Tradición Perenne sites

  https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=en&ie=UTF8&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=es&sp=nmt4&tl=en&u=http://traditioperennis.com/drupal/node/4631&usg=ALkJrhiGiOYaHAthCvKiPrtjV9PdPjRfYw

Buddhism

• Buddhist tradition
• Content
• Buddha
• Schools
  • Tien Tai
    • Chi-I
  • Hua Yen
    • Fazang
  • Fa Hsiang
  • Pure Land
    • Gendyn Rinpoche
  • San Lun
    • Kumarajiva
  • Chan- Articles
    • Bodhidharma
    • Hui Ko
    • Seng Tsang
    • Dao Xin
    • Hui Neng
    • Kuei Yang
    • Yun Men
      • Xu Yun
    • Fa Yen
    • Tsung Mi
    • Ts'ao Tung (Soto)
      • Dogen
  • Theravada
    • Nyanaponika thera
    • Ajhan Subhedo
  • Vajrayana

Christianity

• Christian tradition
• Content
• Ancient Christianity
  • Apostolic Fathers
  • Fathers of the Church
    • Origins of Alexandria
    • Dioniso Areopagita
    • San Agustin
• Medieval Christianity
  • Catholicism
    • Saint Bernard of Clairvaux
    • Thomas Aquinas
    • Miguel de Molinos
    • Master Eckhart
    • Ramón Llull
    • Marsilio Ficino
• Christian Humanism
  • Social Doctrine
  • Jacques Maritain
  • Emmanuel Mounier
  • Nicolás Berdiaev
  • Leo XIII
  • Pius XI
  • Benedict XVI
• Chesterton

Grecolatine

• Grecolatine tradition
• Content
• Plato
• Aristotle
• Euclid
• Pythagoras
• Plotinus
• Proclo

Hermetic

• Hermetic tradition
• Content
• Basilio Valentín
• Alfonso X El Sabio
• Arnau de Vilanova
• Bernardo de Treviso
• Diego de Santiago
• Domingo Gundisalvo
• Enrique de Villena
• Luis de Centelles
• Lumen Luminum

Hinduism

• Hindu tradition
• Content
• Advaita Vedanta
  • Shankaracharya
  • Ramana Maharshi
• Swami
  • Yukteswar
• Ramakrishna

Islam

• Islamic tradition
• Content
• Sufism
  • Al Alawi
  • Al Ghazali
  • Ibn Arabi
  • Muzaffer Ozak
  • Rumi
  • Martin Lings
• Chiismo
  • Sohravardi
  • Avicenna
  • Mulla Sadra

Qabbalah

• Kabbalistic tradition
• Content
• Azriel from Girona
• Maimonides

Taoism

• Taoism
• Content
  • Lao Tze
    • Tao Traduccion TP

Traditionalism

• Presentation
  • Glossary
  • Content
• Rene Guenon
• Jean Tourniac
• AK Coomaraswamy
• Boris Muraviov
• Charbonneau-Lassay
• Dante Alighieri
• Fritjof Schuon
• GI Gurdjieff
• Henry Corbin
• Jean Hani
• Julius Evola
• Leo Schaya
• Luc Benoist
• Ouspenski
• Titus Burckhardt
• Oswald Spengler

Not Traditional

• J. Krishnamurti

Masonry

• Operational Freemasonry
• Content
• Ambelain
• JM Ragón

Cultural pathogens

Psychiatrist Boris Vatel (Chronicles Dec 2017) writes that a psychiatric disorder can be present when a persons internal experience is at odds with the shared observations and experiences that we define as reality. I would expand that concept and suggest that a pathogen can be more than a bacterium causing disease. I think cultural Marxism, postmodernism, and radical feminism could be considered cultural pathogens at odds with the shared observations and experiences we define as reality.

Reality says that human nature is kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection. People and cultures can operate for a time with behavior that goes against this basic human nature, with such experiments as Marxism, postmodernism, and radical feminism, but the culture is eventually pulled back by the biological and genetic leash of real human nature to cultures that better reflect real human nature, and humans then adapt to the environments they find themselves living in.

We thought the Soviet Union was evil for defining people who refused to follow communist orders (refuseniks) as insane. Western culture, including Western psychiatry, has instead gone the opposite direction, toward the dark side, and declared even such things as transgenderism as sane, saying any problems of distress they may have is caused by discrimination against them!

Are we so far gone that our only hope is for the feminists to become populist-nationalists?

I have not respected the radical feminists mainly because they deny gender differences or insist that the differences between men and women have nothing to do with genetic differences, which is moronic. But it fascinates me to see that it is feminist-influenced women, not men, who have found the courage to bring down the sleazy Hollywood-New York-Washington sexual abusers of women (mostly gentile women and Jewish men).

So what's next? Radical feminism is intellectually Marxist, so will that continue to be the direction the corrupt Big Media takes us? Our colleges and universities have brainwashed our college graduates to be culturally Marxist, so are we to count only on the proletariat "deplorables" living between the East and West coast, the ones who voted for Trump? Are we so far gone that our only hope is for the feminists to become populist-nationalists?

The quantum world isn't spiritual

Perhaps the last outpost of spiritualism is the claim that quantum mechanics affirms spiritualism. "Electrical theory" suggest that the electrical structure of matter at the lowest levels of the structure of matter causes the quantum effect. And of course they are considered cranks for saying this.

Electrical theory says that subatomic particles, including the electron, are structures of electrical charges. This makes the indeterminate "superposition" material not spiritual, it seems to me. Electrical charges between tiny material objects are grounded in material connections not spiritualism.

Maybe Einstein should have kept looking to unify the small and large worlds. The missing knowledge explaining gravity and quantum behavior may be the electoral structure of matter.

Speculating even deeper I ask why do we have these forces in the first place? I see both the quantum and large forces essentially activating existence to materially evolve to the highest levels of life, which defines Godhood and is the purpose of the universe and the origin of religion and philosophy.

Correctly defining the enemy and the defense

America and the West are being attacked by people who seek to destroy the traditional Euro-American people and the culture of the West. And the defenders of the West are defined as deplorable, or worse, by the Big Media and by Global Corporations. All of natures laws and all the laws of civilization give the West the right to defend itself, which was the character, tone, and guiding belief of the populist/nationalist movement that elected President Trump.

But it seems to me that the the populist/nationalist defenders of the West will have only temporary victories due to increased competition within the multicultural nations of the West, which could gradually overwhelm them. And so real order and harmony will come when multiculturalism consciously or unconsciously separates into an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. This need not be radical or revolutionary, American conservatism can maintain the legal constitutional separation of powers and states as regions and states gradually become ethnostates within existing federalism.

The Big Media and Global Corporations will fight against this defense but there is no better way to actually save the West. Will we succeed? Are we too unhealthy to survive? Healthy life has a very strong drive to live and prosper.

What Is Deep Conservatism?

