolving to Godhood, bonded within our various groups and ethnostates. This is the revitalized-conservative way out of
the nihilism and hedonism of the modern world. The revolutions of
communism and fascism were too radical and too far removed from human nature to work for humanity.
Monday, August 06, 2012
The Great Turn Around
I do not think that evolution is blind,
although for most intents and purposes it looks that way because
evolution wanders around and bumps its head against brick walls and
goes down blind alleys. In this I depart from most scientists,
including one of the best, Raymond Cattell.
A sacred instinct, a sacred erg,
activates material life which is then shaped by evolution. This
sacred instinct is called the Spirit-Will, or more formerly, the
Spirit-Will-To-Godhood, and this activation helps explain the path of material evolution from the simple to the complex as the Spirit-Will seeks the
highest evolution possible, which is Godhood.
Affirming the sacred instinct of
Spirit-Will leads to the Great Turn Around of the Twofold Path in the Theoevolutionary Church In the great religions, the
Involutionary Inward Path turned the material into the spiritual,
whereas the Evolutionary Outward Path turns the spiritual
into the material. The virtual God, or Father Within, of the Inward
Path of Christianity, and the great religions, is reached by evolving to the actual Godhood of the Evolutionary Outward Path. The
spiritual and material can meet here, religion and science can meet
here, traditional religion and future religion can meet here.
Sunday, August 05, 2012
How far can we extend group morality?
The scientific work of Wilson and
Cattell, as well as common observation, shows that morality evolved
from group selection. Survival advantages went to the groups who
could bond together morally without killing each other, in
competition, and even war, with other groups. The groups with the
morality which was best bonded within the group were more successful
in survival and reproduction. Individual and kin selection took
place within the bonded groups. Kin and ethnic selection does not
disappear from basic human nature when group selection is
acknowledged, politically incorrect as this may be.
To demand equality with no preference
for ones own group departs too far from actual human nature,which is
why it has never worked. But I think it is possible to extend
group selection to cooperative competition, rather than
murderous competition between groups. Both culture and genetics are
involved in this sublimation of aggressive drives.
Competition in group selection is the
natural way to find positive evolutionary mutations, which can ideally
then be shared with the world, while maintaining the natural
preference for ones own group. It has been shown time after time
that cultural and genetic stagnation sets in without competition. Does this
sound like too much for humans to handle? Human beings
are capable of this, but it does seem to require the cultural and
genetic sublimation of aggressive and sexual drives toward higher
evolution. We are all evolving to Godhood but we won't get there without cooperation within the parameters of actual human nature and group selection.
The one basic instinct that needs to be affirmed is the Spirit-Will-To-Godhood which activates material life
and is then shaped by evolution. To evolve in the world and in the
cosmos to Godhood is the essential purpose and reason for our
existence, and it is the present and future mission of religion and
science to help in this sacred mission, by guiding the various
competing groups in how we may best survive and evolve.
Saturday, August 04, 2012
Why humanity needs religion
Nietzsche made the remark that people
would have the void as purpose rather than have no purpose, and he
also talked about people becoming nihilistic if they had no religion.
Nietzsche considered this a sign of weakness in people.
Philosophy and science did not
successfully fill the void of lost religion. The big picture was
missing, and emotional holism, moral direction, and harmony was missing.
Modern humanity tried to fill the void with consumerism, food, sex,
drink, movies, but these did not make them feel satisfied with their
lives. Nihilism followed.
The reason people would rather have the
void as purpose rather than have no purpose is not because they are
weak or slaves, as Nietzsche suggested, it is because sacred purpose
is built into the deepest zenith of our instincts, as the
Spirit-Will-To-Godhood that drives material life to evolve to Godhood, which is then
shaped by natural evolution. This is the base of revitalized
religious philosophy for humanity.
Friday, August 03, 2012
Elegance
“Human reason does not exclude the
merit of faith, but is a sign of greater merit.” St. Thomas Aquinas
It is the Spirit-Will-To-Godhood that
leads “faith,” not human reason, but there is an elegant harmony
between reasoned and empirical materialism and the activation of
materialism by the Spirit-Will, which pleases both faith and
reason.
The elegance in itself is important in
finding the truth behind the patterns of existence. Without first
seeing an elegant pattern, reason has little structure to examine,
inelegance seems more unrealistic or unnatural, although we have to be careful here that we are not biased in our preference for seeing elegant patterns.
The most elegant pattern is seen in the
Spirit-Will activating material life to evolve---shaped by natural
evolution---to the supermaterial Godhood first glimpsed by the great
religions, which harmonizes faith and reason, religion and science, past and future.
Thursday, August 02, 2012
Identity
In “The Politics of Myth,” Robert
Ellwood suggests that what we identity as most important tends to
define our political philosophy. For example, socioeconomic class,
race, religion, the individual, etc. Communists prefer socioeconomic class,
fascist race-nation, liberals the individual, and so on.
Group identification (along with
individual selection) has just been reaffirmed by one of the greatest
living scientists, E. O. Wilson, reversing his prior preference for
kin-selection. I think all three, group, individual and kin
selection work together, but group selection is the main unit of
selection developing the ethics of our various cultures.
Group selection brings us in the
direction of older romanticism, as well as conservatism, and turns us
somewhat away from the liberal Enlightenment with its affirmation of
the autonomous individual. But romanticism and conservatism also
affirmed the individual and the hero.
Group selection and romantic
conservatism are seen in the religious philosophy of the Theoevolutionary Church where the struggle for survival and evolution to Godhood becomes mythical, almost apocalyptic. We politically project thousands of small states religiously evolving upward toward Godhood, under the protection of a light federalism---not imperialism--- and guided, voluntarily, by the church.
But evolution itself is
grounded in the science of the Enlightenment, which also fits the character and tone of the TC. This defines a holistic worldview
and religion, which we do need in our long evolution to Godhood.
Wednesday, August 01, 2012
Religion and Psychology
Religion has been looked at by
psychology as having spiritual values arrived at from the
sublimation's of instinctual (ergic) frustrations, eg. sex and
aggression frustrations. This seems largely true, with a vital
exception. I believe that the foundational instinct, the Zenith of
the Instincts, is the Spirit-Will which activates material life before
life is shaped by evolution.
That is, religion and culture arise
from the sublimation of instinctual frustrations, which has a sort of
negative tone, but religion and culture also arise more deeply from the positive activation of the Spirit-Will, which essentially
defines life itself.
Psychology and science in general have
not acknowledged this sacred activating base beneath
religion and biological life, they acknowledge only random evolution seeking
survival success for the sake of survival success, with no long-term
religious goal of Godhood.
This makes the ECC more a religion than
a psychology, and this separates us from such great influences as Raymond Cattell and E. O. Wilson.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)