Only Pat Buchanan, Ron Paul, and now President Donald Trump have tried to stop the Republican Party Scam (and of course stop the leftist cabal) which has done nothing much to even slow affirmative action, multiculturalism, gay marriage, immigration, and the wars promoted by the all-powerful Wall Street/Israeli/Saudi lobbies. A large percentage of Republican Party elected officials nation-wide refused to endorse Trump against Hillary.

Traditional conservatives, especially of the Southern branch, would have preferred to have the agrarian republic that Jefferson wanted (minus the slavery), and so would I, rather than the centralized travesty we now have, but even that doesn't define Deep Conservatism. We need to go deeper into the biological and genetic origin of most of our social behavior if we really want to conserve America, and Traditional conservatives would rather not go there.

Even the smallest change in our human nature, for example, in our immune system, took hundreds of thousands of years (now we have genetic engineering which is more rapid) yet we all remain kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of selection. Deep conservatism affirms these things.

Deep conservatism points toward the political/cultural solution of ethnopluralism, which very few Traditional conservatives will talk about. It is a conservative transformation---not revolution---which will bring about an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, where different ethnic groups can politically and culturally conduct themselves the way they want to in their own states within our Democratic Republic, perhaps with only a few amendments to the constitutional separation of powers and states. We will need to retain federalism and balance the states together to protect the independence of the ethnostates, and because we need the geopolitical heft of a large nation to defend ourselves in the big world.

Deep conservatism is the political/cultural philosophy most in harmony with real human nature. Rational and instinctive channeling of human nature and human drives, education, and culture in general needs to move in the direction of deep conservatism and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates...Empires always fall back to ethnostates.

The missing link affirming religion in philosophical naturalism

Darwinian theory accepts only random variation and natural selection in defining evolution and lacks the Godhood goal-motivation coming from the sacred inward activation of life. I think this missing link is filled by the activation within life, within every cell of the body, demanding that metabolism and reproduction move toward the ultimate success of evolving to Godhood. That is, evolution works by way of changes originating internally along with the action of random variation and natural selection from the outside environment. And this inward activation, which I have called Tirips or spirit-will, is entirely material.

In the other missing link random variation and natural selection are missing from religion. The philosophy of theological materialism includes the sacred activation within evolutionary life, along with the randomness of outside evolution, with life moving toward ever more complex life forms, or at least toward higher evolved forms and intelligences (beauty, truth and goodness), all the way to Godhood, but then continuing on to higher stages of Godhood, endlessly, with starts, stops, sideways and backward-going along the the way... The death of religion and Godhood was premature, or immature.

Fighting against natural political behavior is not successful in the long term

Conservative Allan Carlson talks about how the American Midwest might have become the dominant region of the United States, but how East Coast intellectuals and television producers destroyed regionalism by successfully labeling the regions as full of rednecks, crypto anti-Semites, etc. etc. Those were the patriotic populist/nationalists of the Midwest and the South who elected Trump.

It won't be easy but America could still be saved if the Midwest and the South can continue to stand against the East and West Coast intellectuals and the corrupt Big Media they control. Trump hasn't been helping the cause with the petty almost unhinged battles he wastes his time on. But he's all we have, for now.

Can the American Midwest become the dominant region of the United States? Ultimately I think regionalism in general in the U.S. can best be advanced by gradually transforming all the regions into an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, in line with our already existing constitutional separation of powers and states. (There might even be a region for decadent multicultural liberals?) 

Why? Because people always create cultures that biologically and ethnically reflect what they are, which includes Regional Patriots as well as the East and West Coast cabal.  Fighting against that natural political behavior is not successful in the long term.

Eurogenes Blog: The ancient genomics revolution (Skoglund & Mathie...

Eurogenes Blog: The ancient genomics revolution (Skoglund & Mathie...: Two former Harvard scientists Pontus Skoglund and Iain Mathieson are working on a new review paper on the wide range of scientific breakthro...

Defending the survival of the gene pool that developed the British Empire

When I unwisely venture to criticize Idiot Prince Harry's rejection of his own upper class British gene pool with his decision to marry a beautiful black American woman, I am not hatefully attacking the gene pool of black Americans, or defining gene pools as inferior or superior. I am an admiring American defending the survival of the gene pool that developed the British Empire, which was perhaps the greatest empire in human history (although I now reject the building of empires)

Resembling George Orwell's brilliant predictive terms "newspeak" and "thoughtcrime," the cultural criminals---yes criminals---of today have successfully perverted the love of ones own people, ones own ethnic culture, into terms of evil, such as white supremacy, racism, hate, and deplorables.  The biological and genetic origin of most of our social behavior has become unmentionable.

The British royals have become a symbol for the destruction of a great nation, from goofy Prince Charles, who shattered and destroyed his beautiful young wife because he missed the mothering of his old girlfriend, and now his idiot son Prince Harry.

A dead white male British genius once wrote: "Lord, what fools these mortals be!"

Overcoming the disorder and chaos of multiculturalism

To paraphrase Alexander Zubatov (Chronicles, Dec. 2017), multicultural messages coming in from all over the numerous media, unconnected to any central reality, create "societal schizophrenia," which brings society to a crisis so it cannot function.

For me this points to the idea that in multicultural societies social order naturally falls apart because distinctly different ethnic groups do not or cannot easily assimilate and therefore compete against one another and even become enemies. This is the reality of real human nature, which remains kin-centered and ethnocentric.

And to complicate multiculturalism even further, it is usually promoted by people who exploit the disorder and chaos to advance their own group.

Is there a way out the disorder and chaos of multiculturalism? Religious, political, or ethnic totalitarianism, fascism, or empire-building have often been the temptation, but these always fall apart for many of the same reasons that multiculturalism falls apart: distinctly different ethnic groups and states do not or cannot easily assimilate, even with force, and the empires fall.

I think the best way out of the increasing disorder and chaos of multiculturalism is to affirm distinctly different non-assimilating ethnic cultures by developing an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. The constitutional separation of powers and states in the U.S. could lend itself to this natural solution. The big question is can this be done consciously and rationally, or will we have to completely fall apart first?

The way real charitable empathy can exist across the world

Catholics are more practical than Protestants in giving two pillars to the church, scripture plus ongoing apostolic tradition, but protestants are closer to the complete non-material, ascetic, impracticality of Christ in validating only the scriptures.

So if we consider what Chilton Williamson Jr. called "universal empathy" (Chronicles Dec. 2017) and how the Church teaches us that our primary charitable empathy is to those nearest to us, that practicality leans more toward apostolic tradition and interpretation than the scriptures.

We can, and should, care about the world, at least at the far end of our charitable empathy, but our genetically derived human nature simply cares more deeply about kin and ethnic group. This may not conform to the ideals of socialism, postmodernism, or even the Church, but it is nevertheless true.

Such things as universal empathy, the Brotherhood of Man, universal equality, and perfect liberty, which have been promoted for many years by liberalism, do not exist in reality. And fascism tends to want only one group in the world, which is not only impractical but almost as unreal as promoting  universal empathy (really brain-washing).

The reality which forms around the real charity and real empathy inherent in human nature suggests an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected by populist nationalism---that is the practical way real charitable empathy can exist across the world.

What's with these people still wanting to build corrupt empires?

It looks like a build up to war with Iran, pushed by the usual influence dealers in Washington, the Wall Street lobby, "neoconservatives," and the Israeli and Saudi lobbyists, who pay off and threaten corrupt government officials and representatives to get them to take actions that are completely against the interests of our nation.

It is basically America/Israel against Russia/Iran, with China sitting back watching the fools, but leaning toward Russia. President Trump seems to be falling for war with Iran even though he was elected by people who do not want these wars.

Russia wants to build another empire, not having learned from the collapse of their Soviet empire. And China of course is on its way to building the next big empire. America could lose this one and then lose its corrupt empire, like its British cousin lost their last global empire. What's with these people still wanting to build corrupt empires?

If they really wanted to, all of these people could develop an ethnopluralism of ethnostates in their home territories, protected by populist/nationalism. In the U.S.A. the constitutional separation of powers and states could be gradually adapted toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. which is directly harmonious with real kin-centered, gender defined, heterosexual, hierarchical, ethnocentric, and even xenophobic human nature.

This will come, it's in the historical wind, the question is when?

Truth, beauty, change, and essence

Can we say truth is about what does not change? There's a problem with that. Things always change and evolve. So perfect objectivity seems dubious. Real truth includes change. Even when Godhood is attained in material evolution, life moves on and evolves to higher Godhood, endlessly it seems.

"Beauty" works the same way. Rather than say that beauty is the most characteristic of the species, it might be better to say that beauty is the synthesis of the particular species at various levels of evolution. Godhood could then be seen as the most perfect syntheses of life itself at the highest stages of evolution at any given stage of evolution.

Only humans think in terms of beginnings and endings because we see ourselves ending and beginning, at least as individuals.

So then we come to the "essence " of life which seems to be the activation to life within life, called many things, the will, the spirit, the soul, the spirit-will, or Tirips as I have come to call it, which is entirely material and works along with the outside material natural world in which life evolves. Yet even this essence has the changing goal of activating life toward Godhood, endlessly.

I'm not defending Roy Moore, but how is early marriage worse than what we have?

Well, hillbilly Roy Moore has taken Harvey Weinstein and the degenerate Hollywood cabal out of the Big Media picture. How convenient. The Big Media and Hollywood have always hated the south because the south (rightly) hates the Big Media. I'm not defending Roy Moore, whose southern brand of Christianity probably caused more people to reject religion than science ever did. But how is early marriage worse than what we have?  What has our stopping girls from marrying in their teens really done for girls in the West? Liberals now smugly pass out condoms to teen girls in schools and teach disastrous cultural Marxism. Teen culture in the West has become a degenerate and decadent separate culture of sex, drugs and rock and roll.

If we want to prevent the destruction of America we have to fix our historical immigration mistakes

In the past 50 years we have had 50 million immigrants, legally and illegally, and the main problem with immigration has been that the old "melting pot" no longer melts---it was originally workable with mainly European immigrants who could more naturally harmonize and assimilate with the existing Euro-American citizens of America, and the new immigrants were no longer Europeans and would not or could not assimilate.

This is only natural given that real human nature is kin-centered, gender defined, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, among other traditional traits. Cultures can operate for a time with behavior that goes against real human nature with such unworkable immigration experiments as we have had, but cultures are eventually pulled back by the biological and genetic leash of real human nature to cultures that better reflect real human nature.

So since the melting pot idea no longer melted we changed to the "multicultural" mosaic idea, which has caused not order but separation and bitter stratification and competition between distinctly different ethnic groups---which makes complete sense given the real human nature just mentioned.

Now if we want to prevent the destruction of America we have to fix our historical immigration mistakes. We will need to legally develop an ethnopluralism of ethnostates from out of our constitutional separation of powers and states. It won't be easy of course because even mentioning this common sense solution goes against the prevailing political correctness of cultural Marxism which has both purposely and ignorantly usurped and nearly destroyed American culture.

Why beauty will never be permanently usurped by ugliness

In one of his amusing and gutsy columns Taki Theodoracopulos mentioned the ancient Greek belief that an ugly countenance comes from within and portrays an ugly soul. That also makes sense when we consider less romantic genetics: sexual selection often chooses beauty because beauty indicates a healthier reproductive partner.

Money can displace beauty, and even buy beauty, but if beauty and and health are hijacked for money the reproductive product may be damaged down the line. Instinctively healthy young people often still get into trouble with their older more venal advisers because they tend to choose beauty over everything else.

And in spite of the radical feminists and cultural Marxists who are trying to promote ugly people, advertisers, movie producers and beauty contests still, usually, prefer beauty because it sells better than ugliness.

But the Greeks, radical feminists, and cultural Marxists took beauty down the wrong metaphysical path when they made absolute beauty a nonphysical, non-material thing. And they did the same spiritualization to truth and goodness. Traditional religions did the same thing, and soon real physical beauty took second and third place to mere ideas, at least with philosophers and theologians.

We evolve to Godhood in the material and supermaterial world, and Godhood is the zenith of beautiful, living, material/supermaterial objects.  So beauty, truth and goodness will never be permanently usurped by ugliness.

Let each musical form and each people develop on their own

I'm reluctant to compare European classical music and American jazz because they really do come from different ethnic cultures and it's like comparing apples and oranges. Multiculturalism forces distinctly different cultures together, which naturally brings competition, along with deep resentments, etc., because human nature remains kin-centered and ethnocentric.

I've never understood why some jazz musician didn't follow what Miles Davis did and play fewer notes when improvising rather than more notes. Think of the difference between the improvisations of Miles and Coltrane. And speaking of Coltrane, although Coltrane was soulful and religious I usually found his notes more angry than melodic. I like Cannonball Adderley better because of his very melodic way of improvising.

Where Miles went wrong, which had later repercussions throughout the jazz world, was in "making it new" his God. Here the conservative philosophy would have helped, and Miles certainly was not a conservative. The popular album "Kind of Blue" was never surpassed by Miles (or anyone else) and Miles should not have sacrificed that form. That album brings jazz into its own as a great form distinctly different from European classical music. But instead, jazz followed Miles into new forms inferior to old forms, and Miles seems to have sunk into complete hedonism.

Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, and Chopin could improvise like crazy, and on very complicated themes, but there were no recording devices around to capture it. We could think of their variations on themes as improvisations corrected and perfected as they were written down. But there is something very ballsy and exciting about jazz musicians improvising on the spot, although they do improvise on the same songs night after night. That creation-on-the spot is the uniqueness of the jazz experience.

But that sort of selflessness in jazz playing is almost ruined by the defensiveness of jazz musicians and critics, which is inevitable in multicultural societies. I'm reminded of Paul Fussell's comment on the sports "experts" in bars defensively talking statistics and trumpeting their importance like stock brokers,

Let each musical form and each people develop on their own.

Ways America could be saved

There are two main ways America could be saved: the hard way would be for the empire first to fall as a result of our global military and economic meddling, and the better way of disengaging from global military and economic meddling. That is, disengaging from the Korean peninsula, the nefarious behavior of Israel, Saudi Arabia, Iran. etc., because engaging with them has hurt us far more than helped us.

But disengagement means our Senators and Representatives would have to go along with it, and most of them are controlled by lobbies of the very same people we need to disengage from, which is why we never have the simple way out of our imperial mess---meddling purposely creates deceitful complications.

"America First " means we deal with the world to enhance the American people and not merely to enhance the thoroughly corrupt globalists. Nationalism in military and economic affair doesn't create isolationism, as we are told by those who benefit from globalist meddling.

I think the conservative thing to do is to work on three fronts: first, we work toward disengagement from the Korean peninsula, the nefarious behavior of Israel, Saudi Arabia, Iran. etc, second, we prepare to pick up the pieces when the empire falls. And finally we prepare for our own devolutionary disengagement from Big Government by gradually transforming our constitutional separation of powers and states into an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, in harmony with real human nature, protected by military and economic nationalism.

A note on connecting evolution, dialectics, conservatism and theology

Hegel and the communists don't own the dialectics. Material evolution is the deepest dialectics, and conservatism can maintain the past as it moves toward the future. Biological evolution moves through the thesis, antithesis and synthesis but then on toward another thesis.

The ultimate synthesis is Godhood evolved to in the material and supermaterial world, but then even Godhood evolves on to the next level of Godhood. It is human beings, who are mortal, who provincially insist on beginnings and endings. But there is no end or beginning to evolution, dialectics, conservatism or theology.

It's a meritocracy, no matter what gender you are

"A woman came into our conference room yesterday and she saw five men sitting there waiting for her. She said, joking, but not really joking, "I see no women in here at all. Why is that?"

Everyone looked around, saying nothing. Then I said, "This place runs strictly on merit, it's a meritocracy, no matter what gender you are."

"Are you sure?" She asked me.

"Why would I lie about that, we're proud of it," I replied.

She stared at me for a few seconds, then she sat down and said, "Can we get started?" The meeting began, and it went fine. And we bought here product because it was superior."

Earl B.

I wouldn't be surprised to see a third party win in the next presidential election

Does globalism always win? Trump's "draining of the swamp" excited both the populist left and right, but the Republican and Democratic parties don't really believe in populism, they and their friends in the Big Media, the academic world, and global corporations, are draining Trump instead of the swamp.

Even though third parties usually lose in America, there is a new deeper survival force in modern politics; I wouldn't be surprised to see a third party win in the next presidential election. The third party will be resolutely populist nationalist, and economic nationalist.

I suppose we will have to wait awhile for the deepest political vehicle, that is, gradually and legally transforming the constitutional separation of powers and states into an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, in harmony with real human nature. Globalism will criminally fight this as they always have. But empires always fall, and ethnostates always rise.

People develop culture before culture develops people

I don't think Hellaire Belloc lacked courage but he got his priorities wrong with his statement "The Faith is Europe and Europe is the Faith." Europe is Europeans, it was ethnic Europeans who developed the faith and culture of Europe.

Conservatives make the same mistake, but in their case it often has to do with the consequences they suffer from saying anything that is considered politically incorrect. They will defend the faith but not the people, the ethnic group, who developed the faith.

It's not easy to speak of the biological or genetic origin of most of our social behavior, it's even against the law in Europe, more or less, but that doesn't change the truth, and it won't save Europeans or Euro-Americans.

The political correctness of cultural Marxism was itself mainly the product of a group of ethnic Jewish philosophers who fled Germany in the 1930s, the so-called "Frankfurt School," so the sociobiological priority of people developing culture before culture develops people is affirmed.

This is not anti any group, it defines the kin-centered and ethnic-centered development of human cultures from human nature.

The best way to overcome depression and anger over the decline of the West

It's easy for deep conservatives to become depressed or angry about the decline of the West when all their culture shows them is endless commercials with American families attempting to rap dance with joy over a new consumer product.

And Christianity tends to offer only sentimental slop about us all getting along, which no one listens to. Conservatives never mention sociobiology as a great aid in the recovery of the West.

The deepest affirmation of conservative behavior comes from the biological and genetic origin of much of our social behavior which remains today as it has been, kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

There is opportunity for conservatives even in our decline to recover---without radicalism---by gradually transforming the constitutional separation of powers and states into an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, in harmony with real human nature. That is the best way I know of to overcome depression and anger over the decline of the West.

How and why leftist and vulgar Show Business and Hollywood conquered

Childish narcissistic actors were only pawns in the leftist and vulgar take down of traditional America, which was accomplished even though the majority of Americans didn't approve of the leftism and vulgarity.

Was it the refusal of America to allow the mostly Jewish immigrants or sons of immigrants who developed Hollywood and Show Business to assimilate, or was it their own refusal to assimilate which caused them to promote the leftism and vulgarity which has been destroying traditional America?

Then the academic world was a great aid to Show Business and Hollywood by teaching our students to accept cultural Marxism, transgenderism, codes of speech, racial and gender quotas, safe spaces, march-riots, etc. etc.

Ironically, piggy producer Harvey Weinstein's fall from grace had more to do with the actions of radical feminism, promoted by Show Business and Hollywood, than it did from anything else...What a world.

Even if poetry could go back to traditional rhythm, sound, and image it could still be boring

There are very few great poets, just as there are very few great philosophers, so even if poetry could go back to traditional rhythm, sound, and image it could still be boring. Like the abstractions of modern philosophers which lead nowhere, the images of modern poets also usually go nowhere.

The Beat poets felt the need to bring poetry back to the reality of the physical sexual world, they rejected traditional poetry for more reasons than hating capitalism or fidelity in marriage, they rejected traditional poetry because it was boring. The leftism and hedonism of the Beat poets, and later their Buddhism, was decadent and degenerate, but they were right about most traditional poetry being boring.

What is missing in both modern poetry and philosophy is the reality of the biological origin of most of our social behavior, including the social behavior of making poetry or philosophy. That is, the reality of being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection. When poetry or philosophy includes the blood and guts of those truths it is harder to be boring.

Deepening our constitutional separation of powers and states

I believe that Americans should go back and pick up the good things that the Founder's taught us. Our hope is to fall back upon our Constitution and the traditional American way of life. It is the only political foundation we have and it will still work in this populated world, by insisting on local and state government, and a small federal government, but with a few constitutional amendments.

It is necessary to work in harmony with real human nature which has been affirmed throughout human history to this day as being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection. Cultures can operate for a time with behavior that goes against this human nature, with such experiments as Marxism, but culture is eventually pulled back by the biological and genetic leash of real human nature to cultures that better reflect real human nature, and humans must then work within and adapt to the environments they find themselves living in.

This shows anyone who is willing to look at reality that an ethnopluralism of ethnostates is probably the best political configuration for humans beings to live within. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected by federalism. It may require a few constitutional amendments to give more power to the states to move toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. It will, of course, not be easy at all, but it is far preferable to radical Marxism or Fascism, or political dissimulations based on flawed definitions of human nature, which increasingly bring us civil disruptions, or even civil war, now increasing across the world within unworkable multicultural (multi-ethnic) societies.

 

The Three Covenants of Deep Conservatism

Reblog from June 29, 2010

Because we see the solid ecumenical connection of the Involutionary Inward Path in the Revealed Religions, we give credit to the Jewish and the Brahmanic-Zoroastrian religions for retaining the ancient perennial religion throughout human history. Almost alone in the West, the Jews retained the ancient perennial wisdom of Egypt and Babylon, in the face of exile and rejection. And the Hindus have retained the most ancient Vedas and the Yogic schools, which harken back to the original homeland of perhaps the original proto-Indo-European perennial religion.

But what we do Not affirm is Imperial Religion, or an imperial race, or defining any people as Noble Aryan or Chosen Jew alone. The introduction of the Evolutionary Outward Path, and the Twofold Path, corrects the metaphysical error of having only the one path to the God Within, the Involutionary Inward Path. In the Theoevolutionary Church, all people, all races have the right, indeed the Covenant, to evolve in the Evolutionary Outward Path to the Godhood first seen in the Inward Path, with variety and voluntary separation if they choose, in small virtually independent ethnostates protected by light federalism.

The Jews and Hindus established the First Covenant, where the Spirit and Soul of the Inward Path were understood tribally, racially in the blood. In the Second Covenant, Buddha and Christ brought the knowledge that the Soul-Within need not be understood racially or tribally but could be understood by any race, any people, universally, provided they were taught the proper way, applying the proper deeds, to see the God Within. The Third Covenant is the mission affirmed by the Theoevolutionary Church, where both Primordial Tradition and Christianity are revitalized by once again addressing the First Covenant, and the vital biological, genetic qualities in our evolution to Godhood, which is applied to the Evolutionary Outward Path of material evolution to Godhood. We do not see the need to go back to the tribal religions themselves which have mostly passed away. And also, as in the Second Covenant, this is applied to all people, all nations, all races, all should have access to knowledge of the evolution to God. In the Twofold Path we affirm the ancient Involutionary Inward Path of identifying with the Second Covenant God-Within, whom we are evolving to materially become while applying the First Covenant in an ethnopluralism of ethnostates in the Outward Path...This affirms real conservatism, or as I call it, deep conservatism.

Posted by Kenneth Lloyd Anderson at Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Is there a highest level of human social civilization?

Real human nature is violated by attempts to make everyone the same and to jam distinctly different people together into the same state, because human nature remains deeply kin-centered and ethnocentric, among other mostly traditional traits.

The natural will to kin and ethnic survival and reproductive success often leads one group to promote the supremacy of their own group over other groups, which is how colonialism and empires develop.

But we can see from the rise and fall of rightist or leftist empires in history that they fall apart and decentralize into an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. So why not go to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates in the first place? This could bring whatever peace and harmony is possible for human beings.

I think the highest level of human social civilization will come when human beings consciously form themselves into an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, bypassing the cycles of the rise and fall of empires, and then devote themselves with variety to evolving in the material world to supermaterial Godhood.

Word fluff and the logic of the material

Call it the logic of the material: the material physical object takes precedence over its definition or meaning, regardless of whether the material physical object is fully understood. The material object is grasped by its materiality. Definition and meaning can come later but they are always less important than the material object in itself. When this logic of the material is applied to religion or philosophy we can see how far away from the actual material object these fields have become, even to the point of there being no real material object behind the definitions. Religious or philosophical definitions of God and truth would be an example of this idealism or spiritualism.  But God and truth need not therefore be rejected as only word fluff, divine things can be brought back to material reality. For example, in theological materialism, real material/supermaterial Godhood is understood as being evolved to in continually higher stages of material evolution in the real material world. Human nature, which helps develop political and cultural things, can this way be grounded in the real world.

The strongest instincts of life call out for the saving of the people and the country

Could it be that the country has been miss-educated for too long to be saved? All the schools have been teaching (really brainwashing) cultural Marxism to everyone---with the help of the Big Media---at least since the 1960's, and we see the debilitating results everywhere.

Traditional and conservative intellectuals have tried to counter this decline but few people read them (Fox News is mainly neoconservative and globalist). Only the people who didn't take school seriously and ignored politics, preferring sports or auto racing, retain some sense of cultural health, but not much.

What can be done? Many of those middle-of-the-country people voted for Trump, who promised economic nationalism to bring their jobs back, and who said he would bring the troops home, and the people are still waiting for that.

Many people are dropping out and home-schooling to avoid the insanity of the public schools. What if those dropouts could do as the 1960's dropouts did and eventually march through the institutions and reverse the cultural Marxism? I know, I know, that sounds impossible, but who would have thought the hippies would conquer? Of course they had the Big Media on their side and the conservatives don't. Why not build a new, conservative/nationalist, Big Media alongside the degenerate one?

And then beneath all that rescuing is the deep conservative change which you often hear about here: legally adapting (not radically) our constitutional separation of powers and states to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected by federalism and economic nationalism, in harmony with real human nature which remains kin-centered and ethnocentric. That would make us ready for a long and successful future.

Could it be that the country has been miss-educated for too long to be saved? No, we can save the country, the strongest instincts of life call out for the saving of the people and their country.

The natural sequence of altruistic priorities of real human nature

Individual, kin, ethnic group, region, state, nation, world, universe, Godhood---this is how a natural political subsidiary would harmonize with the natural sequence of the altruistic genetic priorities of real human nature. When political philosophy synchronizes with this sequence then we can have nations of light federal systems protecting the variety and independence of decentralized regions and states or ethnostates. When this philosophy is also bonded in a religion dedicated to life materially evolving to Godhood, it seems to me that then we will be approaching a whole, complete, and long-lasting worldview. But human beings tend to be more a lying and scheming species than a wise species and long-term religions and philosophies are often blocked by short-term selfish people who need to be reformed.

What is sin?

Sin is the intentional transgression of the divine and natural laws of the evolution of material life toward Godhood. This is also defined as ignorance. It has not been easy for humanity to discern the divine and natural laws, which is mainly why they have been transgressed.

When a sports culture, or political culture, strays too far away from behavior that benefits the people

Sports have been the one place where modern men can escape the political correctness of cultural Marxism, but professional sports have changed over the years as the athletes changed from white to black athletes. That's not a racist statement it's just a fact. Sports are a microcosm of the larger political reality showing us that as the people change the culture changes. The gentleman sports of English and American culture changed to barbarian and savage professional sports.

But what has not changed is the biological and genetic origin of most of our social behavior, and we are just now beginning to see men pulling away from professional sports---due to the latest unpatriotic behavior of black athletes. When a sports culture, or political culture, strays too far away from behavior that enhances the successful survival and reproduction of a people then the culture is pulled back, consciously or unconsciously, to cultural behavior that benefits the people who partake in the culture.

The conscious media-driven attempt to demoralize white men

More and more feminist women are conspiring with minorities to attack white masculinity in general, but also to attack meritocracies. which men tend to prefer. And this is approved of by the academic world.

Nurturing, which is a primary trait of women, and is genetically, not culturally created, becomes a problem when it is applied to social and political issues that are not related to caring for ones kin and friends.

When feminist women and minorities attack the masculine trait of defense and protectiveness---which is also genetically not culturally created---the nation becomes vulnerable internally and externally to attacks by real enemies.

I'm for women and minorities getting equal pay for equal work, but attacking meritocracies, which men prefer, by declaring that businesses with more women and minorities do better than meritocracies makes sense only if the meritocracies are full of assholes.

I could go on and on with other examples, such as professional sports now dominated by preening black millionaires who object to our nations flag, or how about the now popular internet porn sites filled with blacks with large appendages and white women declaring the wonder of it all.

I'm not a racial supremacist but this sure looks like a conscious media-driven attempt to demoralize white men.

Nothingness and goallessness seen as in error

Darwin, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Wilson all brilliantly described activating dynamics behind human life, but none really described material evolution to Godhood as the goal of those life dynamics. Schopenhauer saw an irrational will behind everything which needed to be blocked, Nietzsche found an irrational will-to-power which needed to be let free, and Darwin and Wilson found the drive to survival and reproductive success behind life. Some of these men rejected or down-played religious views regarding the drives of life---in explaining life, religion itself had already been largely put aside by the material sciences.

In theological materialism religion is revived, but the entirely spiritual Godhood is understood as an entirely material and supermaterial Godhood. The goal of the inward activation of life (called here the spirit-will although it is material) is to evolve to a succession of material/supermaterial Godhoods, seen as the zenith of success in survival and evolution, while working unconscionably and then consciously with the ebb and flow of outside evolution. Science works with religion in this sacred quest.  In the Twofold Path the old religions are seen as the first Inward Path glimpses of God, and are retained, but now transformed in the Outward Path of material evolution to real Godhood.

How real reform not radicalism is the preferred way of deep conservatism

The entire establishment, democrat and republican, are dismayed by President Trump, but if they succeed in removing him from office they may be a lot more dismayed. Our nation may fall further into civil disorder because the radical right will claim that conservative reform will not save America or the West and radicalism, not reform, is necessary. And that is dismaying to deep conservatives.

The fact is Blacks, Whites, Jews, Hispanics, etc. have had problems getting along together not because they are bigoted or hateful but because ethnocentrism or group-selection is instinctively and genetically a deep part of human nature---it was the behavior that allowed these groups to survive successfully during the time when human nature was formed, and it is still very much with us today. Its not a culturally learned trait.

But no one wants to define human nature accurately in that way and it has become politically incorrect to do so. That will only strengthen the radical right and the radical left in response. Deep conservatives seek to stop denying kin-centered, ethnocentric and group-selecting real human nature and believe this could lead to real reform, not radicalism or revolution.

For example, deep conservatism thinks that the existing constitutional separation of powers and states in the US could be gradually and legally adapted to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates and regions, finally in harmony with real, traditional, human nature. Otherwise the radicals may succeed, at least in their usual short-term way.

Is President Trump an Aspy?

Some of us like the fact that President Trump doesn't act like a typical politician, but the Big Media constantly attacks Trump for his inappropriate social skills, his repetitive behavior, etc. I think of Joe Scarborough and Mika who day after day are obsessed with attacking Trump.

Here are some of the traits on the autism spectrum: a tendency to discuss self rather than others, inability to understand social/emotional issues or nonliteral phrases, lack of eye contact or reciprocal conversation, obsession with specific, often unusual, topics, one-sided conversations, etc (Autism Speaks)

If President Trump was an Aspy would that put the Big Media in a politically incorrect bind? I doubt it, they would go after Trump anyway---they would probably use it as an medical excuse to impeach him.

Trump's Handlers?

President Trump is now being accused of being weak and vacillating for scraping the Iran deal by passing the decision back to Congress. But what if Trump is being clever because he knows Congress won't cross the Israeli lobby who want to destroy Iran, so he won't have to take the blame alone for scraping the Iran deal?

The one area where Trump does seem consistent is in supporting Israel, even to the point of turning his back on the nationalism that got him elected. He was going to move away from the neoconservatives and bring the troops and the corporations home. He was going to stop going abroad in search of monsters, who seem to have been defined by Israel. The Big Media will not even speak on this subject---one would think they share the same handlers?

Will populist nationalism have to wait for another leader more courageous than Trump, one more like Pat Buchanan, who was probably destroyed by the same handlers who Trump now fortifies?

I am not anti-Semitic, I believe Israel should  have its own secure ethnostate, like every other distinctive ethnic group. Israel doesn't have to always be walking on the edge of disaster praising its own chutzpah, even though it thinks it requires that behavior.  Empire building with international intrigues by all parties has got to be curbed, and real decentralization has got to happen, if any of us are going to survive and evolve on this planet.

Falsely claiming that we are all the same will not stop wars

I watched Henry Louis Gates, Jr. this morning telling an adoring Charlie Rose how humans are 99.99 genetically the same and therefore how ridiculous and stupid it is that humans have all these wars and all this pain between races. I'm thinking, how wise and scientific Affirmative Action has made Harvard professors like Gates.  It's hard to believe that Henry Louis Gates, Jr. and Edward O. Wilson walk the same halls at Harvard.

One mutation of one gene can cause, say, dwarfism. We share 60 percent of our genes with fruit flies. One gene-pair out of 20,000 genes makes the difference between men and women, but it is a regulatory gene telling many other genes what to do.  Chimps are said be 99% identical in DNA to humans.  Little difference between us there? Apparently without even knowing it, Gates proves the point that minuscule changes in genes causes huge differences that explain why competing genetic pools of ethnic groups continue to compete for survival and reproductive success.

Wars are bad and destructive. We all stop evolving during wars. But falsely claiming that we are all the same will not stop wars. What will at least slow down wars is admitting that we are all different and we need our own space, our own ethnostates or regions, rather than jamming distinctly different people together in one multi-ethnic space and telling us the big lie that we are all the same and we should all get along. Who is causing the trouble here?

The best political configuration for humans beings to live within

Are we blind to the forces that rule us? I think Charles Darwin and now E. O. Wilson have defined the forces that rule us better than religion or philosophy did. Religion created invisible non-material forces controlling life, and philosophy obfuscated with mind games. Homo sapien or Homo mendaciter?

In any case, after many centuries of empirical and intuitive study, the evolutionary sociobiological definition of human nature defines human nature as being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection. Cultures can operate for a time with behavior that goes against this human nature, with such experiments as Marxism, but culture is eventually pulled back by the biological and genetic leash of real human nature to cultures that better reflect real human nature, and humans then work within and adapt to the environments they find themselves living in.

This shows that an ethnopluralism of ethnostates is the best political configuration for humans beings to live within. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could even be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected by federalism. It may require a few constitutional amendments to give more power to the states to move toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. It will not be easy at all, but it is far preferable to radical Marxism or Fascism, or the political dissimulations based on flawed definitions of human nature which have brought us radically destructive civil disruptions, or even civil war, and which are now increasing across the world within unworkable multicultural (multi-ethnic) societies demanding that we all get along.

If the abuse of freedom of the press, by the press, is irreparable than America is irreparable

Is it being "authoritarian" to want to curb the over-sized and corrupt power of the Big Media? I suppose that question is linked to curbing the power of the global big business drive to create a border-less world, controlled by them. Is that giving-in to Jean Revel's "totalitarian temptation?"

The Big Media has been falsely shouting fire in a crowded theater. If the abuse of freedom of the press, by the press, is irreparable than America is irreparable. There are bright people in America who should be able to figure out a legal way to curb the power of the Big Media, by breaking up monopolies, etc.

Trump is now nearly destroyed by the very swamp he sought to drain. I suppose Trump suffers from what the Greeks called hubris---but the huge task to save America and the West requires the boldness of a hero. That is what the populist nationalism and economic nationalism of Trump was all about.

America can be saved without calling for a Stalin or Hitler, cant it? I think so. It was the survival instinct, not a desire for totalitarianism, that caused the people who live between the decadent coasts in America to elect Donald Trump.

The idealistic realism of theological materialism

Neoconservative Leo Strauss used the term "idealistic realism," which became empire building and was not conservative. But I would keep the term and describe theological materialism as idealistic realism.

In the Twofold Path, the Outward Path of evolving toward Godhood is defined as realism and materialism/supermaterialism, while still conservatively retaining the ancient Inward Path to the God Within, which was the first ascetic symbolic experience of God.

In the Outward Path real Godhood can be reached and is reached by evolved living beings at the zenith of material evolution, which is not an inward-only, non-material, spiritual idealism, and not a Marxian political classless Utopia, and also not a neoconservative cabal-led world empire.

On earth we can set ourselves up in an ethnopluralism of ethnostates as the most equitable way to evolve and harmonize with real human nature, which remains kin-centered and ethnocentric in spite of widespread cynical idealistic propaganda saying otherwise.

That is the idealistic realism of theological materialism.

Contrary to conservatives, leftists, feminists, and postmodernists, reality does not exist outside the material world

The subject of gender has been obfuscated by postmodernism, which denies or overlooks the biological or genetic origin of most of our social behavior. That lie, which often denies that there is a human nature, allows leftists, feminists, etc, to claim that human behavior is completely malleable through social conditioning. And so we have such present ludicrous trends as transgenderism, cultural Marxism, etc.

Theological materialism shares the same traditions, values and morals as conservatism, but Godhood is understood and defined materially or supermaterially as that which life evolves to become in the material world. So conservatives obfuscate too when they claim that real tradition and order is founded not in material nature but in a non-material spiritual God.

Contrary to conservatives, leftists, feminists, and postmodernists, reality does not exist in ideologies or religions outside the material world. Godhood and order do exist, or can exist, but are entirely material and within an evolutionary world. Human competitions and battles, anarchism as well as order, even Godhood, find order only within evolving nature, and searching outside of nature leads to dead ends.

All empires fall and become an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, and that is good

The main principle of our latest empire, globalism in business, is to increase the pile of money. God is defined as money. The arrogant claim is then even made that what is good for global business is good for all people, since money brings all things. So national borders, cultures, and people fall to money.

This corrupt state of affairs in the world does not call for the venalities and totalitarian solutions of Marxism or fascism on the right, which are at least as bad as globalism in business. What is needed is the devolution, decentralization, and de-monopolization of globalism in business toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected by various forms of federalism, in line with real human nature.

Globalism in business of course strongly and violently objects to this solution, and still attracts the best minds who make money their God too, since other gods are rejected. But this will change as globalism in business increasingly causes the loss of borders, cultures and people, which creates social chaos. People will then begin to recognize that the best way to save ourselves and the world is by moving toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, which affirms kin-centered, gender defined, marriage-making, ethnocentric, even xenophobic and group-selecting human nature.  All empires fall and become an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, and that is good.

At last a Hollywood producer is called out for serial abuse of women

I don't usually praise the feminists, mainly because they deny or overlook the biological origin of gender differences, which are considerable, but I doubt if Harvey Weinstein would have been called out without the feminist influence.

It's hard to believe that a Hollywood producer is actually being revealed for the serial abuse of women, which Hollywood producers have been doing since Hollywood began. Some of the women were destroyed by the abuse---(who cares, they were only gentile women, right Harvey?)

A material way to define the Spirit-Within and the Soul-Within

If we want to consider a material dwelling place for the Spirit and Soul within, after centuries of mystics talking about them as non-material, the left brain might represent where the Soul is, which is the language and symbol side of the brain, the Apollonian brain, representing the Soul not the Spirit. The Spirit, which is also material, is represented in the right brain, the artistic, intuitive, even Dionysian brain, which could be called the Spark of the Soul since that is what it does in activating life, perhaps in all the cells of the body, to evolve toward Godhood.. Both “brains” work together in first seeing and experiencing God, the Father Within, symbolically, and later in attaining real Godhood through material evolution.

The Soul-Within could be called the Zenith of the mind and as such it is probably represented in the prefrontal cortex, not the limbic system that is blocked by mystics in order to "see" the Soul. We could say that the Spirit is represented in the right brain, which is the Zenith of the Soul, and activates both the Inward Path of the Soul and the Outward Path of the Spirit. The Soul and Spirit must then interact with outside natural evolution on the path of the material evolution of life toward supermaterial Godhood.
 

This allows a rational way to retain the Soul and Spirit of traditional religion, which is conservatively desired in theological materialism, and is seen in the Twofold Path.

In the Twofold Path, involutionary traditional religion is represented in the Inward Path to the symbolic God-Within, the first way humans saw God, and the Outward Path represents the evolution of material life to real, not symbolic, supermaterial Godhood, in the distant future.

Why has Western culture deferred to political correctness or cultural Marxism?

It is biology driving political correctness or cultural Marxism, as it does most social behavior, which Marxism cunningly or stupidly denies. Cultural Marxism is Marxist ideology and critical theory cunningly applied to the social sciences, but it is really the will to power of at least the elite of cultural Marxism, and it is a hidden drive to survival and reproductive success.

There are of course the useful idiots who promote cultural Marxism having been indoctrinated in virtually all our schools, as well as constant bias by the corrupt Big Media promoting the same propaganda in a more superficial way to the public.

We are too crowded and is too late---and it is immoral---to think of one group conquering all the other groups, whether it be cultural Marxists or fascists on the right, with some kind of throwback empire. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates is the most equitable way for all of us to live now.

Real human nature and the fundamental drives and instincts of human nature strongly suggest the political configuration of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. For conservatives this means adapting the already existing constitutional separation of powers and states toward ethnostates, in harmony with real kin-centered and ethnocentric human nature.

It is not the fundamental biological drives to power or survival success that are wrong, it's the exploitation of those natural drives that is wrong, and even evil. So ending the political correctness of cultural Marxism, or at least greatly curbing it, is vital if we want to save the West.

The best Trump tweet so far: investigate the corrupt power of the Big Media

This morning President Trump tweeted: "Why Isn't the Senate Intel Committee looking into the Fake News Networks in OUR country to see why so much of our news is just made up-FAKE! "

Now that would be the most important domestic thing Trump could do to try to save the West. The corrupt Big Media is the daily wing of the radical, postmodern thinkers who are intent on destroying the foundation and structure of the Western world, and are indoctrinating especially our young people with their perverse cultural Marxism.

If Trump is going to politically martyr himself to any cause, breaking up the monopoly power of the Big Media and exposing their virtual treason of attempting to overthrow the state and the president is the best cause. The way things are going Trump may not have long to do it. He has the guts to do it if he listens to his instincts.

An underground attempt to stop any Tillerson deal with Iran?

I'll bet the recent "news" that Secretary of State Rex Tillerson once called President Trump a "moron" was first initiated as an underground Israeli/Saudi attempt to stop any Tillerson deal with Iran, because the Israeli/Saudi's want the USA to destroy Iran, not deal with them, and they usually get what they want.

The Israeli/Saudi's know the Media will broadcast this nonsense because they know the Media hates Trump, and they know that overly-defensive Trump might fire Tillerson and hire a Secretary of State more pleasing to their wishes. Who knows if it will work, but this sort of thing often does work.

Trump is a useful moron to the Israeli/Saudi's, but so he---sort of---was to those of us who wanted to see economic nationalism established, which Trump promised. But we don't control most of the government and the Big Media as they do, so I suppose Iran is as doomed as economic nationalism.

Jazz, Plato, and Biology

Plato was right about the seductive aspects of art, but philosophy, including Plato's philosophy, is also seductive. Both art and philosophy can stir the senses and emotions and inflame man's character and culture.

For example, I have enjoyed jazz music even though the jazz scene has been permeated with drugs, illicit sex, and the opposite of the traditional morality I uphold. "Kind of Blue" by Miles, Coltrane, Cannonball Adderley, Bill Evans, etc, may be the best jazz recording ever made.  But jazz has also been the will-to-power of African-Americans, many who, like Miles Davis, hated whites.

Jazz also eventually became the will-to-power-of African-Americans over whites. And we saw that whites who liked jazz music also tended to affirm the will to power of blacks over whites, much like postmodernism was teaching whites to hate whites in our colleges. This was a decadent seduction.

I came to understand that it is completely natural for art and culture to be "used" to advance a people or a particular ethnic group since all social behavior has a biological and genetic origin.  And about the same time I came to understand the negative seductive nature of jazz.  Rap is now doing much the same thing to young whites who seem to be especially prone to such seduction.

I think Plato was wrong in placing spiritual abstract forms above material life and material art and culture. I believe that life evolves to Godhood only in the material and supermaterial world and it is Plato's Forms that are unreal.

As to jazz, I still listen to it, along with European classical music, and I see the seductive nature of both.  But it is the idealists and abstractors who are the real negative seducers.

Mind is not better than matter; I am therefore I think

Contrary to Kant, mind is not better than matter, matter takes on the form it does from looking at it with our material minds. Matter is there whether we see it or not, even if we see it with our “limited” senses. In any case, mind is also matter. Is this believed by faith alone?

Neuroscience has shown that that all our feelings and emotions have an exact physical/material source or reaction in the brain. A "soul" would be, or is, a part of the material body, for example, an activating will-spirit within life essentially defining "life" is material.

When I turn the old epistemological saying around and say, I am therefore I think, this implies that matter exists or I would not be thinking about it, or with it. If anything matter is therefore “better” than mind.

Life is the existential experience of matter, categories like mind come later. Theological Materialism rests on this base: matter-with-mind evolves to Supermatter-with-Supermind, or Godhood. There is no duality between "God" and matter because there is no "spiritual," but there is supermaterial which matter can evolve to become, defined as Godhood.

The mass shooting in Las Vegas last night leads to many thoughts and questions

Will the increasing violence by foreign and domestic terrorists, along with the so-called Antifa ( Anti-fascism) riots on the left, and the increasing civil and racial disruptions in our cities, eventually lead to a police state or military state on the left or on the right, supposedly to protect our citizens, and will this be used by those who want to take legal guns away from the citizens?

Are we seeing that freedom requires responsible citizens, but more than that, are we seeing that freedom relies upon people who can actually live in harmony with one another, which requires a large degree of homogeneity, that is, at least the same language, same general nationality, perhaps the same religion, and a high degree of localism?  That logically and instinctively leads to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates protected in their independence by federalism, not police states...But which will come first, a police state on the left or the right, or since that never works for long, an ethnopluralism of ethnostates?

...In any case, we now mourn the dead and wounded in Las Vegas.

"Equality" as political dissimulation

It is "equality" as political dissimulation that is the problem, groups seeking power and dominance are completely natural. The social task becomes how to deal with the natural will to power of various ethnic groups and individuals, which is what religions and ideologies have concerned themselves with.

African Americans play the equality and victim game now, the Jewish people played it before African Americans, and whites did it before Jews. Even a few African Americans now admit that Affirmative Action has resulted in discrimination against whites and Asians.

Much depends on the definition of human nature. If you think human nature is completely malleable and can be changed by culture into anything you desire---such as complete equality for all---then you have the left dissimulation, whereas the right thinks human nature is more fixed the further right you go.

Science and common sense have been slowly better defining human nature since the time of the Ancient Greeks or the Ancient Vedic Indians, and now we have the science of sociobiology, which has empirically shown us that basic human nature across the world is kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection.

This reveals to those who are willing to see it that seeking "equality" is political dissimulation, and it also says that it's time to apply what has been tearing us apart, that is, our differences and our wills to power, to putting us back together again.

An ethnopluralism of ethnostates and regions could be established legally in the United States due to our constitutional separation of powers and states. It may require a few constitutional amendments to give more power to the states to move toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. It will not be easy, but it is far preferable to the political dissimulation of equality that has brought us radically destructive civil disruptions, or even civil war, and which is, naturally, now increasing within unworkable multicultural (multi-ethnic) societies.